Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LUCENA CITY
BY:
MARY grace L. gordula
MBA II
1ST Semester
2011-2012
10 SEPTEMBER 2011
AGRARIAN REFORM
Agrarian Reform Bill is basically the blueprint of an agricultural law, which is accepted
by different governmental authorities, to become a full-fledged law.
WHEREAS, by virtue of Proclamation No. 131 dated July 22, 1987 the Comprehensive Agrarian
Reform Program has been instituted;WHEREAS, there is a need to provide for the mechanisms
to start the implementation of the program; WHEREAS, public hearings and consultations were
held to determine appropriate mechanisms capable of being established;NOW, THEREFORE, I,
CORAZON C. AQUINO, President of the Philippines, by virtue of the powers vested in me by
the Constitution, do hereby order:
SECTION 1. Scope. - The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) shall cover,
regardless of tenurial arrangement and commodity produced, all public and private agricultural
lands as provided in Proclamation No. 131 dated July 22, 1987, including whenever applicable in
accordance with law, other lands of the public domain suitable to agriculture.
SEC. 3. Exemptions. - Lands actually used and found to be necessary for national defense,
school sites and campuses, religious purposes, penal colonies, and government research and
quarantine centers, are exempted from the coverage of the program.
SEC. 4. Compulsory Registration. - Within one hundred eighty (180) days from the effectivity of
this Order all natural and juridical persons, including government entities, owning, leasing or
managing agricultural lands shall file a sworn statement in the proper Assessor's Office in the
form to prescribed by the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR). This statement shall include
among others, (a) the description and area of the property; (b) the estimated average gross
income from the property; (c) the names of all tenants and regular farmworkers therein; (d) the
crop(s) planted in the property and the area covered by each crop as of June 1, 1987; (e) the
terms of mortgages, leases, and management contracts subsisting as of June 1, 1987; (f) the latest
declared market value of the land as determined by the City/Provincial Assessor; and (g) a sworn
declaration of the current fair market value, which the owner wishes to receive if the property
should be acquired by the government for agrarian reform purposes.If the landowner fails to
register within the prescribed period, the government shall base the valuation of his property for
landowner compensation purposes on the City/Provincial Assessor's value. Beginning with the
quarter immediately following this registration, the real property tax payable shall be based on
the abovementioned owner's declaration of current fair market value.
SEC. 5. Procedure of Acquisition. - After the land, landowners, and beneficiaries shall have been
identified, the DAR shall publish its decision to acquire the land and notify the landowners
thereof, together with the offer of the DAR to pay for the land as provided in Section 6
hereunder. Within fifteen (15) days from publication and notice, the landowner shall signify to
the DAR his acceptance or rejection of the offer. If the landowner accepts the offer of the DAR,
the Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) shall pay the landowner the purchase price of the land
within fifteen (15) days after he surrenders the Certificate of Title and other relevant documents
required by the DAR and the LBP. In case of rejection or if no reply is received, the DAR shall
conduct administrative summary proceedings to determine the compensation for the land,
requiring the landowner, the LBP, and other interested parties to submit within fifteen (15) days
from the receipt of notice, evidence as to the compensation for the land. After the expiration of
the above period, the matter is deemed submitted for decision. Within fifteen (15) days from
receipt of the decision, the LBP shall establish a trust fund for the landowner concerned in the
amount decided and notify the landowner and the DAR of its establishment.Any party who
disagrees with the decision may bring the matter to the proper court for determination of just
compensation. After the establishment of the trust fund or receipt by the DAR of the landowner's
acceptance of the offer, the DAR shall take immediate possession of the land. Upon formal
notification by the DAR, the Register of Deeds shall issue a Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) in
the name of the Republic of the Philippines as Trustee for and in behalf of qualified
beneficiaries. Thereupon, the DAR shall proceed with the redistribution of the land to the
qualified beneficiaries. The rights and responsibilities of ownership by the beneficiaries
commence at the time of their beneficiaries at the time of their designation as awardees-owners
by the DAR, as evidenced by a Certificate of Landownership Award in their favor.
