Professional Documents
Culture Documents
361-11. PeCu 8 Rana Pil Contest Sed 18 Sep 10 P PDF
361-11. PeCu 8 Rana Pil Contest Sed 18 Sep 10 P PDF
in fact conceive of their religious places as sacred places that should not be
destroyed, irrespective of their architectural or historical merit”. In passage
of time the difference between religious/ritual performances and spiritual
awakening has been lost; in fact, rituals superseded the spiritual. This
development process led the adherents believe that religious places are
intrinsically sacred and possess spiritual values from where the devout
Hindus charismatically get their wishes fulfilled.
In spite of the message of communal harmony and brotherhood, after
the death of Prophet Muhammad in CE 632, Arab raided outlying
settlements in the northwest of India that marked the religiously
intentioned destruction of Hindus’ religious builtup like temples, shrines
and monasteries. From the 8th to the 15th centuries successive waves of
ethnic Muslims entered the subcontinent – Arabs, Turks, Afghans,
Persians, Mongols raiders came to loot the palaces, treasuries, and
temples, but it was the settled merchants and other colonists who slowly
spread the new religion (Knipe 1991: 64). The Arabic Qur’an, as revealed
through his messenger, the Prophet Muhammad; the only aim of Islam has
been to establish a single community with a single law and the notion of
an abode of Islam (dar al-Islām) in which religion and polity are one; a
doctrine of the unity of God that has no place for iconography, let alone
myths, symbols, and rituals celebrating the dynamic multiplicity of the
divine.
The Mughal dynasty (CE 1526-1707) in South Asia has tactfully and
brutally tried to fulfil the dream of a dar al-Islām through destruction of
Hindu monasteries, temples, pilgrimage sites, and iconography and
transplanting there own built structure, traditions and culture. The bigoted
and fanatic emperor Aurangzeb (r. 1658-1707) was a ruler by confront-
ation who declared Islam as the religion and constantly destroyed the
Hindu temples, including the major temple at Ayodhya, Mathura and
Varanasi. But by 1800 the Mughal empire had all but collapsed, and with
it the dream of a dar al-Islām too.
The World Hindu Council (Vishva Hindu Parishad, VHP) extends
their agenda for getting under their control several disputed mosques,
strongly arguing for the important mosques in the holy cities of Ayodhya,
Mathura and Varanasi (Banaras). Historian Eaton (2000) clearly shows
that cases of destruction of places of worship were not restricted to
Muslim rulers alone. He recounts numerous instances of Hindu kings
having torn down Hindu temples, in addition to Jain and Buddhist shrines.
He says that these must be seen as, above all, powerful politically
symbolic acts. All other Hindu sacred places too equally suffered
destruction in the rule of Aurangzeb in the 17th century, with mosques
312 12. Rana P.B. Singh
built on them, like Krishna’s birth temple in Mathura and the rebuilt
Somnath temple on the coast of Gujarat. The neo-Hindu revivalism and
awakening of Hindu identity with vested interest are getting inspiration by
the VHP and making their mind to destroy those Muslim monuments built
on the razed site of ancient Hindu temples.
Travel for pilgrimage purposes is an important part of Hindu doctrine
and millions of adherents travel throughout India and from abroad each
year to participate in enormous festivals, pilgrimage circuits, and ritual
cleansings. Likewise, thousands of people of other religions visit India
each year to admire its ancient and beautiful Hindu architecture and
important historical sites that are associated with the religion. With the
revival of traditional Hinduism during 1950s pilgrimages became more
popular. Of all domestic travel in India, over one-third is for the purpose
of performing pilgrimage. The growth and importance of pilgrimage-
tourism may be related to an increased desire among Hindus to assert their
identity against an ever more visible Muslim population. Such competition
emerged more actively after the destruction of Babri Mosque at Ayodhya
on December 6th 1992, by conservative nationalist Hindu groups who
wished to build a temple on this sacred site, which is assumed to be the
birth place of Lord Rāma. This act of aggression resulted in civil
disturbances throughout the country. Since then large numbers of Hindus
have become more conscious of their Hindu heritage, resulting in
increased participation in traditional rituals, celebrations, the construction
of temples, and of course pilgrimages (cf. Singh 2006).
