Isolation and Identification of Compounds from the Leaf Extract of
Dillenia indica Linn
Md. Abdul Muhit*, Syed Mohammed Tareq, Apurba Sarker Apu, Debasish Basak and Mohammad S. Islam
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh,
Abstract:
Crude extract of the leaf of Dillenia indica linn. was taken under phytochemical investigation. The
crude methanolic extract was partitioned with different solvent system by increasing their polarities
(h-hexane, carbon tetrachloride and chloroform). The compounds were fractionated and isolated
from n-hexane and chloroform partitionates by using vacuum liquid chromatography, column
chromatography and preparative thin layer chromatographic technique. Detection was accomplished
with UV detection at
254 nm. The structures of the isolated compounds were established by
extensive spectroscopic studies (IH NMR spectroscopy) and chemical shifts are reported in ppm
with respect to TMS or residual non-deutarated solvent signal. The n-hexane and chloroform
fractionate yielded total of four compounds namely 3,5,7-trihydroxy-2"4°-dimethoxy flavone
(1) Gdillenetin), betulinic acid (2), B-sitosterol (8) and stigmasterol (4). The result indicates that the
leaf of Dillenia indica linn. may provide a rich source of triterpenoids and flavonoids,
Keywords: Dillnia indica, phytochemical investigation, Dilleniaceae
Introduction
The chemical constituents of the medicinal plants,
particularly the secondary metabolites have
pronounced pharmacological actions on animal
system and organs. Several bioactive compounds
were isolated from the plant sources such as
digoxin, digitoxin, morphine, reserpine, taxol,
vinblastine, vincristine, quercetin (Ghani A, 2003)
etc. which have different pharmacological and
nutritional properties. The discovery of a novel
chemical component from a medicinal plant may
form the basis of development of various
therapeutic agents with better activity. More than
500 medicinal plants have been reported to possess
medicinal properties in Bangladesh and Dillenia
indica linn. (Family: Dilleniaceae) is one of the most
common edible species among them (Ghani A,
2003). Dillenia indica is an evergreen tree widely
grows in tropical forests in the India, Bangladesh,
Sri Lanka and China, The common local names are
Chalta or Chalita (Bengali and Hindi), Karambel or
thor for Carespondence
Karmal in Marathi, and Ramphal in Nepal (Kirtikar &
Basu, 1981). The leaves, bark, stem and fruits of the
plat are used in traditional medicine for a long time.
‘The fruit juice is mixed up with sugar and water and
used as cooling beverage in treatment of fever and
also cardiotonic (Shome et.al, 1980). The leaves and
bark are used as laxative and astringent. Alcoholic
extract of the D. indica showed central nervous
system depressant activity (Bhakuni et al. 1968).
Phyltochemical studies showed that D. indica
species contains the lupeol group of triterpene such
as betulinic acid, betulin, betulinaldehyde and
flavonol such as myricetin (Parvin et al. 2009). Stem
bark contains myricetin, isorthamnetin, dillenetin
and glucosides etc (Pavanasasivam and
Sultanbawa, 1975). Here we report the chemical
constituents present in the leaf extract by
chromatographic and spectrophotometric analysis
and established the presence of triterpenoids as
well as flavonoids,
Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Joural. Vol. 13, No 1, January 2010 49
ISSN no.: 0301-4606Materials and methods:
General experimental procedure
The 'H NMR spectra was recorded using an Ultra
Shield Bruker DPX-400 (400 MHz) instrument. For
NMR spectrum studies deutarated chloroform was
used and the 6 values for tH spectra were referred
to the residual non-deutarated solvent signals.
Collection of plant materials
Plant sample of Dillenia indica was collected from
Dhaka in August 2007. The plant sample was
identified by taxonomist and a voucher specimen
was given from National herbarium, Dhaka,
Bangladesh (Voucher specimen no; DACB 34359)
which was kept for further references.
