Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Disclaimer 1
Conclusion 15
Creation and fulfillment of supply document (source of supply) to the fulfillment warehouse
Back-to-Back supply processes are similar to regular supply processes that deliver supply to a
warehouse except for one difference; the Back-to-Back supply is always reserved to an Order
Management sales order line. The different variants of the Back-to-Back process are:
To sum up, the Back-to-Back supply creation and fulfillment is a complex, highly-integrated flow that
has multiple variants. This document seeks to lay down the key application setups that drive Back-to-
Back supply creation and fulfillment.
SCO tracks the creation of the supply document and immediately initiates a reservation request to tie the sales order
demand with the supply document. The reservation of supply to demand is made in Inventory and ensures that the
incoming supply is not ‘stolen’ or ‘wrongly allocated’ to any other demand source. It is to be noted that GOP will
respect the pegging between the supply document and the sales order during subsequent reschedules for the order.
Once the supply document is received into stock (PO receipt and put away, TO receipt and put away or WO
completion), the reservation for the sales order line switches from the supply document to on-hand that has been
created by the supply document receipt.
SCO tracks the fulfillment of the supply document and creation of inventory to ship the Back-to-back sales order.
During this tracking process, SCO sends supply status updates to Order Management until supply is available and
the sales order is ready to be shipped to the customer. Upon shipment of the Back-to-Back sales order, the sales
order fulfillment line interfaces with Receivables for billing.
The flow diagram given below depicts the generic Back-to-Back supply creation and fulfillment process.
Considering that there are four variants of the Back-to-Back flow (Make, Buy, Transfer and On-hand) as mentioned
in the introduction section, setups for Back-to-Back can be broadly divided into
2. Core application configuration like flexfields, profile options, document sequences, lookups and
attachments
3. Generic Supply Chain Management setups that apply for all Back-to-Back flow supply types, and
4. Specific setups that apply only to a particular supply type of the Back-to-Back flow
The scope of this document is restricted to setups that pertain to points 3 and 4 mentioned above. It is assumed that
all common setups and core application configurations have been completed before users begin setting up the
application specifically for enabling the Back-to-Back supply creation and fulfillment flow. If there are common
setups that have specific impact on Back-to-Back flows, for instance Transit Times, information pertaining to those
setups is provided in this document.
Let us first look at generic setups that apply to all variants of the Back-to-Back flow.
Navigation: Product Management > Product Information Management > Create Item
If this flag is set to “Yes”, Order Management will send a request for supply and GOP will send a supply
recommendation to SCO and the Back-to-Back fulfillment process will be executed. If this flag is not set, the
standard order fulfillment process in Order Management will be executed.
Navigation: Value Chain Planning > Order Promising > Manage ATP Rules
Select the Promising Mode “Supply chain availability search”. This option along with selecting the Supply
Type On Hand will ensure that any already available supply is used before new supply is created.
Enable “Search Components and Resources” if “Make” recommendations are required (Mandatory for
Back-to-Back Make recommendations). This option ensures there are enough available components and
resources to complete the work order for a Make recommendation.
Under Supply Types select all required supply types that must be considered during order promising
o On hand – if selected, existing on-hand quantities are considered for order promising.
o Purchase orders – if selected, open purchase orders will be considered for order promising.
o Standard work orders – if selected, open work orders will be considered for order promising.
Under Demand Types select all required demand types that must be considered during order promising.
For Back-to-Back sales orders, the Fulfillment lines option should be selected.
Set the Infinite Time Fence to a large value
o Since Back-to-Back items often require long lead times for manufacturing, or procurement, make
sure this definition is set with this in mind
o For example, if all Make orders require between 30 to 40 days to manufacture, and the time
fence is set to 20 days, orders with requested ship dates that are 21 days away will be promised
when in reality the goods will not be available until at least 9 days later. In this scenario, the
lowest number used for the infinite availability time fence definition should be 41 days lead time.
Setting up of Sourcing Rules to support the Back-to-Back flow is similar to how Sourcing Rules are set up and
assigned for standard order promising. A global sourcing rule is defined to determine the ship-from warehouse on
the sales order and a local sourcing rule in the ship-from warehouse determines how supply is created to fulfill the
Back-to-Back sales order. In the context of Back-to-Back fulfillment the focus is on the local rule since there are
certain points to be noted specifically for Back-to-Back order promising.
Navigation: Value Chain Planning > Order Promising > Manage Sourcing Rules
Examples of simple sourcing rules for different supply types are given below. Let us assume that these local rules
are defined in the sales order ship-from warehouse/organization, M6 – Houston.
In a Back-to-Back supply creation flow with the above sourcing rule, a Purchase Requisition and Purchase Order
would be created in Procurement with supplier Midtown Suppliers and supplier site Midtown Chicago.
