You are on page 1of 7

ARTICLE

Bullous Keratopathy as a Progressive Disease: Evidence


From Clinical and Laboratory Imaging Studies
Naoyuki Morishige, MD, PhD, and Koh-Hei Sonoda, MD, PhD

primary angle closure or acute primary angle closure glau-


Abstract: Bullous keratopathy is categorized as a corneal endo- coma.1 Although novel treatment strategies for bullous ker-
thelial disease. However, pathological changes, including subepi- atopathy have been proposed,2,3 keratoplasty remains the
thelial fibrosis and the accumulation of extracellular matrix, have treatment option adopted for most patients. However, the
been detected in the corneal stroma of individuals with this surgical strategy is undergoing a change, from penetrating
condition. In vivo confocal microscopy allows the visualization of keratoplasty (PKP) to endothelial keratoplasty such as
human corneal cellular structures and has provided information Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
regarding how eyes are affected by various diseases. However, the (DSAEK) or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.4
determination of disease pathogenesis on the basis of in vivo In bullous keratopathy, the aim of these surgeries is to
confocal microscopic observations is problematic. We evaluated restore corneal endothelial function, which is responsible
the structural alterations in the corneal stroma of eyes affected by for the removal of water from the corneal stroma. The
bullous keratopathy using second harmonic generation microscopy replacement of the corneal stroma, Bowman layer, and cor-
and laser confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of whole-mount neal epithelium, which occurs during PKP, is not thought to
preparations. Using these approaches, we detected the transdiffer- be necessary.
entiation of keratocytes into fibroblasts and myofibroblasts at the Studies have indicated that the clinical outcome of
anterior and posterior stroma and the presence of subepithelial endothelial keratoplasty is more favorable than that of PKP.5,6
fibrosis at the anterior stroma and disorganized collagen lamellae at The induction of corneal irregular astigmatism is less pro-
the posterior stroma of the bullous keratopathy cornea. These nounced for endothelial keratoplasty than for PKP, with the
changes were only detected in specimens from eyes with stromal result that the visual acuity after endothelial keratoplasty is
edema lasting at least 12 months. Similar time-dependent changes better than that after performing a PKP.7 In addition, the
were apparent by using in vivo confocal microscopy in the corneal frequency of graft rejection after a DSAEK is performed is
stroma of patients with bullous keratopathy after performing lower than that after a PKP.8,9 Such clinical results underlie
a Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty surgery the transition from PKP to endothelial keratoplasty, with the
and were associated with an unfavorable outcome with regard to assumption being that the cornea will become clear after the
postoperative visual acuity. Our observations suggest that patholog- amelioration of corneal stromal edema by endothelial kerato-
ical changes in the corneal stroma of patients with bullous plasty. However, some patients with bullous keratopathy do
keratopathy are progressive and affect postoperative visual acuity not achieve favorable postoperative visual acuity after sur-
after a Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty gery, with interface opacity thought to be responsible for this
surgery is performed. failure. We have focused on the clinical course of bullous
Key Words: bullous keratopathy, second harmonic generation, keratopathy, especially the duration of stromal edema, in an
scarring, endothelial keratoplasty attempt to identify the factors that might affect visual acuity
after an endothelial keratoplasty is performed. In this review,
(Cornea 2013;32(Suppl):S77–S83) we describe our findings that suggest that stromal edema
gives rise to pathological changes in the corneal stroma in
a time-dependent manner in individuals with bullous keratop-

B ullous keratopathy is characterized by corneal endothelial


decompensation associated with irreversible stromal
edema. Conditions or events that give rise to this disease
athy. Our observations suggest that bullous keratopathy is
a progressive disease with a pathology related to the duration
of stromal edema.
include Fuchs corneal endothelial dystrophy, cytomegalovi-
ral corneal endotheliitis, exfoliation syndrome, birth injury,
and endothelial injury caused by intraocular surgeries such as DETECTION OF PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN
cataract or glaucoma surgeries, including laser iridotomy for THE CORNEAL STROMA BY APPLICATION
From the Department of Ophthalmology, Yamaguchi University Graduate
OF SECOND HARMONIC GENERATION
School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan. IMAGING MICROSCOPY AND
The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose. WHOLE-MOUNT IMMUNOSTAINING
Reprints: Naoyuki Morishige, Department of Ophthalmology, Yamaguchi
University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami Kogushi, Ube, To detect and analyze the structural changes in the
Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan (e-mail: morishig@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp). cornea with bullous keratopathy, we applied second harmonic
Copyright © 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins generation (SHG) imaging microscopy10–12 and whole-mount

