Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scholarship
Scholarship
Mrs. Scharf
ERWC
25 January 2019
The Cyclops
The story of Odysseus and the cyclops Polyphemus from Homer’s “Iliad” has spawned
many paintings as well as a movie based off of the story. However, there are many varying
portrayals of cyclopes throughout Greek mythology and history. For example, in Jacob Jordaens
painting, Polyphemus is shown as more human-like than other interpretations, giving you a
different perspective than the usual almost alien-like way he was more commonly depicted at the
time. For example, the fact that Polyphemus is more humanized in the painting may evoke more
thought about how Odysseus and his crew are intruding and causing the giant trouble, as they
took the liberty to do whatever they pleased to the giants possessions, including eating all of the
cheese that Polyphemus had stored. On the other hand, the movie of the same story depicts the
cyclops in a more malevolent light, showing Polyphemus becoming violent and aggressive
immediately, eating several crew members without question. However, these are just two
In Jordaens’ painting, Polyphemus is depicted on the left, hands outreached petting his
sheep, searching for Odysseus and his crew. Meanwhile, he and his crew are escaping under
Polyphemus’ sheep because he is only petting the tops of the sheep to let them pass. Still, some
of Odysseus’ crew are cowering further back in the painting. The main defining factor about this
painting is the fact of how human looking Polyphemus is. This could be meant to make the
viewer think deeper about maybe the fact that Odysseus and his men came disturbing
Polyphemus, and not vice versa. Acknowledging this concept, you realize the possible validity of
this, based on the fact that Polyphemus was living peacefully with his sheep making cheese and
wasn’t bothering anybody until Odysseus showed up. This style is very unique to other
depictions of the same scene, which tend to show him as more evil and cruel, however none of
Contrary to Jordaens’ portrayal of Polyphemus and the story in general, the Hollywood
movie version shows the whole story differently. It displays him as a huge beast ugly and
terrorizing the poor Odysseus and his crew. One thing the movie shows that pictures do not is the
fact that you can get more of a visual sense of what is going on, rather than having a still image.
book. The movie also lacks the ability to describe things that can be told in a book, such as
Odysseus and his crews emotions and thoughts. This detracts from the overall experience,
however having a video showing what is going in the surroundings is more descriptive and
When you compare the movie and painting, you will slowly begin to notice several subtle
similarities and differences between them. For example, in almost all renditions of the story,
Odysseus and his crew are scared of Polyphemus. On the other hand, the way the giant looks as
far as his facial features, size, and height, among many other things, vary significantly between
the two. They show Polyphemus as ugly, large, and unwelcoming in the movie, however in
Jordaens painting, he is painted in a more humanlike way, with similar facial features and body
build to a human. These along with various other features and details display just how differently
All in all, the story of the Cyclops has sparked many renditions of paintings, as well as a
movie based on the story. Because of the mass amounts of paintings, and the vagueness of the
original story, there have been limitless interpretations of Polyphemus and his struggle with
Odysseus and his crew. These can vary massively in the different versions and portrayals of the
story. For example, Jordaens’ painting depicts Polyphemus with more humanoid features ,
whereas the movie shows him as much larger and beastly. Overall, the story of Polyphemus and
Odysseus from Homer’s Iliad is one of history’s most prevalent stories, and as such over the
years has spurred the creation of many paintings and movies to be made portraying it.
there were still many minor diction errors and sentences that lacked proper structure or adequate
vocabulary. I added more pieces of evidence and improved my commentary on that evidence,
changing almost every sentence and adding one or two where it was needed. Some of the words I
used in the essay were repeated 10-12 times, such as “humanlike”, which I replaced with
stronger and more effective synonyms that described Polyphemus better and articulated my
thoughts better. There were also minor syntax mistakes that I cleaned up and made sentences