The U.S.

Supreme Court has ruled that police officers

usually need a warrant before they can search an
arrested suspect's cellphone.

The 9-0 opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts

held the right of police to search an arrested suspect
at the scene without a warrant does not extend in
most circumstances to data held on a cellphone. Still,
there are some emergency situations in which a
warrantless search would be permitted, the court said.

Ruling on two cases from California and Massachusetts, the justices acknowledged both a right to
privacy and a need to investigate crimes. But they came down squarely on the side of privacy rights.

Seeing someone with a cellphone is such a common thing today, that "the proverbial visitor from Mars
might conclude they were an important feature of human anatomy," Roberts wrote. "We cannot deny
that our decision today will have an impact on the ability of law enforcement to combat
crime...Privacy comes at a cost."

Cellphones, an 'Important Part of Human Anatomy,' Require a Search Warrant:

SCOTUS
x x x."