Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aug-18
Equity
4,094.53
Debt
35,744.36
after SEBI rationalization
pg 13
Jul-18 3,995.60 -3,635.21
Data Cruncher pg 16
Financial
Wisdom
-“In the short run, the market is a
voting machine but in the long run,
it is a weighing machine.”
- Benjamin Graham
2
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
Market Outlook
Uncertainty regarding trade conflict continues. The United States is selections.
potentially entering into a bilateral trade agreement with Mexico, RBI's release of FY18 Household savings trend poses some worrying
however a truce with Canada is pending. The US focus has narrowed trends. Household Net Financial Savings (7.1% of GDP) is low while
to China, while the tensions with European Union have eased. US- there is a sharp rise in household liabilities (4.0% in FY18 vs. 2.4% of
China trade tensions are unlikely to be resolved that easily and the US GDP in FY17). Given that general government fiscal deficit stands ~6-
administration is now expected to impose 25% tariff on additional US$ 6.5%, less than 1% of GDP is left for private sector borrowing needs.
200 billion worth of Chinese imports taking the total value of goods Muted net financial savings pose risks to India's external account. We
affected by tariffs to US$ 435bn (i.e. 2.3% of global trade or 0.5% of already saw CAD rise to 1.9% of GDP in FY18 from 0.9% in FY19. It is
global GDP). further slated to edge up to 2.8% in FY19.
Total trade value of US and China is equivalent of 10% of global GDP. Savings in the form of bank deposits is declining in share - reflecting
US and China together account for one-fourth of the global trade. the reduced attractiveness in return. While the penetration of long-
Hence, given global value chains, basking in the bilateral nature US- term financial products (insurance, pension and mutual funds) is still
China trade spat is gross underestimation of the spill-over effects. low, investment in mutual funds have depicted a handsome gain (0.9%
Chinese policy response is stepping up, and provides some near-term of GDP vs. 0.2% for multi years now).
offset There has been a sharp rise in the overall retail lending space due to a
Total trade value of US and China is equivalent of 10% of global GDP. confluence of push and pull factors. While the enabling environment
US and China together account for one-fourth of the global trade. (CIBIL, digitalization) and low starting penetration provide comfort,
Hence, given global value chains, basking in the bilateral nature US- one needs to be watchful. On the other hand, as a response to NPA
China trade spat is gross underestimation of the spill-over effects. cycle, the corporate lending space has seen battery of reform actions
Chinese policy response is stepping up, and provides some near-term which will place it on a stronger footing. RBI has sped up the process of
offset early recognition and resolution of stress. Decision in February to do
Interestingly, amidst the global worries, Indian equities are up away with various restructuring scheme is a case in point. Given the
meaningfully since July. NIFTY is up 11% YTD, 9% of which has come newness of the NCLT and IBC, the resolution process is taking longer
in last two months. Owing to the weakness in rupee, NIFTY is flat in than expected, but it will set better precedence for future cases. The
US$ terms, but is still one of the best performing emerging market. The strengthening of the institutional capability such as judicial (NCLT),
up move can be explained by confluence of factors such as continued legislative system (IBC) and market structure (specialized asset
participation by domestic investors, consumption oriented Indian management, legal, valuation and insolvency resolution expertise etc)
growth leaving it less vulnerable to trade tensions and healthy coupled with forced stressed asset recognition will ensure that the
earnings outcome in 1Q FY19. That said, it is a narrow band of corporate lenders start on a clean slate as and when the new cycle
companies that had participated in recent upside. Return in BSE 500 begins.
index was lower at 5.6%. Performance down the capitalization curve Coming to the bond market, with the RBI giving a 50bps of pre-emptive
has also been poor with mid and small cap down 5% and 11 % YTD rate hike (in June and August), we expected the central bank to take a
respectively. pause in the October meeting. The same can also be reinforced by the
The 1Q FY19 earnings have come to a close with NIFTY companies softening of recent inflation prints (4.2% in July and expected at ~4%
clocking 10% y-o-y growth. The miss in the aggregate PAT was driven in August)
by financials, mainly PSU banks and corporate lenders due to higher However, one needs to take cognizance of surmounting worries in the
provisions and MTM treasury losses. Excluding three corporate banks, emerging market currencies, particularly the ones with current
PAT growth was robust at ~25% account deficit such as India. Rupee reached its lowest level vs. US$
Aggregate 1QFY19 revenue growth continues the strong momentum (presently hovering around 71.2) as contagion fears from Turkish crisis
with double-digit growth in most of the NIFTY 50 companies reflecting weighed on EM currencies and domestic trade deficit surged to a five
the improvement in domestic economic activity. The same trends year high of US$18.0 billion in July. RBI has actively intervened as FX
were also being resonated by various economic activity data and the reserves deplete by US$ 23 billion FYTD. While Indian fundamentals
latest (Q1 FY19) GDP data which took the market by surprise (8.2% y-o- are relatively better than some of the high yielding currencies, Indian
y vs. expectation of 7.6%). EBITDA growth was healthy at 17% but rupee has been amongst the weakest of the lot and given in to the
missed the estimated strength. Margins moderated on rising raw contagion pressures and worries of the rising crude prices. Brent
material cost. They may remain under pressure for some time as rupee moved up to US$ 79/bbl from US$ 72/bbl at the start of the month, as
slides, raw material and interest costs escalate and competitive the US sanctions on Iran led to a steep drop in Iranian oil exports this
pressures in few sectors (telecom, aviation, staples and auto) inhibits month. Given that India is one of the largest oil importer and imports
the capacity to take the parallel price hikes. With 2-3% downgrades, nearly 85% of its oil needs, hence the currency impact.
