Professional Documents
Culture Documents
List of Contents
List of Contents
List of Contents:
a. List of Contents 1
b. Introduction and abstract 2
c. Explanation of the underlying requirements for market segmentation:
1. Market Definition
i. Measuring the market share and market growth 3
ii. Recognize the relevant competitors 3
iii. Identify the firm’s current competitive position 4
iv. Identify the nature of the market 4
v. Purpose of the previous group of requirements 4, 5
vi. Some suggested tools for implementing the previous requirements 5
2. Actual reasons for market segmentation 5, 6, 7, 8
d. An overview of major issues in segmentation 9, 10
e. List of references
2
Student name:
Market Segmentation
Introduction:
Most of marketers agree that a business should be customer-focused in order to achieve the
organizational objectives at all levels. Thus, most strategists try to design strategies that can
better serve the target market. But, before designing strategies, they must well recognize the
prospective market, customers’ needs, characteristics, preferences and different buying
patterns. Then, they should combine the like-minded customers with each other in groups to
represent segments of the market. This process is called ‘market segmentation’.
Market segmentation is a process by which a strategist can divide the market into like-minded
groups and put specific variables for segmentation which are based on the differences between
customers (Hooley, Piercy and Nicoulaud, 2008:206). Thus, it is a critical tool for accurate
recognition of prospective customers’ needs and responding accordingly. However, not all
businesses are satisfied with market segmentation as a concept although they really know the
3
logic behind it. This is because segmentation may be difficult to apply in some markets or may
be given more attention than the market itself (Wilson and Gilligan, 2005:318).
Therefore, a research for Lazarus Research Group (2006) has suggested a specific group of
requirements that must be achieved by a strategist so as to create efficient and effective
market segmentation.
Thus, this paper will discuss the underlying requirements for accurate market segmentation.
The topic will be discussed in a simple way that defines each requirement, suggest optimal tools
for achievement and purpose of every single requirement. In addition, the information used in
the discussion and explanation are very valuable because it is obtained from different resources
to view the topic from diverse perspectives. What about an introduction for the issues used
Customer needs should be put at the heart of market segmentation process. But, how a
strategist can recognize these needs and how he or she best serves the target customer.
Strategists should wisely estimate the current market share, in terms of value and size,
and the expected future growth rate to be able to assess the attractiveness of the
potential market. In this context, the strategist tries to weigh the expected net profit
compared to the costs incurred in the segmentation process in an attempt to assure
whether the segmentation will be profitable, or not.
Strategies should identify the key competitors in the prospective market and study them
very well to be capable of assessing the level of competition within the market. By
collecting such information, they become ready to fight against the prospective
competitors.
Developers must recognize the firm’s strength among other competitors within the
market so that they can judge whether a firm is qualified for the existing competition, or
not. More importantly, if the firm is not qualified to fight against the current
competitors, strategists should start to develop both short-run and long-run strategies.
Short-run strategies may be difficult to be attained because of high costs incurred, but it
will help a firm compete in a shorter time. Still, they are not enough for maintaining a
competitive advantage over other players in the market, so a great effort should be
done in the formulation of long-term strategies, taking into consideration the current
situation of the firm against other firms within the market.
d. Identify the nature of the market (Lazarus,2006:2):
Strategists ought to study the nature of market, meaning that recognizing whether the
market is dominated by a Business-To-Business market (B2B), a Business-To-Consumer
(B2C) market, or a combination of both types. B2B market is a market in which a firm is
selling its products or services to another company, whereas B2C market is the one
where a company is selling its products or services to a consumer. Therefore, an
assessment for the differences between both markets is highly recommended to be
conducted in order establish an effective market segmentation strategy that better
serves the needs of prospective consumers. This is because this assessment will provide
the strategists with a clear understanding of the key differences already existed
between B2B and B2C markets. For instance, the number of customers served in B2B
market is small, whereas it is large in the B2C market.
5
In addition to the stated reasons for every single requirement, there are common purposes for
the previous whole group of requirements. This group can provide a rich understanding for the
market structure in three critical areas which are consumers’ perceptions of brands,
estimation of the current demand for a specific product and the ability to predict consumers’
responses to new and modified products accordingly (Wilson and Gilligan, 2005, p.328). As a
result, a strategist can convert such an understanding to a basis for segmentation strategy.
Wilson and Gilligan (2005:322) suggested a formal procedure that helps in collecting
information about such requirements which has three steps as follow:
I. Survey stage: in such a stage, the researcher collects the required information
about brand awareness and its ranking among competitors, popular usage
behaviors and consumers’ attitudes of a specific product.
II. Analysis Stage: here the researcher tries to recognize specific groups within the market.
Each group share similar characteristics among its members and is differentiated from
other groups within the market. After that, each group will be called a segment which is
one of the obtained results from market segmentation.
III. Profiling Stage: this stage is the last one where the researcher collects the
shared characteristics of each segment in a profile that is recommended to be
given a distinctive name from other profiles.
Second, the strategist must determine the actual reasons for market segmentation:
The reasons behind segmentation may be one of the following reasons, a combination of
them, or not (Lazarus, 2006, p.3).
