BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adger Carolyn (2003), ‘Discourse in Educational Settings, in Deborah

Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi Hamilton (Eds) (2003).
Ahmed Mazin(2010). An Intertextual Approach to Arabic-
EnglishTranslation. College of Basic Education Researchers Journal
Vol. 10, No. 1.
Alexander, R.J. (1997). Aspects of verbal humour in English. Tübingen:
Gunter Narr Verlag Tübingen.
Allen, G. (2000) Intertextuality. London: Routledge.
Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and Curriculum. London Routledge and
Kegan Paul.
Argiris Archakis and Villy Tsakona(2011). ‘Informal talk in formal
settings: Humorous narratives in Greek parliamentary debates’. In
Tsakona, Villy and Diana Elena Popa (eds.), 2011. Studies in
Political Humour: In Between Political Critique and Public,
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aronowitz, S. (1988). Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern
Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Atkinson, J.M. (1988) Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body
Language of Politics.London: Routledge.
Atkinson, P., Davies, B., and Delamont, S. (eds). (1995). Discourse and
Reproduction. Essays in Honor of Basil Bernstein. Cresskill, NJ:
Hampton Press.
Attardo, Salvatore and Raskin, Victor. (1991) Script theory revis(it)ed: joke
similarity and joke representation model. In: HUMOR, the
International Journal of Humor Research, Mouton de Gruyter,
volume 4-3/4 pages 293-348.
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Austin,J.(1975). How to do Things with Words, Second Edition.Oxford:
Oxford University Press.

252
Avidar, (2012). How a Politician Can Successfully Use Self-Humor and
Apply Public Relations Principles Online: An Israeli Case Study
Israeli Journal of Humor Research, 1(2), 2012.
Ayala, S. P. de (2001) FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting needs?
Politeness in Question Time. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 143–169.
Bakhtin,M.(1935/1981).‘Discourse in the Novel’.In
M.HOLOQUIST(eds.).The dialogic imagination,Austin, TX,
University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin,M.(1953/1986).‘Speech Genres and other Late Essays. Austin, TX,
University of Texas Press.
Barreca, Regina. (1990). They used to call me Snow White: Women’s
strategic use of humor.New York: Viking Press.
Bayley, P. (2004).Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse.
Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.
Beaugrande & Dressler (1981: 10-11)BEAUGRANDE, Robert de &
DRESSLER, Wolfgang.(1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics.
London: Longman. (PR)
Berger, A. (1993).An anatomy of humor. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Bernstein, B. (1975).Class, Codes and Control. Volume 3, Towards a
Theory of Educational Transmissions. London: Routledge and
Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, B. (1990). The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, B. (1996), Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity, London:
Taylor and Francis.
Bevitori, Cinzia. (2004). Negotiating conflict: Interruptions in British and
Italian parliamentary debates. In P. Bayley (ed.) Cross-cultural
perspectives on parliamentary discourse. 87-109. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Bhatia Aditi. (2006) Discourse & Society, Critical Discourse analysis of
politica press conferences Vol 17(2): 173–203 SAGE Publications
Biletzki, A. (1997) Talking Wolves: Thomas Hobbes on the Language of
Politics and the Politicsof Language. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.

253
Bippus, Amy. (2007) Humor: International Journal of Humor Research,
Vol 20(2), 2007, 105-121.
Blommaert, Jan.(2005).Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Bousfield, Derek.(2008).Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins B.V.
Bradac, J. J., Hemphill, M. R., and Tardy, C. H. (1981). Language style on
trial: effects of "powerful" and "powerless" speech upon judgments
of victims and villains. Western Journal of Speech Communication,
45(4), 327-41.
Brown, P and Levinson,S.( 1987).Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Brown,G. and Yule,G.(1983).Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Buijzen, M., Valkenburg, P. M. (2004). "Developing a Typology of Humor
in Audiovisual Media". Media Psychology, 6, 147–167.
C. George Boeree. "Humor". Webspace.ship.edu. Retrieved 2012-12-11.
Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (1990). Deeds done in words:
presidential rhetoric and the genres of governance. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press
Candlin C. & Maley Y. (1997). Intertextuality and interdiscursive in the
discourse of alternative dispute resolution. In B. Gunarrsson, P.
Linell & B. Nordberg (eds.): The Construction of Professional
Discourse, 201-22. London: Longman.
Cantor, Joanne. (1976). What is funny to whom? The role of gender.
Journal of Communication 26 (3):164-72.
Carbó, Teresa. (1992). Towards an interpretation of interruptions in
Mexican parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society 3(1): 25-45.
Carolyn Temple Adger (2003) ‘Discourse in Educational Settings, In
Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi Hamilton (Eds)
(2003).The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,Wiley-Blackwell.
Carranza Marquez, Aurelia (2010). The faces of humour: Humour as
catalyst of face in the context of the British and Spanish
Parliament.Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 23.
467-504.