FY19 earnings growth is now placed at nearly 19%. In terms of valuations, the rupee is now trading closer to the longer-
Market rally coupled with earnings miss had led to richness in term trend. That said, the valuations typically tend to work over a
valuations. Nifty is trading at ~ 19 times forward earnings. Earnings medium to long-term. In the near-term, EM assets are in the slippery
yield is at 60% premium to bonds (highest level since 2012). India zone and as such, the continued pressure on rupee could not be ruled
MSCI P/E compared to MSCI EM index is at 66% premium which is a out. If the currency pressure sustains, the calculus of the October
record high. Sectorally, valuations have been re-rated across most policy meeting could change
sectors while IT, consumer staples, healthcare and energy are trading 10-year G-sec yield has touched 8% to factor in these challenges
higher than their historical trend. (currency and oil), apart from lower than expected government tax
The rally in equity indices has come amidst macro headwinds (rising collections. As such, we maintain the cautious stance on bond market
import bill led primarily by high commodity prices, tightening liquidity, and a tactical approach to duration. Notwithstanding the near-term
rising cost of funds and raw materials, fiscal pressure raising the hazy outlook, investors should consider SIPs in fixed income funds as
probability of clamp-down on government capex) and upcoming valuations enter an attractive zone. Timing the market may not be
political uncertainty. We remain positive on the medium-term easy!
structural story as the reforms implemented (GST, IBC, RERA) in the
last two-three years should start paying off. In the near-term, however, Navneet Munot
the richness in valuations command increased importance to stock CIO- SBI Funds Management Private Limited
3
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
4
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
nothing but the study of why otherwise rational people take which was purchased for their portfolio. Investors should also
some really dumb investment decisions. decide specific criteria for making an instant decision to buy,
Decision making is a process of choosing best alternatives sale or hold.
among a number of alternatives. This decision has come out Investors should also keep in mind the answer of the
after a proper evaluation of all the alternatives. Decision following questions before taking any decision of buying,
making is the most complex and challenging activity of selling and holding new shares:
investors. Every investor differs from the others in all aspects (i) Why investors purchase the stock?
due to various factors like demographic factor, socioeconomic (ii) What is the time horizon of the investment?
background, educational level, sex, age and race. An optimum (iii) What is the expected rate of return?
investment decision plays an active role and is a significant (iv) After one year the stock has under-performed or over-
consideration. performed.
Investor is a rational being who will always act to maximize his (v) Do you plan on buying, selling or holding your position?
financial gain. Yet we are not rational beings; we are human (vi) How risky is this stock within your overall portfolio?
beings; an integral part of this humanness is the emotion Mutual Fund Investment
within us. Indeed, we make most of our life decisions on purely Tomic and Ruccuardi recommended that investors select
emotional considerations. mutual funds with a simple four step process which include
In the financial world, investor's sometimes base their the followings:
decisions on irrelevant figures and statistics, e.g., some (i) Invest in only no-load mutual fund with low operating
investor may invest in the stock that have witnessed expense;
considerable fall after a continuous growth in recent past. They (ii) Look for funds with a strong historical track record over
believe that price has fallen which is only due to short- term 5-10 years;
market movements, creating an opportunity to buy the stock
(iii) Invest with tenured Portfolio Manager with a strong
cheap. However, in reality, stocks do quite often also decline in
investment philosophy; and
value due to changes in their underlying fundamentals.
(iv) Understand the specific risk associated with each mutual
Cognitive dissonance is the perception of incompatibility
fund.
between two cognitions, which can be defined as any element
The key to successful investing is recognizing the type of
of knowledge including attitude, emotion, belief or behavior.
investor you are along with implementing a solid investment
The theory of cognitive dissonance holds that contradicting
strategy. Behavioural factors can help investors to avoid
cognition serve as a driving force that compels the mind to
mistakes. Avoiding mistakes is called defensive behavioural
acquire or invent new thoughts or beliefs or to modify existing
finance applications in investment decision making.
beliefs, so as to reduce the amount of dissonance (conflict)
CONCLUSION
between cognition.
Behavioural finance provides explanations for why investors
Strategies for Overcoming Behavioural Bias
make irrational financial decisions. It demonstrates how
In recent years, behavioural finance is becoming an integral
emotions and cognitive errors influence investors in the
part of decision-making process because it heavily influences
decision making process. The various causes that led to
the investor's performance. Understanding behavioural
behavioural finance are anchoring, overconfidence, herd
finance will help the investor to select a better investment
behavior, over and under reaction and loss aversions. In
instrument and they can avoid repeating the expensive error in
essence, behavioural finance approach investigates the
future. They can improve their performance by recognizing
behavioural patterns of investors and tries to understand how
their biases and errors of judgement to which we are all prone.
these patterns guide investment decision. Behavioural
The main issue of studying behavioural finance is how to
finance offers many useful insights for investment
minimize or eliminate the psychological biases in investment
professionals and thus, provides a framework for evaluating
decisions of the investors.
active investment strategies for the investors.
After an extensive study of the literature on behavioural
finance, it is believed that its perfect application could make a
Anoop Trivedi
successful investor making fewer mistakes.
Regional Sales Head - Wealth Management
Several psychological and behavioural factors influence
(Article Inspired From Different Sources)
investors in decision making. Various safeguards are needed
to control mental error and psychological roadblocks while
investing in stocks and mutual funds. A disciplined trading
strategy is required to control these mental roadblocks to all
types of investors.
