You are on page 1of 1

JOSUE SONCUYA vs.

CARMEN DE LUNA
G.R. No. L-45464 April 28, 1939

FACTS:

Petitioner Jose Soncuya filed a complaint against respondent Carmen De Luna for
damages as a result of the fraudulent administration of the partnership, “Centro Escolar de
Senoritas” of which petitioner and the deceased Avelino Librada were members. For the
purpose of adjudicating to plaintiff damages which he alleged to have suffered as a partner, it
is necessary that a liquidation of the business be made that the end profits and losses may be
known and the causes of the latter and the responsibility of the defendant as well as the
damages in which each partner may have suffered, maybe determined.

ISSUE:

Whether the petitioner is entitled to damages.

RULING:

According to the Supreme Court, the complaint is not sufficient to constitute a cause
of action on the part of the plaintiff as a member of the partnership to collect damages from
defendant as managing partner thereof, without previous liquidation. It was not alleged in the
complaint that such a liquidation has been effected nor is it prayed that it be made.
Consequently, there is no reason or cause for plaintiff to institute the action for damages which
he claims from the managing partner Carmen de Luna. Thus, for a partner to be able to claim
from another partner who manages the general co-partnership, allegedly suffered by him by
reason of the fraudulent administration of the latter, a previous liquidation of said partnership
is necessary

You might also like