Extraction and fractionation of Plant material
The fresh leaves were collected, cut into small
pieces and air dried for several days. The plant
materials were then ground into coarse powder. The
dried and ground plant powder (500g) was
extracted with methanol (25 liters) in an air tight,
clean flat bottomed container for 7 days at room
temperature with occasional stirring and shaking,
The extract was then filtered first through a fresh
cotton plug and finally with a Whatman filters paper.
taolc Grade or 8 am)
Extacton with aheane (100 x3)
————,
Uarer ler
a
retin with Caton acl (103)
The filtrate was concentrated using a rotary
evaporator (Heidolph, UK) at low temperature
(90C) and pressure, The weight of the crude
extract was 78 gm.
Solvent-solvent partitioning (Figure: 1) was done by
Using the protocol designed by Kupchan and Tsou
(1873) and modified version of Wagenen et al(1993)
The crude extract (6 gm) was triturated with 90%
methanol. The prepared solution was then
fractionated successively using solvents of,
increasing polarity, such as n-hexane (HX: 820 mg),
carbon tetrachloride (CT: 850 mg) and chloroform
(CF: 665 mg). All the three fractions were
evaporated to dryness by using rotary evaporator at
low temperature of 390C and kept in air tight
containers for further analysis.
Isolation and Identification of compounds
The chloroform (CF: 665 mg) soluble materials of
methanolic extract were fractionated by gel permeation
column chromatography (Reid and Sarker, 1988). The
column was packed with Sephadex (LH-20) and
soaked with a ratio of
n-hexane:dichloromethane:methanol (25:1) for at least
12 hours. The column was then eluted with the same
solvent mixture and finally the column was washed
with dichloromethane and methanol mixtures of
increasing polarity. Total 100 ml volume was collected
in the mentioned solvent system (Fraction no. 1-28), 50
ml was collected in dichloromethane: methanol (9:1)
(fraction no, 29-42), 50 ml was collected in
dichloromethane (1): methanol (1) (fraction no,
43-53), 100 ml was collected in 100% methanol
(fraction no, 54-56). The Compound 1 (6.7 mg),
white amorphous materials were collected from
the column fractions 52-55. The R-value of the
compound 1 was determined as 051 in
chloroform-methanol (97:3) and the yield value
was 0.073%. Compound 2 (46 mg) was
‘Carbon tac aabe ction
gee tation
collected from the column fractions 23-28 by
T
sme (6
7
etn wih eto (00 3)
preparative thin layer chromatography (Liu and
Kindetlerer, 1999) (Stationary phase-silca gel
Fase, mobile phase- 5% methanol in
chloroform, thickness of plates - 0.5%). The
R-value of the compound 2 was determined as
0.60 in chloroform-methanol (95:5) and the yield
value was 0.061%.
Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Journal. Vol. 13, No 1, January 2010
ISSN no.: 0301-4606
50‘The n-hexane (HX: 820 mg) partitioned compounds
were then fractionated by vacuum liquid
chromatography (Coll and Bowden, 1986). The
column was packed with silica gel (Keisel gel 60H,
mesh 70-230) under vacuum and washed with
petroleum ether. The n-hexane partitionates were
adsorbed onto silica gel, allowed to dry and
subsequently applied on top of the adsorbent layer.
Then the column was eluted with petroleum ether,
ethyl acetate and methanol mixtures of increasing
polarities to provide 31 fractions (60 ml each),
Evaporation of the solvents, colorless crystalline
compound 3 (3.8 mg) was isolated from the fraction
No, 14-18 eluted with 50% ethyl acetate in petroleum
ether and colorless needle shaped crystal compound
4 (4.3 mg) were isolated from the fraction no. 24-27
eluted with 10% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether. The
Ri-value of the compound 3 was determined as 0.55
in ethyl acetate-toluene (10:90) and the yield value
‘was 0.049%, The Ry-value of the compound 4 was
determined as 0.33 in ethyl acetate-toluene (6:95)
and the yield value was 0.055%,
Result
Repeated chromatographic separation and
purification of the cold methanolic extracts of the
leaf of Dillenia indica provided a total of four
compounds (compound 1, 2, 3 and 4), the structure
of which were determined by extensive 'H NMR
spectral analysis as well as by comparison of their
spectral data with previously reported values.