Stock Investment
There is a need to focus a 'specific investment strategy' over
the long period to control “mental mistakes” by the investors.
Investors should keep detailed records of the specific stock
5
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
GDP growth posted upside surprise to 8.2% in Q1 FY2019; concerns linger on sustainability of
V-shaped recovery in remaining quarters of FY2019
HIGHLIGHTS OVERVIEW
• Growth of India's GDP (at constant 2011-12 prices) in Growth of India's GDP (at constant 2011-12 prices)
year-on-year (YoY) terms has been placed at a nine- improved to a nine-quarter high 8.2% in Q1 FY2019 from
quarter high 8.2% in Q1 FY2019, exceeding the pace of 5.6% in Q1 FY2018 and 7.7% in Q4 FY2018 (refer Exhibit 1
5.6% in Q1 FY2018 and 7.7% in Q4 FY2018, as well as and 2), exceeding our forecast of 7.5%. Similarly, the
our forecast (+7.5%). The pickup in GDP growth in Q1 growth in GVA at basic prices improved to 8.0% in Q1
FY2019 relative to the previous quarter was driven by FY2019 from 5.6% in Q1 FY2018 and 7.7% in Q4 FY2018,
private final consumption expenditure (PFCE; to which was higher than our forecast (+7.4%).
+8.6% from +6.7%), whereas the growth of The substantial improvement in GDP growth to an eight-
government final consumption expenditure (GFCE; to quarter high 8.2% in Q1 FY2018 from 5.6% in Q1 FY2018
+7.6% from +16.9%) and gross fixed capital was led by a pickup in growth of GFCF, inventories, PFCE
formation (GFCF; to +10.0% from +14.4%) recorded and exports, which more than offset the slowdown in
some easing while remaining healthy. growth of GFCE. GFCF growth improved sharply to 10.0%
• Similarly, the pace of growth of gross value added in Q1 FY2019 from 0.8% in Q1 FY2018; this was in line with
(GVA) at basic prices stood at 8.0% in Q1 FY2019, the pickup in growth of capital goods output (+9.5% in Q1
exceeding the prints for Q1 FY2018 (+5.6%), Q4 FY2019, -4.2% in Q1 FY2018), while somewhat at odds with
FY2018 (+7.6%) and our expectation (+7.4%). The the trends related to project announcement and
sequential uptick in Q1 FY2019 relative to Q4 FY2018 completion. Moreover, inventories recorded a YoY growth
was led by industry (to +10.3% from +8.8%) and of 8.6% in Q1 FY2019, in contrast to the contraction of 2.9%
agriculture (to +5.3% from +4.5%), while the pace of in Q1 FY2018. In addition, the growth of PFCE improved to
growth of services eased mildly (to +7.3% from 8.6% in Q1 FY2019 from 6.9% in Q1 FY2018. However,
+7.7%). GFCE growth slowed to 7.6% in Q1 FY2019 from 17.6% in
• Manufacturing was the key driver of industrial growth Q1 FY2018, partly on account of unfavourable base effect.
in Q1 FY2019. The improvement in the growth of Despite a moderation in the expansion of imports (to
volumes and the healthy earnings reported by
+12.5% in Q1 FY2019 from +18.5% in Q1 FY2018) and an
corporates, which partly reflects the base effect
uptick in the growth of exports (to +12.7% from +5.9%),
related to the transition to the Goods and Services
Tax (GST), boosted the GVA growth of manufacturing net imports exerted a drag of 0.4% on the GDP growth in Q1
to 13.5% in Q1 FY2019 from (-1.8% in Q1 FY2018; FY2019.
+9.1% in Q4 FY2018).
• The decline in construction GVA growth to 8.7% in Q1 Exhibit 1: Growth of GDP and its Components (in %,
FY2019 from 11.5% in Q4 FY2018 was led by the Constant 2011-12 Prices, YoY)
waning of the base effect. Nevertheless, the pace of Private Final Consumption Exp.
Q1 FY2018
6.9%
Q2 FY2018
6.8%
Q3 FY2018
5.9%
Q4 FY2018
6.7%
Q1 FY2019
8.6%
FY2017RE
7.3%
FY2018PE
6.6%
construction GVA growth was healthy in Q1 FY2019, Government Final Consumption Exp.
