Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TL Performance 275kV PDF
TL Performance 275kV PDF
Lines
R. Bhattarai1, R. Rashedin, S. Venkatesan, A. Haddad, H. Griffiths, N. Harid
High Voltage Energy Systems Group, School of Engineering, Cardiff University, United Kingdom
1
BhattaraiR@Cardiff.ac.uk
Abstract—This paper presents a comparative lightning front time of the lightning impulse. The overvoltage
performance study conducted on a 275 kV double circuit magnitude and impulse shape on the struck phase conductor
shielded transmission line using two software programs, TFlash
and Sigma-Slp. The line performance was investigated by using is computed for both the shielding failure and backflashover
both a single stroke and a statistical performance analysis and cases.
considering cases of shielding failure and backflashover. A To improve the lightning performance of the line, the
sensitivity analysis was carried out to determine the relationship application of metal oxide surge arrester was studied using
between the flashover rate and the parameters influencing it. To different arrester configurations and locations. The computed
improve the lightning performance of the line, metal oxide surge
arresters were introduced using different phase and line results indicate that arresters installed on the top phase of
locations. Optimised arrester arrangements are proposed. each circuit give the most significant improvement in
lightning performance when combined with low tower
Index Terms—Lightning Overvoltages, Statistical Analysis,
Electrogeometric modelling, Sensitivity Analysis, Surge Arrester footing resistance. Optimised locations of surge arresters
were then derived for practical applications.
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS. Downloaded on March 4, 2009 at 11:15 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
III. LINE MODELLING TECHNIQUES
The details of the transmission line modelling in the
software are as follows:
The line consists of 116 spans with each span represented
as a multiphase untransposed distributed parameter line
section. To avoid reflections on the line, a sufficiently long
section is added to each side of the studied line. At line ends,
Sigma-Slp connects coupling matrices while TFlash adds
matching impedances in order to avoid reflections. Each
simulated span section is further divided into shorter sections
to enable stroke simulation at a number of points along the
span.
In TFlash, the tower is modelled as a simple transmission
line with constant surge impedance, and terminated with a
footing resistance. In Sigma-Slp, the tower is modelled by a
propagation element model represented by the tower surge
impedance and its propagation length. The propagation
length is equal to the height of the tower.
A non-linear footing resistance, as derived by Weck [2] and
given in (3), is used in both programs
R0
RT = (3)
I
1+
Ig
Eg ρ
With; Ig = (4)
2 π R02
where, R0 is the low-current tower footing resistance, ρ is the
Fig. 1. 275 kV double circuit shielded transmission line tower showing
its conductor coordinates. Values in parenthesis are midspan heights. soil resistivity, I is the stroke current through the tower
footing and, E0 the soil ionisation threshold [400kV/m].
The line insulator strings are composed of 16 individual In TFlash, the Disruptive Effect (DE) method [6] is used as
glass insulator discs having 170mm spacing and each disc has the default insulator flashover model whereas Sigma-Slp, uses
a creepage distance of 540mm which is equivalent to a total a leader progression method. The DE method defines the
string length of 3.31m (including the length of the fittings at disruptive index by
top and bottom of the string). The calculated critical B
700 ⎦
where, Vl is the leader velocity, d the gap distance, ll the
650
leader length, u(t) the applied voltage and, E0 the voltage
600 gradient (520kV/m).
The power frequency voltage may influence the insulator
550
flashover. This influence is taken into account by calculating
500
the voltage across the insulators through a 3600 phase cycle,
0 10 20 30 40 and the flashover rate is determined using its average.
Arre ster Cur rent (k A) The effect of corona coupling in the line is considered in
Fig. 2. Surge arrester voltage-curve.
TFlash while it is ignored in Sigma-Slp.