Cornea  Volume 32, Number 11, Supplement, November 2013 www.corneajrnl.com | S77
Morishige and Sonoda Cornea  Volume 32, Number 11, Supplement, November 2013

fluorescence microscopic analysis of F-actin and a–smooth specific for aSMA allow the detection of transdifferentiation
muscle actin (aSMA).13 SHG imaging microscopy allows the of keratocytes into fibroblasts and myofibroblasts.
observation of 3-dimensional structures of collagen fibers and
lamellae in the cornea without the need for sectioning of the
tissue.11 It also allows the observation of a wider region of the CHANGES IN THE STRUCTURE OF COLLAGEN
specimen than does a conventional microscopic analysis of LAMELLAE AND KERATOCYTE PHENOTYPE IN
sectioned tissue (230 vs. 6–10 mm with a 40· objective lens). THE BULLOUS KERATOPATHY CORNEA
A series of images obtained along the z-axis of a specimen Frontal sectional SHG images of the anterior stroma of
can be reconstructed into 3-dimensional images that can also the normal human cornea revealed the presence of short and
be analyzed as projection images. These properties of SHG densely packed collagen fibers (Fig. 1A). Fibers oriented in
imaging microscopy render it more capable of detecting the same direction formed lamellae that were feather shaped
abnormalities in the 3-dimensional structure of collagen fibers and randomly oriented.11,12,16 Similar images of the posterior
and lamellae compared with light microscopy of sectioned stroma of the normal cornea revealed collagen fibers that were
samples.14 In addition to SHG imaging microscopy, we longer than at the anterior stroma (Fig. 1B). Collagen lamellae
applied fluorescence microscopy to corneal tissue blocks also appeared wider, indicating that the angle they form rel-
(2 · 2 mm). Again, sectioning is not required, allowing ative to the Bowman layer or Descemet membrane is flatter
the observation of keratocytes in the corneal stroma without than that formed by lamellae at the anterior stroma.11,16
any artifactual damage inflicted by the sectioning process. Observation of the anterior region of the bullous keratopathy
Staining with phalloidin and immunostaining with antibodies cornea revealed the presence of an abnormal collagen

FIGURE 1. SHG microscopic images of the normal human cornea and the bullous keratopathy cornea. A and B, Frontal sectional
SHG images of the anterior and posterior stroma, respectively, of a normal cornea. C and D, Frontal sectional SHG images of
a lesion above the Bowman layer and of the posterior stroma, respectively, in a bullous keratopathy cornea. Note the loss of
alignment of collagen lamellae at the posterior stroma. E and F, SHG projection images reconstructed from stacks of frontal
sectional images of the anterior and posterior stroma, respectively, of a bullous keratopathy cornea. Scale bar, 50 mm. Modified
and reprinted from Morishige et al14,15 with permission from the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

S78 | www.corneajrnl.com  2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins


Cornea  Volume 32, Number 11, Supplement, November 2013 Bullous Keratopathy as a Progressive Disease

structure above the Bowman layer (Fig. 1C), corresponding to of the normal cornea, the shape of cells was similar to that of
subepithelial fibrosis, although the feather-shaped structure of keratocytes at the anterior stroma, but the cells appeared larger
collagen lamellae in the anterior stroma was well main- (Fig. 2B). In some corneas with bullous keratopathy, cells at the
tained.14 In the posterior stroma of the bullous keratopathy anterior and posterior stroma were observed as a spindle shape
cornea, the arrangement of collagen lamellae changed from with pronounced F-actin structures (Figs. 2C, D), indicating
well aligned to irregular (Fig. 1D), and cracked lamellae were that keratocytes had been transformed into fibroblasts. Immu-
observed.15 Reconstructed 3-dimensional projection images nofluorescence analysis of aSMA expression further showed
of the anterior stroma of the bullous keratopathy cornea also that some fibroblasts at the anterior or posterior stroma of bul-
revealed an abnormal collagen-containing structure above the lous keratopathy corneas had transdifferentiated into myofibro-
Bowman layer and the well-maintained interwoven structure blasts (Figs. 2E, F).
of collagen lamellae (Fig. 1E).14 Such images also revealed
irregular collagen lamellae at the posterior stroma (Fig. 1F).15
Fluorescence microscopic analysis of whole-mount WHAT INDUCES COLLAGEN STRUCTURAL
preparations revealed 3 different phenotypes for cells at the CHANGES AND TRANSDIFFERENTIATION OF
anterior or posterior stroma. In the cornea of normal KERATOCYTES IN THE BULLOUS
individuals or some patients with bullous keratopathy, cells KERATOPATHY CORNEA?
at the anterior stroma were star shaped and did not exhibit Changes in the extracellular matrix of the bullous
prominent F-actin structures (Fig. 2A). At the posterior stroma keratopathy cornea have been described,17,18 but the factors