Exports
17.6%
5.9%
3.8%
6.8%
6.8%
6.2%
16.8%
3.6%
7.6%
12.7%
12.2%
5.0%
10.9%
5.6%
less Imports 18.5% 10.0% 10.5% 10.9% 12.5% 4.0% 12.4%
in line with the trend in its inputs, like cement and Gross Fixed Capital Formation
GDP
0.8%
5.6%
6.1%
6.3%
9.1%
7.0%
14.4%
7.7%
10.0%
8.2%
10.1%
7.1%
7.6%
6.7%
steel consumption, and activity in the infrastructure Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing
Q1 FY2018
3.0%
Q2 FY2018
2.6%
Q3 FY2018
3.1%
Q4 FY2018
4.5%
Q1 FY2019
5.3%
FY2017RE
6.3%
FY2018PE
3.4%
estate and industrial capex is yet to pick up and GVA at Basic Prices
GVA ex-Agri
5.6%
6.0%
6.1%
6.6%
6.6%
7.5%
7.6%
-19.5%
8.0%
8.4%
7.1%
7.2%
6.5%
7.0%
consumer sentiment is yet to recover appreciably. RE: Revised Estimates: PE: Provisional Estimates Source: Central Statistics Office
• While GFCF growth eased in Q1 FY2019 relative to the (CSO); ICRA research
14.4% recorded in Q4 FY2018, it outpaced the
expansion displayed by PFCE and GFCE in the just- Exhibit 2: YoY Growth in GDP and GVA at Basic Prices
concluded quarter. The 9.5% YoY rise in the output of (Constant 2011-12 Prices)
capital goods, which benefitted from a low base, and 10%
the healthy 27.3% expansion in the Government of 9%
India's (GoI's) capital spending in Q1 FY2019, 8%
supported the 10.0% GFCF growth in Q1 FY2019, 7%
6%
despite unfavourable trends in project announcement
5%
and completion. 4%
• While GDP and GVA growth posted an upside surprise 3%
in Q1 FY2019, some concerns linger on the 2%
1%
sustainability of growth around 8.0% in the remaining
0%
quarters of FY2019, given the expected waning of the
favourable base effect, fiscal constraints, as well as
risks posed by higher crude oil prices GVA at basic prices GDP
6
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
Exhibit 3: YoY Growth in Agriculture, Industry and quarter. The decline in construction GVA growth to 8.7% in
Services (Constant 2011-12 Prices) Q1 FY2019 from 11.5% in Q4 FY2018, was led by the
14% waning of the base effect. Nevertheless, the pace of
12% construction GVA growth was healthy in Q1 FY2019, in line
10%
with the trend in its inputs, like cement and steel
8%
6%
consumption, and activity in the infrastructure sector
4% including affordable housing. However, real estate and
2% industrial capex is yet to pick up and consumer sentiment is
0% yet to recover appreciably.
-2%
-4%
The service sector growth eased to 7.3% in Q1 FY2019
from 7.7% in Q4 FY2018, with the considerable moderation
in growth in public administration, defence and other
Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing Industry Services services (PADOS; to +9.9% from +13.3%), and mild dip in
expansion of trade, hotels, transport, communication and
Source: CSO; ICRA research
services related to broadcasting (THTCS; to +6.7% from
+6.8%), partly offset by the pickup in growth of financial,
In sequential terms, the pickup in GDP growth in Q1 FY2019 real estate and professional services (FRP; to +6.5% from
relative to the previous quarter was driven by PFCE (to +5.0%).
+8.6% from +6.7%), whereas the growth of GFCE (to In nominal terms, GDP growth rose considerably to 13.8%
+7.6% from +16.9%) and GFCF (to +10.0% from +14.4%) in Q1 FY2019 from 10.9% in Q4 FY2018, while the GVA
recorded some easing while remaining healthy. In growth improved to 12.9% in Q1 FY2019 from 10.7% in Q4
particular, while GFCF growth eased in Q1 FY2019 relative FY2018 (refer Exhibit 4). The GDP and GVA deflator rose to
to the 14.4% recorded in Q4 FY2018, it outpaced the 5.6% and 4.9%, respectively, in Q1 FY2019 from 3.1% each
expansion displayed by PFCE and GFCE in the just- in Q4 FY2018.
concluded quarter.
On a YoY basis, the pace of expansion of GVA at basic Exhibit 4: GDP and GVA data
prices improved to 8.0% in Q1 FY2019 from 5.6% in Q1
GDP Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 GVA at Basic Prices Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
FY2018 (refer Annexures A, B and C), led by an FY2018 FY2018 FY2018 FY2018 FY2019 FY2018 FY2018 FY2018 FY2018 FY2019
improvement in growth of industry (to +10.3% from Constant 5.6% 6.3% 7.0% 7.7% 8.2% Constant 5.6% 6.1% 6.6% 7.6% 8.0%
Current 8.3% 9.5% 11.0% 10.9% 13.8% Current 8.0% 9.2% 10.7% 10.7% 12.9%
+0.1%; driven by manufacturing, construction and Deflator 2.7% 3.2% 4.0% 3.1% 5.6% Deflator 2.5% 3.1% 4.1% 3.1% 4.9%
electricity, gas, water supply and other utility services) and
Source: CSO; ICRA research
agriculture, forestry and fishing (to +5.3% from +3.0%).
However, this was offset by a slowdown in the growth of
With an 11.7% growth of taxes on products less subsidies
services to 7.3% in Q1 FY2019 from 9.5% in Q1 FY2018.
on products, GDP expansion (8.2%) exceeded the pace of
In sequential terms, GVA growth increased to 8.0% in Q1
GVA growth (8.0%) by 23 bps in Q1 FY2019. This was in
FY2019 from 7.6% in Q4 FY2018, led by the agricultural
contrast to the trend in Q1 FY2018, with GDP and GVA
sector (to +5.3% from +4.5%, reflecting the robust rabi
growth having converged to 5.6% in that quarter.
harvest), and industry (to +10.3% from +8.8%). However,
the growth in the services sector eased to 7.3% in Q1
FY2019 from 7.7% in Q4 FY2018. Notably, the growth of OUTLOOK
GVA excluding agriculture improved to 8.4% in Q1 FY2019 Amid an uneven monsoon, the hikes in minimum support
from 8.1% in Q4 FY2018. prices (MSPs) for kharif crops would boost rural demand,
The industrial recovery in Q1 FY2019 relative to the but contribute to higher inflation and/or fiscal risks. The
previous quarter was led by manufacturing (to +13.5% improvement in sentiment, staggered pay revision by
from +9.1%), which was the key driver of industrial growth various state governments and the recent GST rate cuts,
in that quarter. The improvement in the growth of volumes would support urban consumption demand. However,
and the healthy earnings reported by corporates, which there is a risk that higher inflation would weigh upon the
partly reflects the base effect related to the transition to the disposable income of consumers and the margins of
GST, boosted the GVA growth of manufacturing to 13.5% producers, preventing a faster pickup of economic growth.