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS. Downloaded on March 4, 2009 at 11:15 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
The EGM is used to determine the strike point on the line. 6000
TFlash
In this investigation, more than 20000 stokes are used for the 5000 Sigma-Slp
Overvoltage (kV)
striking distance used in the software are given by [2, 7] 3000
2000
0.65
R c = 10 I (7) 1000
-1000
Overvoltage (kV)
For the single stroke studies, the overvoltage magnitude
3000
and impulse shape on the phase conductor during shielding
2000
failure and backflashover are computed. A 32kA, 2/75
impulse current is applied to phase conductor A1 at the tower 1000
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS. Downloaded on March 4, 2009 at 11:15 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
which is more likely to result in shielding failures. On the B. Flashover Performance of the Line with Surge Arresters
other hand, in the Sigma-Slp model, only 10% to 15% of the The objective of this study was to estimate the
total number of strokes are likely to hit the phase conductor as improvement in flashover rate by implementing surge
a result of shielding failure. Therefore, the majority of arresters on the line. Different arrester configurations and
strokes in the Sigma-Slp simulations hit the shield wire or the locations were analysed and compared to assess
tower top resulting in higher backflashover rates. improvements in lightning performance of the line. In these
studies, low current tower footing resistance value was varied
(iii) Effect of impulse shape
from 10Ω to 80Ω keeping the ratio of soil resistivity to
The computed effect of lightning impulse shape on the line
footing resistance constant (ρ/R0 = 20). An initial study was
flashover rate is shown in Fig. 4c. Only results from the
carried out with arresters positioned at every tower and on
TFlash model were shown since it is possible to vary the
every phase conductor. This resulted in a zero flashover rate,
impulse front time in this case. From Fig. 4c, it can be seen
but, practically the configuration would be too expensive.
that, for fast front times (< 2µs), the BFR increases as the
It is well known [8] that, in the low current range, the
front time decreases. The simulations show that SFFR is not
lightning strikes hit only the top phase conductors of the two
influenced by variations in the front time; a constant value of
circuits during shielding failure. This suggests that the
0.7 fl/100km/yr is obtained.
majority of shielding failures for this tower design would
TF las h
occur on the top phases. Table I shows typical results of an
0. 4 S ig m a-S lp electrogeometric model (EGM) study obtained with Sigma-
0 .3 5
0. 3
Slp and Fig. 5 shows an example of graphical display of
lightning strokes hitting the line for different current
BFR (fl/100km/yr)
0 .2 5
0. 2 magnitudes, which were obtained with TFlash. Based on
0 .1 5 these studies, four practical different arrester configurations
0. 1 were studied, and are shown in Table II. In the table, the
0 .0 5 black spots on the phases represent the application of an
0
arrester on that phase.
-0 .0 5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
As can be seen in the table, the Sigma-Slp modelling shows
L o w C u rr e n t F o o tin g R e sista n ce (o h m ) that the application of arresters substantially improves the
flashover rate. By placing arresters on the top phases only, a
(a) Flashover rate vs. low current footing resistance
zero SFFR is obtained. However, this arrangement only
(GFD = 0.5 fl/km2/yr, ρ/R0 = 20)
TF la s h
suppresses backflashover under low footing resistance
1. 6
S igm a -S lp conditions. On the other hand, with arresters installed on the
1. 4
bottom phases only, a zero backflashover rate is obtained at
1. 2
expense of shielding failure. When arresters are installed on
SFFR (fl/100km/yr)
1
the top and bottom phases, both shielding and backflashover
0. 8
failure can be suppressed. Therefore, to improve the
0. 6
lightning performance, it is recommended to install arresters
0. 4
only in the top phases at towers with low footing resistance
0. 2
and in the top and bottom phases at towers with high footing
0
0 0 .2 0. 4 0 .6 0. 8 1 1. 2
resistance.
G F D (fl /k m 2 / yr ) TABLE I
EGM REPORT IN SIGMA-SLP
(b) Flashover rate vs. GFD (R0 = 10 Ω, ρ = 200 Ωm)
To Phase A2
To phase A1
To phase B1
To phase C1
To phase C2
To phase B2
current (kA)
Med. stroke
Total stroke
0 .7
To shield
To tower
To earth
GFD
wire
0 .6
0 .5
BFR (fl/100km/yr)
0 .4
0 .3
20000
14054
4840
31.5
331
280
298
0.5
0 .2
0 .1
-0 .1
0 .5 1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3. 5 4
F r o n t T im e (µ s)
Fig. 4. Sensitivity analysis Fig. 5. Stroke view at different current magnitude in TFlash
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS. Downloaded on March 4, 2009 at 11:15 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Table III shows the results obtained with the TFlash model, 40 0.01 0 0 0 0
which agree with the previous findings. The SFFR obtained 50 0.04 0 0 0 0
60 0.09 0.02 0 0 0
in this case is slightly higher while the BFR lower.
