Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Michael Atkinson) Moral Horrors in Guillermo Del (B-Ok - CC) PDF
(Michael Atkinson) Moral Horrors in Guillermo Del (B-Ok - CC) PDF
BY MICHAEL ATKINSON
S fiUlI.LF.RMO DEL TORO A FOLK straight fantasy, or some coyote admixture
artist? Not "folk" in the sense therein. His sensibility is Grimmian, horn of
of, say, Sergei Paradjanov, an urban-Mexican culture steeped in native-
invoking the antiquated forms, art crafts, poverty, simmering civil discon-
spirits., and textures of preindustrial native tent, and American pop. Pan's i^lryrinth in
arr. But rather, a toiler in the fields of fable, particular—-a hot-tempered yet methodical
animist anxiety, symbolic trial, the fragility tall tale in which fantastical tribulation runs,
of "good.," the ambivalence of "evil," and gasping, hand in hand with monstrous
vice versa? human destruction—has the matter-of-fact
Or is he mere pulp? Well, let's suggest a magic and fearless relationship with histori-
differential between rhe rwo labels, without cal blood of a Singer or Marquez story. Del
which del Toro's six films, from Cronos Toro may have been seduced into the
(93) ro Pan's Lalryritith., could he unjusrly graphic-novel blockbuster illuminati of New
junked in wirh "new primitives" as dis- Line and Sony because of his Grand Guignol
parate as Robert Rodriguez's Sin City, the sense of visual brio, hut his storytelling is just
vogue in spandexed-superhero passion as apt to be modulated, conceptual, full of
plays, and the new school of rortiire proce- contemplation and quiet frisson. He's as
durals. You draw your line wherever you much a descendant of Borges, mad for
like, but my sense of it is ethical, respecting ancient anti-science and reflective labyrinths,
still tbe toe print left hehind hy rhe contro- as he is an heir of KC comics.
versial literary dictates of Jobn Gardner's
On Moral Fiction. Pulp, as it's heing perpe- H I S IS N O T T O C A I . I . H I M A
trated in tbe new century, plays strictly to subtle filmmaker—del Toro
the desires of the young, wbereas folk art loves vampire shock and
takes our baser instincts as a given and archetypal nightmare experi-
plays rheir consequences our for us like ence far roo mucb, not to mention his ardor
ordeals by imagination. Wbereas pulp is for tbe class insecta, for tbeir biophysical
wholly concerned with the moment of vis- creeps, their disquieting mutabilit>', and their
ceral experience—be it dazzlcment, nausea, shadowy resemblance to macbinery, rain-
sadistic thrills—folk art could be said to be coat-clad strangers, faeries, and demons.
more concerned with the totality of the Cronos came as a disorienting surprise: a
yarn told, within a self-contained narrative Mexican horror film that summarily
universe fraught with moral tension. This ignored its own el-cheapo genre heritage,
defines the no-man's-land between the pop- and decided in its calcified bones not to go
ular cinema that will last in the puhlic skull for scar)'. Instead, del Toro's Algernon-
and in discourse, and tbat wbich will van- Blackwood-translates-"Tbe Gircular Ruins"
ish unmourned into our dated, campy, tale constructs a sui generis 14th-cenrury
can't-believe-we-ever-liked-it past. This is alchemy-vampirism backstory that's quickly
why, for instance, classic film noir is folk, shuttled into the modern age, where it
but the modern action film isn't. hegi[is to resonate iike a funeral bell with the
Del Toro, of course, lives in the main- social dynamics of AIDS, drug addiction, class
stream, and has marched with one boot in warfare, the folly of the rich, aging, and the
each camp. It might help to claim that all ot not-so-simple preadolcscent questions of
bis films—even Blade ii (02}—are fairy tales,
even when thev're science fiction, horror., Reality check: Pan confers with Ofelia