in Q1 FY2019 from 9.1% in Q4 FY2018. However, the Continued consumption demand, as well as the benefits of
performance of construction (to +8.7% from +11.5%), the implementation of the GST, are expected to support
electricity, gas and water supply (to +7.3% from +7.7%) as volume growth. However, in the initial commentary on Q1
well as mining and quarrying growth (to +0.1% from FY2019 results, some companies have indicated that the
+2.7%) deteriorated in Q1 FY2019 relative to the previous unorganized segment continues to have a reasonable
7
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
market share and the transition from the unorganized to Exhibit 6: YoY GVA Growth and its Composition
organized segment has been modest. (Constant 2011-12 Prices)
A pickup in capacity utilisation is expected to set the stage 9%
8.0%
for a broadening of the investment recovery in H2 FY2019. 8% 7.6%
6.6%
Completion of the resolution process of cases admitted to 7% 6.1%
5.6%
the NCLT would improve utilisation of existing capacity and 6%
promote consolidation in some sectors. While bond yields 5%
have hardened over the last year, the two rate hikes would 4%
8
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
The GVA of mining and quarrying eased to a marginal 0.1% FY2019, from 26.8% in Q1 FY2018, according to data
in Q1 FY2019 from 1.7% in Q1 FY2018 and 2.7% in Q4 released by the Controller General of Accounts (CGA)
FY2018. The dip in growth in Q1 FY2019 relative to Q1
FY2018 was led by natural gas (to +0.4% from +4.4%) and Exhibit 8: YoY Services Growth and its Composition
crude oil (to -2.4% from +0.2%), despite the considerable (Constant 2011-12 Prices)
improvement in coal (to +13.2% from -4.4%).
10% 9.5%
7.7% 7.7%
Exhibit 7: YoY Industrial Growth and its Composition 8%
6.8%
7.3%
(Constant 2011-12 Prices) 6%
4%
10.3%
2%
8.8%
7.1% 0%
8%
6.1% Q3 FY2017 Q4 FY2017 Q1 FY2018 Q2 FY2018 Q3 FY2018
9
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
EXPENDITURE ON GDP based pickup in the investment cycle, in our view. For
GDP growth improved for fourth quarter in a row to 8.2% instance, capital spending of a sample of 18 state
in Q1 FY2019: The YoY growth of GDP (at constant 2011-12 governments1 displayed a modest 3.3% growth in Q1
prices) rose to a nine-quarter high 8.2% in Q1 FY2019 from FY2019. Moreover, the value of new projects and
5.6% in Q1 FY2018 and 7.7% in Q4 FY2018. completed projects contracted on a YoY basis to Rs. 2.3
trillion and Rs. 0.8 trillion, respectively, in Q1 FY2019 from
Exhibit 10: YoY Growth of PFCE and GFCE (Constant Rs. 2.6 trillion and Rs. 0.9 trillion, respectively, in Q1 FY2018
2011-12 Prices) (source: www.economicoutlook. cmie.com, Centre for
Monitoring Indian Economy, August 13, 2018).
20%
18% Exhibit 11: YoY Growth of GFCF (Constant 2011-12 Prices)
16%
16%
14%
12% 14%
10%
12%
8%
6% 10%
4%
8%
2%
0% 6%
Q1 FY2018 Q2 FY2018 Q3 FY2018 Q4 FY2018 Q1 FY2019
PFCE GFCE 4%
Source: CSO; ICRA research
2%
0%
PFCE growth increased to 8.6% in Q1 FY2019: The pace of
Q1 FY2018 Q2 FY2018 Q3 FY2018 Q4 FY2018 Q1 FY2019
expansion of PFCE increased to 8.6% in Q1 FY2019 from
6.9% in Q1 FY2018 and 6.7% in Q4 FY2018 (refer Exhibit Source: CSO; ICRA research
10). Consumption demand may have benefited from the
healthy rabi output, as well as the staggered pay revision by Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, HP, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala,
various state governments. MP, Maharashtra, Mizoram, Nagaland, Punjab, Rajasthan,
PFCE as a percentage of GDP (at current prices) stood at TN, Telangana, UP, WB and Uttarakhand GFCF accounted
58.4% in Q1 FY2019, in line with Q1 FY2018, but higher than for 3.1% of the 8.2% GDP growth in Q1 FY2019. Notably,
Q4 FY2018 (57.8%). Moreover, PFCE accounted for a GFCF as a percentage of GDP (at current prices) increased
substantial 4.7% of the 8.2% GDP growth in Q1 FY2019, mildly to 28.8% in Q1 FY2019 from 28.7% in Q1 FY2018,
exceeding the contributions of both GFCF and GFCE. but remained lower than Q4 FY2018 (29.1%).
Valuables recorded a contraction of 8.0% in Q1 FY2019
GFCE growth eased in Q1 FY2019: The pace of growth of (constant 2011-12 prices), in sharp contrast to the high
GFCE stood at 7.6% in Q1 FY2019, lower than the prints of expansion in Q1 FY2018 (+122.2%) and Q4 FY2018
17.6% in Q1 FY2018 and 16.9% in Q4 FY2018, partly (+29.1%). At current prices, valuables displayed a de-
reflecting the unfavourable base effect. growth of 15.1% in Q1 FY2019, narrower than the 25.1%
GFCE accounted for a modest 0.9% of the 8.2% GDP contraction in the value of gold imports in that quarter
growth in Q1 FY2019. GFCE as a percentage of GDP (at (source: Ministry of Commerce). Valuables as a percentage
current prices) stood at 12.5% in Q1 FY2019, similar to Q1 of GDP (at current prices) stood at 1.6% in Q1 FY2019,
FY2018 (+12.6%), but higher than Q4 FY2018 (+10.1%). lower than the print in Q1 FY2018 (2.2%), but higher than
the level of 1.1% for Q4 FY2018.
