Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUPREME COURT
Manila
AB,
Petitioner,
GR NO. 11-2015
-versus-
CC,
Respondent.
/------------------------------------------------/
THE PARTIES
TIMELINESS OF PETITION
3. Despite said demand letter, respondent failed to pay the rental rate.
On March 3, 2015 a second demand letter was executed by herein
petitioner which was received personally by respondent on the same
date, said demand letter is herein attached as ANNEX "E";
10. On September 28, 2015, petitioner received the order of the RTC
Br. 8 of Tacloban City granting the motion for reconsideration of
respondent, herein attached as ANNEX "J";
12. On November 20, 2015, the RTC Br. 8, Tacloban City petitioner
received the order denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration,
herein attached as ANNEX "L";
P a g e | 4 of 8
ISSUES RAISED
DISCUSSION
3. The respondent failed to pay the loan third and last installment of
the loan due on February 15, 2015 as stipulated in the Loan Contract and
duly signed by the respondent.
4. The petitioner's rights to his property were violated when the trial
court ignored the substantial and overwhelming evidence against the
respondent - contrary to Articles 19, 20 and 21 of the New Civil Code.
PRAYER
b. Costs of suit.
BY
I, AB, of legal age, after having been duly sworn, deposes and states
that:
3. I have read the contents thereof and the facts stated therein are true
and correct of my personal knowledge and/or on the basis of the
documents and records in my possession;
AB
Affiant
T.I.N. 216-777-222, Tacloban City
Doc. No. 1;
Page No. 2;
Book No. II;
Series of 2014.
Copy furnished:
Clerk of Court
RTC BR. 8, Tacloban City
Date of Receipt: ______________________
Signature: __________________________
Atty. TMZ
Counsel for Respondent
S and A Building, Juan Luna St.
Tacloban City
Date of Receipt:___________________
Signature:_____________________