254
Cazden, C.B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and
learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Back (1st citation) | (2nd
citation)
Cazden, C.B., John, V., & Hymes, D. (Eds.). (1972). Functions of language
in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Chilton, P. (ed.) (1985) Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate:
Nukespeak Today. London:Frances Pinter.
Chilton,P. and Schä.ner,C. (1997: 207), Discourse and Politics. In
Discourse as Social Interaction (eds) Van Dijk(1997).A Multi
Disciplinary Introduction.Sage Publications.
Choullaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity:
Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press.
Chun,Elaine W.(2004),” Ideologies of legitimate mockery: Margaret Cho’s
revoicings of mock Asian”.Pragmatics 14:263:289.
Cinzia Bevitori (2004). in "Negotiating conflict - Interruptions in British
and Italian parliamentary debates" (pp. 87 - 109). In Bayley, P.
(2004). Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse.
Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.
Clark, H.H. and T.B. and Carlson (1982). ‘Speech Acts and Hearer’s
Beliefs’, N.V.Smith (ed.), Mutual Knowledge, Academic Press ,
New York, 1982, pp.1-37
Collins, J. (2002) ‘Terrorism’, in J. Collins and R. Glover (eds) Collateral
Language: A User’sGuide to America’s New War. New York: New
York University Press.
Constantinescu Mihaela Viorica,(2012)‘Humour as a relational
management Strategy’ In: Revue roumaine de linguistique 57
(2012) 4, 389-398, BLLDB.
Cook Guy (1989). Discourse.Oxford University Press.
Copeland, Gary W. and Samuel C. Patterson (eds). (1997). Parliaments in
the modern world: Carolyn Temple Adger (2003 Changing
institutions. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Coulthard, M. & Montgomery, M. (1981). Studies in discourse analysis.
London: Routledge.

255
Coulthard, M. (1986).An introduction to Discourse Analysis.London:
Longman.
Coulthard, R. M. (ed.) (1994). Advances in Written Text Analysis. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Crystal David (1997). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics 4th
Edition.David Crystal. Blackwell.
Culpeper, J. (1996). 'Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness'. Journal of
Pragmatics 25,347-3 67.
Cutting Joan ( 2002). Pragmatics and Discourse,Routledge,London.
Dahlberg, W. (1945). Lincoln the wit. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 31,
424–427.
Danet, B. (ed.) (1984). Legal discourse. Text, 4, 1/3, special issue.
Davies, C.( 2008). Response essays in Muhammed cartoons and humour
research:A collection of essays. In P.Lewia (Ed.), Humour:
International Journal of Humour Research, 21. 30-32
Davis, K. (1988). Power Under the Microscope. Toward a Grounded
Theory of Gender Relations in Medical Encounters. Dordrecht:
Foris.
De Ayala, S. P. (2001). TTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting Needs? -
Politeness in QuestionTime'. Journal of Pragmatics 3 3,143 -169.
De Beaugrande,R.,and Dressler,W.(1981). Introduction to Text
Linguistics.London :Routledge.
Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi Hamilton (Eds) (2003).The
Handbook of Discourse Analysis,Wiley-Blackwell.
Devorkin, Earl, and J. Efran, (1967).”The Angered: Their Susceptibility to
Varieties of Humor." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6
233-236.
Dibattista Denise (2004). "Legitimising and informative discourse in the
Kosovo debates in the British House of Commons and the Italian
Chamber of Deputies" (pp. 151 - 184). In Bayley, P. (2004). Cross-
cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam
Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.

256
Dumas, Bethany K. (1990). An analysis of the adequacy of federally
Mandated cigarette package warnings. In Judith N. Levi and Anne
Graffam Walker, eds., Language in the Judicial Process (New York:
Plenum, 1990)
Duszak, A. (ed.) (1997). Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Edelman, M. (1974). The political language of the helping
professions.Politics and Society, 4,295-310
Encarta World English Dictionary (1999), Bloomsbury Publishing: London.
Escarpit, R. (1963)L'humour. Paris: PUF .
Evan Esar ‘The Humor of Humor- The Art and Techniques of Popular
Comedy, 1952 ,Bramhall House .
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity
Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992a) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992b) Discourse and Text: Linguistics and intertextual
analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 3(2): 193-
217.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. (London, Longman).
Fairclough, N. (1995a) Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of
language. London, UK: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1995a). Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
Fairclough, N. (1995b) Critical Language Awareness and Self-identity in
Education, in D. Corson (ed.), Discourse and Power in Educational
Organizations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995c) Media Discourse. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Fairclough, N. (1998) Political discourse in media: an analytical
framework.In approaches to media Discourse, A. Bell and p. garret
(eds.), 142-162.Oxford:Blackwell.
Fairclough, N. (2000) Discourse, Social Theory, and Social Research: The
discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2): 163-
95.

