• Force majeure means a condition beyond party’s control
• From contractor’s standpoint - owner caused delay is force majeure (even though delay was within owner’s control) • Inclement weather, flood - force majeure from both parties’ standpoint • Common conditions of force majeure – Acts of God, war, riots, labor strikes, inability to obtain critical materials when all proper procurement actions have been taken, and other similar situations – Failure of prime contractor’s subcontractors or material suppliers to meet time requirements due to conditions beyond control. This is a heavy burden of proof FORCE MAJEURE • Contract relief for conditions of Force Majeure – Contract relief for conditions of force majeure normally is an extension of time to avoid unfair assessment of liquidated damages – Resulting delay is contractually excusable – If an enforceable no-damages-for delay clause is absent in contract and if the condition is caused by the owner, the delay is also compensable, entitling the contractor to both time extension & additional payment • Time extensions – Though time extensions are promised by contract, they are far from automatic – Contractor should follow prescribed contract procedures & must prove entitlement to assure that contractually justified time extensions will be forthcoming FORCE MAJEURE
• Importance of notice of claim
– Contractor claiming time extension must file notice of claim within a stated no. of calendar days from the event giving rise to claim or waive the right to relief – Although sometimes owner possesses constructive notice of cause of the delay - important for contractor to file time extension claims within contractually prescribed time – If contractor has not requested time extension the owner is not responsible – When contractor has been delayed - immediate written request for time extension must be made – Initial notice should be followed by written claim for the no. of days that contract has been delayed – Claim filed at earliest possible time so that extent of delay can be determined FORCE MAJEURE
• Contractor responsibility to prove entitlement
– In any type of claim situation whether for time, additional contract payment, or both, the contractor bears the legal burden to prove entitlement under contractual terms to whatever is being claimed – Contractor must support a time extension claim showing that delaying events have extended contract completion – Usually done by supporting claim with Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule analysis indicating extent of overall delay of project FORCE MAJEURE
• Owner’s responsibility and contractor time extension
requests – CPM schedule analysis indicating delay and request for discrete no. of days in accordance with CPM result - submitted to owner in support of contractor’s claim – If time extension claim is properly supported, owner has a duty to grant the time extension – Failure of owner to grant a properly supported request for time extension or failure to grant in timely manner is breach of contract FORCE MAJEURE
• Granting of time extensions
– A time extension can only be granted by a formal change to the contract executed by the owner – Contract date not extended until and unless owner formally notifies the contractor by a change to the contract – Following the receipt of contractor’s claim of time extension if a change to contract is not initiated - contractor must assume that claim has been denied – If owner fails to act or denies properly supported time extension claim - contractor’s course of action is clear • First a notice to be filed, in writing, protesting the denial or lack of timely action FORCE MAJEURE
• Secondly - contractor should take all possible &
reasonable action to meet unextended contract completion date - because failure to prosecute the work by the then existing completion date is a contractual breach - results in termination of contract for default – Contractor’s proper position (after protesting and writing) is to meet unextended completion date & pursue remedy under the doctrine of constructive acceleration