Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kylie Quale
Professor Fields
Eng. Comp. 105
Filling The Gap
21 March 2019
A clear definition of “school shooting” lacks across the board when looking at research
on school shootings. There are so many types of school shootings that exist now today, e.g.,
target shootings vs. random shooting that varying definitions listed don’t allow other types of
shootings to go into other categories. These varying factors lead to varying definitions, which
create a lack of continuity across the board. In Apodaca, the research gained shows that there is a
distinction in environmental factors that directly plays a role into which type of shooting occurs
more in which school setting. For example, it was documented that a high school’s environment
was less likely to have a random rather than targeted school shootings compared to college’s
environment (372). By creating universal definitions and categorizing types of shooting it will
prevent varying factors that lead to varying definitions and create more unity to a clearer picture
It’s important to have a set definition because more clear and concise research can be
done. Right now, as the research stands because there is no clear-cut definition, or even a
standard broad definition, each research study is done on a case-to-case basis. This means each
research study has their own definition of school shooting. This lack of continuity doesn’t allow
for research to pinpoint the ongoing problems with school shootings. For example, some of the
school shooting definitions revolves around shootings that happen during school vs. after school,
on school property but not in school, on a college campus vs. elementary, middle school, and
high school. Even with all these environmental discrepancies, there’s even less clarity when
Quale 2
taking single gun wounds involving gang violence versus multiple gun wounds involving a
single student and the student body without gang affiliation into consideration. Setting these
boundaries in research will only make way for more correlations to be found and set the narrative
A recent research study done in 2012 by Apodaca et al., looked at environmental factors
of school shootings and found a clear separation between the atmosphere of a college campus vs.
elementary, middle school, and high school (363). Through the separation of atmospheres
associated with each type of school, it shows a direct impact on each site’s environmental factors
differently. The research was done because of the lack of research on social and environmental
factors, which they found clearly played a role in school shootings, possibly a much larger role
than they were expecting. This shows that in order to have a greater understanding, the research
of each shooting needs to be broken down even further and split between college shootings vs.
elementary, middle school, and high school shootings. Further, the separation between targeted
vs. random definitions need to be split categorically as well for one to a unified understanding. If
the shooting definitions were to be better split categorically it is possible other correlations could
be found.
Another discrepancy between definitions happens when laws that define shootings
change, and how they’re incorporated for future research and data. According to Follman et al.,
in January 2013, a mandate for federal investigation of mass shootings authorized by president
Barack Obama lowered the regulation to three or more victims killed when it was originally
defined as four (Follman et al.). This questions whether previous research should be updated
with the new regulation standard in mind or applying regulation to future incidents. Ultimately,
Quale 3
tracking mass shooting is complex and an ongoing process that will continually need to be edited
and revised.
Researchers and law makers will fix this situation by setting up a universal definition of
school shootings that would split categorically down into different types of shooting based on
location (college vs. elementary, middle school high school) and reasoning behind the shooting
(targeted vs. random) will give researchers and the public a clearer understanding of what is
happening. Once a set definition and categories are established by law makers, researches will go
out into different environmental settings such as colleges, elementary, middle, and high schools,
rural, suburban, and urban schools and will collect data from those areas. The researchers will
conduct research based on social interactions of the school by interviewing students and staff
whom were witnesses to the shooting, people who knew the shooter to know if the shooting was
premeditated, and families affected by the shootings, and school officials about their bullying
policy and if the shooter was bullied and their policy implemented. Researchers will also obtain
information about environmental factors such as the city surrounding the school, the financial
allocation of money for the school, political views on gun rights. Lastly, researchers will focus
on individual characteristics of the shooters, their research will dedicate to the “why” and
reasoning behind the shooting in personal interviews with the shooters family and their political
views and opinions on gun rights and the right to bear arms. This newer categorization will
create a consensus in research to better analyze data/compartmentalize it to better look for trends.
Quale 4
Works Cited
Apodaca, Roberto Flores de, et al. "Characteristics of Schools in Which Fatal Shootings Occur."
Psychological Reports, 15th ser., vol. 110, no. 2, Apr. 2012, pp. 363-77. EBSCOhost,
Duplechain, Rosalind, and Robert Morris. "School Violence: Reported School Shootings and
Making Schools Safer." Education, 6th ser., vol. 135, no. 2, Winter 2014, pp. 145-50.
EBSCOhost,
ezproxy.uwgb.edu:2443/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&
AuthType=ip,uid&db=aph&AN=100464126&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Accessed 28
Feb. 2019.
Follman, Mark, et al. "A Guide to Mass Shootings in America." Mother Jones, 15 Feb. 2019,
Katsiyannis, Antonis, et al. "Historical Examination of United States Intentional Mass School
Shootings in the 20th and 21st Centuries: Implications for Students, Schools, and
Society." Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol. 27, no. 8, July 2018, pp. 2562-65.
2019.
Musu-Gillette, L., Zhang, A., Wang, K., Zhang, J., and Oudekerk, B.A. (2017). Indicators of
School Crime and Safety: 2016 (NCES 2017-064/NCJ 250650). National Center for
Feb. 2019
Quale 5
Springer, editor. "Study Shows Rapid Rise in Mass School Shootings in the US." Phys.org,