Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8(3): 45-49
- 45 -
ISSN 1860-3122
eJBio Electronic Journal of Biology, 2012, Vol. 8(3): 45-49
These initial explants were cultured in Murashige The cultures were incubated under the following
and Skoog (MS) [15] solid medium (pH = 5.8) in test culture chamber conditions:
tubes supplemented with cytokinins. - temperature 25±1°С;
Sprouts → MS + 4 mg/l KIN - relative humidity 50%;
Sprouts → MS + 2 mg/l BAP - photoperiod 16/8 hour light/dark and
- illumination of 50 μmol·m ·s .
2 -1
Table 1. The effect of GA3 treatment on in vivo sprout formation in potato tubers in vivo.
Figure 1. The effect of treatmeant with 2 ppm GA3 for rapid sprouting.
In the Table 2 is presented the effect of cytokinins rooting and shoots formation. On MS + 2 mg/l BAP
KIN and BAP on in vitro shoots, roots and plantlets both parameters show 100.00% rooting and
formation from sprout explants. The results show formation of start explants (Figure 2).
that the cultivar Agrija has maximum potential for
A B C
Figure 2. Shoot formation from initial sprouts explants: A. after 2 weeks; B. after 3 week; C. after 6 weeks.
- 46 -
ISSN 1860-3122
eJBio Electronic Journal of Biology, 2012, Vol. 8(3): 45-49
Table 2. The effect of KIN and BAP on in vitro shoots, roots and plantlets formation form sprouts explants.
thickness x̄ mm
Type of explant
Nr of explants
Length x̄ mm
Cultivar on
Nr of root per
Shoot length x̄
MS media
Nr of shoots
Root length
per explant
Thickness
% rooting
formation
% shoot
Shoot
shoot
x̄ mm
x̄ mm
mm
MS + 4 mg/l KIN
Andrea 33 sprout 6.22 3.87 20.07 2.50 1.25 3.00 10.66 11.75 42.42
Agrija 36 sprout 6.94 4.07 20.82 2.47 2.47 3.75 20.02 16.25 100.00
MS + 2 mg/l BAP
Andrea 36 sprout 6.15 3.64 25.30 3.00 1.56 2.56 10.83 17.64 30.26
Agrija 34 sprout 7.82 2.87 26.36 2.72 2.37 2.37 20.33 100.00 100.00
Table 3. The effect of KIN + IAA and BAP + NAA on in vitro shoots, roots and plantlets formation form nodal
segments explants.
thickness x̄ mm
Type of explant
Nr of explants
Length x̄ mm
Cultivar on
Nr of root per
Shoot length x̄
MS media
Nr of shoots
Root length
per explant
Thickness
% rooting
formation
% shoot
Shoot
shoot
x̄ mm
x̄ mm
mm
Table 4. The effect of KIN + IAA and BAP + NAA on in vitro microtuber formation in potato.
microtuber per
Cultivar on
Nr of explants
Length x̄ mm
MS media
% microtuber
Shoot length x̄
Thickness
formation
explant
Shoot
x̄ mm
Nr of
mm
A B C
Figure 3. Shoot and microtuber formation from nodal explants: A. after 2 weeks; B. after 3 week; C.
microtuberisation after 6 weeks.
- 47 -
ISSN 1860-3122
eJBio Electronic Journal of Biology, 2012, Vol. 8(3): 45-49
The effect of cytokinins and auxins in MS medium microtuber production is very important for the
and their influence on organogenesis in vitro of production and storage of a potato valuable stock.
nodal segments is presented in Table 3. The Potato microtubers obtained through in vitro culture
specific combination of cytokinin with auxin was from single-node cuttings are convenient for han-
effective for the both cultivars. The percentage of dling, storage and exchange of healthy germplasme.
rooting and shoot formation is maximum 100 for the The nodal segments as starting explants
both cultivars. demonstrated higher efficiency compared to the
Microtubersation is examined in MS medium with sprouts. The composition of MS with cytokinin and
combination of cytokinin and auxin and the results auxin has shown the best effect, especially MS + 2
are presented in Table 4. The cultivar Andrea result mg/l BAP + 1 mg/l NAA where the cultivar Agrija
with no microtuberisation on all media, while the formed 13.33% microtubers. High sucrose
cultivar Agrija resulted with microtuberisation on the concentrations may act as inducing signal leading to
MS + 4 mg/l KIN + 1 mg/l IAA and MS + 2 mg/l BAP starch accumulation, so to increase the present of
+ 1 mg/l NAA with 10% microtubers and 13,33% microtuberisation the concentration of sucrose must
microtubers respectively (Figure 3). be higher.
