Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reflective Commentary JDS
Reflective Commentary JDS
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
REFLECTIVE COMMENTARY
JEROME D. SCHMIDT
(ID# 25513126)
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………1
INTENTION….…………..……………………………………………………………………..1
CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………………………………5
ii
HOMI 601
Introduction.
The intention of this paper is to address the role and function of evaluations in the
training process. As leaders for Christ, we must be able to take an honest look at our teaching
and performance. First Timothy 4:13-16 tells us to devote ourselves to the Word of God and
teach others His Word. 13 Until I come, devote yourself to the public reading of Scripture, to
preaching and to teaching. 14 Do not neglect your gift, which was given you through a prophetic
message when the body of elders laid their hands on you. 15 Be diligent in these matters; give
yourself wholly to them, so that everyone may see your progress. 16 Watch your life and
doctrine closely. Persevere in them, because if you do, you will save both yourself and your
hearers. (NIV)
However, James warns us, Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers,
because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly. (James 3:1, NIV) When we
are called to teach the Word of God, we have a great responsibility to continually improve our
teaching in order to transform lives to the glory of God. Evaluating our lessons effectiveness and
Intention
The intention of this paper is to address the role and function of evaluations in the
training process and objective self-assessment by the trainer. Additionally, I will reexamine my
suggests that when evaluating the teacher-learner process, one must take into consideration four
1
HOMI 601
variables: “the learner, the teacher, the curriculum, and the environment.”1 Taking these
variables into account during the planning stage will streamline the final evaluation process.
Evaluation must take place at every stage of the teacher-learner process. Richards tells us, “We
must look at what comes before we teach, what happens during our teaching, and what happens
However, in order to evaluate your lesson, training, or curriculum, there must be in place a
standard. The standard is what how we judge the outcome. The standard is communicated. Once
the training outcome. Robert Stakes model for evaluating teaching and education is very similar
to the Army’s AAR. “The after action review is a structured review process that allows
participants to discover how and why certain events actually happened and how to improve
In Proverbs 27:12, “The prudent see danger and take refuge.” A good teacher will always
be looking for trouble on the horizon and evaluating the past. When trouble or problems are just
a blip on the radar, a good teacher takes action and does something. “But the simple keep going
and suffer for it.” The small group dies, church membership drops, the church doors close, etc.
1
Richards, Lawrence O.; Bredfeldt, Gary J. (1998-03-01). Creative Bible Teaching
(Kindle Locations 5857-5858). Moody Publishers. Kindle Edition.
2
Richards, Lawrence O.; Bredfeldt, Gary J. (1998-03-01). Creative Bible Teaching
(Kindle Locations 6048-6049). Moody Publishers. Kindle Edition.
3
United States Army, Army Regulation 350-1, Army Training and Leader Development.
(Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 19 August 2014) 109.
2
HOMI 601
Andy Stanley tells us, “The point is, no matter how good the system, a consistent time of
Assessment of assessment
4
Stanley, Andy; Jones, Lane; Joiner, Reggie (2008-08-19). Seven Practices of Effective
Ministry (North Point Resources) (Kindle Locations 2202-2203). The Crown Publishing Group.
Kindle Edition.
3
HOMI 601
Conclusion