Name of Student: Joseph Mark T. Baldomar Submitted to: RANDE B.

DECHAVEZ,PhD
MAT SOC STUD Asso. Prof 2

MIDTERM EXAMINATION
Mgt 600 – Statistical Analysis in Mgt and Education

I. Compute for the Mean, Median and Mode for ungrouped data.

1) 44, 45, 45, 46, 46, 47, 48, 48, 49, 49, 50, 67, 78, 32
2) 55, 57, 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, 65, 65, 69, 70, 70, 70, 57, 67
3) 10, 10, 25, 25, 25, 35, 40, 53, 90, 125, 135, 245, 270, 309 ,410
4) 45, 30, 63, 57, 46, 67, 54, 51, 49, 44, 50, 66, 39, 55, 54, 60, 63, 67, 55, 57
5) 71, 53, 57, 45, 57, 65, 29, 35, 74, 52, 45, 58, 74, 59, 42, 61, 63, 43, 39, 53

II. Compute the mean, median and mode of the following data given below:
a. Class limit frequency

90 – 94 2 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
85 – 89 3 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
80 – 84 4 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
75 – 79 6 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
70 – 74 6 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
65 – 69 7 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
60 – 64 8 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
55 – 59 9 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
50 – 54 7 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
45 – 49 5 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
40 – 44 4 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
35 – 39 3 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
30 – 34 2 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
25 – 29 2 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
20 – 24 1 tjjyjyjyjytututydegdghdfhgnfgxhfghfghfg
III. The following is a list of scores of students in Stat 111 midterm examination
administered to 50 students

45 66 17 32 41
80 47 40 59 49
83 68 48 76 50
57 53 57 68 57
70 78 66 70 65
58 34 73 68 64
41 60 30 61 54
49 89 49 53 59
90 43 52 62 38
58 44 62 36 63
1. Make a tally
2. Construct frequency distribution using 5 as class interval.
3. Find the following measures :
a. Range e. D6 i. SD
 b. Q1 f. P45 j.Q
c. Q3 g. AD
d. D4 h. S2

IV. Given the data above compute the skewness and kurtosis and tell if the
frequency distribution is normal or abnormal.

V. The following are the score of 10 male and 10 female BS Math students in
Math 101. Test the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference
between the performance of male and female students in the said test. Use
the t – test at .05 level of significance. Tab value = 2.101
Male (X1) Female (X2)
10 7
16 11
29 29
25 14
31 20
27 16
31 10
24 28
37 30
43 29

VI. The data below represent the number of hours of pain relief provided by two
brands of mefenamic tablets administered to 24 subjects. These subjects
were randomly divided into two groups and each group was treated with a
different brand. Use the t – test at .05 level of significance to test the null
hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the average number
of hours of pain relief provided by the two brands of headache tablets. Tab
value = 2.074

Brand (X1) Brand (X2)

6 4
9 3
8 2
4 5
9 4
6 3
8 7
8 4
7 5
6 3
9 5
5 2
Good luck…
 MIDTERM EXAMINATION
Mgt 600 – Statistical Analysis in Mgt and Education

I. Compute for the Mean, Median and Mode for ungrouped data.

1) 44, 45, 45, 46, 46, 47, 48, 48, 49, 49, 50, 67, 78, 32
2) 55, 57, 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, 65, 65, 69, 70, 70, 70, 57, 67
3) 10, 10, 25, 25, 25, 35, 40, 53, 90, 125, 135, 245, 270, 309 ,410
4) 45, 30, 63, 57, 46, 67, 54, 51, 49, 44, 50, 66, 39, 55, 54, 60, 63, 67, 55, 57
5) 71, 53, 57, 45, 57, 65, 29, 35, 74, 52, 45, 58, 74, 59, 42, 61, 63, 43, 39, 53

Answer:

MEAN MEDIAN MODE REMARKS

1. 49.57 47.5 49, 48, 46, and 45 Multi modal
2. 62.875 63.5 70 and 57 Bimodal
3. 120.4667 53 25
4. 53.60 54.5 67, 57, 55, 54 Multi modal
5. 53.75 55 74, 57, 53, and 45 Multi modal

II. COMPUTE THE MEAN,MEDIAN AND MODEOF THE FOLLOWING DATA GIVEN
BELOW:

The MEAN for grouped data

Solution:

Class limit Frequency(fi) Xi fiXi <cf

90-94 2 92 184 69
85-89 3 87 261 67
80-84 4 82 328 64
75-79 6 77 462 60
70-74 6 72 432 54
65-69 7 67 469 48
60-64 8 62 496 41
55-59 9 57 513 33
50-54 7 52 364 24
45-49 5 47 235 17
40-44 4 42 168 12
35-39 3 37 111 8
30-34 2 32 64 5
25-29 2 27 54 3
20-24 1 22 22 1
n=69 ∑fixi=4163
 n 
   cf 
Mean 
 fixi
Median  LCB   2 c
 d1 
Mode  LCB    c
n  fud


  d1  d 2 
 
4163  2 
Mean  Mode  54.5   5
69  2 1
n 69 10
Mean  60.33 = = 34.5 Mode  54.5 
2 2 3
LCB = 59.5 Mode  54.5  3.33
<cf = 33 Mode  57.83
fµd = 8
 34.5  33.5 
Median  59.5   5
 8 
Median  59.5  0.9375
Median  60.44

III. The following is a list of scores of students in Stat 111 midterm examination
administered to 50 students

Ci Tally Frequency Midpoint X <cf

LL-UL
87-91 2 2 89 50
82-86 1 1 84 48
77-81 2 2 79 47
72-76 2 2 74 45
67-71 5 5 69 43
62-66 7 7 64 38
57-61 9 9 59 31
52-56 4 4 54 22
47-51 6 6 49 18
42-46 3 3 44 12
37-41 4 4 39 9
32-36 3 3 34 5
27-31 1 1 29 2
22-26 0 0 24 1
17-21 1 1 19 1
n= 50

a. Range = 90 – 17 =73
 N 
   cf   12.5  12 
b. Q1  LCB   4 i b. Q1  46.5   5
 fQ1   6 
 
 
n  0.5 
=12.5 Q1  46.5   5
4  6 
LCB = 46. 5 Q1 = 46.5 + 0.41667
 cf  12 Q1 = 46.92
fQ1 = 6
i=5

 3N 
   cf 
c. Q3  LCB   4 i
 fQ3 
 
 
3N 3(50)  37.5  31 
= = 37.5 Q3  61.5   5
4 4  7 
LCB= 61.5 Q3  61.5  4.64289  cf  31
Q3= 66.14
fQ3 = 7
i=5
 4N 
   cf 
d.D4 = LCB+  10 i
 fD4 
 
 
4N 4(50)  20  18 
= = 20 D4  51.5   5
10 10  4 
LCB =51.5 D4 =51.5 + 2.5
<cf =18 D4 = 54
fD4 = 4
i=5
 6N 
   cf 
e. D6 = LCB +  10 i
 fD6 
 
 
30  22 
D4 =51.5 + 
6N 6(50)
= = 30 5
10 10  9 
LCB =56.5 D6 =56.5 + 4.44
 cf  22 D4 = 60.94
fD6 = 9
i=5

 45 N 
   cf 
f. P45 = LCB +  100 i
 fP45 
 
 
45N 45(50)  22.5  22 
= = 22.5 P45 =51.5 +  5
100 100  9 
LCB = 56.5 P45 =56.5 + 0.27777
 cf  22 P45 = 56.77
fP45 = 9
i=5

 f x  x  n fx 2   fx
2 2

i. SD  
n  1 nn  1

50 172 770  2 840

2
SD 
5049
8 638 500  8 065 600
SD 
2 450
572 900
SD 
2 450
SD  233.8367
SD = 15.29
IV.Given the data above compute the skewness and kurtosis and tell if the
frequency distribution is normal or abnormal.

A. SKEWNESS
3 Mean  Median 
SK =
S tan dard Deviation
356.8  58.17 
SK =
15.29
3 1.3
SK =
15.29
 3.9
SK =
15.29
SK = - 0.26 Skewed to the left or negatively skewed. Thefrequency distribution is symmetric or normal.
B. KURTOSIS

 f x  x
4

Ku =
nS 4
13909574.24
Ku 
5015.29
4

13909574.24
Ku 
2732750.271
Ku = 5. 09
Remarks: 5.09 > 3, the distribution is leptokurtic.

Ci f x fx xx 
f xx 2

f xx 
4

87-91 2 89 178 32.2 1 428.84 2 041 583.746

82-86 1 84 84 27.2 0 0
77-81 2 79 158 22.2 772.84 597 281.6656
72-76 2 74 148 17.2 1 559.52 2 432 102.63
67-71 5 69 345 12.2 1 267.36 1 606 201.37
62-66 7 64 448 7.2 491.52 241 591.9104
57-61 9 59 531 2.2 365.04 133 254.2016
52-56 4 54 216 -2.8 31.36 983.4496
47-51 6 49 294 -7.8 43.56 1 897.4736
42-46 3 44 132 -12.8 362.88 131 681.8944
37-41 4 39 156 -17.8 774.2 553 833.64
32-36 3 34 102 -22.8 591.68 350 085.2224
27-31 1 29 29 -27.8 985.68 971 565.0624
22-26 0 24 0 -32.8 739.84 547 363.742
17-21 1 19 19 -37.8 2 073 4 300 148.742
N=50  fx  2 840  f x  x
4

=13909 574.24
 VII. The following are the score of 10 male and 10 female BS Math students in
Math 101. Test the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference
between the performance of male and female students in the said test. Use
the t – test at .05 level of significance. Tab value = 2.101

Male (X1) Female (X2)

