Professional Documents
Culture Documents
14026
Original Article
A comparison of gastric emptying of soluble solid meals and clear
fluids matched for volume and energy content: a pilot crossover
study
T. Okabe,1 H. Terashima2 and A. Sakamoto3
1 Chief Physician, Department of Anaesthesiology, Hitachi Ltd., Hitachinaka General Hospital, Hitachinaka-shi, Japan
2 Professor, Hitachinaka Medical Education and Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Hitachinaka-shi,
Japan
3 Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
Summary
We previously demonstrated that the gastric emptying time of different liquids with the same volume mainly
depended on their energy content, regardless of differences in composition. In this crossover study, we investigated
whether the same applies when soluble solid foods are ingested with water. Ten healthy volunteers ingested one of
five test diets consisting of two test meals (Calorie Mateâ 100 and 200 kcal) and three test solutions (water and glu-
cose solutions of 100 and 200 kcal), each given in a volume of 400 ml, and then underwent ultrasonography to mea-
sure the gastric antral cross-sectional area every 10 min for 120 min. The gastric emptying time was defined as the
time for the antral cross-sectional area to revert to its initial value. When test diets with the same energy content
were ingested, the gastric emptying curves were nearly identical, regardless of whether the original form was solid or
liquid. The median (IQR[range]) gastric emptying times of Calorie Mateâ of 100 kcal with water vs. isocaloric glu-
cose solution were 65 (60–78 [50–80]) vs. 65 (60–70 [50–80]) min (p = 0.58), and for Calorie Mateâ of 200 kcal
with water vs. isocaloric glucose solution they were 100 (93–108 [90–120]) vs. 105 (90–110 [90–120]) min
(p = 0.54). The median (IQR [range]) for water was 40 (30–40 [30–50]) min. Energy content may be a critical deter-
minant of the gastric emptying time when ingesting soluble solid diets with water.
.................................................................................................................................................................
Correspondence to: T. Okabe
Email: t-okabe@nms.ac.jp
Accepted: 11 July 2017
Keywords: gastric emptying time; isocaloric fluids and solid foods; pre-operative fasting; ultrasonography
with only one example given, namely ‘toast and clear right lateral position. To ensure technical uniformity,
liquid’ [1], making it difficult to exactly understand what all measurements were performed by only one evalua-
‘light meal’ represents. Thus, to date, there seems to tor (the lead author of this study). The same subject
have been no hard evidence regarding the pre-operative had another one of the five test diets on a different
fasting period after ingestion of solid foods. A rational day (there was no fixed interval between tests) and
next step, in our view, would be to establish the underly- underwent the same ultrasound examination. This pat-
ing principles of gastric emptying rather than just evalu- tern was repeated until each subject had ingested all
ating the emptying times of various solids or liquids five diets. These consisted of:
individually. Our previous work has already established
1 One piece of Calorie Mateâ (Otsuka Pharmaceuti-
several principles for gastric emptying of liquids [5, 6].
cal Factory, Tokushima, Japan) + 380 ml of water
The fundamental principles are as follows: if the initial
(100 kcal, total 400 ml when mixed): the Calorie
volume of liquid ingested is fixed, it is the energy con-
Mate 100 group.
tent (total amount of calories) which is the critical deter-
2 Two pieces of Calorie Mate + 360 ml of water
minant of liquid gastric emptying, regardless of
(200 kcal, total 400 ml when mixed): the Calorie
compositional differences in the liquid [5]; the energy
Mate 200 group.
content of the liquid ingested may be a primary determi-
3 6.25% glucose solution (100 kcal, 400 ml): the glu-
nant of the gastric emptying rate rather than the volume
cose 100 group.
[5, 6]. We therefore wished to examine whether the
4 12.5% glucose solution (200 kcal, 400 ml): the glu-
above principles might also apply when ingesting sol-
cose 200 group.
uble solid diets with water.