257
Fairclough, N. (2000a), ‘Discourse, Social Theory and Social Research: the
Discourse of Welfare Reform’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol. 4,
No. 2, May 2000 Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 163-195.
Fairclough, N. (2000b). New Labour New Language. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2001a) Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social
Scientific Research, in R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of
Critical Discourse Analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Fairclough, N. (2001b) Language and Power(2nd ed.). London, UK:
Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003) ‘Political Correctness’: The politics of culture and
language. Discourse and Society, 14(1): 17-28.
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997), 'Critical Discourse Analysis'. in van
Dijk, T. A. (ed. )Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 25 8-284.
London: Sage.
Fairclough, N.(1995b). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the
Marketisation of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse &
Society 4(2): 133–168.
Fairclough, Norman (1996). A Reply to Henry Widdowson's 'Discourse
Analysis: A Critical View'. Language & Literature 5(1): 49–56
Feinberg, L. (1978). The secret of humor.Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi.
Fisher, S. (1995). Nursing Wounds. Nurse Practitioners, Doctors, Women
Patients, and the Negotiation of Meaning. New Brunswick, NJ:
Rutgers University Press.
Fisher, S. and Todd, A. D. (eds). (1986). Discourse and Institutional
Authority. Medicine, Education, and Law. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Fisher, Sue & Alexandra Dundas Todd, eds. (1983). The Social
Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Washington, D.C.:
Center for Applied Linguistics.
Foster, M. (1995), Talking that talk. The language of control,curriculum
and critique. Linguistic and Education 7.
Foucault, M. (1971): L'ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard

258
Foucault, M. (1975): Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris:
Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1976): Histoire de la sexualité I: La volonté de savoir. Paris:
Gallimard
Foucault, M. (1980).Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other
writings.1972-77.NewYork. Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1994): Two Lectures (07 & 14.01.1976). In: Kelly, Michael
(ed.) (1994): Critique and Power:Recasting the Foucault / Habermas
Debate. Cambridge, Massachusetts / London: MIT Press: 17 – 46.
Foucault, M. (1994b): The Art of Telling the Truth. In: Kelly, Michael
(ed.)(1994): Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault / Habermas
Debate. Cambridge, Massachusetts / London: MIT Press: 139 – 148
Fraley, B. (1999.) Humor as the Mechanism for Creating Feelings of
Closeness Between Strangers. Ph.D. diss. SUNY: Stony Brook, NY .
Franklin, M. and Norton, P. (eds). (1993). Parliamentary questions. Oxford:
Oxford University Press,
Freeman, S. H., & Heller, M. S. (1987). Medical discourse. Text, 7 (special
issue)
Gadavanij, Savitri (2000, 2002). Intertexuality as Discourse Strategy: The
case of No Confidence Debates in Thailand. In Nelson, D. (ed.)
Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9 (2002), pp. 35-
55.
Gadavanij, Savitri (2002) Discursive strategies for political survival: A
critical discourse analysis of Thai no confidence debates, The
University of Leeds, Department of
LinguisticsandPhonetics/Polis.http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/803/1/u
k_bl_ethos_270747.pdf
Gee, J.P. (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and
Method. London: Routledge
Gee, J.P. (1996).Social linguistics and literacies. Ideologies in
discourses.(2nd Edition).London. Taylor and Francis.
Geis, M.L. (1987). The Language of Politics. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Georgalidou Marianthi (2011). “Stop caressing the ears of the hooded”:
Political humour in times of conflict. In Tsakona, Villy and Diana

259
 Elena Popa (eds.), 2011. Studies in Political Humour: In Between
Political Critique and Public, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giroux, H. (1981). Ideology, Culture, and the Process of Schooling.
London: Falmer Press
Glasgow, R. D. (1995:178) Madness, Masks and Laughter: An Essay on
Comedy. NJ, London, Canada: Associated University Presses.
Glover, R. (2002). ‘The War on____’, in J. Collins and R. Glover (eds)
Collateral. Language:A User’s Guide to America’s New War. New
York: New York University Press.
Goffman, E. (1955). On face work. Psychiatry, 18,213–231
Goffman, E.(1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour.
Goldstein, Jeffrey, and Paul McGhee, eds. (1983).Handbook of Humor
Research. 2 vols. NY: Springer
Green, J.( 1983).Exploring Classroom Discourse. Linguistic perspectives
on teaching-learning processes. Educational Psychologist,18.
Green, J., & Wallat, C (Eds.1981). Ethnography and language in
educational settings.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
Grice H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan
(eds.).
Grice, P.(1989). Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
Grimes, W. (1955). A theory of humor for public address: The mirth
experience. CommunicationMonographs, 22,217–226.
Gruber, H. (1993). 'Political Language and Textual Vagueness'. Pragmatics
3 (1), 1-2 8.
Grundy, P. (2000). Doing Pragmatics. London: Arnold. 2 nd edn.
Gruner, C. (1965). Is wit to humor what rhetoric is to poetic? Central States
Speech Journal, 16,17–22.
Gruner, C. (1967). Effect of humor on speaker ethos and audience
information gain. Journal of Communication, 17,228–233.