The determination of the real reasons for segmenting the market in an earlier stage will be very
beneficial in choosing the suitable methods and approaches of segmentation. By the accurate
determination of the reasons behind segmentation, a firm will be able to decide on the best
way to enter the prospective market. This way may be either introducing a single product for
multiple segments, or multiple products to multiple segments (Lazarus, 2006:3). The first
method, that is one product to multiple segments, is based on the different suggested packages
for different segments. By using this method, a firm design different promotion and distribution
programs that make the product suitable for the largest possible number of the potential target
market. In contrast, the second method of introducing many products to many segments is
based on an extensive research for the market to identify the current needs and respond by
production and introduction of the new products accordingly.
Therefore, a strategist has to determine whether a firm will introduce a single product or
many products. Taking such a decision is not easy, so a strategist must first consider the costs
and benefits of each method as follow:
This method is very simple since it avoids the high costs that may be incurred for the
extensive research and introduction of other versions of the product. Although it is
easy and simple to apply, it can be very risky because the market, partially or entirely,
may not accept this product. Thus, a product needs to be differentiated and innovative
enough to protect the firm from falling in such a trap.
b. A multiple products to multiple segments:
This method is more complicated than the other method as it requires more
expenses for the research, development and introduction for different versions of a
product. It may have risk lower than the other method as it introduces a diversified
group of products that maximize the opportunities for sales.
7
In fact, each method has advantages and disadvantages, so the wise strategist is the one who
decides on a method which can be profitable and cost-effective and above all, serve the
customers’ needs. By the wise choice of one of these methods, the firm has organized its
products portfolio.
Still, a firm needs to organize its customers into segments, so it has to select the suitable
segmentation approach that will help the strategist use the obtained information from the
above requirements. The choice decision should be based on the amount of knowledge
acquired about the market (Wilson and Gilligan, 2005:325). For instance, if the results of the
above used procedures give the strategist a rich understanding for the market, the strategist
may use an approach called an a priori approach may be used. Whereas, if the above
procedures, for information collection, do not give the strategist enough knowledge or assured
facts about a specific market, the strategist ought to use post hoc approach. Wilson and Gilligan
(2005, p.324) has explained the two methods as follow:
a. An a priori approach:
1. the basis of usage patterns (heavy, medium, light and non-users) as in the case
of the industrial or the Business-To-Business markets,
2. demographic characteristics ( age, sex and income) as in the case of the Business-To-
Consumer market, and
After the choice of one or a combination of the above bases, the strategist
becomes ready to use the chosen bases in identifying every single detailed related
to the prospective customers such as their location and potential size.
8
This approach is very dissimilar from the other approach as the basis for segmenting the
market is chosen after the ending of conducting the market research. This means that
the research findings are the key determinant for the used basis in segmentation.
Consequently, it may have greater risk than the other method as it can be beneficial
only if the obtained information about the market is complete and consistent.
Nonetheless, if the research findings are partially or entirely doubtful, the determined
basis for segmenting may cause a misunderstanding for the market. Misunderstanding
of the market can lead to a surprise decline in a firm’s sales. For example, if a firm is
operating in a market that puts the high quality products on the top of their choices,
and for some unknown reasons, the market research found that the price of a product is
the key determinant for choosing any product in this market. As it is illustrated in this
example, the research has found a result other than what is actually existed in the
market.
Thus, the strategist must carefully determine the suitable approach whether the
first one, the second one, or a combination of both.
By doing so, the all the requirements discussed by Hooley, Piercy and
Nicoulaud (2008:211) can be easily implemented. These premises are as follow:
There is a group of issues related to market segmentation that must be continually reviewed and
considered by researchers. Some of these issues have discussed by Wilson and Gilligan (2005),
which are called “factors affecting the feasibility of segmentation”. Part of this factors are also
discussed by Piercy and Morgan (1993) under the name of “testing the robustness of segments”.
These factors, which must be satisfied in any segment, are as follow:
a. ‘Measurable’:
The task of measuring the segment can be simple in the case of consumer market.
In contrast, it is very complicated with most types of industrial markets that require
a diversified group of technical goods because of lack of published technical data.
b. ‘Accessible’:
Not all markets can be easily entered because of the high capital needed to enter a
specific market or the special expertise needed in a specific field. So, a firm may
find that a definite segment is profitable and measurable, but it cannot exploit it.
c. ‘Substantial’:
The segment must be attractive for a firm in terms of relative size and value to the
firm. This is necessary to be existed in order for the process of segmentation to be cost-
effective.
d. ‘Unique in its response’:
The segment should be distinctive from other segments in order to support the firm’s
competitive advantage.
e. ‘Appropriate’:
The firm should have the resources and capabilities needed to exploit this
segment. Likewise, the use of these capabilities and resources should not affect the
overall performance of a company.
f. ‘Stable’:
10
It includes the choice of discussed above bases of segmentation and the applied
procedures and techniques of segment evaluation such as post hoc and as a
priori approaches.
b. Strategic segmentation decision:
The decisions related to ‘segmental analysis, modeling and attractive segments’. The
strategist has to decide whether the firm will target the market entirely or partially.
c. Implementation of segmentation strategies:
References: