Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Free and Open Net Is Under Attack, Again PDF
The Free and Open Net Is Under Attack, Again PDF
MENU
Contact Me About Me
https://blakesblog.com/2017/07/netneutrality/ 1/10
11/7/2017 The Free and Open Net Is Under Attack, Again
About two years ago, I wrote an article for Inc. Magazine warning of the
danger to the content neutrality of the Internet. At the time, the FCC
was considering a move that would essentially divide the Internet into
two traffic lanes—one for big business and one for everyone else. That
meant Internet Service Providers could create “fast lanes” for preferred
companies or content, leaving small businesses, charities, and individual
initiatives to wither on the old, slow networks.
https://blakesblog.com/2017/07/netneutrality/ 2/10
11/7/2017 The Free and Open Net Is Under Attack, Again
No one has felt this equalizing force of the Internet more than small,
independent ventures. Over the past three decades, we’ve seen
countless businesses catapulted from obscurity to success purely by
the power of the open Internet.
One of the two dissenting votes (and the most vocal opponent of Net
Neutrality) was cast by Ajit Pai, a commissioner whose background
includes work for Verizon as an Associate General Counsel. His reaction
to the net neutrality proposal was, “The Internet is not broken. There is
no problem to solve.” The translation is “there’s nothing unique that
https://blakesblog.com/2017/07/netneutrality/ 3/10
11/7/2017 The Free and Open Net Is Under Attack, Again
needs protection.” I respect Mr. Pai’s position as a vocal advocate for free
markets and I understand that he believes the result of Internet
regulation would be a decreased level of investment by network
providers. However, what Mr. Pai fails to understand is that in 2017, the
Internet is the free market and its openness is the key to its freedom.
Mr. Pai is now the Chairman of the FCC and with the welcoming of a new
administration to Washington, the entire political dynamic of the FCC
has changed. Under his leadership, the FCC has already voted to
reexamine the Net Neutrality policy that was formalized two years ago.
Worrisomely, the public conversation about this new threat to Net
Neutrality seems to be quietly advancing with much less attention than
last time.
https://blakesblog.com/2017/07/netneutrality/ 4/10
11/7/2017 The Free and Open Net Is Under Attack, Again
Imagine if your local mall could direct the entire budget of your city’s
planning department. Eventually all the roads to and from the mall
would be in pristine condition while the roads to Main Street shops
would fall into disrepair. When customers can no longer navigate the
potholes and overgrown rambles on Main Street, they simply won’t go
back and your town mall would hold a monopoly on brick and mortar
business. In this metaphor, Net Neutrality keeps the roads department
focusing on the entire area, not just the town’s big businesses.
https://blakesblog.com/2017/07/netneutrality/ 5/10
11/7/2017 The Free and Open Net Is Under Attack, Again
The reality of the Internet is that it has advanced well beyond being a
commodity. From the very first moment of network connectivity, we
were launched onto a path that culminates at one inflection point: the
Internet has become the most important marketplace for goods and
services in the history of humanity. The Internet’s commerce story
began much like the story of the Sears Roebuck catalog; let me explain.
During the mid- to late- 1800’s, America was racing ahead with Western
expansion. New towns and communities were forming, far away from the
more urbanized east coast, and the railroads and postal system served as
critical connections between the two sides of the country. Sears Roebuck
recognized that this infrastructure created an environment primed for a
mail-order business. They released the first catalog in 1894, and it
exploded in popularity because it gave consumers access to products
outside of their physical geography. For the first time, farmers in rural
Wyoming could purchase many of the same products as a person living
in New York City.
The big difference is that the Internet has always been far more than just
the catalog of one company; it’s the catalog of every idea, plus the
railroads, the postal system and the spirit of exploration rolled into one.
That is what is at risk when we talk about the end of Net Neutrality. How
different would the story of Sears Roebuck and the US be if the postal
service or railroads had simply said, “We won’t deliver your catalog.” It
doesn’t require endless amounts of analysis to realize the chilling effect
that would have had on the development of communities and businesses.
That same chilling effect is what is bound to happen without Net
Neutrality, only on a global scale.
These issues are the very reason the FCC moved to protect the Internet
two years ago. There is a precedent for protecting the Internet that
goes beyond economic theory. As far back as 1934, when the
Communications Act was passed, the telephone was recognized as
central to interstate commerce. Any attempt to manipulate access or
openness of the telephone system was more than just a threat to a
business or a consumer. It jeopardized the well-being of an entire
economic and social system. Conservative government regulations
through the FCC weren’t implemented to limit the use of the telephone
(or broadcasting or any of the other elements of the Communications
Act). They were implemented to ensure that what had become a
marketplace for innovation remained open and stable.
Similarly, the Internet needs to remain open and free if we want it, and
all of the connections and innovations it enables, to grow. Chairman Pai
and his colleagues regularly point to a study that shows investment in
network infrastructure declining by 5.6 percent over the last two years.
That argument has been debunked on a number of fronts, with one of
the most important being the investment cost in network infrastructure
is actually decreasing over time. They also claim that small ISPs have
told them over and over again that Title II (the 2015 Net Neutrality
policy) has prevented them from building new networks. And yet, only a
few days ago, 30 small ISPs petitioned the FCC to maintain Net Neutrality
because it gave them a fair playing field just like the small businesses
https://blakesblog.com/2017/07/netneutrality/ 7/10
11/7/2017 The Free and Open Net Is Under Attack, Again
and communities they serve. They shouldn’t be left to stand alone for the
future of the Internet.
July 12th will be an incredibly important day in the fight for a free and
open Internet. It’s been coined the “Day of Action,” and GoDaddy, along
with 40,000 other companies like Amazon, Netflix, Twitter, and
Kickstarter, will use our home pages and channels to encourage users to
get involved in the conversation. You’ll see banners, messages and pages
all asking you to comment on the FCC’s proposal.
It may seem like an uphill battle, but there is power in your voice. Even
Thomas Jefferson, a man renowned for his belief that a little government
goes a long way, once wrote, “the basis of our government is opinion of
the people.” Based on what I witnessed in 2015, I believe the opinion of
the people is clear: we have to maintain an open Internet. I’m hopeful
https://blakesblog.com/2017/07/netneutrality/ 8/10
11/7/2017 The Free and Open Net Is Under Attack, Again
that you will make your voice heard—and at such volume the FCC can’t
ignore the volume.
I’m hopeful that you will make your voice heard—and at such
volume the FCC can’t ignore the volume.
Archived in Business Culture, Ethics & Morality, GoDaddy Brand, Internet Policy, Leadership
Philosophy, Technology, Uncategorized, Very Small Business. Bookmark the permalink.
Share this article: Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Add a comment...
Previous article
https://blakesblog.com/2017/07/netneutrality/ 9/10
11/7/2017 The Free and Open Net Is Under Attack, Again
https://blakesblog.com/2017/07/netneutrality/ 10/10