ena017 2N vs N+ | Digital Really
Blog
&
wack to Man Page
2N vs N+1
‘April 28,2014 | Written by Ben Gonyea, Vice President, Product Management
Redundancy level of any critical infrastructure in a datacenter design is paramount to ensuring 100% uptime
for mission critical applications, Redundancy, as you might expect, refers to a system design where a
component is duplicated so that in the event of a failure or required maintenance, IT equipment is not
impacted.
There are different levels of redundancy which are often misunderstood or misrepresented, The purpose of
this blog is to clarify the definitions of N#1 vs 2N and highlight some of the misunderstandings often seen in
datacenter evaluations.
N equals the amount of capacity required to power, backup or cool a facility at full T load. A design of N
‘means the facility was designed only to account for the facility at full load and zero redundancy has been
added. Ifthe facility is at full load and there is a component failure or required maintenance, mission critical
applications would suffer.
IFN equals the amount of capacity needed to run the facility; N+1 denotes an additional component added
to support a single failure or required maintenance on a component. This does not mean if a facility requires
(B) CRAC/CRAH units to cool the facility that the design of N+1 requires a single additional cooling unit
Design standards follow a rule of thumb of 1 added component for every 4 needed. So if (8) cooling units
are required, a total of (10) would be accounted for in a proper N+1 design.
hips cgitalrealy.comiblognvs-r- th usezanot7 2NveN+4| Dig Really
One can then deduce that the most common misunderstanding of this design approach is adding a single
unit beyond N. If N=8, an inappropriately designed N+1 system would only have 9 units. The goal is take a
modular approach in design and ensure redundancy level is appropriate to the size of the overall
distribution
2N equates to fully redundant, mirrored system, so if (4) UPS(S) are required there would be completely
diverse and independent (4) UPS(S) for resiliency. In this design one can take down an entire leg w/zero
interruption to the critical IT load.
Common misrepresentation with 2N is a facility that is running at half load on an N or N+ design, Just
because a facility is currently at half the load designed does not make it 2N,
Here at Telx; the importance of infrastructure resiliency is never sacrificed, We understand what type of
applications can run at N+1 and which require a true 2N setup. That is why we built NIRS as a truly 2N
system on power distribution.
If you'd like to learn more about the redundancy levels in place at Telx data centers, see our data centers
page, or connect with us via the contact page of our site, or by Facebook or Twitter.
&
‘We were unable to load Disqus. It you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide,
DSN:
CUM Me y=)
69 Subscribe to our feed
~ Subscribe to our newsletter
Search
hips: cgtalrealy comblogrvs-r- tf22017 2N vs N+ | Digital Really
Ben Gonyea
Vice President, Product Management
RECENT POSTS
Direct Link Colocation Takes Hybrid Cloud Speed & Performance to a New Level
How Data Collection Brings You Closer to Your Customers
Virtualization and You: The Data Centers of the Future
ipso cgitalrealy.comibloganvs-r-t!
a