Professional Documents
Culture Documents
13.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you should be able to :
state the concepts and classification of tax revenue
discuss the components of non-tax revenue
describe the sharing of receipts with states; and
explain trends in resdrce mobilisation over the years.
13.1 INTRODUCTION
Mobilisation of resources is a sine-qua-non for planned economic development of the
economy. It becomes the means to the attainment of growth. The term resource
mobilisation covers much more than taxation. It covers the income from public
services, public enterprises and public utilities. A development plan, in order to be ,
,uccessful, should accord the highest priority to the generation of sufficient surplus
from the ccrrent revenues of the government, its departmental units and the public
enterprises. As development proceeds and the level of income in the economy rises,
it should be able to mop up additional resources in the form of public borrowings
and small savings. It may also be necessary to resort to deficit financing (about which
we will discuss in detail in Unit 15) primarily to provide money for increasing
transactions in the wake of rising incomes and growing monetisation of the economy.
But at the same time care should be taken to ensure that it does not become
inflationary. Similarly external assistance may be necessary as long as domestic
resources do not prove adequate to finance the developmental programmes.
In this unit, we are concentrating mainly on two sources of revenue-tax and non-tax
for resource mobilisation. The compdnents of tax and non-tax revenue will be
discussed and as an example provisions in regard to Budget of 1991-92 relating to
resource mobilisation will be given.
II 1) What do you understand by direct taxes? State the types of direct taxes levied by
the Union Government.
2) What is Corporation Tax?
..........................................................................................................
3) What do you understand by Wealth tax?
.........................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................
4) Distinguish between specific and ad valorem excise duties.
.........................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................
Table 2
International Financial Institutions
I 1) International
Budget
1990-91
Receipts Discharge Net
Revised
1990-91
Receipts Discharge Net
some other taxes to finance their activities. The important taxes falling in this
category are sales tax, land revenue, state excise duties, entertainment tax etc.
2) Some taxes are levied by the central government but their proceeds are divided
between the centre and the states. Union excise duties and taxes on income other
than agricultural income belong to this category. The basis on which these taxes
are divided between the centre and {he states is recommended by the Finance
Commission.
3) The power to levy and collect certain taxes is vested in the centre, whereas their
revenue proceeds are to be distributed among the states. Estate duty on property
other than agricultural land, duty on railway freights and fares, terminal tax on
goods and passengers carried by railways o r purchase of newspaper and
. . . . - - -.
Though some taxes are levied by the central government, the responsibility to collect
them is on the state government. For instance, stamp duties other than those included
in the Union list and excise duties on drugs and cosmetics have been included in this
category.
There is need for decentralisation of functions for encouraging local initiative, for
securing promptness in decision-making and efficiency in its implementation, and for
allowing for a variety of experiments to suit varying needs, tastes and temperaments
- this is implied in the federal nature of the Constitution which ensures immediate
effective resource mobilisation and maintenance of national perspective.
According to 1991-92 budget, current situation of sharing of receipts with states is as
follows :
Table 3
Tax Revenue
resources. Most of the projects on which the state governments invested capital by
borrowing from the centre are not yielding the desired rate of returns. This calls for
more determined efforts to improve the performance of public sector projects. But
some of the non-plan loans have become dead weight debts which need to be
remitted.
Centre-state financial relations need review and readjustment. States should learn to
live within their means and should exploit their resources fully.
India has done extremely well in terms of tax effort. In 1950-51 when the planning
process was initiated, t h ; ~ a x - ~ e National
t Product (NNP) ratio was as low as 6.4%;
since then it has been risiqg steadily and s t a n d a t 25% (approximately) today. For
a developing country like Itidia which started its development effort with a very low
per capita income and has recorded an extremely modesyrate of growth (i.e. around
1.370 per annum increase in NNP per capita), this record in mobilising tax revenue Sourees of Revenw :
is remarkably good by any standard. In India all the major taxes, except personal Tax and Non-Tar
income tax and land revenue, have recorded buoyancy greater than unity. In recent
years buoyancy of excise duty and sales tax has been as high as 1.51 and 1.41
per cent respectively. This has enabled far greater mobilisation of resources through
taxation. There still remains some scope for raising additional tax revenue in the
country. This can be done if the government decides to show the required political
will to tax agricultural incomes which presently remain outside the taxation net.
I Apart from tax revenue other important aspects of resource mobilisation are
generation of non-tax revenues, restricting of current government expenditure and
raising of surpluses of public sector enterprises.
Additional resource mobilisation measures undertaken in the 1990-91 budget were
expected to yield Rs. 1,790 crore. Out of this Rs. 550 crore were to be raised through
i
direct taxes and Rs. 1240 crore through indirect taxes. The states' share in centre's
additional resource mobilisation after making adjustment for the loss of Rs. 170 crore
on account of concessions in income tax was estimated at Rs. 3 crore.
The Railway Budget for 1990-91 proposed hikes in the rates of goods traffic,
passenger fares, parcel and luggage rates. These proposals are estimated to yield
additional revenue of Rs. 892 crore. ~ e v i s i o h i nthe postal and telecommunication
tariffs were estimated to result in an additional revenue of Rs. 645 crore. The total
additional revenue changes in tax rates, through revisions in railway fares and freights
and through revisions in postal and telecommunication tariffs was thus estimated at
Rs. 3327 crore in 1990-91.
II Net profits (after tax) of central government public enterprises increased substantially
from Rs. 2994 crore in 1988-89 to Rs. 3782 crore in 1989-90. The rate of return, as
I measured by the ratio of net profits to capital employed, rises to 4.5% in 1989-90,
which is the highest achieved in the decade. Howeb~rthe petroleum sector accounted
for the bulk of these profits, i.e. Rs. 2,900 crore out of the total Rs. 3,782 crore in
1989-90. The non-petroleum sector enterprises numbering about 200 contributed a
meagre sum of Rs. 882 crore. While this reflects an improvement over the net profit
of Rs. 430 crore made in 1988-89, the ratio of the net profits to capital employed in
I non-petroleum sector enterprises was only 1.3% in 1989-90. It indicates that there is
a substantial scope for improving the financial performance of non-petroleum central
government public enterprises. The overall working results of Central Government
i public enterprises for the first half of 1990-91showed a net profit of Rs. 481 crore as
against Rs. 1,103 crore during the corresponding period of 1989-90.
The seventh plan envisaged generation of internal resources to the ex'tent of
Rs. 23,013 crore and additional resource mobilisation to the extent of Rs. 11,490
crore at 1984-85 prices for fii~ancingthe plan outlays. Against this during the seventh
plan, the public enterprises have generated gross internal resources of Rs. 37,715
crore at current market prices. About 32% of plan investment in central public
enterprises during the seventh plan was financed by generating net internal resources
- 28% by extra-budgetary resources and 40Yo by the budgetary support.
The outlook on the resource mobilisation front is serious but not unmanageable. The
resource imbalances accumulated over several years cannot be eliminated in a short
period. In the present context soft options have either a limited effect or no effect at
all in the correction of macro-economic imbalances. The measures introduced during
1990-91, which aimed at better revenue collections and containment of public
expenditure have had a limited effect as evidenced by the revised budget deficit which
is estimated to be considerably higher than the budget estimate. It is essential that a
serious effort be made to introduce corrective measures through hard decisions and
difficult choices. Any beginning should aim at strict control over government
expenditure, particularly the revenue and non-plan expenditure, rationalisation of
subsidies so that they are better directed towards the poor and improvement in
revenue collections. Continued effort on the part of the government may provide the
basis for a transition to a sustainable resource regime over the next few years.