SEC. 6. Compensation to Landowners. - The LBP shall compensate the landowner an amount to
be established by the government, which shall be based on the owner's declaration of current fair
market value as provided in Section 4 hereof, but subject to certain controls to be defined and
promulgate by the Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC) as provided in Section 18
hereof. The compensation shall be paid in any of the following modes, be paid in any of the
following modes, at the option of the landowner: Bond payment over ten (10) years, with ten
(10) percent of the value of the land payable immediately in cash and the land payable
immediately in cash and the balance in the form of LBP bonds bearing market rates of interest
that are aligned with 91-day treasury bills rates, net of applicable final withholding tax. One-
tenth of the face value of the bonds shall mature every year from the date of issuance until the
tenth year; The LBP bonds issued hereunder shall be eligible at face value for the purchase of
government assets to be privatized; Direct payment in cash or kind by the farmer-beneficiaries
with the terms to be mutually agreed upon by the beneficiaries and landowners and subject to the
approval of the DAR; and Other modes of payment as may be prescribed or approved by the
PARC.
SEC. 7. Assistance to Landowners. - Landowners affected by this Order shall be assisted and
provided by the LBP with the following services: a. Investment information and counseling
assistance; b. Conversion and/or exchange of LBP bonds to/from government stocks and/or with
government assets; and c. Marketing of LBP bonds.
SEC. 8. Voluntary Land Transfer. - Landowners whose lands are subject to redistribution under
this Order have the option of entering into a voluntary agreement for direct transfer of their lands
to appropriate beneficiaries, under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties and subject to
the approval of the DAR. The general guidelines for voluntary land transfer are: The
beneficiaries are determined by the DAR to be the same individuals who would be eligible to
purchase the land in case the government under this Order acquired the land for resale;. The area
of land to be transferred is no less than the area which the government, under this Order, would
otherwise acquire for resale;. The terms and conditions of the government's standing offer to
purchase from the landowner and standing offer to resell to the beneficiaries are fully known and
understood by both parties. The voluntary transfer agreement shall include sanctions for non-
compliance by either party and shall be binding and irrevocable for both parties, shall be duly
recorded at and monitored by the DAR.
SEC. 9. Voluntary Offer to Sell - The government shall purchase all agricultural lands it deems
productive and suitable to farmer cultivation voluntarily offered for sale to it at a valuation
determined in accordance with Section 6. Such transactions shall be exempt from the payment of
capital gains tax and other taxes and fees.
SEC. 10. Corporate Landowners. - Corporate landowners may give their workers and other
qualified beneficiaries the right to purchase such proportion of the capital stock of the
corporation that the land assets bear in relation to the corporation's total assets, and grant
additional compensation which may be used for this purposes. The approval by the PARC of a
plan for such stock distribution, and its initial implementation, shall be deemed compliance with
the land distribution requirements of the CARP.
SEC. 11. Leases, Management Contracts, Mortgages, and Claims.- Leases and management
contracts on land covered by land distribution and registered with the Register of Deeds prior to
the approval of this Order may continue under their original terms and conditions, but not
beyond five (5) years from the effectivity of this leases and management contracts may only be
renewed subject to the agreement of the qualified beneficiaries; and provided further that upon
the distribution or award of the land, where the existing lease rentals are not acceptable to the
qualified beneficiaries, such rentals shall be renegotiated with the assistance of the Barangay
Agrarian Reform Council (BARC). If the parties fail to agree, the DAR shall determine the
rental. Mortgages and other claims registered with the Register of Deeds will be assumed by the
government up to the landowner's compensation value as provided for in Section 6 hereof.
SEC. 12. Payment of Beneficiaries. - Land acquired and redistributed by the government shall be
paid for by the beneficiaries in thirty (30) equal annual payments at six (6) percent per annum
interest, with the first payment due one year after resale, and a two (2) percent interest rebate for
amortizations paid on time, provided, that in no case shall the annual amortizations exceed ten
(10) percent of the land's annual value of gross production. Should the amortization exceed ten
(10) percent, the LBP shall reduce the interest rate and/or reduce the principal obligation to make
the repayments affordable. Incentives shall be given for prepayments. The LBP shall have a lien
by way of mortgage on the land acquired by the beneficiary and this mortgage may be foreclosed
by the LBP when the outstanding principal balance unpaid and past due reaches the equivalent of
three (3) annual amortizations.
SEC. 13. Credit Support. - Upon land transfer, each beneficiary who actually farms his land shall
be eligible for a production loan to finance one crop cycle under terms and conditions to be
determined by the LBP on a case to case basis, renewable upon repayment.