10 7
16 11
29 29
25 14
31 20
27 16
31 10
24 28
37 30
44 29
 x1  273  x2  194
273 194
x1   27.3 x2   19.4
10 10

x1  x 2
t-Test=
s2
1 n1  1  s 22 n2 
 1
n1  n2   2
x1  x2
t=
s2
1 n1  1  s22 n2  1  1  1 
n1  n2   2 n n 
 1 2

(10 - 27.3) 2 + (16 - 27.3) 2 (29 - 27.3) 2 + (25 - 27.3) 2 + (31 - 27.3) 2 +

s12  (27 - 27.3) 2 + (31 - 27.3) 2 + (24 - 27.3) 2 + (37 - 27.3) 2 + (43 - 27.3) 2
10 - 1

s12  299.29 + 127.69 + 2.89 + 5.29 + 13.69 + 0.09 + 13.69 + 10.89 + 94.09 + 246.49
9

s12  819.1
9

s12  90.46
 (7 - 19.4) 2 + (11 - 19.4) 2 + (29 - 19.4) 2 + (14 - 19.4) 2 + (20 - 19.4) 2 +

s22  (16 - 19.4) 2  (10 - 19.4) 2 + (28 - 19.4) 2 + (30 - 19.4) + (29 - 19.4) 2
10 - 1

s22  153.76 + 70.56 + 92.16 + 29.16 + 0.36 + 11.56 + 88.36 + 73.96 + 112.36 + 92.16
9

s22  724.470
9

s22  80.48

t-test computed
x1  x2
=
s2
1 n1  1  s22 n2  1  1  1 
n1  n2   2  
 n1 n2 
27.3  19.4
=
90.969  80.489  1  1 
10  10  2 10 10 

27.3  19.4
=
90.969  80.489  2 
18 
10 

= 7.9
1538.46  2 
 
18  10 
7.9
=
85.47 0.2
7.9
=
17.094
7 .9
=
4.134489
t =1.911
H0
:There is no significant difference between the performance of the male and female BS-Math
students.
Ha
: There is significant difference between the performance of male and female BS-Math
students.
Conclusion: Since the t-test computed value 1.91 is less than thet-test criticalvalue2.101at 0.05
level of significance with 18 degrees of freedom, the Ho is accepted in favor of the Haalternative
hypothesis.

IV. The data below represent the number of hours of pain relief provided by
two brands of mefenamic tablets administered to 24 subjects. These subjects
were randomly divided into two groups and each group was treated with a
different brand. Use the t – test at .05 level of significance to test the null
hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the average number
of hours of pain relief provided by the two brands of headache tablets. Tab
value = 2.074

Brand (X1) Brand (X2)

6 4
9 3
8 2
4 5
9 4
6 3
8 7
8 4
7 5
6 3
9 5
5 2
 x1 85  x2  47
85 47
x1   7.08 x2   3.92
12 12

(6 - 7.08) 2 + (9 - 7.08) 2 + (8 - 7.08) 2 + (4 - 7.08) 2 + (9 - 7.08) 2 + (6 - 7.08) 2 +

s12  (8 - 7.08) 2 + (8 - 7.08) 2 + (7 - 7.08) 2 + (6 - 7.08) 2 + (9 - 7.08) 2 + (5 - 7.08) 2

12 - 1

1.1664 + 3.6864 + 0.8464 + 9.4864 + 3.6864 + 1.1664 +

s12  0.8464 + 0.8464 + 0.0064 + 1.1664 + 3.6864 + 4. 3264
11

s12  30.9168
11

s12  2.81
 (4 - 3.92) 2 + (3 - 3.92) 2 + (2 - 3.92) 2 + (5 - 3.92) 2 + (4 - 3.92) 2 + (3 - 3.92) 2

s22  (7 - 3.92)  (4 - 3.92) 2 + (5 - 3.92) 2 + (3 - 3.92) 2 + (5 - 3.92) 2 + (2 - 3.92) 2

2

12 - 1

0.0064  0.8464  3.6864  1.1664  0.0064  0.8464 

s22  9.4864  0.0064  1.1664  0.8464  1.1664  3.6864
11

s22  22.9168
11

s22  2.08

t-test computed
x1  x2
=
s n  1 s n
2
1 1
2
2  1  1
2  1
 
n1  n2   2 
 n1 n2 
7.08  3.92
=
2.8111  2.0811  1  1 
12  12  2 12 12 
3.16
=
30.91  22.88  2 
22  24 

3.16
=
53.79  2 
22   24 

3.16
=
2.4450.83
3.16
=
2.02935
3.16

1.2455256
t  2.218
H0
:Thereis no significant difference between the average number of hours of pain relief
Ha
provided by the two brands of headache tablets. : There is
significant difference between the average number of hours of pain relief provided by the two
brands of headache tablets.

Conclusion: Since the t-test computed value 2.218 is greater than the Tab value 2.074 at 0.05
level of significance , then Hois rejected andHaalternative hypothesis is accepted.

-------------------------------------------------- END -----------------------------------------------------------