Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS

MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION

Lucena City Document Title: Project Study
An Autonomous University Page No.: Page 1 of 8
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 2017
QUALITY FORM Prepared by: DCAVRKMI
Reviewed by: QMR
Approved by: President

e.) Results and Discussions

Data Gathering and Analysis
Existing Design. (Provide Discussion and figure)

Existing Process. (Provide Discussion and figure)

Problems Encountered in the Existing Design. (you may present defect history or
quality result, efficiency, downtime history, no of defects etc. caused by the existing design)

Design
In this part present each components and the whole design along with the drawings and
computations design.
Shaft. (provide discussion about the shaft like specifications, used etc.)

Present the drawing of the part or component

Present the computation design

Over-all Design.
Present the over-all design of your study
 Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
Lucena City Document Title: Project Study
An Autonomous University Page No.: Page 2 of 8
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 2017
QUALITY FORM Prepared by: DCAVRKMI
Reviewed by: QMR
Approved by: President

Example:
Double Threaded Rod. It is designed as a power screw with single threaded left hand

and right hand screw to accurately adjust the opening of the guard and convert a rotational

movement to a linear motion. The rod must be rotate manually.

Specification:

Pitch

Core diameter

Lead

Pitch 1mm or 0.04in

Lead Single thread 2mm or 0.08in

Core diameter (Mean diameter) 10mm or 0.4in

Coefficient of sliding friction 0.58

Coefficient of sliding friction if greased 0.15

Load (weight of the guard ) 2.3kg or 5.1lb

Computation: Based on Prime’s Mechanical Engineering Reference Manual.

For lead angel:

 Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
Lucena City Document Title: Project Study
An Autonomous University Page No.: Page 3 of 8
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 2017
QUALITY FORM Prepared by: DCAVRKMI
Reviewed by: QMR
Approved by: President

a = tan -1 (2mm / π 10mm)

a = 3.6 degrees

Where:

L = lead (mm or in.)

Dm = mean diameter (mm or in)

a = lead angle (deg.)

The adjustable guard must be adjusted by hand so, to compute the total torque require to

operate the screw (acme) is the following:

Where:

a = lead angle (deg.)

f = coefficient of friction

Dm = mean diameter (in)

W = load (lb)
 Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
Lucena City Document Title: Project Study
An Autonomous University Page No.: Page 4 of 8
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 2017
QUALITY FORM Prepared by: DCAVRKMI
Reviewed by: QMR
Approved by: President

Complete Design.

Fabrication of the Prototype

Flow chart of the Fabrication Process. (discuss the flow process or flow chart)

Activity Chart. (Present the process with an actual picture)

Bill of Materials. (Present the list of Material and prices, use table)
 Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
Lucena City Document Title: Project Study
An Autonomous University Page No.: Page 5 of 8
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 2017
QUALITY FORM Prepared by: DCAVRKMI
Reviewed by: QMR
Approved by: President

Example
Table 4
Bill of Material
Components Complete Specification Unit Quantity Machining Total

Price price

Plate Size - 20cm diameter 0 1 500 500

Thickness – 30mm

Scrap materials carbon steel

Base 24cm x 32cm 0 1 500 500

Thickness- 25mm

Scrap materials carbon steel

Total 3,500

Testing and Evaluation

Testing Result. (Discuss the testing result and use table)
 Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
Lucena City Document Title: Project Study
An Autonomous University Page No.: Page 6 of 8
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 2017
QUALITY FORM Prepared by: DCAVRKMI
Reviewed by: QMR
Approved by: President

Example
Table 5
Testing Result
Trials Condition Result Remarks Action taken
1st Height of the Failed Inspection of big bottle came up Change the Guard
Guard is good, but during inspection of Height from 60mm
60mm small bottles, the body of the to 15mm.
small container cannot be
visualized because the height of
the Guard is too high for small
containers.
2nd Height of the Failed It is now good during inspection When running big
Guard is of the small bottle, but now, bottle at the line,
15mm during inspection of the big use the bigger
bottle, sometimes the bottle Guard, and when
toppling still occurred. running small
bottle, use smaller
size of guard.

3rd Two types of Successful Running big bottle will use big ---
Guard is size guard, and running small
available, the bottle will be using a smaller
small size guard.
15mm and the
big size 60mm
 Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
Lucena City Document Title: Project Study
An Autonomous University Page No.: Page 7 of 8
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 2017
QUALITY FORM Prepared by: DCAVRKMI
Reviewed by: QMR
Approved by: President

Evaluation Result. (Discuss the evaluation result and use table)

Example

Table 6

Evaluation Result

Frequency Weighted Qualitative

Criteria 5 4 3 2 1 Arithmetic Description
Mean

A. Functionality

1. The 2 in 1 Turn table device is user 1 6 3 3.8 Agree

friendly
2. The 2 in 1 Turn table device 8 1 1 4.7 Strongly
conserves time during inspection of Agree
bottle
3. The 2 in 1 Turn table device gives 1 6 2 1 3.7 Agree
Glass forming personnel a safe
environment.
B. Effectiveness

1. The 2 in 1 Turn table device suits for 1 9 4.1 Agree

sampling of big and/or small size of
bottle.
2. The 2 in 1 Turn table device is heavy 4 1 4 1 3.8 Agree
duty
3. The 2 in 1 Turn table device can 7 2 1 4.6 Strongly
handle High temperature newly Agree
formed glass bottle
C. Efficiency

1. The 2 in 1 Turn table device is easy 1 7 2 3.9 Agree

to use
 Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
Lucena City Document Title: Project Study
An Autonomous University Page No.: Page 8 of 8
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 2017
QUALITY FORM Prepared by: DCAVRKMI
Reviewed by: QMR
Approved by: President

2. The 2 in 1 Turn table device 2 6 1 1 3.9 Agree

eliminates incident of ware toppling
during inspection
3. The 2 in 1 Turn table device uses 9 1 4.9 Strongly
only 1 device instead of two Agree

Summary of Findings

Discuss all the result of your findings and present it based on your objectives.

There should have 3 Paragraphs (Design Result, Fabrication Result, Testing and

Evaluation Result)

Conclusions and Recommendations

There should have 3 Conclusions and Recommendations – based on your objectives

Conclusion

1.

2.

3.

Recommendations

1.

2.

3.