SEC. 14. Collection or Individual Ownership - For lands with multiple beneficiaries, ownership
of whole parcels or estates may be transferred to the farmer-beneficiaries collectively or
individually, at the option of the beneficiaries, provided, that in collective ownership, each
beneficiary shall have an undivided share of the land held in common equivalent to not more
than the applicable retention limit. The beneficiaries may collectively decide on the continued
operation of the parcel/estate as a whole or to subdivide the same into individual lots and
determine the manner in which such subdivision is to be implemented.
SEC. 15. Distribution and Utilization of Public Lands - All alienable and disposable lands of the
public domain suitable for agriculture and outside proclaimed settlements shall be distributed by
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to qualified beneficiaries as
certified to jointly by the DAR and the DENR.
SEC. 16. Production Sharing. - Individuals or entities owing and/or operating under lease
agricultural lands with gross sales in excess of Five Million Pesos (P5 million) per annum are
hereby mandated to execute a production sharing salary plan whereby at least two and one-half
(2.5) percent of the gross sales from the production/cultivation of such lands are distributed as
compensation to the farmworkers over and above the compensation they currently receive,
provided that such individuals or entities are not obligated to pay more than 100 percent of the
regular and annual compensation of the farmworkers.
SEC. 17. Quasi-Judicial Powers of the DAR. - The DAR is hereby vested with quasi-judicial
powers to determine and adjudicate agrarian reform mattes, and shall have exclusive original
jurisdiction over all matters involving implementation of agrarian reform, except those falling
under the exclusive original jurisdiction of the DENR and the Department of Agriculture (DA).
The DAR shall have powers to punish for contempt and to issue subpoena, subpoena duces
tecum and writs to enforce its orders or decisions. The decisions of the DAR may, in proper
cases, be appealed to the Regional Trial Courts but shall be immediately executory
notwithstanding such appeal.
SEC. 18. - The Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC). - To coordinate the
implementation of the CARP and to ensure the timely and effective delivery of the necessary
support services, there is hereby created the Presidential Agrarian Reform Council composed of
the President as Chairman, and the Secretaries or Heads of the following agencies, as follows:
Department of Agrarian Reform - Vice Chairman, Department of Agriculture- Vice Chairman
Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Vice Chairman, Executive Secretary –
Member, Department of Budget and Management- Member, Department of Finance- Member,
Department of Justice- Member, Department of Labor and Employment- Member, Department of
Local Government- Member Department of Public Works and Highways – Member Department
of Trade & Industry – Member, Department of Transportation and Communications -
Member National Economic and Development Authority- Member, LandBank of the
Philippines- Member, Presidential Commission on Good Government- Member The President
shall appoint representatives of agrarian reform beneficiaries and affected landowners as
members of PARC. The DAR shall provide the Secretariat for the PARC and the Secretary of
Agrarian Reform shall be the Director-General thereof. The PARC shall formulate and/or
implement the policies, rules and regulations shall include the following: Recommend small
farm economy areas, which shall be specific by crop and based on through technical study and
evaluation; The schedule of acquisition and redistribution of specific agrarian reform areas,
provided that such acquisition shall not be implemented until all the requirements are completed
including the first payment to the landowners concerned. Control mechanisms for evaluating the
owner's declaration of current fair market value as provided in Section 4 hereof in order to
establish the government's compensation offer as provided in Section 6 hereof, taking into
account current land transactions in the locality, the landowner's annual income from his land,
and other factors. PARC shall have an Executive Committee composed of the Secretary of
Agrarian Reform as Chairman, and Secretaries or Heads of the following agencies as members:
Executive Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Department of Finance, Department of Public Works and Highways, Land Bank of
the Philippines. Within ninety (90) days from the effectivity of this Order, the Executive
Committee of PARC shall complete a Program of implementation incorporating the physical
targets, implementation schedule and support requirements of agrarian reform and shall submit
the same to the PARC for approval. Such program of implementation shall take into account, and
be consistent with, priorities and retention limits that Congress may in the meantime prescribe,
and the following basic policies and guidelines set forth in the Constitution: The CARP is
founded on the right of farmers and regular farmworkers, who are landless, to own directly of
collectively, the lands they till or, in the case of other farmworkers, to receive a just share of the
fruits thereof: The right of small landowners shall be respected; Voluntary land-sharing shall be
encouraged; Farmers, farmworkers, landowners, cooperatives and/or independent farmer's
organizations have the right to participate in the planning organization, and management of the
CARP; In lands of the public domain, the CARP shall respect prior rights, homestead rights of
small settlers, and the rights of indigenous communities to their ancestral lands; Support to
agriculture through appropriate technology and research, and adequate financial, production,
marketing, and other support services must be provided; Landowners shall be encouraged to
invest the proceeds of the agrarian reform to promote industrialization, employment creation, and
privatization of public sector enterprises; and At the earliest possible time, idle or abandoned
agricultural lands as may be defined by law shall be expropriated for distribution to the
beneficiaries of the agrarian reform program.