260
Gruner, C. R. (1996). 'Wit and Humour in Mass Communication'. in
Chapman, AT and Foot,H. C. (eds. ) Humour and Laughter: Theory
Research and Applications, pp. 28 7-3 12.London: Transaction.
Gruner,C.R. (1997). The game of humour : A comprehensive theory of why
we laugh.New Brunswick, NJ.:Transaction publishers Handleman D.
GumperZ, J. and D. Hymes (eds.1972), Social Meaning in Linguistic
Structures: Code Switching in Northern Norway (with Jan-Petter
Blom). In: J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in
Sociolinguistics. New York Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Gumperz, J.T. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Hackman, Michael Z. (1988). Audience reactionsto the use of direct and
personal 245 disparaging humor in informative public address.
Communication Research Reports5 (2):126-30.
Hanks,W( 2000). Intertexts: Writing on Language ,Utterance and
Context.Lanham,MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
Hanks,W.(1996).Language and Communicative Practice.Boulder:
Westview.
Harris, S. (1991). ‘Evasive Action: Politicians and Political Interviews’, in
P. Scannell (ed.)Broadcast Talk. London: Sage.
Harris, Sandra (2001).Being Politically impolite. “Extending Politeness
Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse”.Discourse and Society
12.
Hart, R. P. 1984. Verbal style and the presidency: A computer-based
analysis. New York:Academic Press
Hawkes T. (1977). Structuralism and Semiotics. London: Methuen.
Heap, J. (1985). Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge:
Reading Lessons. Curriculum Inquiry.,15.
Heap, J. (1988). On task in classroom discourse.Linguistics and Education
Heath, S.B. (1983). Ways with words: Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press.

261
Holly, W. (1989) ‘Credibility and Political Language’, in R. Wodak (ed.)
Language, Powerand Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Holmes, J., and Marra, M. (2006). Humour and leadership style. Humour:
International Journal of Humour Research, 19, 119-138.
Hudson, K. (1978) The Language of Modern Politics. London: Macmillan
Press Ltd.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic
Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ilie, Cornelia (1999).Disagreement about agreement: key word polarization
in parliamentary debates. In P Linell, L. Ahrenberg,
&L.Jönsson(Eds.),Samtalochspråkanvändningiprofessionerna.Rappo
rtfrånASLA:shostsymposium,Linköpin 6-7November 1997 (pp. 111-
122).Uppsala: UppsalaUniversity.
Ilie, Cornelia. (2000). Cliché-based metadiscursive argumentation in the
Houses of Parliament. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics,10 (1):65-84.
Ilie, Cornelia. (2001). Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms
of confrontation. In R. Dirven, R. Frank and C. Ilie (eds.) Language
and Ideology, Vol. II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches, 235-263,
‘Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ilie, C. (2003). Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates.
Journal of Language and Politics, 1(2), 269-291.
Ilie, C. (2003). Parenthetically speaking: Parliamentary parentheticals as
rhetorical strategies. In M. Bondi & S. Stati (Eds.), Current Studies
in Dialogic Communication (pp. 253-264). Tubingen: Max
Niemeyer Verlag.
Ilie, Cornelia. (2003a). Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary
debates. Journal of Language and Politics 1(2): 269-291.
Ilie, Cornelia. (2003b). Histrionic and agonistic features of parliamentary
discourse. Studies in Communication Sciences 3(1): 25-53.
Ilie, Cornelia. (2003c). Parenthetically speaking: Parliamentary
parentheticals as rhetorical strategies. In M. Bondi and S. Stati (eds.)
Current Studies in Dialogic Communication, 253-264. Tübingen:
Max Niemeyer Verlag.

262
Ilie, Cornelia. (2003d). Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the
English and Swedish Parliaments. Forthcoming in P. Bayley (ed.)
Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse. 45-86.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ilie Cornelia (2004) "Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British
and Swedish parliaments: A rhetorical approach"(pp.45-86). In
Bayley, P. (2004). Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary
discourse. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub.Co.
Ilie, Cornelia. (2004). Interruption patterns in British parliamentary debates
and in drama dialogue. In A. Betten and M. Dannerer (eds.)
Dialoganalyse IX - Dialogue in Literature and the Media. 311-326.
Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Ilie, Cornelia. (2005). Politeness in Sweden: Parliamentary forms of
address. In L. Hickey and M.
Ilie, Cornelia. (2006a). Parliamentary Discourses. In Keith Brown (ed.)
Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics2ndEdition, Vol. 9, 188-
196. Oxford: ElsevierIlie, Cornelia. 2010. Strategic uses of
parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and
the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics 42(4): 885-911.
Ilie, Cornelia (2010). ‘Identity co-construction in parliamentary discourse
practices’. In Ilie, Cornelia (2010 ed.), European Parliaments under
Scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. John
Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ilie, Cornelia (2010 ed.), European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse
strategies and interaction practices. John Benjamins Publishing
Company.
Kant, Immanuel.(1951) Critique of Judgment. J. Bernard, trans. (1892) NY:
Hafner 1951.
Kant, Immanuel.(1990) Kritik der Urteilskraft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Kashyap, Subhash. C. (1992). Parliamentary Wit and Humour, Shipra,
Delhi.
Keep, Christopher; Tim McLaughlin and Robin Parmar (2000).
“Intertextuality.”The Electronic Labyrinth. [Online].
http://elab.eserver.org/hfl0278.html [2007, June 17].