FIGURE 2. Whole-mount fluorescence microscopic analysis of the normal human cornea and bullous keratopathy cornea. A–D,
Whole-mount staining for F-actin at the anterior (A, C) and posterior (B, D) stroma of normal (A, B) or bullous keratopathy (C, D)
corneas. The star-shaped keratocytes detected in the normal cornea appeared larger at the posterior stroma. Spindle-shaped cells
with prominent F-actin structures (fibroblasts) were observed in both regions of the bullous keratopathy cornea. F-actin was
stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate–labeled phalloidin (green), and nuclei were stained with Syto 59 (red). E and F, Whole-
mount immunostaining for aSMA (green) at the anterior and posterior stroma of the cornea with bullous keratopathy. Spindle-
shaped cells positive for aSMA expression (myofibroblasts) were observed in both regions (arrows). The asterisk indicates the
Descemet membrane. F-actin was also stained with rhodamine-labeled phalloidin (red), and nuclei were stained with Syto 59
(blue). Scale bar, 50 mm. Modified and reprinted from Morishige et al13 with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health and from
Morishige et al14 with permission from the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins www.corneajrnl.com | S79


Morishige and Sonoda Cornea  Volume 32, Number 11, Supplement, November 2013

or events that give rise to such changes are unknown. We


focused on the duration of stromal edema as a potential con-
tributing factor to the changes in the structure of collagen
lamellae and the transdifferentiation of keratocytes into fibro-
blasts and myofibroblasts in the cornea of individuals with
bullous keratopathy. We retrospectively reviewed the onset
of clinical stromal edema on the basis of clinical signs, such
as direct observation of epithelial or stromal edema, formation
of Descemet membrane folds, and foreign body sensation or
acute onset of ocular pain suggestive of epithelial erosion, in
patients who underwent a PKP or a DSAEK. We determined
the duration of stromal edema as the time from the onset of
FIGURE 4. Relationship between the duration of corneal
such signs to the time of surgery, and we then evaluated the stromal edema and the presence or absence of fibroblasts at
relationship between this parameter and changes in collagen the anterior stroma as detected by whole-mount staining for
structure and keratocyte phenotype detected by SHG imaging F-actin in patients with bullous keratopathy. Modified and
microscopy and fluorescence microscopic analysis. reprinted from Morishige et al14 with permission from the
Figure 3 shows the relationship between the duration of Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
stromal edema and the presence or absence of abnormal struc-
tures visualized by SHG imaging at the anterior stroma of the ence of aSMA-positive myofibroblasts at the anterior or pos-
bullous keratopathy cornea detected by SHG imaging micros- terior stroma determined by immunofluorescence analysis were
copy. All tissue specimens were derived from the corneal only detected in tissue specimens with a duration of stromal
button obtained at the time of PKP. Subepithelial fibrosis edema of at least 12 months.15
was only detected in specimens from individuals with a dura-
tion of stromal edema of at least 12 months.14 We similarly
examined the relationship between the duration of stromal
edema and the presence or absence of fibroblasts in the ante-
CLINICAL IMPACT OF PATHOLOGICAL
rior stroma of the bullous keratopathy cornea (Fig. 4). Again, CHANGES IN THE BULLOUS
fibroblasts were not detected in specimens from patients with KERATOPATHY CORNEA
a duration of stromal edema of ,12 months.14 We also exam- Our laboratory observations of collagen structural alter-
ined the relationship between the duration of stromal edema ations (detected by SHG imaging microscopy) and the trans-
and the presence or absence of myofibroblasts in the anterior differentiation of keratocytes into fibroblasts or myofibroblasts
stroma of the bullous keratopathy cornea. Similar to the other (detected by whole-mount fluorescence microscopy) in the
pathological changes, the presence of aSMA-positive myofi- corneal stroma of bullous keratopathy patients with a duration
broblasts was only detected in tissue samples from individuals of stromal edema of at least 12 months suggested that
with a duration of stromal edema of at least 12 months (Fig. 5).13 irreversible pathological changes may occur in the corneal
We subsequently examined the relationship between the dura- stroma of such individuals. In addition, these changes might
tion of stromal edema and pathological changes at both the affect the visual acuity after DSAEK, given that in contrast to
anterior and posterior stroma of patients with bullous keratop- PKP, the corneal stroma is not replaced by this procedure. We
athy (Fig. 6). Both subepithelial fibrosis at the anterior stroma
and the presence of highly scattered collagen lamellae at the
posterior stroma as revealed by SHG microscopy and the pres-

FIGURE 3. Relationship between the duration of corneal FIGURE 5. Relationship between the duration of corneal
stromal edema and the presence or absence of subepithelial stromal edema and the presence or absence of myofibroblasts
fibrosis as detected in projection SHG images for patients with at the anterior stroma as detected by whole-mount im-
bullous keratopathy. Modified and reprinted from Morishige munostaining for aSMA in patients with bullous keratopathy.
et al14 with permission from the Association for Research in Modified and reprinted from Morishige et al13 with permission
Vision and Ophthalmology. from Wolters Kluwer Health.

