Professional Documents
Culture Documents
972 PDF
972 PDF
Foreword. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Explanation of Symbols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
Glossary of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
List of Positions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
Index of Names. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
5
Foreword
In this book, I suggest a thinking method that is intended to help the practical chess
player. I am sure that using this technique, the reader will improve his play as a
whole, meaning both his tactical abilities (i.e. the ability to foresee combinations)
and his positional abilities.
The idea of this work is to provide the reader with a kind of ‘antenna’. This an-
tenna has seven ‘filters’ (what I call signals) that will allow a chess player to detect
tactical possibilities.
First look, then analyse, plan, and only then start to look for the right move! See
Part III of this book.
A great trainer and champion1 once advised his pupils to calculate like machines.
I‘d say: be human ! Do not calculate without ideas.
Emmanuel Neiman
November 2012
1 Alexander Kotov.
7
Introduction
Improving the ability to solve chess combinations is the main road to progress for
the learning chess player. As soon as he is given the magic formula ‘White to play
and win’, the seeker will try to find as quickly as possible the best move in order to
provoke events and in so doing, he will improve his capacity to calculate forced
lines.
After some practice, in general the improvement is significant and as a trainer I
am often surprised by the ability of some people to quickly find the solution to a
non-obvious puzzle.
When I congratulate a pupil on good solving, his/her reaction is often: ‘That
was not difficult, you told us that there was a combination!’ Most of them add: ‘The
real problem is that when we are playing, we don’t know when to look for a tactic’.
This started me thinking about the idea of an ‘antenna’ that ‘alarms’ a player when
a combination is available.
Lingnau,Carsten
Orso,Miklos
Budapest 1992 (4)
M_._._._
_._._._.
I_N_._._
_._._._.
._K_._._
_._._.j.
._._.lB_
_._._._.
White to play and win
One, maybe two seconds after I showed him the position, he indicated the right so-
lution by drawing a kind of ‘Z’ with his finger in the air.
Nevertheless, in the actual game White was unable to win, and had to be content
with a draw after
65.®d5 Ãg1 66.®e6 Ãf2 67.®d7 Ãg1 68.®c8 Ãe3 69.Àa5+ ®a7 70.Ãb7
g2 ½-½
9
Tune Your Chess Tac tics An tenna
Here we have a basic illustration of our theme. White was not advised that there
was a forced win, so he just continued in the ‘logical’ way, bringing his king to-
ward the enemy monarch.
What did Vaisser immediately detect here ?
We can observe, before doing any calculation, that the black king is already
‘stalemated’ by the knight on c6 and the pawn on a6. This observation should lead
us to look for some chance to give check without moving the two guards (knight
and pawn). Then we might notice that the light-squared bishop is able to deliver
the mate, for it can reach the b7-square via the route h3-c8-b7 and mate.
Did Vaisser follow all these steps?
I doubt it – in one or two seconds. What (as I think) he did instantly was just:
does not appear randomly, but as a con- What is the difference between a signal
sequence of the positional superiority of and a theme?
one side. This superiority lies in positive The signal (the motif) is the reason
factors, let’s say more active pieces. But why the combination exists. The theme
we can take the opposite approach: look- is the main mechanism which allows us
ing at the opponent’s position, we can to make it work.
establish that he has passive pieces; or
they may be trapped, locked in or lack- Christiansen,Larry
ing coordination. This way of looking Karpov,Anatoly
gives us hints, and those hints we will Wijk aan Zee (m/1) 1993
call signals, in other words: reasons to
1.d4 Àf6 2.c4 e6 3.Àf3 b6 4.a3
believe that there is a possible win.
Ãa6 5.©c2 Ãb7 6.Àc3 c5 7.e4
cxd4 8.Àxd4 Àc6 9.Àxc6 Ãxc6
Take another position:
10.Ãf4 Àh5
Chasing the white bishop, but also pro-
n T_._._._ visionally misplacing the knight. The
_J_._JmJ move is correct here, but not with Kar-
J_._L_J_ pov’s follow-up in mind...