263
Koller, Marvin. (1988.)Humor and Society: Explorations in the Sociology
of Humor. Houston, TX: Cap & Gown Press 1988.
Kristeva, J. (1969)Desire in Language: a semiotic approach.
Oxford:Blackwell.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature
and Art. Leon S. Roudiez (ed.), T. Gora et al (trans.). New York:
Columbia University Press.
Kristeva J. (1986). Word, dialogue and novel. In T. Moi (Ed.) The Kristeva
Reader , 34-61. Oxford: Blackwell.
Krzyzanowski M. & Wodak R. (2008). The Politics of Exclusion: Debating
Migration in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Ksenia Shilikhina (2013) Canned jokes in Russian public political
discourse. In The European Journal of Humour Research Vol 1 No
2(1).Pgs(84-100).
Lakoff, R.T. (1990) Talking Power: The Politics of Language in Our Lives.
New York: Basic Books.
Leech, G. (1983): Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lefcourt, Herbert.(2001:27).Humor: The Psychology of Living Buoyantly.
NY: Kluwer/Plenum 2001.
Levi and Anne Walker (eds), Languagein the Judicial Process. New
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
Limon, D and W R McKay (eds) (1997) Erskine May — Parliamentary
Practice, Twenty-second edition, London, Butterworths.
Lockyer,Sharon and Michael Pickering (2001). “Dear Shit-shovellers:
Humour, Censure and the Discourse of Complaint.” Discourse and
Society, 12: 633-651.
Lockyer,Sharon and Michael Pickering eds. (2005). Beyond a Joke: The
Limits of Humour. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Long and Straesser (1988) as cited in Alexander (1997: 11) Alexander, R.J.
(1997). Aspects of verbal humour in English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr
Verlag Tübingen.

264
Lynch, Owen (2002). Humorous Communication:Finding a Place for
Humor in Communication Research, In
CommunicationTheoryTwelve:FourNovember2002. pp 423–44.
McCarthy, E. (2002) ‘Justice’, in J. Collins and R. Glover (eds) Collateral
Language: A User’sGuide to America’s New War. New York: New
York University Press.
McGhee & Goldstein (1983, I: v) argue that “There is still no agreement on
how humor should be defined” Ruch, W. and Proyer,R.T.( 2008).
The fear of being laughed at:Individual and group differences in
Gelotophobia. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research,
21(1),47-67.
McGwire, B.S. (1980).Translation Studies. London: Mthuen and Co.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Meisel,Joseph S. (2009): Humour and insults in the House of Commons:
The case of Palmerston and Disraeli.Parliamentary History 28. 228-
231:
Mercer, N.(1995).The Guided Construction and Learners. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters.
Mey, J. (1993): Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Beijing: Foreign Language
Teaching and Research Press; Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Meyer,J.C. ( 2000).Humour as a double edged sword:Four functions of
humour in communication. Communication Theory 10(3,)310-331.
Mishler, E. G. (1984). The Discourse of Medicine. Dialectics in Medical
Interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Morgan, Roger and Tame, Clare (eds). (1996). Parliaments and parties: The
European Parliament in the political life of Europe. London:
Macmillan.
Morreall, J. (1983). Taking laughter seriously. Albany: State University of
New York press).
Morreall, J. ( 2005). Humour and the conduct of Politics. In S. Lockyer, and
M.Pickering (Eds.), Beyond the Joke. The limits of humour( pp 64-
78) Basingstoke,UK: Palgrave.

265
Morreall, J. (2009). Comic Relief. A comprehensive philosophy of
humour.Chichester: Wiley- Blackwell.
Morris, Charles William (1938): “Foundations of the theory of signs”, in
Morris, C. W. (ed.) (1971). Writings on the General Theory of
Signs. The Hague: Mouton.
Mulder M.P., Nijholt A. (2002). Humour Research: State of the Art.
Technical report. CTIT, Centre for Telematics and Information
Technology, University of Twente, Twente, the Netherlands.
Mulkay, Michael (1988). On Humour.Cambridge: Polity
Müller Ralph (2011) ‘Fun in the German parliament? In Tsakona, Villy and
Diana Elena Popa (eds.), 2011. Studies in Political Humour: In
Between Political Critique and Public, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mumby and Stohl (1991), cited in Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An
Introduction. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research
Press; Blackwell Publishers Ltd. (Mey,2001:191)
Mumby, D. and Stohl, C. (1991). ‘Power and discourse in organization
studies: Absence and dialectic of control’. Discourse and Society, 2,
313-332.
Negrine, R. (1994). Politics and the Mass Media in Britain. London:
Routledge.Ng & Bradac, 1993.
Nilsen, D.L.F. (1990). The social functions of political humour.The Journal
of Popular culture 24(3), 35-47.
Norrick, N. R. (1994). 'Involvement and Joking in Conversation'. Journal of
Pragmatics (22), 409-430.
Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. (1995). Political recruitment: Gender,
race, and class in the British Parliament. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
O'Barr, W. M., Conley, J. M., and Lind, A. (1978). The power of language:
presentational style in the courtroom. Duke Law Journal, 14, 266-
79.Ochs, Schegloff, & Thompson, 1996).
Obeng, S. G. (1997). 'Language and Politics: Indirectness in Political
Discourse'.Discourse and Society 8 (1), 49- 84.
Otero, C.P. (ed.) (1988) Noam Chomsky: Language and Politics. Montreal:
Black Rose Books.

