Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A It sounds like something from a science fiction film – the idea of bringing
back to life creatures that became extinct thousands of years ago. But it seems
that the idea could soon move from fiction to fact. Scientists are improving their
ability to use the technique of cloning, in which they use the genetic material
5 from just one cell from an animal to ‘grow’ a new version of the animal.
B In May 2007, a scientist in Japan successfully cloned mice that had been
frozen for 16 years. A group of American scientists thinks that this breakthrough
could open the door to using frozen remains of ancient woolly mammoths to
reproduce the animals themselves. In 2009, a group of scientists published a
10 paper which contained 70% of the mammoth genome – that’s a list of all the
genes the mammoth has. This leaves just 30% to figure out, and scientist Roger
Marshall believes that ‘it’s just a matter of time before this happens’. Comments
C Other scientists are focusing on a more immediate problem – can they This research is amazing
use cloning to save endangered species? Some zoos, like the San Diego Zoo, – I mean, how long had
15 keep ‘frozen zoos’, in which they retain genetic material from endangered they been trying to clone
Emily24 animals before their
species. In 2003, scientists at San Diego Zoo successfully cloned a banteng, breakthrough?! Wouldn’t
an endangered species of ox. They did it by inserting genes from a banteng it be great to see a real,
into the reproductive cells of a domestic cow. The cow then gave birth to a live woolly mammoth?
healthy baby banteng. They are now keen to extend their experiments and use
20 similar techniques to try to clone other species in danger of extinction, such This article brings me
hope that with the aid of
as giant pandas, or to re-create extinct species like the Pyrenean ibex and the science we can save many
Tasmanian tiger. SamT0009 species from extinction.
D But some people are raising ethical objections to this work. For example,
Scientists should
mammoths, like their modern relatives elephants, were intelligent and move away from
25 gregarious animals. Some scientists argue that it wouldn’t be fair to clone genetic experiments
a single animal and keep it in captivity when mammoths had been living AnnaJones in laboratories and
concentrate on preserving
in groups for thousands of years before their extinction. There are similar animals in their natural
objections to cloning endangered or recently-extinct species. If you suddenly habitats.
reintroduce a new predator like the Tasmanian tiger, smaller creatures will
30 become its prey, and these species may then also become endangered.
Environmentalists argue that if animal habitats hadn’t been disappearing so
drastically, because of climate change and human activity, this situation would
never have arisen. They say the answer is not to re-create species whose
natural habitat no longer exists, but to work to preserve the habitats of today’s
35 animals so they can continue to thrive in the wild.
2 How did scientists in San Diego Zoo create a baby 7 The phrase ‘open the door to’ in paragraph B
banteng? means …
A be the result of.
B have the effect of.
C accept.
3 Why do some people think it would be wrong to bring
D make possible.
back a woolly mammoth?
8 What do you think is the main intention of the
writer?
A To persuade people that cloning is a good idea.
4 What might happen if Tasmanian tigers are
B To warn people about the dangers of cloning.
reintroduced?
C To inform people about the science and ethics of
cloning.
D To criticize modern science.
E To encourage more people to become
5 According to the article, which statements are true? environmentalists.
1 Scientists have already cloned some animals.
2 Scientists at San Diego Zoo are hoping to clone a
banteng.
3 Environmentalists would like to see more cloning of
endangered animals.
Affirmative
I / He / She / It / You
had (’d) been -ing
/ We / They
Negative
I / He / She / It / You
had not (hadn’t) been -ing
/ We / They
Questions
Had I / he / she / it / you / we / they been -ing?
Use
We use the past perfect continuous:
• to emphasize the duration of an action that started
in the past and finished before the present time.
We’d been revising for hours (before we stopped
to eat dinner).
(= But then we stopped revising to eat dinner.)
• to talk about actions or situations in the past that
had an effect on another action or situation in the
past.
She failed the exam because she hadn’t been
paying attention in class.
(= She didn’t pay attention in class, therefore she
failed the exam.)
Affirmative
I / He / She / It / You /
had (’d) past participle
We / They
Negative
I / He / She / It / You /
had not (hadn’t) past participle
We / They
Questions
Had I / he / she / it / you / we / they past participle?
Use
We use the past perfect simple:
• To talk about actions or situations in the past which
happened before other actions or situations.
The party had started before we arrived.
• To talk about actions or situations which happened
before a specific moment in the past.
By the end of the evening, he’d written three
essays!
• With the expression It was the first / second / third
time …
It was the first time I’d ridden a bike.