5 Four hundred ml of water: the water group.
Calorie Mate 100 group: one piece of Calorie Mate + 380 ml of water. Calorie Mate 200 group: two pieces of Calorie
Mate + 360 ml of water. Glucose 100 group: 400 ml of 6.25% glucose solution. Glucose 200 group: 400 ml of 12.5% glucose solu-
tion. Water group: 400 ml of water.
aorta or inferior vena cava as anatomical landmarks, by Yamazaki S, Igakutosyo Syuppan Co., Ltd.,
as described previously [5, 6, 8–11]. When the mini- Tokyo, Japan).
mal antral cross-sectional area of the gastric antrum
was imaged using ultrasonography (Hi Vision AVIUS, Results
Hitachi Aloka Medical, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), the antero- Ten healthy men consented to, were enrolled in, and
posterior (AP) and craniocaudal (CC) diameters were completed the study. Their mean (SD) physical charac-
both measured and recorded in the database, as teristics were: age 29.6 (5.2) years; height 169.2
described previously [5, 6, 8–11]. (4.2) cm; weight 62.6 (7.7) kg; and body mass index
The following formula was used to calculate the 22.1 (2.5) kg.m2. Figure 1 shows typical ultrasound
antral cross-sectional area: images obtained during this study.
Figure 2 shows the gastric emptying curves.
cross-sectional area ¼ p AP CC=4
Between groups with the same energy content,
The time required for the cross-sectional area to namely the Calorie Mate 100 group vs. the glucose
return to the level within the 10% error range of 100 group and the Calorie Mate 200 group vs. the
the initial value was defined as the gastric emptying glucose 200 group, there were near-overlapping
time. A graph with a time scale on the x-axis and changes in the cross-sectional area of the gastric
measured values of the antral cross-sectional area on antrum over time. The mean antral cross-
the y-axis was used to obtain gastric emptying sectional area in the water group decreased in an
curves. Statistical analyses for comparisons of each exponential manner, and returned to its baseline
group were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis H- value 40 min after ingestion.
test. When the analysis of variance was found to be The median (range [IQR]) gastric emptying times
significant at the 95% confidence level, multiple obtained in the Calorie Mate 100, Calorie Mate 200,
comparisons between groups were performed using glucose 100, glucose 200 and water groups were 65
the Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correc- (60–78 [50–80]), 100 (93–108 [90–120]), 65 (60–70
tions. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be sig- [50–80]), 105 (90–110 [90–120]) and 40 (30–40 [30–
nificant. All statistical analyses were conducted using 50]) min, respectively (Fig. 3). In all groups,
Excel Statistical Program File Ystat 2013 (developed the ingested material passed from the stomach into the
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 1 (a) Sagittal sonogram of the empty gastric antrum. The antrum is found between the left lobe of the liver
and the pancreas, at the level of the aorta or inferior vena cava. (b) Sagittal sonogram of the gastric antrum 10 min
after the ingestion of 400 ml of 12.5% glucose solution (the glucose 200 group). The antrum appeared distended with
a hypo-echoic fluid content. (c) Sagittal sonogram of the gastric antrum 10 min after the ingestion of two pieces of
Calorie Mate with 360 ml of water (the Calorie Mate 200 group). The antrum appeared distended with hyperechoic
particles suspended in hypo-echoic fluid. (d) Sagittal sonogram of the gastric antrum 10 min after the ingestion of
400 ml of water (the water group). The antrum appears distended with hypo-echoic fluid. Arrow denotes gastric
antrum; L, liver; P, pancreas; Ao, aorta.
