Republic of the Philippines Document Code: SDO-QF-SGOD-SMME

Revision: 00
Region I Effectivity date:
LA UNION SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE
On-site Monitoring and Evaluation Tool Name of Office:
SGOD-SMME

(To be accomplished by individual monitors on a basis; Evaluations are to be validated with session-facilitator
evaluation of participants. The results will be the basis for debriefing sessions for action by the management team.)

GENERAL INFORMATION
PROGRAM/ACTIVITY CLUSTER
MONITORED
REGION LEARNING ARE
DIVISION CLASS SECTION
LEARING SERVICE NUMBER OF
PROVIDER PARTICIPANTS
VENUE NUMBER OF
TRAINERS
INCLUSIVE DATES DATE MONITORED

I. PROGRAM DELIVERY
ACTIVITIES STRONG
STRONGLY
LY AGREE DISAGREE
DISAGREE
AGREE
1. Conduct of Program Delivery (daily monitoring)
 Maximum of fifty (50) pax per class
 Program started according to schedule
 Program ended according to schedule
 Attendance was systematically monitored
 Ground rules were cleared
 Compliance of ground rules was monitored
 Modification in activities and schedule were
consulted with the participants
 Modification in activities and schedule were
given ahead of time
2. Training Site/Venue
 Adequately lit
 Clean
 Comfortable temperature
 Clean Comfort Rooms
 Equipment were serviceable
 Medical care was available e.g common
medicines, first aid
3. Accommodations
 Clean
 facilities were in good working order
4. Meals
 Good Quality
 Sufficient Quality
 Generally Healthy
 Good variety
 Meals served in time

QM - Page 1 of 2
 Republic of the Philippines Document Code: SDO-QF-SGOD-SMME
Revision: 00
Region I Effectivity date:
LA UNION SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE
On-site Monitoring and Evaluation Tool Name of Office:
SGOD-SMME

5. Session and trainers

 The trainers used approved resources
package(session guides, slides, videos, etc.)
 Training/ learning materials were adequate
 Training/ learning materials were given on time
 Support materials were available
 Support materials were in Good condition
6. Program Management Team
 Available when needed
 Courteous
 Efficient
 Responsive to the needs of participants
7. QAME system
 Monitoring team was present
 A system for gathering participant feedback
was in place
 At least one (1) monitor was assigned per class
 Latest QAME forms were used.
 Conducted daily debriefing session
 Data gathering was used to inform
management
 Issued discussed in debriefing session were
resolved/addressed

Comments and suggestions:

______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________

II. CRITICAL INCIDENTS; For any remarkable events/situation (positive or negative) encountered, accomplish the
STAR form.
Situation/Task-Describe the specific situation and/or task that needed to be accomplished.
Action- Describe how the person/s or the team responded to the situation or acted on the task at hand,
Result_ Describe the effect of the action or lack of action

CRITICAL INCIDENTS
(STAR form will be used to document critical incidents not captured in QAME forms; to be accomplished as needed)

SITUATION/TASK ACTION RESULT

Name of Monitor (last name, first name): ____________________________________________

Region: _____________________ Division/Office: ____________________________________

QM - Page 2 of 2