4.4 A process output is given by the following expression K Y= ae) Because we know that the Laplace transform of the output can express the product of the process (ransier function and the Laplace transform of the input, give all possible combinations of G(s) and U(s) that yield the above Y(s) and interpret them. Use Table F4.4 as a guide: From Exereise 4.2, a - iw +1 o Rearrange, ¥(s)[10s +1] =5U() 2 Take Z* of (2). 024 ys) 8) dr Take Z of (3) for (0)=1, 10[s¥(s)—1] + ¥(s) =5U(s) Substitute U(s) =2/.s and rearrange to give, re=(as) 10] _ 10+) s+ ~(40s+1 s} s(Q0s+1) s(s+0.1)Partial fraction expansion: yeyestl 2%, ss+0.D 5 90.1 @ Find @;: Multiply bys and set s=0 => a, =10 Find @,: Multiply bys +0.1 and set s=-0.1 => a =-9 Substitute into (4) and take Z', y()=10-9e°" Cheek: At 1=0, y(O)=1 4.5. For the process modeled by 2 = -2y, —3y. +20 Bm ay, — Gyr + 20 + 402 Find the four transfer functions relating the outputs (v1, 92) to the inputs (us, uz). The w and y are deviation variables. +2 a) Ay, — 6y2 + 2m + dup @ ‘Taking Laplace transform of the above equations and rearranging, (25+2)¥a(s) + 3¥a(5) = 2Ui(s) 8) ~A Vy) + (S46) Ya(5)=2U (5) + AU3(5) «@) Solving Eqs. 3 and 4 simultaneously for ¥4(s) and ¥3(5), Qs+6U(s)=12U (8) _ 28 +3U,(8) = 12U5 (5) NO) Sass 2d 2s43er 4)Solving Eqs. 3 and 4 simultaneously for ¥,(s) and ¥(s), Ke= + 6)U,(s)-12U,(s) _ 2s + 3)U4 (s) ~120, (s) 2s? +148 +24 2s +3)(s+4) Ys) 5) — (8 +8)U,(s) _ 46s + IU, (5) + 865 + DU, (9) +145 +24 2As+3\s+4) Therefore. ¥(s)_ 1 Xs) __ 6 Us) s+4 Us) (+3844) AGH) s+3y(s+4) 4.6 A single irreversible chemical reaction, A — B, takes place in a nonisothermat continuous stirred-tank reac- tor (CSTR), as shown in Figure 2,6, The reaction rete expression is given by Eqs. (2-62) and (2-63), It is de- sired to derive the transfer function between reactor concentration ca and coolant temperature, Ts. Some- one has proposed the following approach: first derive the individual transfer functions between cs and T and between T and T;. Then the desired overall transfer function will be obtained from the product of the two individual transfer functions: Cas) _ CAG), GO) Bo Te) Tes) Briefly indicate your opinioa of the proposed ap- proach. Is it feasible? Is there a better approach? (Note; Itis not necessary to actually derive any transfer functions.)