Ket. in Brochey amd Donald, Subse tuity aout Socal Le lanes
3 Ideology and Ideological
State Apparatuses
(Notes towards an
Investigation)
Louis Althusser
entered eer
(On the Reproduction of the Conditlons of Production
{must now expose mor filly something which was biefly glimpsed in my
alysis when fr apoke of the necsity to renew the meant of proton if
production sto be poe. That a pass hint Now Isha onder for
Ie.
‘As Meas every child nos that social formation which dd noeprodce
the conditions of production athe sre me att produced woul ot as een
‘The timate condition f production iy therefore the reproduction af the
anions of praaction. Tas maybe sigpe(eprodeing exaty the previous
ondtons of production) ot Yon sn extended sea” (expanding them) Let
lore thi lt tintin for the moment
"Wht then the vprductin ofthe cron of production?
Here me te entering a domain which I both very faite (since Cpial
Volume Tws) and niqiey ignored. The tenacigor ebwourneset (eal!
voumese fn empl pe) ofthe pnt of view of peadction le oF even
ofthat of mere productive practice (self absent lation to the process of
[rection ee ontegrted ina or everyaycancousnese tha iisetremely
Bed, nt tsa almost impor, to raze oneself o the pon of tea of
Peproducton, Neverteles, everything ove thi pnt view remain abt
(ore than one-sided: distrted)-even the level of production, tortion,
that of mere practice
Leta ty and examine the mater methodical
“Tosimpliy my expsition anc arroing tht vey Sc oti are fom
«dominant made of production, Lean say ta the proces of production rs fo
‘enka exiting prodciveForcerin and under dint elton of production
56
eso ond Iso Siate Apparat, 1
1 flows that, in ordre ext, every socal formation must eprdce the
contons production at the ame ime mit produces, andin dette abe
tovpendoce, Kun therefore reprooce
1 the productive forces,
2 the exiting atone of production
Reproduction of the Meon of Proton
Everyone (coding the bourgeois economies whote works atonal accounting,
torte modern macto-economie’"thoreticans nom Fecngizes, bee Mart
ompelinay proved in Capt! Volume Two that no production is posise
‘hich doesnot allow for the teredocton ofthe material condltens af
Prodan: the reproduction af the meen of preietion
“The average ecomoin, wo no ilferent inthis than the avenge captit
no that exch year eset freee what ee ded Yo replace he he
been wsed up oF worn wut sn prodscton raw meri fed invaltnn
(bulge), straments nf production (machines, ete Lay the tere
conomistthe average capita, fr they Both express the point of ve ofthe
Sm, regeeding Ha sien simply give commentry onthe terns the
fms nan acconting pve,
‘thnk o she gers of Quesny whos posed thie lasing! problem tn
‘othe penis of Mare who eesved i, we Row that the repredeton ofthe
Imari conditions of production cannot be thought atthe Teel of the fm,
Urecase i does mot eit that level its el conditions. What happens a the
level af the fiom 99 elfect, which only giver an idee of the neces of
‘production, bat sbseutel ils allow conditions and mechanisms tobe
‘hows
"Armoment’s election enough oe convinced of thi: Me Xyacapitalit who
produce woollen ymin ie spnning mil hs to epreduce’ hist mee it
Invchines ete Bot doesnot produce them for is wm production ofr
Capitainy do: an Australian sheep tamer, MY, 4 heany engineer producing
Imtchine tol, Mr Z, ee ete. And MY and Me Z inorder to proce tore
Products which ae the eandton of the teprodvtion of Me X's sonctinae of
Prodaction, sso hive to repredoce th conditions of therm production, ends
‘Seo infiny-she whole in propotons sch fey on the naoal and eve the
Sold markt the demand for ens of prodaction (or reproduction) ean be
‘sed by the supply
In order techn this mechani, which eds ro hind ons chan i
ecssry 10 follow Mares lal procedare, ap to sy in pale the
‘eons ofthe eitculatin of cpt between Deparien](podtion of eens
{fgrodacian ond Departmeat I (reduction means of ons
‘esization af surpos-al, in Coa, Volumes two end Tee
‘We shal ot gointo he nae thi question epeoghrotave mentioned
teextence of the necenity a he reproduction ofthe materia eonations of
rrodecton= Lewis Albus
| Reproduction of Laour-Power
However, the reader wil ot have led to note one thing, We have dncused the
reproduction of the means of production-but not the fepreduction of the
productive forces. We have therefore ignored the reprodsction of what
~“Ginguene® Wieprodctve forces from the meens of production, ie. the
reproduction of labour power
"From the observation of what takes place in the fim, in particular from the
‘examination of the financial accountng practice which predicts amortization and
Investment, me have been able obtain an approximate idea ofthe existence ofthe
rmuteral proces of reproduction, but we are now entering a domain in which the
‘observation of what happens in the firm if nt totaly blind, a lest almost
‘emtrely 20, and for good reson: the reproduction of labour power takes place
‘exemally outside the few
Sow isthe reproduction of labour power ensured?