GFCF expanded by 10.0% in Q1 FY2019: GFCF growth The pace of growth of inventories increased to 8.6% in Q1
rose to 10.0% in Q1 FY2019 from the muted 0.8% in Q1 FY2019 relative to the prints for Q1 FY2018 (-2.9%) and Q4
FY2018. However, the pace of growth of GFCF eased in FY2018 (+7.8%). The contraction of 2.9% in Q1 FY2018
sequential quarters, compared to 14.4% in Q4 FY2018 may have reflected the de-stocking that happened prior to
(refer Exhibit 11). The 9.5% YoY rise in the output of capital the implementation of the GST. Inventories as a percentage
goods and the healthy 27.3% expansion in the GoI's capital of GDP (at current prices) stood at a mild 0.6% in Q1
spending in Q1 FY2019, are likely to have supported the FY2019, in line with the print in Q1 FY2018, but lower than
GFCF growth in Q1 FY2019. While there is a perceptible Q4 FY2018 (+0.7%).
improvement in sentiment, it is yet to translate into a broad-
10
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
Exhibit 12: YoY Growth of Exports and Imports (Constant Exhibit 14: GDP and Final Expenditures (YoY Growth,
2011-12 Prices) Constant 2011-12 Prices)
Q1 FY2018 Q2 FY2018 Q3 FY2018 Q4 FY2018 Q1 FY2019 FY2017 RE FY2018 PE
20%
GDP 5.6% 6.3% 7.0% 7.7% 8.2% 7.1% 6.7%
18% PFCE 6.9% 6.8% 5.9% 6.7% 8.6% 7.3% 6.6%
16% GFCE 17.6% 3.8% 6.8% 16.9% 7.6% 12.2% 10.9%
Exports 5.9% 6.8% 6.2% 3.6% 12.7% 5.0% 5.6%
14% less Imports 18.5% 10.0% 10.5% 10.9% 12.5% 4.0% 12.4%
Gross Capital Formation 5.1% 8.0% 10.1% 14.9% 8.6% 4.7% 9.6%
12%
GFCF 0.8% 6.1% 9.1% 14.4% 10.0% 10.1% 7.6%
10% Change in Stocks -2.9% 5.8% 7.2% 7.8% 8.6% -61.2% 4.5%
Valuables 122.2% 54.2% 37.2% 29.1% -8.0% -13.9% 58.8%
8% Discrepancies 57.3% 15.4% -55.0% -21.8% 0.4% 7.3% 13.9%
6%
4% Source: CSO; ICRA research
2%
0%
Q1 FY2018 Q2 FY2018 Q3 FY2018 Q4 FY2018 Q1 FY2019 ANNEXURE B
Exports Imports
Source: CSO; ICRA research
Exhibit 15: Composition of GVA at Basic Prices (Constant
Net exports exerted a drag on GDP expansion in Q1 2011-12 Prices)
Q1 FY2018 Q2 FY2018 Q3 FY2018 Q4 FY2018 Q1 FY2019 FY2017 RE FY2018 PE
FY2019: At constant prices, growth of exports posted an
GVA at Basic Prices 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
uptick to 12.7% in Q1 FY2019 from the subdued prints of Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing 13.6% 11.3% 18.8% 15.3% 13.3% 15.3% 14.8%
Industry 30.7% 30.9% 30.5% 32.8% 31.3% 31.5% 31.2%
5.9% in Q1 FY2018 and 3.6% in Q4 FY2018 (refer Exhibit Mining & Quarrying 3.4% 2.6% 3.0% 3.7% 3.2% 3.3% 3.2%
Manufacturing 17.1% 18.5% 17.5% 19.2% 18.0% 18.2% 18.1%
12). In contrast, the growth in imports eased to 12.5% in Q1 Electricity, gas, water supply & other utilities 2.3% 2.3% 2.1% 2.1% 2.3% 2.2% 2.2%
Construction 7.8% 7.5% 7.9% 7.8% 7.9% 7.8% 7.8%
FY2019 from 18.5% in Q1 FY2018, but remained higher Services 55.7% 57.8% 50.7% 51.9% 55.4% 53.2% 54.0%
Trade, Hotels, Transport, Communication &
than 10.9% in Q4 FY2018. Overall, net exports exerted a Services related to Broadcasting 19.1% 18.5% 18.8% 20.6% 18.9% 19.0% 19.3%
drag of 0.4% on the GDP growth in Q1 FY2019. Financial, Real Estate & Professional Services
Public Administration, Defence and Other Services
24.4%
12.2%
26.3%
13.0%
18.5%
13.3%
17.9%
13.4%
24.1%
12.4%
21.7%
12.6%
21.7%
13.0%
At current prices, data released by the CSO indicates that Source: CSO; ICRA research
exports and imports expanded by 17.3% and 17.1%,
respectively, in Q1 FY2019. However, the data released by Exhibit 16: Composition of GDP and Final Expenditures
the RBI, indicates a lower expansion of 14.3% and 11.5%, (Constant 2011-12 Prices)
respectively, in merchandise exports and imports in Q1 Q1 FY2018 Q2 FY2018 Q3 FY2018 Q4 FY2018 Q1 FY2019 FY2017 RE FY2018 PE
FY2019, in US$ terms. Notably, services exports and GDP 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
imports (in US$ terms) recorded a robust rise of 27.4% and PFCE 54.7% 54.5% 59.3% 54.6% 54.9% 55.8% 55.9%
GFCE 11.8% 11.8% 10.0% 9.5% 11.8% 9.9% 10.3%
40.9%, respectively, in Q1 FY2019. Exports 20.5% 20.6% 20.2% 19.5% 21.4% 20.8% 20.4%
less Imports 23.8% 22.7% 23.0% 20.9% 24.7% 22.1% 21.4%
Gross Capital Formation 34.4% 33.5% 33.9% 34.6% 34.5% 34.0% 33.2%
GFCF
Discrepancies rose marginally on a YoY basis: Change in Stocks
31.0%
0.7%
30.8%
0.7%
31.6%
0.7%
32.2%
0.7%
31.6%
0.7%
30.3%
2.0%
31.1%
0.7%
Discrepancies refer to the residual that remains after Valuables 2.6% 1.9% 1.6% 1.7% 2.2% 1.6% 1.3%
Discrepancies 2.3% 2.3% -0.4% 2.6% 2.2% 1.6% 1.6%
disaggregating GDP into its expenditure components, such
Source: CSO; ICRA research
as PFCE, GFCE and GFCF. The discrepancies in the GDP
data for Q1 FY2019 rose marginally to (+) Rs. 732.1 billion
(at 2011-12 prices), from the value of (+) Rs. 729.3 billion in
Q1 FY2019.