S80 | www.corneajrnl.com  2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins


Cornea  Volume 32, Number 11, Supplement, November 2013 Bullous Keratopathy as a Progressive Disease

FIGURE 6. Relationship between the


duration of corneal stromal edema
and pathological changes at the
anterior or posterior stroma of in-
dividuals with bullous keratopathy.
Collagen structural abnormalities as
revealed by SHG imaging microscopy
included subepithelial fibrosis at the
anterior stroma and irregularly
arranged collagen lamellae at the
posterior stroma. Myofibroblasts
were detected by immunofluores-
cence analysis with antibodies to
aSMA. Individuals positive or nega-
tive for the pathological changes are
represented by closed and open
symbols, respectively. Reprinted from
Morishige et al15 with permission
from the Association for Research in
Vision and Ophthalmology.

therefore reviewed the clinical charts of patients with DSAEK 20/40 was significantly larger for group A than for group B.
to evaluate the relationship between the duration of pre- A similar pattern was also apparent for visual acuity at 3
operative stromal edema and postoperative visual acuity. We months after DSAEK and over the entire follow-up period.19
excluded individuals with macular diseases, severe glaucoma We also examined the cornea of post-DSAEK patients by
affecting the central visual field, irregular astigmatism such as in vivo laser confocal microscopy. For individuals in group
that post-PKP, or obvious corneal scarring. Of 56 consecutive A, the cornea, including the shape of keratocytes, appeared
patients with DSAEK seen at the Yamaguchi University normal (Figs. 8A–C). In contrast, we detected subepithelial
Hospital, 28 individuals were enrolled in the analysis. Figure 7 fibrosis-like changes at the level of the Bowman layer or the
shows the relationship between the duration of preoperative stro- presence of cells resembling fibroblasts or myofibroblasts below
mal edema and postoperative visual acuity at 6 months after the Bowman layer in all group B subjects (Figs. 8D–F).19 The
DSAEK. We divided the subjects into 2 groups on the basis pathological changes observed in the cornea with bullous ker-
of the duration of preoperative stromal edema. Those with a dura- atopathy by our laboratory investigations were also apparent
tion of ,12 months (group A) showed a more favorable post- after the DSAEK was performed in patients with bullous kerat-
operative visual acuity than did those with a duration of at least opathy with a long duration of preoperative stromal edema and
12 months (group B).19 Statistical analysis revealed that the pro- were likely responsible for the less favorable outcome of sur-
portion of subjects with a postoperative visual acuity of at least gery in terms of visual acuity.

LABORATORY AND CLINICAL EVIDENCE FOR


BULLOUS KERATOPATHY AS A
PROGRESSIVE DISEASE
Our laboratory and clinical studies13–15,19 focusing on
the impact of the duration of stromal edema on corneal
pathology and post-DSAEK visual acuity suggest that bullous
keratopathy is a progressive disease. Given that bullous ker-
atopathy develops as a result of endothelial decompensation
after endothelial injury caused by various conditions or
events, it is not surprising that pathological changes are
apparent at the level of the corneal endothelium or posterior
stroma. However, consistent with earlier observations,17,18 we
have detected such changes, including subepithelial fibrosis
FIGURE 7. Relationship between the duration of preoperative as revealed by SHG imaging microscopy and fibroblastic or
stromal edema and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 myofibroblastic transdifferentiation of keratocytes as revealed
months after the DSAEK was performed for individuals with by whole-mount fluorescence microscopy, at the anterior
bullous keratopathy. Modified and reprinted from Morishige stroma of the bullous keratopathy cornea. Although the epi-
et al19 with permission from Elsevier. thelial side of the cornea is unlikely to be directly damaged by

 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins www.corneajrnl.com | S81