266
Palmer, Jerry (1994). Taking Humour Seriously. London and New York:
Routledge.
Pardo, M. L. (1996). Derecho y lingilistica: Como se juzga con palabras
(Law and Linguistics: How to Judge with Words). Buenos Aires:
Nueva Vision.
Perez de Ayala, S.(2001)`FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting Needs? -
Politeness in Question Time', Journal of Pragmatics 33: 143-170.
Pragmatics (1999) 9(1).
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues:
A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association/New York: Oxford University
PressPhillips- Anderson, Michael Andrew (2007). A Theory of
Rhetorical Humor in American Political Discourse. Dissertation
submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of
Maryland, College Park.
Phillips- Anderson, Michael Andrew (2007). A Theory of Rhetorical
Humor in American Political Discourse.Pro Quest.
Provine, Robert R.(2000) Laughter: A Scientific Investigation. NY: Viking
2000.Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humour.
Dordrecht. Holland: Kluwer. Renkema 1993: 1).
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht, Holland:
Kluwer.
Renkema, J. (1993). Discourse Studies: An Introductory Textbook.
Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ross, A. (1998).The language of humour.London and New York.
Ruch, Willi. (1992). Assessment of appreciation ofhumor: Studies with the
3 WD humor test. In Advances in personality assessment, Vol. 9,
edited by C. D. Spielberger and J. N. Butcher, 27-75.Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence ErlbaumRutter, Jason. Stand-Up as Interaction:
Performance and Audience in Comedy Venues. University of
Salford, 1997, chapter 2.
Scannell, P. (ed.) (1991) Broadcast Talk. London: Sage.
Schaeffer, Neil.(1981). The Art of Laughter. NY: Columbia University
Press.

267
Schaffner, C. (ed.) (1997) Analyzing Political Speeches. London: Short
Run Press Ltd.
Schnurr, S. (2008). ‘Surviving in a man’s world with a sense of humour: An
analysis of women leaders’ use of humour at work.’ Leadership, 4
(3), 299-319.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. (1883).The World as Will and Idea. Vol. 1, London,
Routledge, 1883. In Mulder M.P., Nijholt A. (2002). Humour
Research: State of the Art. Technical report. CTIT, Centre for
Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente,
Twente, the Netherlands.
Searing, Donald. (1994). Westminster’s World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Searle. J.R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language,:
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Searle, J.R. (1979). Indirect Speech Acts. Expressions and Meaning,
Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
Shakespeare William, (1996). Twelfth Night; Or, What You Will.
Unabridged. Dover Thrift Editions
Shibles Warren A. (1998). Humor Reference Guide: A Comprehensive
Classification and Analysis (Hardcover),Southern Illinois Univ Pr
(Tx).
Shuy, R. W. (1992). Language crimes. The Use and Abuse of Language
Evidence in the Court Room. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shuy, Roger. (1982). Topic as the unit of analysis in a criminal law case. In
Deborah Tannen (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk.
Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 113–26.
Shuy, Roger. (1990). Warning labels: language, law and comprehensibility.
American Speech, 65.4: 291–303.
Shuy, Roger. (1993). Language Crimes. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shuy, Roger. (2008). Discourse Analysis in the Legal Context, in Deborah
Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi Hamilton (Eds) (2003).
Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1990). Reality negotiation and excuse-
making: President Reagan's4 March 1987 Iran Arms Scandal Speech
and other literature. In Michael J. Cody, & MargaretL. McLaughlin

268
 eds, The psychology of tactical communication. Monographs in
socialpsychology of language 2: 207-228. Clevedon: Multilingual
Matters
Sover, A. (2009), Humour: The Pathway to human laughter [Humour
Bedarco shel haadamhatsochek] (Hebrew).Jerusalem: Carmel.
Stahl, B. C. (2004): Whose Discourse? A Comparison of Habermas and
Foucault.Paper presented at the Tenth Americas Conference on
Information Systems. NewYork.
Stevens, Walter W. (1961). On using humor in the public speech. Today’s
Speech9 (2):10, 35
Stilwell Peccei,J. (1999). Pragmatics. Routledge.
Stuckey, M. E. (1989). Getting into the game: the pre-presidential rhetoric
of Ronald Reagan. NewYork: Praeger.
Tharoor, Shashi. (2001). Humour in politics, “The Hindu”, Online edition
of India’s National Newspaper July 22, 2001.
Tharoor, Shashi. (2007). The Elephant, the Tiger & the Cellphone.
Reflections on India in the Twenty – First Century. New Delhi:
Viking-Penguin Books.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction an introduction to pragmatics.
London and New York: Longman.
Thompson, K. W., ed. (1987e). To form or preserve a government: the
presidency, the Congress, and political discourse. Washington, DC:
University Press of America.
Thorat, A. (2002), Discourse Analysis of Five Indian Novels. New Delhi:
Macmillan Ltd.
Tsakona Villy (2013).Parliamentary punning: Is the Opposition more
humorous than the ruling party? In The European Journal of Humour
Research Vol 1 No 2(1) (Pgs 101-111).
Tsakona Villy(2008): The humorous representation of political reality: The
example of contemporary political cartoons.In the Discourse of Mass
Communication: The Greek example.Periklis Politis(eds).
Tsakona, V., (2009), Humor and image politics in parliamentary discourse:
a Greek case study. In Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of