SEC. 19. Barangay Agrarian Reform Council (BARC). - On matters related to agrarian reform,
the DAR shall convene at the barangay level, a Barangay Agrarian Reform Council. The BARC
shall be operated on a self-help basis and will be composed of the following: Representative/s of
farmer and farmworker beneficiaries; Representative/s of farmer and farmwoker non-
beneficiaries; Representative/s of agriculture cooperatives; Representative/s of other farmer
organizations; Representative/s of the Barangay Council; Representative/s of non-government
organizations (NGOs); Representative/s of landowners; DA official assigned to the barangay;
DENR official assigned to the area; DAR Agrarian Reform Technologist assigned to the area
who shall act as the Secretary; and Land Bank of the Philippines representative. The functions of
the BARC shall be: To participate and give support to the implementation of programs on
agrarian reform; To mediate, conciliate or arbitrate agrarian conflicts and issues that are brought
to it for resolution; and To perform such other functions that the PARC, its Executive Committee,
or the DAR Secretary may delegate from time to time.
CHAPTER V. – FINANCING
SEC. 20. Agrarian Reform Fund. - As provided in Proclamation No. 131 dated July 22, 1987, a
special fund is created, known as The Agrarian Reform Fund, an initial amount of FIFTY
BILLION PESOS (P50 billion) to cover the estimated cost of the CARP from 1987 to 1992
which shall be sourced from the receipts of the sale of the assets of the Asset Privatization Trust
(APT) and receipts of sale of ill-gotten wealth recovered through the Presidential Commission on
Good Government and such other sources as government may deem appropriate. The amount
collected and accruing to this special fund shall be considered automatically appropriated for the
purpose authorized in this Order.
SEC. 22. Permanent Disqualification. - Persons, associations, or entities who prematurely enter
the land to avail themselves of the rights and benefits hereunder, shall be permanently
disqualified from receiving benefits and shall forfeit their rights hereunder.
SEC. 23.Contempt, Persons, associations, or entities who willfully prevent or obstruct the
implementation of the CARP shall be liable for contempt.
SEC. 24. Ancestral Lands. - Within the framework of national unity and development, the rights
of indigenous cultural communities to their ancestral lands are hereby protected to ensure their
economic, social, and cultural well-being.
SEC. 26. Assistance of other Government Entities. - The PARC in the exercise of its functions is
hereby authorized to call upon the assistance and support of other government agencies, bureaus,
and offices, including government-owned or controlled corporations.
SEC. 27. Applications of Existing Legislation. - Presidential Decree No. 27, as amended, shall
continue to operate with respect to rice and corn lands, covered thereunder. The provisions of
Republic Act No. 3844 and other agrarian laws not inconsistent with this Order shall have
suppletory effect.
SEC. 28. Free Registration of Patents and Titles. - All Registers of Deeds are hereby directed to
register free from payment of all fees, patents, titles and documents required in the
implementation of the CARP.
SEC. 29. Separability Clause. - If, for any reason, any section or provision of this Order shall be
held unconstitutional or invalid, no other section or provision hereof shall be affected thereby.
SEC. 30. Repealing Clause. - All laws, issuances, decrees or any part of parts thereof
inconsistent with the provisions of this Order are hereby repealed or amended accordingly.
SEC. 31. Effectivity Clause. - This Executive Order shall take effect fifteen (15) days after
publication in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines.
The Reproductive Health bills, popularly known as theRH Bill, are Philippinebills
aiming to guarantee universal access to methods and information on birth control and maternal
care. The bills have become the center of a contentious national debate. There are presently two
bills with the same goals: House Bill No. 4244 or An Act Providing for a Comprehensive
Policy on Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health, and Population and Development,
and For Other Purposes introduced by Albay 1st district Representative Edcel Lagman, and
Senate Bill No. 2378 or An Act Providing For a National Policy on Reproductive Health and
Population and Development introduced by Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago.
