The
Polities
of
Social Ecology
Libertarian
Municipalism
Janet Biehl
with
Murray Bookehin
Montreal ® New York ® London1£/ The Politics of Social Beology: Libertarian Municipatism.
raised with Bookehin some of the questions that in my ten-year
association with him, [have heard most frequently asked in dis-
‘cussions of these ideas,
‘Lam grateil to Bookchin for his support for this project
and for the interview. Let me emphasize that the ideas that
“appear in these pages ae all Bookhin's; only their articulation is
imine, Inthe interview that appears in the second part of the
‘book, Ihave raised with Bookchin some of the questions that in
‘my tenjear association with him, Thave heard most frequentiy
‘eked in diouesions of theee ideas. He road the manuscript in
raft and commented on it, to its immense benefit. Cindy
Milstein and Gary Sisco also read an early draft and made invalu-
able suggestions, for which they have my warm thanks. Dimi
Roussopoulos of Black Rose Books has my deep gratitude for his,
_unlagging support for this project.
have tred to present these ideas inthe simplest possi-
ble tems, forthe benefit of readers who are wholly unfamiliar
‘with them. Bookehin's own writings contain philasophical and
‘istorical nuances that are absent here. Readers who are inter
ested in Teaming more about libertarian municipalism and
should of course consult the wiltings listed at the end of this
‘book. In no way should this book be considered a substitute for
Bookhin’s original works, only a summary introduction to them.
{ul forthe left on an international scale. Probably inevitably, my
presentation is refracted through the prism of the culture in
‘which Ilse and write; I hope that readers outside the United
‘States willbe able to interpret the main priniples inthe context
of their own cultures.
Janet Biehl
‘Burlington, Vermont
‘November 27, 1996
Chapter 1
er
Politics versus Statecraft
Libertarian municipalism is one of many politcal theories that
‘concern themselves with the principles and practices of democ-
racy. In contrast to most such theories, however, it does not
accept the conventional notion that the State and governmental
systems typleal of Western countries today are truly democra-
cles. On the contrary, it considers them republican States with
pretensions of being democratic. Republican States, to be sure,
fare more democratic’ than other kinds of States, like monar-
chles and dictatorships, n that they contain various kinds of rep
resentative institutions.
But they are nonetheless States—overarching structures
‘of domination in which a few people rule over the great majority
A State, by its very nature ie structurally and professionally sep-
arated from the general population—in fac, itis set over and
above ordinary men and women. It exercises power over them,
‘making decisions that affect thei lives. Its power in the last
instance rests on violence, over whose legal use the State has a
‘monopoly, in the form of its araies and police forces, Ina strue-
ture where power is distributed so unevenly, democracy is
impossible. Far from embodying rule by the people, even a
republican State is incompatible with popular rule.
Libertarian municipalism advances a kind of democracy,
by contrast, that is no mere fg leaf for State rule. The democra-
yitadvancesis direct democracy—in which citizens in comunu-
nities manage their own affairs through face-to face processes of