Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4) People Vs Malmstedt
4) People Vs Malmstedt
Facts:
Issue:
Whether or not the decision of the trial court should be reversed (or affirmed)
because the accused argues that the search and arrest was made without a warrant
Held:
Ratio:
The constitution states that a peace officer or a private person may arrest a person
without a warrant when in his presence the person to be arrested has committed, is
actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense. The offense was recognized
with the warrantless search conducted by NARCOM prompted by probable cause: (1) the
receipt of information by NARCOM that a Caucasian coming from Sagada had
prohibited drugs in his possession and (2) failure of the accused to immediately present
his passport.