70 0.15 0.03 0 0 0
80 0.25 0.05 0.02 0 0
TABLE II Total Flashover Rate (fl/100km/yr)
FLASHOVER RATE (SIGMA-SLP MODEL) 10 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0
DIFFERENT ARRESTER CONFIGURATIONS 20 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0
Footing 30 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0
Resistan 40 0.71 0 0.70 0.70 0
ce 50 0.74 0 0.70 0.70 0
(Ω) 60 0.79 0.02 0.70 0.70 0
Shielding Failure Flashover Rate (fl/100km/yr) 70 0.85 0.03 0.70 0.70 0
10 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0 80 0.95 0.05 0.72 0.70 0
20 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0 • mark indicates surge arrester in the phase
30 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0
40 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0
50 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0
60 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0 VI. CONCLUSION
70 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0
80 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0
Two similar models of transmission line were studied using
Backflashover Rate (fl/100km/yr) Sigma-Slp and TFlash software packages. Satisfactory
10 0 0 0 0 0 agreement is given by the two models.
20 0 0 0 0 0 It was shown that the lightning performance of overhead
30 0 0 0 0 0 transmission lines can be improved by applying surge
40 0.03 0 0 0 0 arresters. Arresters on the top phases improve shielding
50 0.08 0.01 0 0 0 failure flashover rate, and when applied to the bottom phases
60 0.14 0.03 0.01 0 0 they allow improvement of backflashover rate. Adequate
70 0.26 0.07 0.02 0 0 selection of the arrester configuration in the line can
80 0.35 0.11 0.03 0 0
significantly improve lightning performance and may reduce
Total Flashover Rate (fl/100km/yr)
10 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0
the financial burden.
20 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0
30 0.63 0 0.63 0.63 0
40 0.67 0 0.63 0.63 0
50 0.72 0.01 0.63 0.63 0 REFERENCES
60 0.78 0.03 0.65 0.63 0 [1] T. Short, "Application of the IEEE Guide for Improving the Lightning
70 0.90 0.07 0.66 0.63 0 Performance of Electric Power Overhead Distribution Lines (Std. 1410-
80 0.99 0.11 0.67 0.63 0 1997)," in IEEE T&D Conference, 1999.
• mark indicates surge arrester in the phase [2] CIGRE Working Group 33-01, "Guide to Procedures for Estimating the
Lightning Performance of Transmission Lines," CIGRE Brochure 63,
1991.
TABLE III [3] T. E. McDermott and V. J. Longo, "Advanced computational methods
FLASHOVER RATE (TFLASH MODEL) in lightning performance the EPRI Lightning Protection Design
DIFFERENT ARRESTER CONFIGURATIONS Workstation," Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2000. IEEE,
2000.
Footing
[4] Y. A. Wahab, Z. Z. Abidin, and S. Sadovic, "Line surge arrester
Resistan
application on the quadruple circuit transmission line," Power Tech
ce
Conference Proceedings, 2003 IEEE Bologna, 2003.
(Ω)
[5] W. A. Chisholm, Y. L. Chow, and K. D. Srivastava, "Travel Time of
Shielding Failure Flashover Rate (fl/100km/yr) Transmission Towers," IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and
10 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0 Systems, vol. PAS-104, pp. 2922-2928, 1985.
20 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0 [6] U. Savadamuthu, K. Udayakumar, and V. Jayashankar, "Modified
30 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0 disruptive effect method as a measure of insulation strength for non-
40 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0 standard lightning waveforms," Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on,
50 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0 vol. 17, pp. 510-515, 2002.
[7] "IEEE guide for improving the lightning performance of transmission
60 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0
lines," IEEE Std 1243-1997, 1997.
70 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0 [8] S. Sadovic, R. Joulie, S. Tartier, and E. Brocard, "Use of line surge
80 0.70 0 0.70 0.70 0 arresters for the improvement of the lightning performance of 63 kV
Backflashover Rate (fl/100km/yr) and 90 kV shielded and unshielded transmission lines," Power
10 0 0 0 0 0 Delivery, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 12, pp. 1232-1240, 1997.
20 0 0 0 0 0
30 0 0 0 0 0
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS. Downloaded on March 4, 2009 at 11:15 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.