solid nutrient (Calorie Mateâ) used in the present was broken up into smaller pieces and uniformly dis-
study melted into a sticky mass when ingested with tributed throughout the fluid component of the stom-
water, it is premature to apply the above result to the ach (Fig. 1C). The gastric emptying curves of the
ingestion of various solid foods. Calorie Mate 100 group and Calorie Mate 200 group
Previous studies indicated that the gastric empty- exhibited similar changes to those of the glucose 100
ing time is longer for solids with high calorific con- group and glucose 200 group, respectively, which is
tents [12–18], and solids may take more time to in accordance with the comparability of each energy
leave the stomach than liquids because of the time content (Fig. 2). As a corollary, no significant differ-
required for grinding processes [15, 19–21]. The for- ences were observed in gastric emptying times among
mer finding supports the results of the present study groups with the same energy content, that is, the
(Fig. 3, Calorie Mate 100 group vs. Calorie Mate 200 Calorie Mate 100 group vs. the glucose 100 group
group), and is reasonable based on the principles we and the Calorie Mate 200 group vs. the glucose 200
have previously described. The latter finding needs to group (Fig. 3). Thus, a solid diet with the property of
be carefully interpreted because the solid and liquid melting into a sticky mass when ingested with water
diets used in the previous studies had clear differ- may not cause delayed gastric emptying associated
ences in energy contents, which may affect gastric with grinding processes. These results also suggest
emptying times more than the physical properties by that an increase in the viscosity of gastric contents
virtue of the time required for grinding processes. due to the ingestion of Calorie Mate does not exert a
Calorie Mate, used as the solid diet in the present major effect on gastric emptying. In support of this
study, has a similar appearance to shortbread and possibility, Juvonen et al. reported that viscosity did
was expected to melt relatively easily into a sticky not markedly affect gastric emptying times [22]. They
mass in the stomach when ingested with water. compared lower and higher viscosity beverages, and
Ultrasonographic findings indicated that Calorie Mate although the difference in viscosity was very large
(less than 250 mPa-s vs. greater than 3000 mPa-s), Registry (ref.: UMIN000023833). No external funding
the gastric emptying rate was only 1.1-fold greater. or competing interests declared.
Feinle et al. investigated the validity of magnetic reso-
nance imaging as a method for measuring the empty- References
ing of a mixed solid/liquid meal [23]. Consistent with 1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee. Practice
guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmaco-
the results of the present study, they concluded that logic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: appli-
magnetic resonance imaging may be used to reliably cation to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an
updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists
measure the gastric emptying not only of liquids but Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Anesthesi-
also of mixed solid/liquid meals in humans, and ology 2011; 114: 495–511.
found no significant differences in gastric emptying 2. Smith I, Kranke P, Murat I, et al. Perioperative fasting in adults
and children: guidelines from the European Society of Anaes-
times between liquids and mixed solid/liquid test thesiology. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2011; 28:
meals of an identical macronutrient composition, 556–69.
3. Miller M, Wishart HY, Nimmo WS. Gastric contents at induction
energy content and weight. Despite this significant of anaesthesia. Is a 4-hour fast necessary? British Journal of
finding, they did not explain why liquids and mixed Anaesthesia 1983; 55: 1185–8.
solid/liquid test meals had the same gastric emptying 4. Meakin G, Dingwall AE, Addison GM. Effects of fasting and
oral premedication on the pH and volume of gastric aspirate
times, and also did not attempt to elucidate the in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1987; 59: 678–82.
underlying principles of gastric emptying. It is note- 5. Okabe T, Terashima H, Sakamoto A. What is a determinant of
liquid gastric emptying? Comparisons between milk and
worthy that two different modalities, ultrasonography isocalorically-adjusted clear fluids. British Journal of Anaesthe-
and magnetic resonance imaging, provided similar sia 2015; 114: 77–82.
results. Distinct from the study conducted by Feinle 6. Okabe T, Terashima H, Sakamoto A. What is the manner of
gastric emptying after ingestion of liquids with differences in
et al., we obtained a novel insight; when the energy the volume under uniform glucose-based energy content?
content and total volume of the ingested material are Clinical Nutrition 2017; 36: 1283–7.
7. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced
equal, gastric emptying times may become the same recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for
independent of ‘compositional differences’ and patients undergoing colon resection. Clinical Nutrition 2005;
whether the original form of the material is solid or 24: 466–77.
