1628P

IN THE

LEARNED

AT NEW DELHI

IN THE MATTER OF

SANDEEP

(PLAINTIFF)

v.

RATNA

(DEFENDANT)

CIVIL SUIT NO.:XXX/2018

[UNDER SECTION

MEMORIAL ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF

STATEMENT OF FACTS
 STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

The counsel for the plaintiff most humbly and respectfully submits that the Honourable

Supreme Court at New Delhi has the requisite territorial, pecuniary and subject matter

jurisdiction to try and hear the present appeal under Section _________ of the Civil Procedure

Code,1908.

The Counsel for the plaintiff most humbly submits to the jurisdiction of this Honourable

_______for deciding the preliminary issue of jurisdiction.

ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS ADVANCED
 PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Wherefore, in the light of the facts stated, issues raised, authorities cited and arguments

advanced, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed before this _______Court to:

All of which is most humbly and respectfully submitted.

25th October 2018 1628P

New Delhi (Counsel for the Plaintiff)

THE ADVERTISEMENT GIVEN IN THE NEWSPAPER WAS AN OFFER RATHER THAN AN INVITATION TO

OFFER.

First argument concers itself with the question whether the advertisement was an offer or

not.

If it is not intended to be binding then its an invitation to offer.the distinctions b/w offer and

invitation to offer depends upon the intention of the person making it, the intention that he

would be bound no sooner the offeree signifies his assent to it.

“The statement is an offer if the person making the statement shows ‘the intention’ to be

bound immediately on acceptance”

here, Ratna by publishing an advertisement in the newspaper made an offer as she wanted