ABSTRACT

The authority to create Regional Regulation is considered as one of the rights in

conducting Regional Autonomy and also a way to cover the needs and aspiration of
the society as long as it does not go against higher regulation and public interest.
Regional autonomy means self-determination and empowerment but it does not
necessarily mean independence. Self-determination and empowerment are the form of
given chance which has account for responsibility. However, both become the tools to
create Regional Regulation. It results in numerous problematic Regional
Regulations. In Tasikmalaya Regency, there are some problematic regulations
including Regional Regulation Number 10 in 2012 on Islamic Education in
Tasikmalaya Regency. In fact, it needs to be analysed on how the implementation of
control and supervision system by the government in creating Regional Regulation is
and how the implementation of General Principles of Good Government in creating
Regional Regulation is. The method employed in this research is descriptive analytic
through normative juridical approach by observing secondary data. The secondary
data are in the form of legislative regulations, books, journals, dissertations, experts’
scientific written works and other documents collected from library as well as other
sources from internet related to observed object. Meanwhile, primary data is gained
from the original source which is the research site along with collecting direct
information from related parties who know and understand very well about the
process or the core of creating Regional Regulation. Based on the result of the
research, the researcher concludes that: 1) The implementation of government
control and supervision towards autonomous region on creating Regional Regulation
as the consequences of decentralization principles and co-administration task turns
out to be less optimal thus it leaves several problematic Regional Regulation
including Regional Regulation of Tasikmalaya Regency Number 10 in 2012 and The
Minister of Home Affairs gave response by letter Number 188.34/1051/SJ on 27
February 2013 regarding clarification of Regional regulation. However, the letter
did not proceed to any follow up of its supervision so the control is not optimal. 2)
The subject of Regional Regulation Number 10 in 2012 on Islamic Education in
Tasikmalaya Regency is in conflict with the higher regulation in which regulating
religion matters becomes the authority of Central Government. Besides, it also does
not accomplish the General Principles of Good Government namely accountability,
law and justice framework, transparency and openness.

Keywords: Regional Autonomy, Regional Regulation, Control and Supervision,

General Principles of Good Government.

vi