However, the effect was variable depending on On the tested media the cultivar Agrija has higher
the genotype and cytokinin concentration. The potential for in vitro micropropagation and
response of potato cultivars studied was in general microtuberisation.
agreement with previously reported findings by a The study also demonstrates that in vitro
number of investigators using different cultivars [15- tuberization capacity of potato depends on the
17]. genotype.
Sucrose has been extensively used to induce
potato microtubers. It was refereed by many studies References
that explants maintained in medium devoid of [1] FAOSTAT Agriculture (2012). FAO statistical database.
sucrose responded negatively with respect to tuber http://www.fao.org/corp/statistics/en/ read on
formation regardless of the incubation periods. In 29.09.2012.
contrast, the use of sucrose at concentrations range
[2] Kanwal Amina, A. A. and K. Shoaib (2006). In Vitro
between 6-12% resulted in earlier microtuber
Microtuberization of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
formation and the intensity of microtuber formation Cultivar Kuroda-A New Variety in Pakistan.
increased progressively with the length of International Journal of Agriculture and Biology
incubation period. These results confirmed the 8(3):337-340.
importance of sucrose on in vitro microtuber
[3] Hossain M.J. (2005). In vitro Microtuberisation in
development as described by a number of
Potato Obtained from Diverse Sources. Plant Tissue
investigators [16, 18, 19, 20]. Cult. & Biotech. 15(2): 157-166.
In this experiment was used 3% sucrose in MS
medium. Probably the low formation of tubers in the [4] Simko, I. (1993) Effect of Kinetin, Paclobutrazol and
cultivar Agria (10.00% and 13.33%) is due to the Their Interactions on the Micropropagation of Potato
Stem Segments Cultured in vitro in the Light”. Plant
low present of glucose used in the MS medium.
Growth Reg., 12: 23-27.
- 48 -
ISSN 1860-3122
eJBio Electronic Journal of Biology, 2012, Vol. 8(3): 45-49
Closed, Difusive and Forced Ventilation on Growth [16] Abbott, A.J. and Belcher, R. (1986). Potato Tuber
and Tuberization, Annals of Botany 87: 53-59. Formation in vitro. In: Plant Tissue Culture and Its
Agricultural Application. Withers, L.A. and Anderson,
[11] Islam, M.S. and Chowdhury A.R. (1998). Virus free P.G. (Eds.). London: Butt Worth, 113-132.
stock production of some indigenous potato varieties
of Bangladesh. Plant Tissue Culture. 8(1): 41-47. [17] Slimmon, T., Machado, Souza and Coffin, R. (1989).
The Effect of Light on in vitro Microtuberization of
[12] Khan, M.S., Hoque, R.H., Sarker, H. and Potato Cultivars”. Amer. Potato J., 66: 843-848
Muehlebach P. (2003). Detection of important plant
viruses in in vitro regenerated potato plants by double [18] Hussey, G. and Stacey, N.J. (1984). Factors Affecting
antibody sandwich method of ELISA. Plant Tissue the Formation of in vitro Tubers of Potato (Solanum
Culture 13(1): 21-29. tuberosum L.). Ann. Bot., 53: 565-578.
[13] Wang PJ and Hu CY (1982). In vitro mass [19] Garner, N. and Blake, J. (1989). The Induction and
tuberization and virus-free seed potato production in Development of Potato Microtubers in vitro on Media
Taiwan. Am Po J. 59: 33-37. Free of Growth Regulating Substances”. Ann. Bot.,
63: 663-674.
[14] Xuan, C.P., Debasis, C., Eun, J. H. and Kee, Y. P.
(2003). A simple method for mass production of [20] El Fatih M. Mahdi, Hamad S. Al-Saadand Sakina
potato microtubers using a bioreactor system. M.A.I. Elshibili (2004). In vitro Tuberization of Potato
Current Science, 84( 8): 1129-1132. Cultivars as Influenced by Photoperiod, Exogenous
Sucrose and Cytokinin Concentrations. J. King Saud
[15] Murashige, T. and F. Skoog, (1962). A revised Univ., Agric. Sci.17(1), pp.25-35.
medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco
cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473-497.
- 49 -
ISSN 1860-3122