While there is general agreement about its provisions on maternal and child health, there
is great debate on its key proposal that the Filipino taxpayer and the private sector will fund and
undertake widespread distribution of family planning devices such as birth control pills (BCPs)
and IUDs, as the government continues to disseminate information on their use through all health
care centers. Private companies and the public and private elementary and secondary school
system will be required to participate in this information and product dissemination as a way of
controlling the fast growing population of the Philippines.
The bill is highly decisive, with experts, academics, religious institutions, and major
political figures both supporting and opposing it, often criticizing the government and each other
in the process. The issue is so divisive that at one point, the Catholic Bishops Conference of the
Philippines threatened to excommunicate the President, Benigno Aquino III if he supported the
bill.
Background
The first time the Reproductive Health Bill was proposed was in 1998.
During the present 15th Congress, the RH Bills filed are those authored by (1) House Minority
Leader Edcel Lagman of Albay, HB 96; (2) Iloilo Rep. Janette Garin, HB 101, (3) Akbayan
Representatives Kaka Bag-ao & Walden Bello; HB 513, (4) Muntinlupa Representative Rodolfo
Biazon, HB 1160, (5) Iloilo Representative Augusto Syjuco, HB 1520, (6) Gabriela Rep.
Luzviminda Ilagan. In the Senate, Sen. Michael Angelo F. Perolina has filed her own version of
the RH bill which, she says, will be part of the country’s commitment to international covenants.
On January 31, 2011, the House of Representatives Committee on Population and Family
Relations voted to consolidate all House versions of the bill, which is entitled An Act Providing
for a Comprehensive Policy on Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health and Population
Development and for Other Purposes
Stated purpose
One of the main concerns of the bill, is that the population of the Philippines makes it
“the 12th most populous nation in the world today”, that the Filipino women’s fertility rate is “at
the upper bracket of 206 countries.” It states that studies and surveys “show that the Filipinos are
responsive to having smaller-sized families through free choice of family planning methods.” It
also refers to studies which “show that rapid population growth exacerbates poverty while
poverty spawns rapid population growth.” And so it aims for improved quality of life through a
“consistent and coherent national population policy.”
History
According to the Senate Policy Brief titled Promoting Reproductive Health, the history of
reproductive health in the Philippines dates back to 1967 when leaders of 12 countries including
the Philippines'Ferdinand Marcos signed the Declaration on Population. The Philippines agreed
that the population problem be considered as the principal element for long-term economic
development. Thus, the Population Commission (Popcom) was created to push for a lower
family size norm and provide information and services to lower fertility rates.
Starting 1967, the USAID started shouldering 80% of the total family planning
commodities (contraceptives) of the country, which amounted to US$ 3 Million annually.
In 1975, the United States adopted as its policy the National Security Study
Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and
Overseas Interests (NSSM200). The policy gives "paramount importance" to population control
measures and the promotion of contraception among 13 populous countries, including the
Philippines to control rapid population growth which they deem to be inimical to the socio-
political and economic growth of these countries and to the national interests of the United
States, since the "U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from
abroad", and these countries can produce destabilizing opposition forces against the United
States. It recommends the US leadership to "influence national leaders" and that "improved
world-wide support for population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis
on mass media and other population education and motivation programs by the U.N., USIA, and
USAID."
Different presidents had different points of emphasis. President Marcos pushed for a systematic
distribution of contraceptives all over the country, a policy that was called "coercive," by its
leading administrator. The Cory Aquino administration focused on giving couples the right to
have the number of children they prefer, while the Ramos presidency shifted from population
control to population management. Estrada used mixed methods of reducing fertility rates, while
Arroyo focused on mainstreaming natural family planning, while stating that contraceptives are
openly sold in the country.
In 1989, the Philippine Legislators’ Committee on Population and Development
(PLCPD) was established, "dedicated to the formulation of viable public policies requiring
legislation on population management and socio-economic development."
In 2000, the Philippines signed the Millennium Declaration and committed to attain the
MDG goals by 2015, including promoting gender equality and health. In 2003, USAID started its
phase out of a 33 year old program by which free contraceptives where given to the country. Aid
recipients such as the Philippines faced the challenge to fund its own contraception program. In
2004, the Department of Health introduced the Philippines Contraceptive Self-Reliance Strategy,
arranging for the replacement of these donations with domestically provided contraceptives.
In August 2010, the government announced a collaborative work with the USAID in
implementing a comprehensive marketing and communications strategy in favor of family
planning called "May Plano Ako" (I Have a Plan).
