0% found this document useful (0 votes)
120 views1 page

Special Proceedings Quiz 2 Finals

This document contains instructions for a quiz on special proceedings for Ruth B. Bawayan's class at Cordillera Career Development College. Students are asked to read a Supreme Court decision on GR No. 181796 and answer three questions. The first question asks students to fully discuss how the Supreme Court resolved the appeal of the Petitioners in the case. The second asks students to fully differentiate between the writ of habeas corpus, writ of amparo, and writ of habeas data. The third asks students to distinguish between remedies for a change of name before administrative bodies versus courts. The document provides details on formatting the answers and ends by noting this concludes Quiz 2 Finals.

Uploaded by

glai
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
120 views1 page

Special Proceedings Quiz 2 Finals

This document contains instructions for a quiz on special proceedings for Ruth B. Bawayan's class at Cordillera Career Development College. Students are asked to read a Supreme Court decision on GR No. 181796 and answer three questions. The first question asks students to fully discuss how the Supreme Court resolved the appeal of the Petitioners in the case. The second asks students to fully differentiate between the writ of habeas corpus, writ of amparo, and writ of habeas data. The third asks students to distinguish between remedies for a change of name before administrative bodies versus courts. The document provides details on formatting the answers and ends by noting this concludes Quiz 2 Finals.

Uploaded by

glai
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Cordillera Career Development College

COLLEGE OF LAW
Buyagan, La Trinidad, Benguet

SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS QUIZ 2 FINALS SET B


Second Semester, SY 2019
Ruth B. Bawayan, Instructor
[Link]@[Link]

READ the following en banc decision of the Supreme Court:

G.R. No. 181796 promulgated November 7, 2017

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE


DIRECTOR/HEAD OF THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND
DETECTION GROUP (CIDG), PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
(PNP), Petitioner [Link] N. CAYANAN AND SPOl ROLANDO V.
PASCUA, Respondents
[Link]

Then, answer the following questions concisely, clearly and


completely. Observe spacing between questions, margins,
correct punctuations, indentation and proper grammar.

1. How did the Supreme Court resolve the appeal of the Petitioners.
Discuss fully. (10 points)

2. Differentiate the writ of habeas corpus, writ of amparo and writ


of habeas data. Discuss fully (10 points)

3. Distinguish the remedy of change of name before the


administrative bodies and before the court. (5 points)

--------------------------------END OF QUIZ 2 FINALS------------------------------

You might also like