You are on page 1of 45
FILE GOPY DO NOT REMOVE} i le IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA” Docket No. 18-0851 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Plaintiff below, Respondent, y. LENA MARIE CONAWAY, Defendant below, Petitioner. RESPONDENT'S BRIER PATRICK MORRISEY ATTORNEY GENERAL SCOTT E. JOHNSON ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL West Virginia State Bar No. 6335 Office of the Attorney General 812 Quarrier Street, 6" Floor Charleston, WV 25301 Tel: (304) 558-5830 304) 558-5833 cott.E.Johnson@wvago.gov TABLE OF CONTENTS. ‘Table of Contents Table of Authorities Assignments of Error Statement of the Case. A. Procedural History B. The Facts Adduced at Trial.... Summary of Argument .. Statement Regarding Oral Argument and Decision.. 12 Argument A. The State produced sufficient evidence of the Petitioner's guilt... 12 B. The Petitioner has waived any double jeopardy violation in this case. Alternatively, there is no double jeopardy violation... 20 C. There was no Brady violation in this case 22 D. The Cireuit Court did not err by denying a jury pool consultant and in denying a change of Z 25 venue. E. The State did not engage in any burden shifting argument .. 27 F, The Petitioner has not demonstrated plain error regarding the Petitioner’s statement.....31 G. The Petitioner’s pro-se motions were untimely and the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to address them ...j.nisnnstsneenuerenie 32 H. There is no error in this case so there is no cumulative error... 34 1. The omissions in the voir dire transcript did not prejudice the Petitioner... 34 Conclusion .. 36 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Case Page Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932). Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Conner v. Griffith, 160 W.Va. 680, 238 S.E.2d $29 (1977). Digital Properties, Inc. v. City of Plantation, 121 F.3d 586, $89 (11th Cir, 1997)... Edwards v. Commonwealth, 808 S.E.2d 211, 217 & n.4 (Va. Ct. App. 2017)... Foster v. Ballard, No. 16-1000, 2017 WL 4570571, at *4 (W. Va. Oct. 13, 2017) (memorandum decision) .. Gov't of Virgin Islands v. Harris, 938 F.2d 401, 415 (3d Cir. 191). 18, 29 Graham v. Wallace, 208 W. Va. 139, 141, 538 S.E.2d 730, 732 (2000). 18 Hines v. State, 473 A.2d 1335, 1348 (Ma. Ct. Spec. App. 1984). 219 Inre JP, No. 18-0171, 2018 WL 6040185, at *3 (W. Va. Nov. 19, 2018) (memorandum decision)........20 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979)... 18,19 Lee v. Ballard, No, 13-1314, 2014 WL 4662517, at *10 (W. Va. Sept. 19, 2014) (memorandum decision) Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)... Morgan v. Price, 151 W. Va. 158, 150 S.E.2d 897 (1966) soe ii

You might also like