0% found this document useful (0 votes)
196 views22 pages

1 Propositional Logic - Axioms and Inference Rules

The document describes axioms of propositional and predicate logic: 1. It defines common propositional logic connectives like conjunction, disjunction, negation, implication, equality and quantifiers like existence and universality. 2. It provides axioms for propositional logic including commutativity, associativity, distribution, De Morgan's laws, negation, excluded middle, contradiction and others. 3. It then derives many theorems in propositional logic related to equivalence, truth, negation, disjunction, conjunction, implication, substitution and others. 4. It introduces axioms of predicate logic including definitions of existential and universal quantifiers, range splitting, interchange of variables, renaming of
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
196 views22 pages

1 Propositional Logic - Axioms and Inference Rules

The document describes axioms of propositional and predicate logic: 1. It defines common propositional logic connectives like conjunction, disjunction, negation, implication, equality and quantifiers like existence and universality. 2. It provides axioms for propositional logic including commutativity, associativity, distribution, De Morgan's laws, negation, excluded middle, contradiction and others. 3. It then derives many theorems in propositional logic related to equivalence, truth, negation, disjunction, conjunction, implication, substitution and others. 4. It introduces axioms of predicate logic including definitions of existential and universal quantifiers, range splitting, interchange of variables, renaming of
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1 Propositional Logic - Axioms and Inference

Rules
Axioms
Axiom 1.1 [Commutativity]

(p ∧ q) = (q ∧ p)
(p ∨ q) = (q ∨ p)
(p = q) = (q = p)

Axiom 1.2 [Associativity]

p ∧ (q ∧ r) = (p ∧ q) ∧ r
p ∨ (q ∨ r) = (p ∨ q) ∨ r

Axiom 1.3 [Distributivity]

p ∨ (q ∧ r) = (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
p ∧ (q ∨ r) = (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)

Axiom 1.4 [De Morgan]

¬(p ∧ q) = ¬p ∨ ¬q
¬(p ∨ q) = ¬p ∧ ¬q

Axiom 1.5 [Negation]

¬¬p = p

Axiom 1.6 [Excluded Middle]

p ∨ ¬p = T

1
Axiom 1.7 [Contradiction]

p ∧ ¬p = F

Axiom 1.8 [Implication]

p ⇒ q = ¬p ∨ q

Axiom 1.9 [Equality]

(p = q) = (p ⇒ q) ∧ (q ⇒ p)

Axiom 1.10 [or-simplification]

p ∨ p = p
p ∨ T = T
p ∨ F = p
p ∨ (p ∧ q) = p

Axiom 1.11 [and-simplification]

p ∧ p = p
p ∧ T = p
p ∧ F = F
p ∧ (p ∨ q) = p

Axiom 1.12 [Identity]

p = p

2
Inference Rules
p1 = p2 , p2 = p3
Transitivity
p1 = p3
p1 = p2
Substitution
E(p1 ) = E(p2 ) , E(p2 ) = E(p1 )

q1 , q2 , . . . , qn , q1 ∧ q2 ∧ . . . ∧ qn ⇒ (p1 = p2 )
Conditional Substitution
E(p1 ) = E(p2 ) , E(p2 ) = E(p1 )

3
2 Propositional Logic - Derived Theorems

Equivalence and Truth

Theorem 2.1 [Associativity of = ]

((p = q) = r) = (p = (q = r))

Theorem 2.2 [Identity of = ]

(T = p) = p

Theorem 2.3 [Truth]

Negation, Inequivalence, and False

Theorem 2.4 [Definition of F ]

F = ¬T

Theorem 2.5 [Distributivity of ¬ over = ]

¬(p = q) = (¬p = q)
(¬p = q) = (p = ¬q)

Theorem 2.6 [Negation of F ]

¬F = T

4
Theorem 2.7 [Definition of ¬]

(¬p = p) = F
¬p = (p = F )

Disjunction

Theorem 2.8 [Distributivity of ∨ over = ]

(p ∨ (q = r)) = ((p ∨ q) = (p ∨ r))


