Sexual Harassment

Domingo v Rayala
 It is not necessary that the demand , request or requirement of a sexual favor be
articulated in a categorical oral or written statement. It may be discerned, with equal
certificate, from the acts of the offender.
 Acts of Rayala resound with deafening clarity the unspoken request for a sexual favor.
 It is not essential that the demand, request or requirement be made as a condition for
continued employment or for promotion to a higher position. It is enough that the
respondent acts result in creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment for
the employee.

Work-related sexual harassment is committed

1. Sexual favor is made as a condition for hiring, re-employment, continued employment,
or in granting favorable compensation, terms of conditions, promotions, or privileges
a. Or refusal to grant the sexual favor results in limiting, segregating or classifying
the employee which in any way would discriminate , deprive or diminish
employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect said employee
2. The above acts would impair the employee’s rights or privileges under existing labor
laws; or
3. The above acts would result in an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment to the
employee.