Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation of An Improved Scoring System For The Grading of Direct Laryngos
Evaluation of An Improved Scoring System For The Grading of Direct Laryngos
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Summary
A modified version of the Cormack and Lehane scoring system was prospectively evaluated in 663
patients requiring tracheal intubation. In the modified system, grade 2 (only part of the glottis
visible) was divided into 2a (part of the cords visible) and 2b (only the arytenoids or the very
posterior origin of the cords visible). One hundred and sixty-two intubations (24.4%) were scored
as grade 2a and 43 (6.5%) as grade 2b, of which seven (4.3%) and 29 (67.4%), respectively, were
difficult, defined as requiring more than one laryngoscopy or the use of specialist equipment.
Grade 2b denotes a laryngoscopic view that is relatively common and is often associated with
difficulty passing a tracheal tube. The modified scoring system thus provides more information
than the original Cormack and Lehane system and its use should be considered when recording
the ease of tracheal intubation in the anaesthetic record or in studies of tracheal intubation.
......................................................................................
Correspondence to: Dr S. M. Yentis
Accepted: 1 May 1998
The four-grade scoring system described by Cormack and (any part of the inlet visible) being recorded in the patient’s
Lehane in 1984 [1] is widely used in clinical practice to notes even though considerable difficulty may have been
describe the view obtained at direct laryngoscopy, both for encountered at intubation. There is thus a need for a more
clinical studies and to aid anaesthetists involved in the sensitive scoring system. Others have proposed five or
subsequent management of patients in whom difficulty more grades with various modifications [3–5] but there
occurred. However, the Cormack and Lehane system was have so far been no evaluations of how useful the extra
described as a means of simulating difficult tracheal intu- information might be, especially in patients in whom
bation in order to teach trainees in obstetric general tracheal intubation has been awkward or difficult.
anaesthesia, not as a grading system for everyday recording The aims of this study were to apply a previously
of the view at laryngoscopy [1]. In addition, Cohen et al. described modified scoring system based on the Cormack
found that few anaesthetists realised that the original and Lehane system [6], ascertain the incidence of the
Cormack and Lehane system referred to the best view different grades in a population of general anaesthetic
obtained, i.e. with or without manipulation of the larynx. patients and, in cases where tracheal intubation was
They also found that there was considerable confusion as difficult, compare the information obtained with that
to what constituted the different grades [2]. noted during previous anaesthetics.
One problem with the Cormack and Lehane system is
that the more difficult laryngoscopies, scoring grades 3
Methods
(epiglottis only) or 4 (no laryngeal structure visible), are
relatively uncommon in clinical practice, whereas an Successive patients aged 16 years and over requiring
anaesthetist is more likely to experience difficulty in tracheal intubation for elective surgery, but excluding
tracheal intubation despite part of the laryngeal inlet those in whom rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia
being visible. This would lead to a grade 2 laryngoscopy was indicated, were studied. After discussion with the
Figure 1 Description of the two scoring systems used. E ¼ epiglottis, LI ¼ laryngeal inlet.
certain circumstances, for example the grade 1 view where described above when investigating laryngoscopic views,
intubation is hindered by a prominent but unfortunately especially when comparing groups.
placed tooth, or the grade 1 view that is obtained only after
the use of a specialist blade. References
It has been demonstrated that difficulty with tracheal
1 Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in
intubation can be defined in many ways, with large
obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 1105–11.
variations in the incidences obtained when different defi-
2 Cohen AM, Fleming BG, Wace JR. Grading of direct
nitions are adopted [9]. Whilst it might be argued that the laryngoscopy. A survey of current practice. Anaesthesia
only laryngoscopic views which truly make intubation 1994; 49: 522–5.
difficult are Cormack and Lehane grades 3 or 4, or possibly 3 Wilson ME, Speiglhalter D, Robertson JA, Lesser P.
even grade 4 alone, we would argue that although intuba- Predicting difficult intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia
tion in these situations may be more difficult, some extra 1988; 61: 211–6.
maneouvre or equipment is still required in a proportion 4 Cook TM, Nolan JP, Gabbott DA. Cricoid pressure: are
of grade 1 and 2 laryngoscopies (6.0% in our study overall) two hands better than one? Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 179–80.
and it is this fact which needs to be recorded. Authors of a 5 Rutter JM, Murphy PG. Cormack and Lehane revisited.
recent evaluation of a multivariate risk index for predicting Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 927.
6 Yentis SM. The effects of single-handed or bimanual
difficult intubation recognised this fact and defined diffi-
cricoid pressure on ease of tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia
culty as the requirement for intubation aids, resulting in an
1997; 52: 332–5.
overall incidence of 3.8% in general surgical patients 7 Takahata O, Kubota M, Mamiya K, et al. The efficacy of
compared with 7.1% in our study [10]. the ‘BURP’ maneuver during a difficult laryngoscopy.
One advantage of increasing the number of grades in the Anesthesia and Analgesia 1997; 84: 419–21.
Cormack and Lehane system is the increased sensitivity it 8 Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, et al. The intubation
confers when studying difficult intubation, given the difficulty scale (IDS). Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1290–7.
relative rarity of Cormack and Lehane grades 3 and 4 in 9 Rose DK, Cohen MM. The incidence of airway problems
general anaesthetic practice. Thus, studies which have depends on the definition used. Canadian Journal of
included relatively small numbers of subjects have found Anaesthesia 1996; 43: 30–4.
no statistical difference between laryngeal views using 10 Arne J, Descoins P, Fusciardi J, et al. Preoperative
assessment for difficult intubation in general and ENT
the conventional Cormack and Lehane system [11, 12],
surgery: predictive value of a clinical multivariate risk
whereas use of an expanded scoring system may result in a
index. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1998; 80: 140–6.
greater potential for studies to achieve statistical signifi- 11 Cook TM. Cricoid pressure: are two hands better than
cance because of its greater discerning ability [6]. In this one? Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 365–8.
respect, the above scoring system has no advantage over 12 Vanner RG, Clarke P, Moore WJ, Raftery S. The effect
other expanded systems. However, we would suggest that of cricoid pressure and neck support on the view at
researchers use an expanded system such as the one laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 896–900.