2.1. Allahabad
Allahabad, culturally known as Prayāga, is eulogised in puranic
mythologies as the “tirtharāja”, the king of all sacred places. Situated
picturesquely at the confluence of the rivers Ganga, Yamuna and the
invisible Sarasvati, it is one of the three holy cities symbolising pillars of
the bridge to heaven; the other two are Varanasi and Gaya. People from
different parts of India come here especially during the month of Māgha
(January-February) to bathe in the sacred waters of the confluence
(sangama) and every twelve years they come by the hundreds of
thousands to the World’s greatest religious bath-fair, the Kumbha Melā.
The greatness of Prayaga is eulogised in Vedic literature, in the puranic
mythologies, in treatises, epigraphic records, Buddhist and Jain literature
and foreign accounts. The land between the rivers Ganga and Yamuna is
said to be the mons veneris of the Earth Goddess, and Prayaga is regarded
as its generative organ (cf. Mahābhārata, III.87.71; Matsya Purana,
105.19). This is a cosmogonic allusion to the place, suggesting that
Pilgrimage & Tourism in India: Contestation and Seduction 313
Prayaga is the symbolic centre (axis mundi) of the creation of the universe
(cf. Singh and Rana 2006: 287-288).
Fig. 12.1. Allahabad: The Kumbha Mela City; the nexus was the Fort.
314 12. Rana P.B. Singh
2.2. Ayodhya
Situated on the bank of the Sarayu (Ghāghara) River, Ayodhya is one
of the seven sacred abodes (puris) and places of pilgrimage that give
liberation from transmigration. Considered to be the birthplace of Lord
Rāma, it is also connected with many events in the Rāmāyana. According
to puranic tales, Manu, the first traditional king of India, founded this city
Pilgrimage & Tourism in India: Contestation and Seduction 315
in ca 3100 BCE. Ikshvaku was the eldest of Manu’s nine sons, by whose
name the race and clan is known. In the early period of development in
and around Ayodhya (ca 500 BCE - CE 500), Buddhism and Brahmanism
alternatively dominated the landscape and culture.
Fig. 12.2. Ayodhya: Religious Landscape.
316 12. Rana P.B. Singh
By the turn of the 2nd century CE, the city of Ayodhya was well
established and known as a pilgrimage centre, and by the turn of Gupta
period (4th-6th centuries) many temples and ghāts along the Sarayu River
were made. With its general decline all over India from the 6th century
onwards, Buddhism lost its position in Ayodhya too, and appears to be
virtually extinct there after CE 1000. It is evident through literary and
archaeological evidence that in the 12th century there were five important
Vishnu temples located one each at Guptar Ghat, Chakratirtha Ghat and
Janmabhumi, and the western and eastern sides of Svargadvara Ghat.
Three of these temples were demolished and replaced by mosques and one
was swept away by the Sarayu River. The fifth one is perhaps occupied by
Chakrahari temple. In 1193 Muhhamad Ghori invaded north India,
including Ayodhya. His army officer Makhdum Shah Ghori came to
Ayodhya and destroyed the famous Jain temple of Adinatha in 1194. Since
then under the Sultanate rule at Delhi and the Mughal rulers, the city of
Ayodhya was invaded and destroyed many times. By the order of the
Mughal invader Babur, in 1528 his army chief Mir Baqi Tashkandi
demolished the famous Rāma temple of Pratihara from the Gahadavala
period at the birthplace of Rāma, and in the following period of 15 months
he built a Muslim monument (mosque) using the debris of the temple (cf.
Fig. 12.2). Since its inception this has been so controversial and sensitive
place that for centuries now, Muslims have never performed prayer
(namaz) there. Since then it has been centre of Hindu-Muslim riots, but the
main site was always opened for devout Hindus till 23 February 1857
when the East India Company (Britain) made a separating wall and
prohibited the entry of Hindus through the mosque. Since 5 January 1950
under the law, only restricted entry was permitted (cf. Singh and Rana
2006: 300-301).