Key definitions
House Bills 101 and 513, and Senate Bill 2378 define the term "reproductive health care"
as follows:
Reproductive Health Care - refers to the state of complete physical, mental and social
well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the
reproductive system and to its functions and processes. This implies that people are able to have
a satisfying and safe sex life, that they have the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide
if, when and how often to do so, provided that these are not against the law. This further implies
that women and men attain equal relationships in matters related to sexual relations and
reproduction.
House Bill 96 replaces "have a satisfying and safe sex life" with "enjoy responsible and
safe sex" but is otherwise identical in its definition. House Bill 1160 omits "a satisfying and" but
is otherwise identical. House Bill 3387 omits the word "complete" before physical, and replaces
"attain" with "are afforded," but is otherwise identical.
Reproductive Rights are defined by House Bills 101, 513, 1160, 3387, and Senate Bill
2378 as follows: the rights of individuals and couples, to decide freely and responsibly whether
or not to have children; the number, spacing and timing of their children; to make other decisions
concerning reproduction free of discrimination, coercion and violence; to have the information
and means to do so; and to attain the highest standard of sexual and reproductive health.
House Bill 96 replaces "other decisions" with "allied decisions," but is otherwise identical.
The opposition says that by supporting such definitions, the country will guarantee this same
right of having "a satisfying and safe sex life" and the freedom of decision to unmarried children
and teenagers, since they are "people" and "individuals." They argue that this will lead to
promiscuity among the young. They say that the terminology is part of deceptive "verbal
engineering" since RH is not in favor of reproduction, and contraceptives are not healthy, but RH
is presented as something good.
The basic content of the Consolidated Reproductive Health Bill is divided into the
following sections.
1. Title
2. Declaration of Policy
3. Guiding Principles
4. Definition of Terms
5. Midwives for Skilled Attendance
6. Emergency Obstetric Care
7. Access to Family Planning
8. Maternal and Newborn Health Care in Crisis Situations
9. Maternal Death Review
10. Family Planning Supplies as Essential Medicines
11. Procurement and Distribution of Family Planning Supplies
12. Integration of Family Planning and Responsible Parenthood Component in Anti-Poverty
Programs
13. Roles of Local Government in Family Planning Programs
14. Benefits for Serious and Life-Threatening Reproductive Health Conditions
15. Mobile Health Care Service
16. Mandatory Age-Appropriate Reproductive Health and Sexuality Education
17. Additional Duty of the Local Population Officer
18. Certificate of Compliance
19. Capability Building of Barangay Health Workers
20. Ideal Family Size
21. Employers’ Responsibilities
22. Pro Bono Services for Indigent Women
23. Sexual And Reproductive Health Programs For Persons With Disabilities (PWDs)
24. Right to Reproductive Health Care Information
25. Implementing Mechanisms
26. Reporting Requirements
27. Congressional Oversight Committee
28. Prohibited Acts
29. Penalties
30. Appropriations
31. Implementing Rules and Regulations
32. Separability Clause
33. Repealing Clause
34. Effectivity
Summary of major provisions
The bill mandates the government to “promote, without bias, all effective natural and
modern methods of family planning that are medically safe and legal.”
Although abortion is recognized as illegal and punishable by law, the bill states that “the
government shall ensure that all women needing care for post-abortion complications shall be
treated and counseled in a humane, non-judgmental and compassionate manner.”
The bill calls for a “multi-dimensional approach” integrates a component of family
planning and responsible parenthood into all government anti-poverty programs.
Under the bill, age-appropriate reproductive health and sexuality education is required
from grade five to fourth year high school using “life-skills and other approaches.”
The bill also mandates the Department of Labor and Employment to guarantee the reproductive
health rights of its female employees. Companies with less than 200 workers are required to
enter into partnership with health care providers in their area for the delivery of reproductive
health services.
Employers are obliged to monitor pregnant working employees among their workforce
and ensure they are provided paid half-day prenatal medical leaves for each month of the
pregnancy period that they are employed.
The national government and local governments will ensure the availability of
reproductive health care services, including family planning and prenatal care.
Any person or public official who prohibits or restricts the delivery of legal and
medically safe reproductive health care services will be meted penalty by imprisonment or a fine.