((p ∨ (q = r)) = (p ∨ q)) = (p ∨ r)

Theorem 2.9 [Distributivity of ∨ over ∨ ]

p ∨ (q ∨ r) = (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ r)

Conjunction

Theorem 2.10 [Mutual definition of ∧ and ∨ ]

(p ∧ q) = (p = (q = (p ∨ q)))
(p ∧ q) = ((p = q) = (p ∨ q))
((p ∧ q) = p) = (q = (p ∨ q))
((p ∧ q) = (p = q)) = (p ∨ q)
(((p ∧ q) = p) = q) = (p ∨ q)

Theorem 2.11 [Distributivity of ∧ over ∧ ]

p ∧ (q ∧ r) = (p ∧ q) ∧ (p ∧ r)

5
Theorem 2.12 [Absorption]

p ∧ (¬p ∨ q) = p ∧ q
p ∨ (¬p ∧ q) = p ∨ q

Theorem 2.13 [Distributivity of ∧ over = ]

(p ∧ q) = ((p ∧ ¬q) = ¬p)


((p ∧ q) = (p ∧ ¬q)) = ¬p
p ∧ (q = p) = (p ∧ q)

Theorem 2.14 [Replacement]

(p = q) ∧ (r = p) = (p = q) ∧ (r = q)

Theorem 2.15 [Definition of = ]

(p = q) = (p ∧ q) ∨ (¬p ∧ ¬q)

Theorem 2.16 [Exclusive or]

¬(p = q) = (¬p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ¬q)

Implication

Theorem 2.17 [Definition of Implication]

(p ⇒ q) = ((p ∨ q) = q)
((p ⇒ q) = (p ∨ q)) = q
(p ⇒ q) = ((p ∧ q) = p)
((p ⇒ q) = (p ∧ q)) = p

6
Theorem 2.18 [Contrapositive]

(p ⇒ q) = (¬q ⇒ ¬p)

Theorem 2.19 [Distributivity of ⇒ over = ]

p ⇒ (q = r) = ((p ⇒ q) = (p ⇒ r))

Theorem 2.20 [Shunting]

p ∧ q ⇒ r = p ⇒ (q ⇒ r)

Theorem 2.21 [Elimination/Introduction of ⇒ ]

p ∧ (p ⇒ q) = p ∧ q
p ∧ (q ⇒ p) = p
p ∨ (p ⇒ q) = T
p ∨ (q ⇒ p) = ¬q ∨ p
(p ∨ q) ⇒ (p ∧ q) = (p = q)
p ⇒ F = ¬p
F ⇒ p = T

Theorem 2.22 [Right Zero of ⇒ ]

(p ⇒ T ) = T

Theorem 2.23 [Left Identity of ⇒ ]

(T ⇒ p) = p

7
Theorem 2.24 [Weakening/Strengthening]

p ⇒ p ∨ q
p ∧ q ⇒ p
p ∧ q ⇒ p ∨ q
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ⇒ p ∨ q
p ∧ q ⇒ p ∧ (q ∨ r)

Theorem 2.25 [Modus Ponens]

p ∧ (p ⇒ q) ⇒ q

Theorem 2.26 [Proof by Cases]

(p ⇒ r) ∧ (q ⇒ r) = (p ∨ q ⇒ r)
(p ⇒ r) ∧ (¬p ⇒ r) = r

Theorem 2.27 [Mutual Implication]

(p ⇒ q) ∧ (q ⇒ p) = (p = q)

Theorem 2.28 [Antisymmetry]

(p ⇒ q) ∧ (q ⇒ p) ⇒ (p = q)

Theorem 2.29 [Transitivity]

(p ⇒ q) ∧ (q ⇒ r) ⇒ (p ⇒ r)
(p = q) ∧ (q ⇒ r) ⇒ (p ⇒ r)
(p ⇒ q) ∧ (q = r) ⇒ (p ⇒ r)

Theorem 2.30 [Monotonicity of ∨ ]