tis ensured’ by giving labour power the material meant with which to
reproduce isl by wager Wages feetreinthe accounting of eachenerpive, but
swage capita’, nota ll «condition of the material ferodueton of labour
power
However, thats in foc how iwoks since wages represents ony that part of
the value produced by the expenditure of labour power whichis indispensable for
Its eproducton: +, indspenble othe reconsition of the nbour power af the
wmege-carer (the wherewithal to pay fo housing, food and clothing, in shoe 10
couble the wage-erner to present himself again atthe fectory gate the next,
‘dyad every further day God grants hrm); and we should ad:ndispensablefor
‘ising and educating the children in whom the proleteian eprodaces hil (in
fn imodel where m0, 1,2 et.» as labour power.
Remember tha this quantity of value (wages) necessary for the reproduction of|
Iubour power is determined not by the needs of a ‘islogia!” Guaranteed
Minimum Wage (Solaire Minimum Inerproferionnel Garant) sone, But bythe
eed of it
French prlearans need wine
shows ike to point out hat tht minimum f doubly historian that itis
‘ot defined by the historical needs of the working clms ‘recognized’ by the
‘apts class but by the historical needs imposed by the proletarian cass
struggle (# double cas toggle: aginst the lengthening ofthe working day end
seine the rection of wage)
i not enough to ensure fr Ibour power the materia conitions of
ine reproduction i i sto be reproduced a labour power. I have sid that the
tniabe Inbour power mst be ‘competent i. siteble ro be set to workin the
omplen system ofthe process of prodction. The development ofthe productive
forces and typeof unity historically conaiutiv ofthe productive Forces at given
‘moment produce the elt tha the labour power has tobe (versely sled and
therefore repreduced a sch, Diversey: secordng tthe requtements of the
socio-technical division of labour, i iferen jobs’ and “posts!
How i thie reproduction ofthe (diversified) skills of labour power provided for
cology and Idelogial Stee Apparaises °
{ina capitalist epi? Here, unite social formation chaacetized by slavery ot
serfdom, this reproduction ofthe kills of inbour power tends (his ia tendental
lw) decreasingly to be provided for ‘on the spot” (apprenticeship within
production ise, but is achieved mote and more outside production: by the
{pitt edveaton system, and by other instances and institutions
‘What do children learn at school? They go varying distances in their studies, but
any rate they learn to read towritandtoadd-ie.anmber of techniques, and
‘ nomber of her things aswel including elements (which may be rudimentary
‘ron the contrary thoroughgoing) of scientific or ‘itera cultor’ which are
lirectly seal in the aitferen obs in prediction one instrvetion for manval
workers, anther for technicians, + hid for engineers 2 final one for higher
‘management, ee). Thos they learn ‘know-how
Bot besides these techniques and knowledges, end in earning them, children a
‘school also learn the ‘rules of good belaviut, he the aide that should be
‘observed hy every agent inthe division of labour, according to the job he i
“destined” for: rules of morality, civic and professional conscience, which ecully
means rules of respect for the soi-technea division of abou and timately the
‘les ofthe order established by clas domination. They alo learnt speak proper
French, to"handle’ the workers correctly, ie tally (or the ftore capitals
tnd their servants) order them about propery i (Weal) to ‘speak to them’
inthe right way, ete
‘Toput this more sentially, I shally that the reproduction of abour power
requires not only a reproduction of ity sil, but alo, at the sme time,
reproduction of its submission to the rules of the established order, Le. #
‘eproducton of submission tothe ruling of ideology forthe workers, and 3
reproduction ofthe ability to manipulate the ruling ideology correctly forthe
‘agents of exploitation and repression, so that they to, wil provide forthe