On 6 December 1992 a mob led by a rightists group of Hindus from
World Hindu Congress (VHP), ultimately in their last attempt succeeded
in razing the sixteenth-century controversial Muslim monument/mosque,
Babri mosque in Ayodhya. However, some leftist historians opine that on
the basis of available evidences proving the existence of Hindu temple at
this site is doubtful. A stone slab of about 5’x 2.25’ recovered from the
debris on 6 December 1992, records the construction of a magnificent
gold-topped temple of Rāma during the reign of Gahadavala emperor
Govindachandra (CE 1114-1154) by King Naya Chandra and Ayush
Chandra. This certainly proves the presence of a temple that was
demolished to make way for a mosque. During last four hundred years
there had been several attempts to remove the mosque through court,
direct action, or planned attacks. In the mid 18th century Nirmohis, a local
Pilgrimage & Tourism in India: Contestation and Seduction 317
Hindu sect laid their unsuccessful claim over the Babri Mosque. But these
claims led to the violent conflict of 1853-55. Again in 1885 Mahant
Raghubar Das filed a suit with the Sub-judge at the district headquarters
for permission to build the temple, but it was turned down, but it resulted
to a battle, recording casualties of some seventy-five Muslims. The
mosque was listed as a protected monument under the Indian “Ancient
Monuments Preservation Act of 1904,” and courts continued to protect the
mosque as an historic landmark. After India’s independence in 1947 the
different religions and their monuments had largely co-existed side by
side, as in Bosnia. Taking the controversy of installation of Lord Rāma’s
image inside the mosque on 22 December 1949, the administration has
ordered to stop entry by any group of the people. In October 1984 the
VHP tried to make the mosque-temple question a national issue through
their newly form organisation for getting the Rāma’s birthplace liberated
from the control of Muslims, and ultimately they succeeded in their
mission on 6th of December 1992. The Ayodhya crisis must also be seen
within the climate of increased tensions between India and Pakistan over
the last few decades, and the fundamentalist groups between Muslims and
Hindus within India itself (see Elst 2002, 2003). Says Bevan (2006: 137),
that:
“The demolition of sacral buildings has become a key proxy through which
post-Partition inter-communal strife is now expressed. Ayodhya is India’s
Twin Towers – a ground zero from which the waves of violence are spreading
to engulf thousands and potentially millions of people”.
Ayodhya for a period of over 2000 years has borne witness to the
presence of Jainism, Buddhism, Shaivism, Vaishnavism and Islam, as well
as sects and cults which transcend sectarian identification. On the other
hand, its pluralistic and reconstituting religious identity is subject to
shorter temporal rhythms determined by sect, caste or annual festival
cycles; and unfolds within a cultural landscape which embodies in varying
degrees an interplay of memory and delusion, politics and religion, faith
and fanaticism (Shaw 2000: 698). Mere facts and interpretations of
archaeological remains would not solve the problem of contestation and
conflict. In Thakurta’s words, ‘the solution lies less in the reiteration of
science, and the staking of its separate boundaries, and more in its re-
alignment with a new historical imagination that can recover for Ayodhya
the variety and multiplicity of its pasts’ (Thakurta 1997: 42).
Remember what Metcalf (1995: 964) opines, “Histories will always be
rewritten. One reason is the relatively straightforward one that new
material will be unearthed ― the scent of untapped source materials that
makes historians salivates. But a second reason is that the world changes.
318 12. Rana P.B. Singh
through their utopian urban planning and so called heritage tourism and
spaces for posh tourists ― in fact, they are not concerned to have
experience of the spirit of the Buddhist landscape, in stead want to have
amusement and recreation through exotic and religious happenings”.
Through personal dialogues and interactions with monks it is obviously
noted that they feel themselves insecure and pessimistic about the future
planning. Let Bodh Gaya not be transformed into a Buddhist theme-park,
a kind of spiritual Disneyland for mass tourism consumption! Let
UNESCO and the recently launched JNNRUM City Development Plan
serve as the glue that holds the culture of peace, compassion and global
humanism, together recognizing the needs of local communities and other
interest groups in a more harmonious way! (Singh and Kumar 2011: 284).
Like in case of Lumbini (the Buddha’s birthplace), in Bodh Gaya also
differences in values, interests, expectations and priorities among stake-
holders, a major source of dissonance, may create conflict in heritage and
can be a challenge for its preservation and management. Here currently
experiencing “latent dissonance” can be reduced through communication,
cooperation and collaboration among various stakeholders
2.4. Sarnath
In order to help living beings gain control of their minds, the Buddha
began the first turning of the Wheel of Dhamma at Sarnath. He taught the
middle way that avoids the extremes of pleasure and austerity, the four
noble truths, and the eight-fold path. Among the five disciples Kaundmya
was first to understand and realise the teaching; Ashvajit was the last. The
rest three were Bashpa, Bhadrika and Mahanaman. All eventually became
arhats. The teaching included in the collection known as the first turning
of the wheel, which began here, extended over a period of seven years.