(p ⇒ q) ⇒ (p ∨ r ⇒ q ∨ r)

8
Theorem 2.31 [Monotonicity of ∧ ]

(p ⇒ q) ⇒ (p ∧ r ⇒ q ∧ r)

Substitution

Theorem 2.32 [Leibniz]

(e = f ) ⇒ (E(e) = E(f ))

Theorem 2.33 [Substitution]

(e = f ) ∧ E(e) = (e = f ) ∧ E(f )
(e = f ) ⇒ E(e) = (e = f ) ⇒ E(f )
q ∧ (e = f ) ⇒ E(e) = q ∧ (e = f ) ⇒ E(f )

Theorem 2.34 [Replace by T ]

p ∧ E(p) = p ∧ E(T )
p ⇒ E(p) = p ⇒ E(T )
q ∧ p ⇒ E(p) = q ∧ p ⇒ E(T )

Theorem 2.35 [Replace by F ]

p ∨ E(p) = p ∨ E(F )
E(p) ⇒ p = E(F ) ⇒ p
E(p) ⇒ p ∨ q = E(F ) ⇒ p ∨ q

Theorem 2.36 [Shannon]

E(p) = (p ∧ E(T )) ∨ (¬p ∧ E(F ))

9
3 Propositional Logic - Examples and Exer-
cises

10
4 Predicate Logic - Axioms

Axiom 4.1 [Definition of ∃]


 
∃i : m ≤ i < n : pi
(m ≥ n) ⇒  = 
F
 
∃i : m ≤ i < n : pi

  = 


(m < n) ⇒ 
 ∃i : m ≤ i < n − 1 : pi 

  ∨  
pn−1

Axiom 4.2 [Definition of ∀]


 
∀i : m ≤ i < n : pi
(m ≥ n) ⇒  = 
T
 
∀i : m ≤ i < n : pi

  = 


(m < n) ⇒ 
 ∀i : m ≤ i < n − 1 : p i


  ∧  
pn−1

11
Axiom 4.3 [Range Split]
   
∀i : m1 ≤ i < m2 : pi
 
 ∧  

(m1 ≤ m2 ≤ m3 ) ⇒ 
 ∀i : m2 ≤ i < m3 : p i


 = 
∀i : m1 ≤ i < m3 : pi
   
∀i : m1 ≤ i < n1 : pi
 
 ∧  

(m1 ≤ m2 ) ∧ (n1 ≥ n2 ) ⇒ 
 ∀i : m2 ≤ i < n2 : pi 

 = 
∀i : m1 ≤ i < n1 : pi
   
∃i : m1 ≤ i < m2 : pi
 
 ∨  

(m1 ≤ m2 ≤ m3 ) ⇒ 
 ∃i : m2 ≤ i < m3 : p i


 = 
∃i : m1 ≤ i < m3 : pi
   
∃i : m1 ≤ i < n1 : pi
 
 ∨  

(m1 ≤ m2 ) ∧ (n1 ≥ n2 ) ⇒ 
 ∃i : m2 ≤ i < n2 : p i


 = 
∃i : m1 ≤ i < n1 : pi

Axiom 4.4 [Interchange of Dummies]

∀i : m1 ≤ i < n1 : (∀j : m2 ≤ j < n2 : pi,j )


=
∀j : m2 ≤ j < n2 : (∀i : m1 ≤ i < n1 : pi,j )

∃i : m1 ≤ i < n1 : (∃j : m2 ≤ j < n2 : pi,j )


=
∃j : m2 ≤ j < n2 : (∃i : m1 ≤ i < n1 : pi,j )

12
Axiom 4.5 [Dummy Renaming]

∀i : m ≤ i < n : pi = ∀j : m ≤ j < n : pj

Axiom 4.6 [Distributivity of ∨ over ∀ ]

(p ∨ (∀i : m ≤ i < n : qi )) = ∀i : m ≤ i < n : (p ∨ qi )