269
 Language, Discourse Communication Studies. Volume 29, Issue 2,
Pages 219–237.
Tsakona Villy (2009a): (Archakis and Tsakona Studies in humour).
Humour and Image Politics in Parliamentary Discourse: A Greek
Case Study. Text and Talk 29.
Tsakona, V., and Popa,D.E. (2011). Studies in Political
humour.Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Philadelphia, PA: John
Benjamins.
Tsakona, V., and Popa,D.E. (2011). Humour in Politics and the politics of
humour: an introduction. In V.Tsakona and D.E. Popa ( Eds.),
Studies in Political humour (pp-1-33).Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Tsakona Villy (2011a). Humour Religion and Politics in Greek Cartoons:
Symbiosis or conflict. In Humour and religion challenges -and
ambiguities.Hans Geybels and Walter Van Herk(eds). 248-
267.London: Continuum.
Tsakona Villy (2011b). Irony beyond criticism:Evidence from Greek
Parliamentary Discourse. Pragmatics and Society.
Van der Valk, Ineke. (2000a). Parliamentary discourse on illegal
immigrants, asylum and integration: The case of Holland. In R.
Wodak & T.A. van Dijk (eds.) Racism at the Top. Parliamentary
discourses on ethnic isues in six European states. Klagenfurt: Drava
Verlag.
Van der Valk, Ineke. (2000b). Parliamentary discourse on immigration and
nationality in France. In R. Wodak & T.A. van Dijk (eds.) Racism at
the top. Parliamentary discourses on ethnic isues in six
Europeanstates.Klagenfurt:DravaVerlag.
Van Dijk, T. (1993). Elite Discourse andRacism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Van Dijk (1997).What is Political Discourse Analysis. In: Blommaert, Jan
and Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Political Linguistics. 1997. vi, 312 pp. (pp.
11–52)
Van Dijk (1997).Key-note address Congress Political Linguistics.
Antwerp, 7-9 -December 1995. In Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen
(Eds.), Political linguistics.(pp. 11-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins,
1997

270
Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics
and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Political discourse and racism: Describing Others
in Western parliaments. In: Riggins, Stephen Harold. (Ed.), The
language and politics of exclusion:Others in discourse.
Communication and human values, Vol. 24. (pp. 31-64).
Van Dijk, T., Ting-Toomey, S., Smitterman,G., and Troutman, D.
(1997).Discourse, ethnicity, culture andracism. In T. A. van Dijk
(ed.),Discourse as Social Interaction.Vol. 2(pp. 144–80). London:
Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as Discourse. London: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1998). Opinions andideologies in the press. In Bell
andGarrett 1998: 21–63.
Van Dijk, T. (1998a). Context modelsin discourse processing. In H.
Oostendorp and S. Goldman(eds), The Construction of
MentalModels during Reading(pp. 123–48).
Van Dijk, T. (1998b). Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Study. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1999) ‘Context Models in Discourse Processing’, in H. van
Oostendorp andS.R. Goldman (eds) The Construction of Mental
Representations during Reading, pp.123–48. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). On the analysis of parliamentary debates on
immigration. In M. Reisigl & R. Wodak (Eds.), The semiotics of
racism. Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis. (pp. 85-104).
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Parliamentary Debates. In R. Wodak & T. A. van
Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic
Issues in Six European States. (pp. 45-78). Klagenfurt, Austria:
Drava Verlag.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2001) ‘Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity’, in
Ruth Wodak andMichael Meyer (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse
Analysis,pp. 95–120. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001 a). 'Text and Context of Parliamentary Debates'. in
Bayley, P. (ed. )Parliamentary Discourse: Language and the
Institutions. Amsterdam: Benjamin.

271
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001b). 'Critical Discourse Analysis', in Schiffrin D.,
Tannen D. and Hamilton, H.(eds*. ). The Handbook of Discourse
Analysis, pp. 35 2-3 72. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2002). 'Discourse Knowledge and Ideology:
Reformulating Old Questions'. Paperfor LAUD 2002.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis .In Debora Schiffrin
Deborah Tannen and Heidi Hamilton(Eds) (2003).
Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Knowledge in parliamentary debates. Journal of
Language and Politics, 2(1), 93-129.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2004). "Text and context of parliamentary debates" (pp.
339 – 372. In Bayley, P. (2004). Cross-cultural perspectives on
parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub.
Co.
Teun A. van Dijk(2010). ‘Political identities in parliamentary debates’.In
European Parliaments under Scrutiny, edited by Cornelia Ilie (2010).
John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Van Eerneren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. Jackson, S. and Jacobs, S. (1997).
'Argumentation'. in van Leeuwen.T.V. (2005). Introducing Social
Semiotics. London: Routledge.
Vasta Nicoletta (2004). "Consent and dissent in British and Italian
parliamentary debates on the 1998 Gulf Crisis" (pp.111 - 149).In
Bayley, P. (2004). Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary
discourse. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.
Verschueren, J. (2002): Understanding Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Villy T. (2009a), Humor and image politics in parliamentary discourse: a
Greek case study, Text and Talk 29: 219-237.
Volosinov, V.N. (1973) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language Tr.
Matejka,L. andTitunik, I.R. New York: Seminar Press.
Weiner, E. Judith.(1997). The Incongruity of Jokes, Riddles and Humorous
Situations. Towardsa Social Science of Language2. Eds. Gregory R.
Guy, Crawford Feagin, Deborah Schiffrin and John Baugh.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company,139-151
West, C. (1984). Routine Complications: Troubles with Talk between
Doctors and Patients. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