Other teachings, such as those on the Vinaya and on the practice of close
placement of mindfulness, were given elsewhere, but the Wheel was
turned twelve times at Sarnath. From the time of the Buddha, monastic
tradition flourished for over 1,500 years on the site of the Deer Park.
Sarnath and its archaeological site is considered as special sacred place
for the Buddhist adherents where the Buddha gave his first sermons,
“Turning the Wheel of Law”, in 529 BCE, that is how this is one of the
most venerated and compulsory places of pilgrimage. However a special
fee of Rs 100 (or US $ 2) is changed for visitors in the archaeological site.
Moreover, the pilgrims are not allowed to perform their rituals like
lightening the candles and incense in the nearby environs since 2005. To a
great surprise that no one neither complains against it, nor support the
Buddhists those agitating against such charges and rules. This decision and
Pilgrimage & Tourism in India: Contestation and Seduction 321
2.5. Varanasi
Varanasi: the city that is a prayer. On the banks of the river that is
almost a faith, the flowing Ganga, stands Hinduism’s greatest city:
Varanasi. For several thousand years, pilgrims have cleansed themselves
of their sins here and sought release from the cycle of rebirth. Hinduism,
deep and mystical, is perceptible everywhere here: in a decorated
doorway, in a glimpse of glittering temple, in the sound of a sacred bell, in
the chant of the priests and in the fragrance of flower oblations.
322 12. Rana P.B. Singh
Fig. 12.4. The ancient Vishvanatha temple in the early 19th century; front (east)
is mosque, the back (west) temple debris (after James Prinsep 1833).
The city is known as cultural capital of India and also as sacred most
city for Hindus. Varanasi: the city that is a prayer. On the banks of the
river that is almost a faith, the flowing Ganga, stands Hinduism’s greatest
324 12. Rana P.B. Singh
2.6. Champaner-Pavagadh
4. Towards Epilogue
With the growing consciousness to understand any problem from the
multiple scales and also in the frames of multidisciplinary approaches,
especially in the light of contemporary ideas like postmodernity, identity,
globalisation and political economy, the old notion of pilgrimage-tourism
has been considered vividly (cf. Edensor 2007: xv). It is the hard reality in
life that good and bad go together, only the degrees and scale vary:
contestation and corroboration, seduction and exposition, … and so on.
From the ‘outsiders’ view many destination are assumed as homologous
and peaceful, while from ‘insiders’ view they are subject of contestation,
conflict and seduction (e.g. see case of Taj Mahal, Edensor 1998). Indian
Pilgrimage & Tourism in India: Contestation and Seduction 329
5. References
Ahir, D.C. 1994. Buddha Gaya through the Ages. Sri Satguru Publ., Delhi.
332 12. Rana P.B. Singh
Bakker, Hans T. 1999. The Hindu Religion and War. 13pp. Institute of
Indian Studies, University of Groningen [a lecture].
Bevan, Robert 2006. The Destruction of Memory. Architecture at War.
Reaktion Books, London.
Bhardwaj, Surinder M. 1973. Hindu Places of Pilgrimage in India,
University of California Press, Berkeley.
Copland, Ian 2004. Managing Religion in Colonial India: The British Raj
and the Bodh Gaya Temple dispute. Journal of Church and State
(Oxford UP), 46 (3), Summer: 527-559.
Eaton, Richard 2000. Essays on Islam and Indian History Delhi: Oxford
University Press.
Edensor, Tim 1998. Tourists at the Taj. Routledge, London.
―. 2007. ‘Foreword’; in, Henderson, Carol E. and Weisgrau, Maxine
(eds.) Raj Rhapsodies: Tourism, Heritage and the Seduction of
History. Ashgate Publ. Ltd., Aldershot UK: xv-xxi.
Elst, Koenraad 2002. Ayodhya: The Case against the Temple. Voice of
India, New Delhi.
―. 2003. Ayodhya, the Finale: Science versus Secularism the Excavations
Debate New Delhi: Voice of India.