Axiom 4.7 [Distributivity of ∧ over ∀ ]


 
p ∧ (∀i : m ≤ i < n : qi )
(m < n) ⇒  = 
∀i : m ≤ i < n : p ∧ qi
 
∀i : m ≤ i < n : pi
 ∧  = ∀i : m ≤ i < n : (pi ∧ qi )
∀i : m ≤ i < n : qi

Axiom 4.8 [Distributivity of ∧ over ∃ ]

(p ∧ (∃i : m ≤ i < n : qi )) = ∃i : m ≤ i < n : (p ∧ qi )

Axiom 4.9 [Distributivity of ∨ over ∃ ]


 
p ∨ (∃i : m ≤ i < n : qi )
(m < n) ⇒  = 
∃i : m ≤ i < n : (p ∨ qi )
 
∃i : m ≤ i < n : pi
 ∨  = ∃i : m ≤ i < n : (pi ∨ qi )
∃i : m ≤ i < n : qi

Axiom 4.10 [Universality of T ]

∀i : m ≤ i < n : T = T

13
Axiom 4.11 [Existence of F ]

∃i : m ≤ i < n : F = F

Axiom 4.12 [Generalized De Morgan]

¬ (∃i : m ≤ i < n : pi ) = ∀i : m ≤ i < n : ¬pi


¬ (∀i : m ≤ i < n : pi ) = ∃i : m ≤ i < n : ¬pi

Axiom 4.13 [Trading]

(m ≤ i < n) ⇒ pi = ∀i : m ≤ i < n : pi
(m ≤ i < n) ∧ pi ⇒ ∃i : m ≤ i < n : pi

Axiom 4.14 [Definition of Numerical Quantification]


 
N i : m ≤ i < n : pi
(m ≥ n) ⇒  = 
0
 
N i : m ≤ i < n : pi
(m < n) ∧ ¬pn−1 ⇒  = 
N i : m ≤ i < n − 1 : pi
 
N i : m ≤ i < n : pi

  = 


(m < n) ∧ pn−1 ⇒ 
 N i : m ≤ i < n − 1 : p i


  +  
1

14
Axiom 4.15 [Definition of Σ]
 
Σi : m ≤ i < n : ei
(m ≥ n) ⇒  = 
0
 
Σi : m ≤ i < n : ei

  = 


(m < n) ⇒ 
 Σi : m ≤ i < n − 1 : ei 

  +  
en−1

Axiom 4.16 [Definition of Π]


 
Πi : m ≤ i < n : ei
(m ≥ n) ⇒  = 
1
 
Πi : m ≤ i < n : ei

  = 


(m < n) ⇒ 
 Πi : m ≤ i < n − 1 : ei


  ∗  
en−1

15
5 Predicate Logic - Derived Theorems

Theorem 5.1 [Definition of ∃]


 
∃i : m < i ≤ n : pi
(m ≥ n) ⇒  = 
F
 
∃i : m < i ≤ n : pi

  = 


(m < n) ⇒ 
 ∃i : m + 1 < i ≤ n : pi 

  ∨  
pm+1

Theorem 5.2 [Definition of ∀]

 
∀i : m < i ≤ n : pi
(m ≥ n) ⇒  = 
T
 
∀i : m < i ≤ n : pi

  = 


(m < n) ⇒ 
 ∀i : m + 1 < i ≤ n : p i


  ∧  
pm+1

16
Theorem 5.3 [Definition of Σ]
 
Σi : m < i ≤ n : ei
(m ≥ n) ⇒  = 
0
 
Σi : m < i ≤ n : ei

  = 


(m < n) ⇒ 
 Σi : m + 1 < i ≤ n : ei 

  +  
em+1

Theorem 5.4 [Definition of Π]

 
Πi : m < i ≤ n : ei
(m ≥ n) ⇒  = 
1
 
Πi : m < i ≤ n : ei

  = 


(m < n) ⇒ 
 Πi : m + 1 < i ≤ n : ei


  ∗  
em+1

17
6 Some Simple Laws of Arithmetic
Throughout this compendium, we assume the validity of all “simple” arith-
metic rules. Examples of such rules are all simplification rules, e.g. =