Summary of support and criticism
Proponents argue: (1) Economic studies, especially the experience in Asia show that rapid
population growth and high fertility rates, especially among the poor, exacerbate poverty and
make it harder for the government to address it. (2) Empirical studies show that poverty
incidence is higher among big families. Smaller families and wider birth intervals could allow
families to invest more in each child’s education, health, nutrition and eventually reduce poverty
and hunger at the household level. (3) Ten to eleven maternal deaths daily could be reduced if
they had access to basic healthcare and essential minerals like iron and calcium, according to the
DOH; (4) Studies show that 44% of the pregnancies in the poorest quintile are unanticipated, and
among the poorest women who would like to avoid pregnancy, at least 41% do not use any
contraceptive method because of lack of information or access. and "Among the poorest families,
22% of married women of reproductive age express a desire to avoid pregnancies but are still not
using any family planning method," (5) use of contraception, which the World Health
Organization has listed as essential medicines, will lower the rate of abortions as it has done in
other parts of the world, according to the Guttmacher Institute.(6) An SWS survey of 2008
showed that 71% of the respondents are in favor of the bill, (7) at the heart of the bill is the free
choice given to people on the use of reproductive health, enabling the people, especially the poor
to have the number of children they want and can care for.
Opponents of the bill argue that: (1) "The world's leading scientific experts" have
resolved the issues related to the bill and show that the "RH Bill is based on wrong economics"
as the 2003 Rand Corporation study shows that "there is little cross-country evidence that
population growth impedes or promotes economic growth". (2) The bill takes away limited
government funds from treating many high priority medical and food needs and transfers them to
fund harmful and deadly devices. The latest studies in scientific journals and organizations show
that the ordinary birth control pill, and the IUD[ are abortifacient to fertilized eggs: they kill
young human embryos, who as such are human beings equally worthy of respect, making the bill
unconstitutional.(3) Leading secular social scientists like Nobel prize winner, George Akerlof
and US National Defense Consultant, Lionel Tiger, have shown empirical evidence that
contraceptives have deleterious social effects (abortion, premarital sex, female impoverishment,
fatherless children, teenage pregnancies, and poverty). Harvard Director Edward Green
concluded that the "best studies" show that more condoms promote the spread of AIDS.
Combined estrogen-progestogen oral contraceptives (the most common type prescribed globally)
are carcinogenic, and confers other serious health risks. The increased usage of contraceptives,
which implies that some babies are unwanted, will eventually lead to more abortion. (4) People's
freedom to access contraceptives is not restricted by any opposing law, being available in family
planning NGOs, stores, etc. The country is not a welfare state: taxpayer's money should not be
used for personal practices that are harmful and immoral; it can be used to inform people of the
harm of BCPs. (5) A 2009 survey showed that 92% rejected the bill when informed of its detailed
provisions and penalties. (6) The penal provisions constitute a violation of free choice and
conscience, and establishes religious persecution.
President Aquino stated he was not an author of the bill. He also stated that he gives full support
to a firm population policy, educating parents to be responsible, providing contraceptives to
those who ask for them, but he refuses to promote contraceptive use. He said that his position "is
more aptly called responsible parenthood rather than reproductive health."
Economic and demographic premises
The Philippines are densely populated, with a density over 300 per squared kilometer,
and the population growth rate is 2.04 (2007 Census), 1.957% (2010 est. by CIA World Fact
Book), or 1.85% (2005-2010 high variant estimate by the UN Population Division, World
Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision) coming from 3.1 in 1960. The 2010 total fertility rate
(TFR) is 3.23 births per woman, from a TFR of 7 in 1960. In addition, the total fertility rate for
the richest quintile of the population is 2.0, which is about one third the TFR of the poorest
quintile (5.9 children per woman). The TFR for women with college education is 2.3, about half
that of women with only an elementary education (4.5 children per woman).
Congressman Lagman states that the bill "recognizes the verifiable link between a huge
population and poverty. Unbridled population growth stunts socioeconomic development and
aggravates poverty."]
The University of the Philippines' School of Economics presented two papers in support
of the bill: Population and Poverty: the Real Score (2004), and Population, Poverty, Politics and
the Reproductive Health Bill (2008). According to these economists, which include Solita
Monsod, Gerardo Sicat, Cayetano Paderanga, Ernesto M. Pernia, and Stella Alabastro-Quimbo,
"rapid population growth and high fertility rates, especially among the poor, do exacerbate
poverty and make it harder for the government to address it," while at the same time clarifying
that it would be "extreme" to view "population growth as the principal cause of poverty that
would justify the government resorting to draconian and coercive measures to deal with the
problem (e.g., denial of basic services and subsidies to families with more than two children)."