For the above sourcing rule, a Transfer Order would be created in Inventory, to transfer the ordered item from M7 –
Cincinnati to the sales order shipping warehouse, M6 – Houston.
When a “Make at” sourcing rule is set up for Back-to-Back supply creation, a work order would be created in M6 –
Houston, for fulfilling Back-to-Back sales order demand.
Please note that each of the above examples assume that there is only one source to fulfill the item. Practically, a
sourcing rule for Back-to-Back fulfillment may include combinations of ranked sources (of different source types)
with splits in allocation percentages.
Navigation: Value Chain Planning > Planning Central > Collect Planning Data
Choose the Source System and Collection Type. Running “Net Change” collections (Collection Type = Net
Change) is a bare minimum to keep planning data up-to-date with changes made in non-planning source
applications.
Select collection filters (optional)
Select all reference data entities
Select all supply planning entities
Submit and monitor the status of the Collection Job Set until successful completion
Search for and select ESS job Refresh and Start the Order Promising Server
Select all entities in the ESS parameters page and submit (this might require downward scrolling)
Monitor the status of the ESS job until completion
Navigation: Setup and Maintenance > Configure Offering > Procurement > Select Feature Choices
Open the implementation project and expand ‘Manufacturing and Supply Chain Materials Management’
offering
Navigate to Define Cost Accounting > Define Subledger Accounting Rules > Define Subledger Accounting
Methods > Manage Mapping Sets
Click on ‘Go to Task’ and set the scope to ‘Cost Management’.
Now set the charge accounts for the following accounts:
o Accrual Account – Organization
o Cost of Sales Account – Organization
o Expense Account – Organization
o Expense Accrual Account – Organization
o Invoice Price Variance Account – Organization
o Material Account – Organization
In the Blanket Purchase Agreement, ensure that the BPA controls are set up to automate PO creation.
1. Item Templates: In general, all items identified for Back-to-Back fulfillment should be MPS/MRP planned
in the item’s Planning specifications in Product Information Management (PIM). An optimal method of
ensuring that such items have all requisite item attributes set is to apply, at the time of creating a new item,
either the seeded “Purchased Item” template or the seeded “Finished Good” template or both depending
on the Back-to-Back flow variants implemented.
2. Default Buyer and List Price: For items identified for the Back-to-Back Buy flow, it is recommended to set a
default buyer and a list price for the item in Purchasing specifications in Product Information Management
(PIM).
3. Running Collections: The frequency at which planning collects data and this data is refreshed to the order
promising server has a significant impact on order promising accuracy and results. The decision on the
frequency at which both these activities are scheduled will primarily depend on organizational
considerations.
4. Transit Times and Default Shipping Method: Another key factor that governs order promising is transit
times. Ensure that transit times are set up (with default shipping method) to account for movement of
goods between two internal locations, from suppliers (external locations) to internal locations and from
internal locations to external locations (customers). Transit times can be set up at multiple hierarchical
levels and judicious planning in setting them up can help in ensuring coverage for lead times involved in
movement of goods. Setting up transit times is a common SCM setup that has to precede setups for Back-
to-Back supply creation and fulfillment.
5. Item Costing: It is important to complete all item costing setups prior to using an item in the Back-to-Back
flow. Not only do item costs impact margin analysis, they are critical for certain Back-to-Back flows. For the
Back-to-Back Transfer flow it is vital to ensure that the ordered item has a cost associated to it at least in
the source organization. The transfer price of the item is derived based on its cost in the source
organization.
6. Release Planning Recommendations: While executing the Back-to-Back flow, an ESS job called Release
Planning Recommendations has to be scheduled to run at regular intervals to initiate the supply creation
Conclusion
Most of the issues that are encountered in the Back-to-Back supply creation and fulfillment flow can be addressed
by ensuring that the setups mentioned in this document are performed as advised. Not only does this serve as a
checklist of setups that have to be executed at the time of an implementation, these can be handy in troubleshooting
issues that occur in the maintenance and sustenance period post-implementation.
blogs.oracle.com/oracle
Copyright © 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is provided for information purposes only, and the
contents hereof are subject to change without notice. This document is not warranted to be error-free, nor subject to any other
facebook.com/oracle warranties or conditions, whether expressed orally or implied in law, including implied warranties and conditions of merchantability or
fitness for a particular purpose. We specifically disclaim any liability with respect to this document, and no contractual obligations are
formed either directly or indirectly by this document. This document may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any
twitter.com/oracle means, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose, without our prior written permission.
oracle.com Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
Intel and Intel Xeon are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation. All SPARC trademarks are used under license and
are trademarks or registered trademarks of SPARC International, Inc. AMD, Opteron, the AMD logo, and the AMD Opteron logo are
trademarks or registered trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices. UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group. 0417