Dillenetin (3,5,7-trihydroxy-3°,4’-dimethoxy flavone)
(1): White amorphous powder; 'H NMR spectrum
(400 MHz, CDCb): 8 12.65 (1H, br. s, HO-5), 760 (1H,
dd, J=76, 2.0 Hz, H-6'), 758 (1H, d, 2.0 Hz, H-2'),
6.95 (1H, d, JH76 Hz, H-5), 6.93 (IH, s, H-8), 3.95 (3H,
s, OMe), 2.97 (3H, s, OMe).
Betulinic acid (2): White mass; 'H NMR spectrum
(#00 MHz, CDCl): 6 4.75 (1H, br. s, Hy-29), 4.62 (1H,
br. s, Hy-29), 3.20 (1H, dd, J=11.2, 4.9 Hz, H-3), 3.00
(1H, m, H-19), 1.70 GH, s, Me-30), 099 (BH, s,
Me-26), 0.98 (3H, s, Me-23), 0.95 (3H, s, Me-27),
0.83 (3H, s, Me-25), 0.76 (SH, s, Me-24)
B-Sitosterol (3): Colorless needles;1H NMR (400
MHz, CDC): 6 5.39 (1H, m, H-6), 3.51 (1H, m, H-3),
1.05 (3H, s, Me-19), 0.96 (3H, d, J+6.5 Hz, Me-21),
0.89 (BH, t, JA74 Hz, Me-29), 0.87 (3H, d, 6.7 Hz,
Me-26), 0.85 (3H, d, +67 Hz, Me-27), 0.72 (3H, s,
Me-18),
Stigmasterol (4): Colorless needle shaped crystal;
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCI): 8 6.35 (1H, m, H-6), 5.13
(IH, dd, $14.4, 8.4 Hz, H- 22), 5.03 (1H, dd, J=14.4,
84 Hz, H- 23), 3.51 (1H, m, H-3), 1.0 GH, s, CHs-10),
0.91 (BH, d, J+6.4 Hz, CHs-20), 0.85 (3H, d, JH74 Hz,
CHb-27), 0.81 GH, d, 74 Hz, CH»-26), 0.67 (3H, ,
CHs-13).
Discussion
The 'H NMR spectrum of compound 1 (Figure: 2)
showed one broad singlet value at 6 12.65 which
revealed hydroxyl groups at C-5 positions. The
double doublet 6 760 with coupling constants 26 Hz
and 2.0 Hz centered at could be assigned with H-6"
The doublet 6 758 and & 6.95 with coupling
constants 2.0 Hz and 76 Hz indicates H-2° and H-5"
The splitting pattern and coupling constants
revealed the presence of a trisubstituted benzene
ring. The spectrum displayed two singlet at 6 3.95
and 6 3.97 indicating the presence of two methoxy
groups. The spectrum also revealed on proton
singlet value at 6 6.93 indicated H-8, The spectra
were compared with published data of Parvin et al.
(2009) works.
The 'H NMR spectrum of compound 2 (Figure: 3)
revealed the presence of a lupene type carbon
skeleton. It displayed signals attributable to an
exomethylene group at 6 4.62 and 475 (1H, each,
brs) which together with an allylic methyl at 6 1.70
which indicated an isopropeny! function, The double
doublet 6 3.20 with couplings of 11.2 and 4.9 Hz
centered at could be assigned to H-3. The large
coupling of this proton (H-3) with the vicinyl
methylene protons suggested a B (beta) orientation
of the hydroxyl group at C-3. In addition, the
spectrum also showed a multiplet at 6 3.00 for the
methine proton at C-19 and five methyl group
resonances at 0.76, 0.83, 0.95, 0.97 and 0.98, On the
basis of the above spectral features, compound 2
was identified as betulinic acid. The identity of 2 as
betulinic acid was confirmed by comparison of these
Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Journal. Vol. 13, No 1, January 2010 51
ISSN no.: 0301-4606