_._J_._.
11.Ãe3 Ãd6
._.n._._
i.r.i.i. 11...Ãc5 or 11...©b8 are better.
.i.k.i.i
_._._._. T_.dM_.t
White has no weaknesses for the time j._J_JjJ
being. All his men are well protected, .jLlJ_._
and Black is unable to threaten any of _._._._S
them. Not a single white piece is on a ._I_I_._
light square, so the bishop is useless for i.n.b._.
offensive purposes. No file is available .iQ_.iIi
for the black rook (Black might dream
r._.kB_R
about ...h7-h5-h4, ...Õh8 and ...h4xg3
with a possible attack on f2, but in the An important signal is the unprotected
meantime White will have taken all the piece. Here Karpov has placed two un-
pawns on the queenside, beginning protected men on open lines: the
with Õc7 or Àxe6). In short, there’s no h5-knight and the d6-bishop.
chance of any winning tactics for Black.
12.©d1 1-0
When we are winning, or at least in a
very advantageous situation like this A double attack winning a piece in the
one, the study of the signals will also opening, quite a rare bird in the prac-
help us keep the opponent in the de- tice of World Champions!
fence, without allowing him any tacti- Here we can clearly see the distinction:
cal possibilities. the signal can be found in the unpro-
11
Tune Your Chess Tac tics An tenna
81
Tune Your Chess Tac tics An tenna
Exercises
Exercise 1 Signal 6 * 17.c4 Àc3 18.Õxb7 ©d8 19.©f4
cxd4
Le Roux,Jean Pierre
Mocquard,Yves
Guingamp 2012 (1)
q T_.dT_M_
jR_._J_J
1.Àf3 Àf6 2.c4 c5 3.Àc3 b6 ._._JlJb
4.g3 Ãb7 5.Ãg2 g6 6.0-0 Ãg7 _._._._.
7.d4 cxd4 8.©xd4 0-0 9.©h4
©c7 10.Õd1 Àa6 11.Ãh6 ._Ij.q._
Õfe8 12.Àd5 Àxd5 13.cxd5 _.s._N_.
Ãxb2 14.d6 ©c3 15.Õab1 I_I_.iIi
Õac8 16.Àd4 Ãxg2 17.®xg2 _._.r.k.
Ãa3 18.Õd3 ©c5 19.dxe7
(Solution on page 155)
©xe7
Exercise 3 Signal 6 *
q ._T_T_M_
j._JdJ_J Milov,Vadim
Sj._._Jb Erismann,Peter
_._._._. Neuchatel 2012 (2)
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3 e5
._.n._.q 4.Ãxc4 exd4 5.exd4 Àf6
l._R_.i. 6.Àf3 Ãe7 7. 0-0 0-0 8.Àc3
I_._IiKi Àbd7 9.Õe1 Àb6 10.Ãb3 c6
_R_._._. 11.h3 Àbd5 12.Ãg5 Ãe6
13.Àe5 h6 14.Ãh4 Àf4 15.Ãc2
(Solution on page 154)
Ãd5 16.Ãg3 Àe6 17.©d3
©b6
Exercise 2 Signal 6 *
132
Fi nal Test
Brady,Stephen q T_L_.tM_
Collins, Sam jJ_J_JbJ
Brannigan Cup 2012 (2) ._._._J_
_._._._.
1.Àf3 Àf6 2.g3 c5 3.c4 b6
4.Ãg2 Ãb7 5.0-0 e6 6.Àc3 Ãe7 ._I_._._
7.b3 0-0 8.Ãb2 d5 9.cxd5 exd5 _._._._.
10.d4 Àa6 11.Õc1 Õe8 12.©d2 Ii._BiDi
Àe4 13.©f4 cxd4 14.Àb5 Àac5 r._Qk._R
195