Workshop Summary
Participation References
We welcome insightful papers in the area of UX
theories, especially ones fostering an interdisciplinary
perspective and the usage of theories in practice.
Workshop candidates are invited to send in a position
statement (up to 4 pages in ACM EA format) via the
workshop website. The topics include, but are not
restricted to:
• Analyses of the applicability and transferability of a
theory and theoretical concepts to UX research or
practice.
• Case studies of using a theory, theoretical concept
in UX design and/or evaluation work.
• Review papers on the theories used in the existing
UX work in terms of their fitness.
Submissions will be reviewed by the program
committee and will be selected according to their
significance, the quality of their presentation, and their
potential to stimulate discussion.
Dissemination
After the workshop the accepted contributions will be
posted on the website, the summarized results of the
workshop will be published, and further discussion of
the topic will be stimulated in a wider audience. The
workshop organizers will consider the publication of a
revised version of accepted papers as part of a special
issue in an HCI-related journal.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the support by the Marie Curie IEF
Action of the European Union (FP7-PEOPLE-2010-IEF).
View publication stats
CHI 2012, May 5–10, 2012, Austin, Texas, USA
[1] Blythe, M., Wright, P., McCarthy, J. and Bertelsen,
O.W. 2006. Theory and method for experience centered
design. In Proc. CHI EA '06. ACM, NY, USA, 1691-1694.
[2] Blythe, M., McCarthy, J., Light, A., Bardzell, S.,
Wright, P., Bardzell, J. and Blackwell, A. 2010. Critical
dialogue: interaction, experience and cultural theory. In
Proc. CHI EA '10. ACM, NY, USA, 4521-4524.
[3] Law, E.L.C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren,
A.P.O.S. and Kort, J. 2009. Understanding, scoping and
defining user experience: a survey approach. In Proc.
CHI '09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 719-728.
[4] Luojus, S. 2010. From a momentary experience to
a lasting one - The concept of and research on
expanded user experience of mobile devices. Doctoral
Dissertation, Acta Universitatis Ouluensis Scientiae
Rerum Naturalium A 559, Oulu 2010.
[5] Kari Kuutti. 2010. Where are the Ionians of user
experience research?. In Proc. NordiCHI '10. ACM, NY,
USA, 715-718.
[6] Obrist, M., Law, E. L.-C., Vainio-Mattila, K. V.,
Roto, V., Vermeeren, A. and Kuutti, K. 2011. UX
Research: What Theoretical Roots Do We Build On – If
Any? In Proc. CHI EA '11. ACM, NY, USA, 165-168.
[7] Obrist, M., Roto, V. and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila,
K. User experience evaluation: Do you know which
method to use? In CHI ’09 EA, ACM, 2763–2766.
[8] Roto, V., Law, E.L.C., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S. and
Hoonhout, J. 2010. Demarcating User Experience.
Dagstuhl Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Germany.
[9] Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Law, E.L.C., Roto, V., Obrist,
M., Hoonhout, J. and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. 2010.
UX evaluation methods: current state and development
needs. In Proc. NordiCHI '10. ACM, NY, USA, 521-530.
[10] Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Koskinen, I. 2009.
Building a unified framework for the practice of
experience design. In Proc. CHI EA '09. ACM, NY, USA,
4803-4806.
2754