domination of the ruling class “n words
Tother words the school (but alo other Stati
other apparatuses ike the Army) teaches how-how', but informs which ensire
Inbjctin tothe ruling ideology or the mastery of “pectic”. All the agents of
production, exploitation and repression, not to speak of the ‘profesional of
deolog’ (Mars), must none way or anor be steeped inthis ideology inorder
to perform thei tasks ‘conscentously”-the tasks of the exploited (the
proletarian) ofthe exploiters (he capitals) ofthe exploiters auxiliaries (he
Imanager) or of the high priest of the ruling Heology (ts Tuncionaies) ete
“The reproduction of labour power thus reveals st sne gua mo ot only the
reproduction of is sil" bras the repreducton ofits subjection tothe rating
‘Meology or ofthe ‘practice’ ofthat ideo the proviso that fenatenoush
to say "nr only but abe, For ivinin the Jorma and wade the forms of
‘deaoicalajeton that provision ti made forthe reproduction of the lof laour
power
Ut this i to eecognize the effective presence of 8 new reality ideology.
Here I shall make two commen
The fret eto round off my analysis of epreduction.« Lewis Aloser
The just given 9 rapid survey of the forms ofthe reproduction of the
prodctve frees, Le. ofthe mean of production onthe one hand, and of sour
power on the ether
‘But have not yet approached te gueston ofthe reproduction of he rlationtof
producon. This 1s a crcl quetion forthe Marts theory of the mode of
Predvction. To It it prt would be a theoretic! omission worse, serious
pola vor
shal therefore discus i.
make anther long, door.
“The second comments that in order to make tis detour, Iam obliged to r=
‘aise ny old question: what i society?
inorder to obtain the means to discus it ohall
Infrastructure and Superstracture
(On a numberof occasions I hae insisted onthe revolutionary character of he
Marxist conception ofthe oe whole insofar a iti distinc rom the Hegelian
“totality: I sid (and this thesis only repeats famous propositions of historical
‘natrili) thet Marx conceived the structure a every society a comstioted by
"levels instance’ articulated by a specific determination: the ifasructre, oF
‘economic (the ‘unity’ of the productive ores andthe relations of redton)
fd the mpertrucin. which itself eontins two level or instances the politi
Tegal (lew andthe Stat) an6 Weology (the differen ideologies, religious, ethical
leg, polis, et)
Besies its theovtico-diactcleterest (it evel the difference berween Mark
ad Hg! this representation hat the following crcl teat cel advan
takes tpesble ro neribe in the theoretical apparatus oft esertl concepts
‘that T have eal their rpc inde of efetcty. What des this seen?
Tei cary to se that this representation of the structure f every society a8 an
edie containing a base (infeastrctre) on which re erected the wo ors of
the superstracute, it « metaphor, to be quite precise, # spatial mecephor: the
‘metaphor of «topography (epigue)- Like every metaphor, this metaphor Suggests
Something, rakes something vibe. What? Precisely this: thatthe upper Boor
ould not sty up” Gn the ni) alone if they didnot rest precisely on their base.
“Thus the objet of the metaphor ofthe eifice isto tepresest shove all he
“determination nthe last instance’ bythe economic bate. Theft ofthis spatial
metaphor to endow the base with an index of effectivity Koon by the famos
terme the determination inthe lst instanceof what happens the upper lors
(ofthe superstructure) by what happens inthe economic base
Given this index of effectivity "in the lst inetance’, the oes of the
superstructure ae clearly endowed with different indices ffetvty. Whatkind
hindices?
Tes posible to sy that the floors ofthe superstructure are not determinant in
the last nstance, but that they are determined by the electvity of the ase; that it
‘they ae determinant in their own a et undefined) satis struc ony insofar
fs they are determined bythe be,
eolgy and Tdeloieal State Apparaees a
‘Their index of effectivity (or determination) as de