They illustrate the connection between rapid population growth and poverty by comparing the
economic growth and population growth rates of Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines,
wherein the first two grew more rapidly than the Philippines due to lower population growth
rates. They stressed that "the experience from across Asia indicates that a population policy cum
government-funded [family planning] program has been a critical complement to sound
economic policy and poverty reduction.
In Population and Poverty, Aniceto Orbeta, Jr, showed that poverty incidence is higher
among big families: 57.3% of Filipino families with seven children are in poverty while only
23.8% of families who have two children live below the poverty threshold.
Proponents argue that smaller families and wider birth intervals resulting from the use of
contraceptives allow families to invest more in each child’s education, health, nutrition and
eventually reduce poverty and hunger at the household level. At the national level, fertility
reduction cuts the cost of social services with fewer people attending school or seeking medical
care and as demand eases for housing, transportation, jobs, water, food and other natural
resources.The Asian Development Bank in 2004 also listed a large population as one of the
major causes of poverty in the country, together with weak macroeconomic management,
employment issues, an underperforming agricultural sector and an unfinished land reform
agenda, governance issues including corruption.
Criticism of premises
Opposing the bill, Former Finance Secretary Roberto de Ocampo wrote that it is "truly
disingenuous for anyone to proceed on the premise that the poor are to blame for the nation’s
poverty." He emphasized that the government should apply the principle of first things first and
focus on the root causes of the poverty (e.g. poor governance, corruption) and apply many other
alternatives to solve the problem (e.g. giving up pork barrel, raising tax collection efficiency).
They also point to the five factors for high economic growth and reduction of poverty shown by
the 2008 Commission on Growth and Development headed by Nobel prize winner Michael
Spence, which does not include population control.
Opponents also refer to a 2003 Rand Corporation study which concluded that "there is
little cross-country evidence that population growth impedes or promotes economic
growth...population neutralism has in fact been the predominant school in thinking among
academics about population growth for the last half-century." In his Primerwhich critiques the
bill, Economist Roberto de Vera refers to Nobel prize winner Simon Kuznets's study which
concludes that “no clear association appears to exist in the present sample of countries, or is
likely to exist in other developed countries, between rates of growth of population and of product
per capita." Julian Simon compared parallel countries such as North and South Korea, East and
West Germany whose birthrates were practically the same but whose economic growth was
entirely different due to different governance factors. De Vera says that "similar conclusions have
been arrived at by the US National Research Council in 1986 and in the UN Population Fund
(UNFPA) Consultative Meeting of Economists in 1992" and the studies of Hanushek and
Wommann (2007), Doppelhoffer, Miller, Sala-I-Martin (2004), Ahlburg (1996), etc. The other
Nobel Prize winner who expressed the same view is Gary Becker.
De Vera also states that from 1961–2000, as Philippine population increased almost three
times, poverty decreased from 59% to 34%. [40] He stressed that the more probable cause of poor
families is not family size but the limited schooling of the household head: 78% to 90% of the
poor households had heads with no high school diploma, preventing them from getting good
paying jobs. He refers to studies which show that 90% of the time the poor want the children
they have: as helpers in the farm and investment for a secure old age.
Instead of aiming at population decrease, De Vera stressed that the country should focus
through education on cashing in on a possible “demographic dividend,” a period of rapid
economic growth that can happens when the labor force is growing faster than the dependents
(children and elderly), thus reducing poverty significantly.
In a recent development, two authors of the Reproductive Health Bill changed their stand
on the provisions of the bill regarding population and development. Reps. Emerciana de Jesus
and Luzviminda Ilagan wanted to delete three provisions which state that "gender equality and
women empowerment are central elements of reproductive health and population and
development," which integrate responsible parenthood and family planning programs into anti-
poverty initiatives, and which name the Population Commission as a coordinating body. The two
party-list representatives strongly state that poverty is not due to over-population but because of
inequality and corruption.
To further explore its features and implementing regulation, here is an excerpt of House
Bill no. 5043:
HOUSE BILL NO. 5043
References:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52969991/I-Coverage-of-the-Comprehensive-Agrarian-Reform-
Program
http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan005112.pdf
http://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_planning
http://2010presidentiables.wordpress.com/reproductive-health-bill-5043/text-of-rh-bill-no-5043/