8. Hillyard S, Cowman S, Ramasundaram R, Seed PT, O’Sullivan
liquid. G. Does adding milk to tea delay gastric emptying? British
There were some limitations to the present study. Journal of Anaesthesia 2014; 112: 66–71.
9. Perlas A, Mitsakakis N, Liu L, et al. Validation of a mathemati-
As has been already noted, the results cannot be cal model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by
applied to the ingestion of other types of solid food. gastroscopic examination. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2013;
Similarly, the results may not necessarily be applied to 116: 357–63.
10. Perlas A, Chan VW, Lupu CM, Mitsakakis N, Hanbidge A. Ultra-
patients undergoing anaesthesia and surgery, because sound assessment of gastric content and volume. Anesthesi-
all subjects who participated in the present study were ology 2009; 111: 82–9.
11. Bouvet L, Mazoit JX, Chassard D, Allaouchiche B, Boselli E,
young and physically and mentally healthy, which dif- Benhamou D. Clinical assessment of the ultrasonographic
fers from actual clinical settings. Furthermore, the measurement of antral area for estimating preoperative gas-
number of subjects (n = 10) was relatively small, sug- tric content and volume. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 1086–92.
12. Moor JG, Christian PE, Coleman RE. Gastric emptying of vary-
gesting that the present study needs to be regarded as ing meal weight and composition in man. Evaluation by dual
a pilot or exploratory study. liquid-and solid-phase isotopic method. Digestive Diseases
and Sciences 1981; 26: 16–22.
However, we believe that the stepwise establish- 13. Meyer JH, MacGregor IL, Gueller R, Martin P, Cavalieri R.
ment of the underlying principles of gastric emptying 99 m-Tc-tagged chicken liver as a marker of solid food in the
will result in evidence being obtained to support prac- human stomach. American Journal of Digestive Diseases
1976; 21: 296–304.
tice guidelines for pre-operative fasting and will con- 14. Doren S, Jones KL, Andrews JM, Horowitz M. Effects of meal
tinue our investigations. volume and posture on gastric emptying of solids and appe-
tite. American Journal of Physiology 1998; 275: 1712–8.
15. Velchik MG, Reynolds JC, Alavi A. The effect of meal energy
Acknowledgements content on gastric emptying. Journal of Nuclear Medicine
This trial was registered on the University Hospital 1989; 30: 1106–10.
16. Lin HC, Doty JE, Reedy TJ, Meyer JH. Inhibition of gastric emp- using a single scintillation camera and computer system. Gut
tying by sodium oleate depends on length of intestine 1983; 24: 1117–25.
exposed to nutrient. American Journal of Physiology 1990; 20. Hinder RA, Kelly KA. Canine gastric emptying of solids and liq-
259: 1030–6. uids. American Journal of Physiology 1977; 233: 335–40.
17. Hunt JN, Stubbs DF. The volume and energy content of meals 21. Kelly KA. Gastric emptying of liquids and solids: roles of proxi-
as determinants of gastric emptying. Journal of Physiology mal and distal stomach. American Journal of Physiology
1975; 245: 209–25. 1980; 239: 71–6.
18. Gonlachanvit S, Chey WD, Goodman KJ, Parkman HP. Effect of 22. Juvonen KR, Purhonen AK, Salmenkallio-Marttila M, et al. Vis-
meal size and test duration on gastric emptying and gastric cosity of oat bran-enriched beverages influences gastrointesti-
myoelectrical activity as determined with simultaneous 13C- nal hormonal responses in healthy humans. Journal of
octanoate breath test and electrogastrography in normal sub- Nutrition 2009; 139: 461–6.
jects using a muffin meal. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 23. Feinle C, Kunz P, Boesiger P, Fried M, Schwizer W. Scintigraphic
2001; 46: 2643–50. validation of a magnetic resonance imaging method to study
19. Collins PJ, Horowitz M, Cook DJ, Harding PE, Shearman DJ. Gas- gastric emptying of a solid meal in humans. Gut 1999; 44:
tric emptying in normal subjects—a reproducible technique 106–11.