2+3 = 5
x+x = 2∗x
x+y−y =x
(x/3) ∗ 3 = x
0∗x = 0
1∗x = x
x ∗ x = x2
0x = 0
1x = 1
(2 ∗ x + 10 = 20) = (x = 5)
(x + y < 2 ∗ y) = (x < y)
(x + y = x + z) = (y = z)
x ∗ (y + 1) − (x + z) = (x ∗ y − z)
Following is a collection of theorems that might be used. The list is not
exhaustive but intend to show the level of complexity that you can specify
theorems on.

18
Theorems on < and ≤

(x < y) = (y > x)
(x < y) ⇒ ¬(y = x) ∧ ¬(y < x)
(x < y) ⇒ (x ≤ y)
(x < y) = (x ≤ y) ∧ (x 6= y)
(x < y) ∧ (y ≤ z) ⇒ (x < z)
(x ≤ y) = ¬(x > y)
(x ≤ x) = T
(x ≤ y) ∧ (y ≤ z) ⇒ (x ≤ z)
(x ≤ y) ∧ (y < z) ⇒ (x < z)
(x ≤ y) ∧ ¬(x < y) ⇒ (x < y)
(x ≤ y − 1) = (x < y)
(x ≤ y) ∨ (y ≤ x) = T
(x ≤ y) ∨ (y < x) = T
(x ≤ y) = (x < y) ∨ (x = y)

Theorems on properties about + and −

(x < y) ⇒ (x < y + 1)
(x < y + 1) = (x ≤ y)
(x < y) ⇒ (z − y < z − x)
(0 < x) = (−x < 0)
(x − 1 < x) = T
(x ≤ y − 1) = (x < y)
(x ≤ y) = (x − 1 < y)
(x1 < y1 ) ∧ (x2 < y2 ) ⇒ (x1 + x2 < y1 + y2 )
(x1 ≤ y1 ) ∧ (x2 ≤ y2 ) ⇒ (x1 + x2 ≤ y1 + y2 )

19
Theorems on properties about ∗ and /

(0 < x) = (0 < 2 ∗ x)
(0 < x) = (x < 2 ∗ x)
(0 < x) = (x ÷ 2 < x)
(0 ≤ x/2) = (0 ≤ x)
(x = 0) ⇒ (x ∗ y = 0)
2 ∗ (x/2) = x

Theorems on equivalence relation

(x = x) = T
(x = y) = (x ≤ y) ∧ (y ≤ x)

Theorems about odd(n) and even(n)

odd(x) ⇒ ((x − 1) ÷ 2 = (x − 1)/2)


even(x) ⇒ (x ÷ 2 = x/2)
odd(x + 2 ∗ y) = odd(x)
even(x + 2 ∗ y) = even(x)
odd(x) = ¬even(x)
odd(x) ⇒ ((x ≥ 1) = (x ≥ 0))
odd(x) ∧ (x = 0) = F

20
7 Predicate Logic - Examples and Exercises

21
8 Arrays - Axioms
8.1 Axioms
Axiom 8.1 [Assignment to Array Element]
 
(i = j) ⇒ (e = f )
((b; i : e) [j] = f ) =  ∧ 
(i 6= j) ⇒ (b[j] = f )

Axiom 8.2 [Definition of Arithmetic Relations]

(b[i : j] = x) = (∀k : i≤k <j+1 : b[k] = x)


(b[i : j] < x) = (∀k : i≤k <j+1 : b[k] < x)
(b[i : j] > x) = (∀k : i≤k <j+1 : b[k] > x)
(b[i : j] ≤ x) = (∀k : i≤k <j+1 : b[k] ≤ x)
(b[i : j] ≥ x) = (∀k : i≤k <j+1 : b[k] ≥ x)
(b[i : j] 6= x) = (∀k : i≤k <j+1 : b[k] 6= x)
x ∈ b[i : j] = (∃k : i≤k <j+1 : x = b[k])

22

You might also like