In a shopping center an assailant was caught who was caught looting the stores that

were possible, to be captured and taken to court the judge imposes a punishment of a
sentence of 10 years because he already had antecedents for the same crimes , as
soon as a subject so my opinion is that if the assailant already reincidido in this subject
its centencia must be greater than the stipulated because in the previous time that
committed the crime is not imputed a punishment according to its committed acts, It is
noteworthy that you should also know the version of the assailant in the first place, he
will give his version of how the events happened and it could be said that the poque
committed the crime, a serious example because he was going through a situation that
I take to commit this type of acts, then you will hear the version of the security guards
or in such case of the authorities, after having listened to the two verdicts the judge in
charge of the case will make a decision. n counts both versions of both the assailant
and the guards, to conclude after the decision is taken both parties, both the accused
and the accuser, should be coupled to what is decided, if the decision is a sentence the
assailants should to comply with their sentence as required by law, and in case this is
not the case, the accusers will comply with the judge's decision.