ANNEXURE A
GVA at Basic Prices 5.6% 6.1% 6.6% 7.6% 8.0% 7.1% 6.5%
Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing 3.0% 2.6% 3.1% 4.5% 5.3% 6.3% 3.4%
Industry 0.1% 6.1% 7.1% 8.8% 10.3% 6.8% 5.5%
Mining & Quarrying 1.7% 6.9% 1.4% 2.7% 0.1% 13.0% 2.9%
Manufacturing -1.8% 7.1% 8.5% 9.1% 13.5% 7.9% 5.7%
Electricity, gas, water supply & other utilities 7.1% 7.7% 6.1% 7.7% 7.3% 9.2% 7.2%
Construction 1.8% 3.1% 6.6% 11.5% 8.7% 1.3% 5.7%
Services 9.5% 6.8% 7.7% 7.7% 7.3% 7.5% 7.9%
Trade, Hotels, Transport, Communication &
Services related to Broadcasting 8.4% 8.5% 8.5% 6.8% 6.7% 7.2% 8.0%
Financial, Real Estate & Professional Services 8.4% 6.1% 6.9% 5.0% 6.5% 6.0% 6.6%
Public Administration, Defence and Other Services 13.5% 6.1% 7.7% 13.3% 9.9% 10.7% 10.0%
11
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
Currency movement Therefore, prima facie, there may be little reason to suspect
Turkish Elections took place on 24th June this year and this has that the fundamentals will drive down the rupee. However
factors of concern will be:-
been the benchmark used here in the table below for tracking
• Speculative interest in the market which can drive
exchange rate movements of various currencies. The dialogue movements
with USA was on but escalated towards the end of July and • Exporters delaying bringing back dollars
hence the point from whence the lira started to depreciate • Importers rushing in for buying dollars
continuously has been chosen as the second point of • Non Deliverable forwards market over which the RBI has
reference. The lira had moved in a range of 4.58-4.88/$ during little control.
the first period and then came down to 4.82/$ on 25th July.
Subsequently it rose continuously to 6.95/$ on 13th and then Where should the rupee be valued?
came down to 6.04/$ on 15th August.
While the present imbroglio in the political space will cause
How have currencies moved since June 24th (%) volatility depending on the way in which the dollar-lira value
moves, it may be expected that a value of Rs 69/$ should be the
Currency June 25 to Jul 25 July 25 to Aug 15 equilibrium one based on expected fundamentals in the rest of
Euro 0.02 3.19 the year which is predicated on the expectation of a higher
Turkish lira 2.88 25.17 trade deficit and CAD but higher invisibles, FPI, FDI and
Rand -3.00 10.79
Argentina peso 0.74 9.79 maintenance of ECBs
- CARE Ratings
12
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
13
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
With at least 1000 mutual fund schemes in the market and fund houses pitching different awards and rating, how to choose the 6-8 funds you
need to invest in? We have handpicked 40 Schemes across various categories based on different parameters like Risk adjusted returns,
JRL 40 Consistent performance and good Portfolio quality. We have also used the ratings from different rating agencies and tested the funds on
qualitative and quantitative risks to filter out the odd ones. We carefully looked at how a fund performs in Bull and Bear market cycles since we
Best Funds need funds that do well at all times. The results of these filters is JRL 40. Treat JRL 40 as the final universe of funds from which you will pick the
Performance as on 02-Sep-2018 ones that suit your investment needs and risk appetite to give you superlative returns in all markets.
Monthly Income Plan NAV 6M 1Y 2Y 3Y 5Y ExpRatio AUM(in Crs.) YTM MD Exit Load
Aditya Birla SL Regular Savings Fund(G) 39.14 5.56 1.16 6.96 9.71 13.92 2.10 2809.88 8.86 2.07 Nil upto 15% of units,1% in excess of limit on
or before 365D and Nil after 365D
ICICI Pru Regular Savings Fund(G) 40.71 7.92 5.36 8.50 9.65 12.84 2.01 1646.41 8.88 1.63 Nil on 10% of units within 1Y and 1% for more
than 10% of units within 1Y, Nil after 1Y.
