Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Estudos Draft
Estudos Draft
Waymire [2004] provide evidence that managers’ incentives to supply high quality
financial statements increase with the level of shareholder-debtholder agency conflicts
as
proxied by the amount of leverage in the firm’s capital structure.
#### colocar que firmas com longo ciclo operacional possuem menor qualidade, todas
as métricas e, por isso, conservadorismo seria mais importante, ou elas tendem a ser
mais conservadoras ###
Easley and O’Hara [2004] imply that firms can affect their cost of capital through the
precision and quantity of the information they provide investors. Building on the above
theory, Francis et al. [2004, 2005] seek to provide evidence consistent with the pricing
effects of information quality and claim that accrual quality is a systematic priced risk
factor. Theevidence documented in Francis et al. [2004, 2005] suggests that information
seems to affect the cost of capital.
Cohen (2006 ) following (…) stated that …
Following Barone [2002] and Francis et al. [2004, 2005], lower quality financial
reporting leads to greater uncertainty and ultimately to higher information risk. –
Segundo Dechow, firmas com longos ciclos operacionais possuem menor qualidade
e/ou são mais arriscadas, sendo assim, os gestores tendem a ser mais conservadores para
mitigar esse risco, dado que o conservadorismo serve pra isso.
Leverage is included as an additional explanatory variable since the firm’s risk
increases with the firm’s financial leverage.
The presence of agency costs gives rise to demand for monitoring. Highly leveraged
firms have higher agency costs and thus a greater demand for monitoring.
BASU(97)
###DECHOW 96 ###
First, it is a noisy measure of closeness to covenants, since optimal
leverage ratios and the corresponding ratios used in debt covenants are
likely to vary as a function of firm characteristics such as the investment
opportunity set (e.g.. Smith and Watts 1992).
We find that an important motivation for eamings
manipulation is the desire to attract external financing at low cost.
The results indicate that important motivations for earnings manipulation are the
desire to raise extemal financing at low cost and to avoid debt covenant restrictions.
Finally, our results are consistent with the firms experiencing a significant increase in
their costs of capital following the revelation that their eamings have been overstated.
This suggests that manipulating eamings initially enables the firms to enjoy lower costs
of capital, but that once the earnings manipulation is revealed, the firms experience
significant increases in their costs of capital.
Nevertheless,
we conclude that the desire to raise extemal financing at low cost represents an
economically significant motivation for earnings manipulation that has received
relatively little attention in previous academic research.
Finally, our results have implications for research into firms' disclosure policies. Existing
research argues that there are long-term benefits to building reputations for providing
reliable and timely disclosures (Lev 1992; Healy and
Palepu 1993; Lang and Lundholm 1993; Botosan 1995; Frankel, McNichols,
and Wilson 1995; and Healy, Palepu and Sweeney 1995). Yet the sample of firms
investigated in this study chose to risk (and ultimately lose) these benefits for the
prospect of short-term gain. Thus, our study highlights the trade-offs that
are made in choosing a firm's disclosure policy.
Second, leverage ratios are positively related to the demand for external equity
financing. In particular, Opler and Titman (1994) show that firms that have high
leverage ratios due to large accumulated losses are more likely to issue equity. As a
result, leverage ratios are also likely to proxy for the demand for external financing
motivation.
WATTS 1993
led to accounting being used to supply information to capital market participants
who contract with the firm (e.g., existing shareholders and creditors –– see Watts and
Zimmerman, 1983).
Highly levered firms have agency conflicts between lenders and shareholders. Well-known
agency problems between these two parties include excessive shareholder distributions,
asset substitution, underinvestment and claim dilution.9 Conservatism results in ‘hard’ or
verifiable lower bounds for accounting numbers used in debt contracts, thereby
constraining opportunistic diversion of resources and triggering debt covenant violations in
a timely fashion (Watts and Zimmerman, 1986, pp.213-215; Watts, 1993, p.2; Ball, 2001;
Watts, 2003a). This suggests a higher contracting demand for conservatism from more
levered firms. Financially distressed firms are more likely to be sued, and the likelihood of
financial distress is increasing in leverage, suggesting a higher litigation demand for
conservatism from more levered firms.
Conclusion: firms with longer investment cycles, and firms with higher idiosyncratic
uncertainty are more conservative.
-
Garcı´a Laraetal. (2009) find a positive association between recognition and governance
characteristics commonly associated with effective monitoring
Pae et al. (2005), also using the BKR metrics, find that firm-level price-to-book ratios
are a determinant of timely loss recognition and that the negative association is
correlated with the accrual component of earnings – LER ESSE ARTIGO !!! pode ser
importante pra provar que o lucro é um fator importante no reconhecimento e fazer a
relação ciclos longos, discricionariedade e conservadorismo.
Ball and Shivakumar (2005), Ball et al. (2008) , Ball et al (2003) e Pae et al
(2005)Taken together, all four studies suggesdt that timely loss recognition has an
endogenous component related to firms' reporting incentives, primarily equity
incentives. Thus, assuming that managers are responding to investor demand for
decision usefulness, these studies suggest that equity market perceive asymmetric
timeliness as imporving earnings quality. – Posso falar que esses 4 estudos sugerem que
o conservadorismo é um componente relacionado aos incentivos das firmas e colocar (
See Dechow e Schrand 2010) – BUSCAR OUTROS QUE FALAM ISSO
Dechow et al. 1996 find that manipulation firms have higher leverage ratios and are
more likely to violate debt covenants during and after the manipulation period than
control firms. – BUSCAR MAIS DESSE TEMA.
a positive relationship with leverage, information asymmetry, corporate age and size, investment
opportunities and cash flow changes (Faulkender, 2002);
Considera-se a
alavancagem, visto que as corporacoes mais
endividadas, ou alavancadas, possuem maiores
conflitos de agencia (WATTS, 2003ª ?? – é o B na vdd) e,
dessa forma, sao positivamente relacionadas
com o conservadorismo e, consequentemente,
com a assimetria de informacao.
Em ciclos mais longos é mais fácil o diferimento das perdas, dada a maior
discricionariedade dos accruals dessas firmas ( see Dechow e Dichev, 2002 )
Also, poorer accrual quality is associated with larger cost of debt and equity (see Francis,
LaFond, Olsson and Schipper, 2005)