This document discusses animal rights and debates whether they should be abolished or regulated. It notes that some nations view animals as living beings rather than property and protect their rights. Advantages of animal rights mentioned include that animal testing does not necessarily benefit humans and fails to guarantee safety, and preventing animal testing could save water supplies. However, cons include that it could change medication testing processes and removing animal rights may reduce human risk. The document concludes by posing debate questions around banning animal testing, and views on vegetarian/vegan diets and whether animal rights should be abolished or regulated.
This document discusses animal rights and debates whether they should be abolished or regulated. It notes that some nations view animals as living beings rather than property and protect their rights. Advantages of animal rights mentioned include that animal testing does not necessarily benefit humans and fails to guarantee safety, and preventing animal testing could save water supplies. However, cons include that it could change medication testing processes and removing animal rights may reduce human risk. The document concludes by posing debate questions around banning animal testing, and views on vegetarian/vegan diets and whether animal rights should be abolished or regulated.
This document discusses animal rights and debates whether they should be abolished or regulated. It notes that some nations view animals as living beings rather than property and protect their rights. Advantages of animal rights mentioned include that animal testing does not necessarily benefit humans and fails to guarantee safety, and preventing animal testing could save water supplies. However, cons include that it could change medication testing processes and removing animal rights may reduce human risk. The document concludes by posing debate questions around banning animal testing, and views on vegetarian/vegan diets and whether animal rights should be abolished or regulated.
● Some nations and juridictions have begun to protect the rights of animals as living being instead of a property. What are the pros of animal rights? The death of an animal doesn´t realy benefit a human Saving animals lives would save our water suppy Animal testing is not a guarantee of safety Preventing animals rights is a costly venture
In the 1990s, up to 92% of products that were tested on animals
never made it to market.By the 2017s the figure rise to over 98% Animals have a certain intelligence to them What are the cons of animal rights? It would change medication testing processes Not having animal rights reduces human risk Animals will require a human representative Let's debate ● Should animal testing be banned? ● What do you think about vegetarian and vegan diets? ● Animal rights: abolition or regulation?