Henderson, Carol E. and Weisgrau, Maxine 2007. ‘Introduction’; in their
(eds.) Raj Rhapsodies: Tourism, Heritage and the Seduction of
History. Ashgate Publ., Aldershot UK: xxv-xlvi.
Houston, Jean 1993. Life Force: The Psycho-historical Recovery of Self.
Quest Books, Wheaton, IL.
Jaffrelot, Christopher (ed.) 2007. Hindu Nationalism: A Reader. Princeton
University Press, Princeton. L.K. Adwani on Ayodhya, cf.: 279-301.
Knipe, David M. 1991. Hinduism. Experiments in the Sacred. Harper
SanFrancisco Publs., New York.
Maclean, Kama 2008. Pilgrimage and Power: the Kumbha Mela in
Allahabad, 1765-1954. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
Metcalf, Barbara D. 1995. Too Little and Too Much: Reflections on
Muslims in the History of India. The Journal of Asian Studies, 54 (4),
Nov: 951-967.
Panikkar, K. N. 1994. What is Communalism Today?; in, Lahiri, Pratul
(ed.) Selected Writings on Communalism. People’s Publishing, Delhi.
Ross, Marc Howard 2007. Cultural Contestation in Ethnic Conflict.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sax, William S. 2000. Conquering the Quarters: Religion and Politics in
Hinduism. International Journal of Hindu Studies, Vol. 4 (1), April:
39-60.
Pilgrimage & Tourism in India: Contestation and Seduction 333
Segal, Ronald 1965. The Crisis of India. Penguin Books, Middlesex, and
reprinted by Jaico Books, Bombay in 1968.
Shaw, Julia 2000. Ayodhya’s sacred landscape: ritual memory, politics
and archaeological ‘fact’. Antiquity, 74 (4): 693-700.
Shinde, Kiran A. 2007b. Pilgrimage and the Environment: Challenges in a
Pilgrimage Centre. Current Issues in Tourism, 10 (4): 343-365.
Singh Rana P.B. 1995. Heritage Ecology & Caring for the Earth: A Search
for Preserving Harmony and Ethical values. National Geographical
Journal of India (NGSI, BHU Varanasi), 41 (2), June: 191-218.
―. 1999. Rethinking development in India. Perspective, crisis and
prospects; in, Simon, David and Närman, Anders (eds.) Development
as Theory and Practice. Longman, London: 55-75.
―. 2006. Pilgrimage in Hinduism, Historical Context and Modern
Perspectives; in, Timothy, Dallen J. and Olsen, Daniel H. (eds.)
Tourism, Religion, and Spiritual Journeys. Routledge, London & New
York: 220- 236.
―. 2009a. Hindu Pilgrimages: From Roots to Perspectives; in his,
Uprooting Geographic Thoughts in India: Toward Ethics, Ecology and
Culture in 21st Century. Planet Earth & Cultural Understanding Series,
Pub. 1. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne UK:
153-191.
―. 2009b. Development in India: Appraising Self Retrospection; in, his:
Geographical Thoughts in India: Snapshots and Vision for the 21st
Century. Planet Earth & Cultural Understanding Series, Pub. 2.
Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne. U.K.: 394-422.
― and Kumar, Devesh 2011. Bodh Gaya, a World Heritage Site: Tourists’
and Natives’ Perceptions of Heritage and its Value; in, Singh, Rana
P.B. (eds.) Heritagescapes and Cultural Landscapes. Planet Earth &
Cultural Understanding Series, Pub. 6. Shubhi Publications, New
Delhi: 255-286.
― and Rana, Pravin S. 2006. Banaras Region: A Spiritual and Cultural
Guide. Indica Books, Varanasi. 1st Ed. 2002.
Sinha, Amita 2004. Champaner-Pavagarh archaeological park: a design
approach. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10 (2): 117-128.
― and Harkness, Terence 2006. Heritage, the Eye visit: the Taj Mahal in
Agra, India. Indian Architect & Builder, July: 95-98.
Thakurta, T.G. 1997. Archaeology as Evidence: Looking Back from the
Ayodhya Debate. Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta.
Timothy, Dallen J. and Olsen, Daniel H. (eds.) 2006. Tourism, Religion,
and Spiritual Journeys. Routledge, London & New York
334 12. Rana P.B. Singh