272
White, E. B.(1977). Essays of E. B. White. NY: Harper & Row.
Widdowson. H.G. (2007). Discourse Analysis, Oxford University Press.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get
Working Class Jobs. London: Saxon House.
Wilson, John and Stapleton, Karyn (2003) Nation State, Devolution and the
Parliamentary Discourse of Minority Languages. Journal of
Language and Politics, 2 (1). pp. 5-30.Wilson, J. (1990) Politically
Speaking. Oxford: Blackwell.
Windt, T. (1983). Presidential rhetoric, 1961 to the present. Dubuque:
Kendall/Hunt.
Windt, T. (1990). Presidents and protesters: political rhetoric in the 1960s.
Anchorage: Universityof Alaska Press.
Wodak, R. (1984). Determination of guilt: discourses in the courtroom. In
C. Kramarae, M. Schulz, and W. M. O'Barr (eds), Language and
Power(pp.89-100). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Wodak, R. (1984a). Wodak, R. (1984a). Determination of guilt: Discourses
in the courtroom. In C. Kramarae, M. Schulz, & W. M. O'Barr,
(Eds.). Language and power. (pp. 89-100). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Wodak, R. (1989) ‘1968: The Power of Political Jargon – a “Club-2”
Discussion’, in R. (ed.). Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in
Political Discourse. Amsterdam:
Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.
Wodak, R. and van Dijk T. A. (eds) (2001). Racism at the Top.
Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six Europrean States.
Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag.
Wodak, R. (1999), Cited in By Chris Barker, Dariusz Galasinski(
2001)Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis: A Dialogue on
Language and Identity
Wodak, R. and van Dijk, T. A. (eds)(2000). Racism at the Top.
Klagenfurt:Drava Verlag.Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of
Discourse.London: Longman.
Wodak, R./ Reisigl, M.(1999): ”Discourse and Racism: European
Perspectives“. In: Annu.Rev. Anthropol., 28, 175-199.

273
Yule, G. (1996): Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.
Dictionaries
Collins Cobuild Advanced Dictionary of English (2009.)@Harper Collins
Publishers.
http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/thank-you.)
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/wit
http://www01.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticterms/WhatIsDiscour
seDeixis.htm
Yan Huang, (2012).The Oxford Dictionary of Pragmatics. Oxford
University Press.
Newspaper Sources
Pranab Mukherjee on setting up a Joint Parliamentary Committee on the
IPL controversy / April 23, 2010Express.Wed Feb 17 2010, 11:07
hrs The Indian Express.
Internet Sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cash-for-votes_scandal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dharna
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._K._Advani
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nandigram_violence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Democratic_Alliance_
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Praful_Patel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telangana
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/
http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nandi_(bull)
http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srikrishna_Committee_on_Telangana
http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tandava

274
http://wwwp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politeness_theory
http://grammar.about.com/od/pq/g/pragmaticsterm.htm
http://news.oneindia.in/2006/07/26/House-adjourned-twice-as-oppn-sees-
red-over-instant-coffee-remark-1153901518.html
http://parliamentofindia.nic.in
http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/intro/introls.html
http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/rules/rulep1.html
http://parliamentofindia.nic.in ‘Rules of Procedure in Lok Sabha’ and
‘parliament ofindia.nic/ls/rules’.
http://speakerloksabha.nic.in/
http://speakerloksabha.nic.in/roleofthespeaker.asp.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com, Laughter, forgotten medicine to bring
House to order’, Avijit Ghosh,TNN , Aug 11, 2008,
http://www.164.100.47.132/LssNew/Legislation/Legislation.aspx
http://www.164.100.47.132/LssNew/others/panelofchairman.aspx
http:/loksabha.nic.in/ (http://164.100.47.132/LssNew/debates
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-timeline-of-cash-for-vote-scam-
case-1923400
http://www.drbarbaramaier.at/shiblesw/humorbook/hpreface.
http://www.etymonline.com
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=wit
http://www.india.com/budget-2014/union-budget-2014-how-different-is-
the-interim-budget-from-a-general-budget-86983/ India Today
Online New Delhi, February 17, 2014.
http://www.livemint, Wanted: wit, humour in political debate, Ask Mint,
Plain Speaking, V.R. Narayanaswami, 2009.
http://www.loksabha.nic
http://www.pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=71142
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somnath_Chatterjee

275
http://www‘Rules of Procedure in LoksSabha’ and ‘parliament
ofindia.nic/ls/rules’.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India)
http://www01.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsDiscourse
Deixis.htm
http://wwwspeakerloksabha.nic.in/former/somnth.asp
http:// www.drbarbaramaier.at/shiblesw/humorbook
https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/elsevier/european-parliaments-under-
scrutiny-n8ztln0lxQ

276