HDFC Hybrid Debt Fund(G) 43.95 3.86 1.35 5.74 7.86 11.98 1.87 3442.34 8.42 3.80 Nil for 15% of investment and 1% for remaining
Investment on or before 1Y, Nil after 1Y
SBI Debt Hybrid Fund(G) 38.10 2.13 0.09 5.00 7.49 10.20 2.03 1486.58 8.58 2.85 Nil for 10% of investment and 1% for remaining
Investment on or before 1Y, Nil after 1Y
Benchmark
CRISIL Hybrid 85+15 - Conservative Index 7.20 3.38 6.86 8.59 10.78
14
MONEY GUIDE
CREATE - OPTIMISE - SECURE
When you want to invest in debt funds then you are confronted with scores of funds to choose from an exercise which no doubt leaves you
baffled. So, we have handpicked 40 schemes across various categories based on different parameters like superior return score, mean return
JRL 40 and volatility, portfolio concentration analysis, liquidity analysis, asset quality, average maturity, assets size, downside risk probability and
historic consistent performance. We have also used the ratings from various rating agencies. We will review these schemes once every quarter
Best Funds depending upon the liquidity and interest rate conditions and RBI's stance and our aim is to enable you to pick those schemes that meet your
investment horizon and risk appetite to give you returns better than over traditional fixed income instruments.
Performance as on 02-Sep-2018
Data Cruncher
Indian Sta s cs 31-Aug-18 31-Jul-18 % Change Global Sta s cs 31-Aug-18 31-Jul-18 % Change
Stock Indices America
CNX Nifty 11,680.50 11,356.50 2.85 Dow Jones (USA) 25,964.82 25,415.19 2.16
BSE Sensex 38,645.07 37,606.58 2.76 Nasdaq (USA) 8,109.54 7,672 5.71
BSE 200 5,040.98 4,870.95 3.49 Bovespa (Brazil) 76,677.53 79,220.43 (3.21)
BSE Midcap 16,881.33 16,013.44 5.42 IPC (Mexico) 49,547.68 49,698.01 (0.30)
BSE SmallCap 17,193.20 16,584.16 3.67 Europe
BSE Realty 2,141.43 2,094.86 2.22 FTSE (UK) 7,432.42 7,748.76 (4.08)
BSE Healthcare 15,945.17 14,205.73 12.24 CAC 40 (France) 5,406.85 5,511.30 (1.90)
BSE Bankex 31,741.91 31,005.96 2.37 DAX (Germany) 12,364.06 12,805.50 (3.45)
BSE I.T. 15,548.52 14,527.23 7.03 Asia Pack
BSE PSU 7,907.60 7,688.09 2.86 Shanghai Composite (China) 2,725.25 2,876.40 (5.25)
Money Market Nikkei 225 (Japan) 22,856 22,553.72 1.34
3 months CD 7.17% 7.16% 0.14 Hang Seng (Hong Kong) 27,888.55 28,583.01 (2.43)
1 Year CD 8.05% 8.06% (0.12) Straits Times (Singapore) 3,213.48 3,319.85 (3.20)
3 months CP 7.77% 8.05% (3.48) Taiwan Weighted (Taiwan) 11,063.94 11,057.51 0.06
1 Year CP 8.55% 8.33% 2.64 Kospi (South Korea) 2,322.88 2,295.26 1.20
Call Rate 6.30% 6.00% 5.00 Jakarta Composite (Indonesia ) 6,018.46 5,936.44 1.38
Gilts KLCI Composite (Malaysia ) 1,819.66 1,784.25 1.98
91 Day T-Bill 6.81% 6.62% 2.87 Other Statistics
364 Day T-Bill 7.34% 7.16% 2.53 Crude Oil (Brent) 77.42 74.25 4.27
10 Yr Benchmark 7.95% 7.77% 2.32 Dollar Index 95.08 94.49 0.62
Corporate Bonds US Fed Rate 2.00% 2.00% 0.00
5 Yr AAA Benchmark 8.71% 8.69% 0.23 10 Year Government Yield (US) 2.86% 2.96% (3.38)
10 Yr AAA Benchmark 8.72% 8.68% 0.46 3 month USD LIBOR 2.32% 2.34% (0.01)
Other Statistics 6 month USD LIBOR 2.53% 2.53% 0.00
Cpi(Inflation-monthly) 4.17% 4.92% (15.24) European Central Bank (interest rate ) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00
Forex Reserves (Billion USD) 401.29 405.1 (0.94) Bank of England (interest rate ) 0.75% 0.75% 0.00
INR vs.USD 71.00 68.54 3.60 10 Year Government Yield (UK) 1.43% 1.33% 7.44
Gold (Rs./10gm) 30,230 29,420 2.75 Bank of Japan (Interest Rate) -0.10% -0.10% 0.00
Silver (Rs./ Kg) 37,975 41,249 (7.94) 10 Year Government Yield (Japan) 0.10% 0.056% 83.93
G-Sec and Corp Bonds prices move inversely to interest rates and hence opposite effect will be portrayed in percentage columns.
* CPI data is as of July and June 2018
Published by Kamal Print House for J R Laddha Financial Services Pvt Ltd., 5th Floor Nehru Center, Worli, Mumbai – 400018. and printed at 9, Laxmibai
Compound, Hotel Suresha Lane, Tarun Bharat Soc. Chakala Andheri East, Mumbai -400099 . This publication is for private circulation only. Not for sale.