Morishige and Sonoda Cornea  Volume 32, Number 11, Supplement, November 2013

FIGURE 8. In vivo confocal microscopy of the cornea of patients with bullous keratopathy at 6 months after DSAEK. A–C,
Confocal images for patients with a duration of preoperative stromal edema of ,12 months (group A in Fig. 7). D–F, Confocal
images for patients with a duration of preoperative stromal edema of at least 12 months (group B). Images were obtained at the
level of the epithelial basal cell layers (A, D), Bowman layer (B, E), and the anterior stroma (C, F). Note the subepithelial fibrosis-like
lesion in (D) and the presence of fibroblasts or myofibroblasts in (E) and (F). Scale bar, 100 mm. Reprinted from Morishige et al19
with permission from Elsevier.

the underlying events or conditions that give rise to bullous gressive. Management of the condition of the corneal epithe-
keratopathy, individuals with this disease often manifest cor- lium in individuals with bullous keratopathy may thus be
neal epithelial erosion. Such erosion may be a key factor in important for the outcome of subsequent endothelial
the development of pathological changes observed in the keratoplasty.
anterior portion of the bullous keratopathy cornea, given that
it results in the exposure of the Bowman layer and anterior
stroma to the external environment including tear fluid. Tear CONCLUSIONS
fluid contains various cytokines and growth factors, including In conclusion, we suggest that bullous keratopathy is
transforming growth factor-b,20 which may promote the a pathologically and clinically progressive disease. This
structural changes observed at the anterior stroma of the bul- notion has important implications for the management of
lous keratopathy cornea. Indeed, we have found that patients bullous keratopathy patients before endothelial keratoplasty
with bullous keratopathy with a clinical history of epithelial and thus warrants further investigation.
erosion manifest myofibroblastic transdifferentiation of kera-
tocytes at the anterior stroma earlier than those without such
a history.13 With the exception of Fuchs dystrophy, infectious
endotheliitis, and exfoliation syndrome, the causes of corneal ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
endothelial damage in individuals with bullous keratopathy The authors thank Atsushi Takahara for permission to
are not ongoing, with the result that pathological changes operate the multiphoton microscope used for our SHG
detected at the posterior stroma may not be progressive. How- imaging studies. The authors also thank Teruo Nishida,
ever, structural alterations in the anterior portion of the cornea Tai-ichiro Chikama, Naoyuki Yamada, Norimasa Nomi, and
caused by epithelial erosion would be expected to be pro- Yukiko Morita for contributions to our investigations.

S82 | www.corneajrnl.com  2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins


Cornea  Volume 32, Number 11, Supplement, November 2013 Bullous Keratopathy as a Progressive Disease

REFERENCES 11. Morishige N, Petroll WM, Nishida T, et al. Noninvasive corneal stromal
1. Shimazaki J, Amano S, Uno T, et al. National survey on bullous kerat- collagen imaging using two-photon-generated second-harmonic signals.
opathy in Japan. Cornea. 2007;26:274–278. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1784–1791.
2. Okumura N, Koizumi N, Ueno M, et al. The new therapeutic concept of 12. Morishige N, Nishida T, Jester JV. Second harmonic generation for
using a rho kinase inhibitor for the treatment of corneal endothelial visualizing 3-dimensional structure of corneal collagen lamellae. Cornea.
dysfunction. Cornea. 2011;30(suppl 1):S54–S59. 2009;28:S46–S53.
3. Okumura N, Koizumi N, Ueno M, et al. Enhancement of corneal endo- 13. Morishige N, Nomi N, Morita Y, et al. Immunohistofluorescence analy-
thelium wound healing by Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) inhibitor eye sis of myofibroblast transdifferentiation in human corneas with bullous
drops. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:1006–1009. keratopathy. Cornea. 2011;30:1129–1134.
4. Boimer C, Lee K, Sharpen L, et al. Evolving surgical techniques of and 14. Morishige N, Yamada N, Teranishi S, et al. Detection of subepithelial
indications for corneal transplantation in Ontario from 2000 to 2009. Can fibrosis associated with corneal stromal edema by second harmonic gener-
J Ophthalmol. 2011;46:360–366. ation imaging microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3145–3150.
5. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Endothelial keratoplasty—a review. Clin Exper- 15. Morishige N, Yamada N, Zhang X, et al. Abnormalities of stromal structure
iment Ophthalmol. 2010;38:128–140. in the bullous keratopathy cornea identified by second harmonic generation
6. Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years imaging microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:4998–5003.
following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Oph- 16. Morishige N, Takagi Y, Chikama T, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of
thalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105: collagen lamellae in the anterior stroma of the human cornea visualized
530–563. by second harmonic generation imaging microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol
7. Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM, et al. Descemet’s membrane endo- Vis Sci. 2011;52:911–915.
thelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive 17. Ljubimov AV, Burgeson RE, Butkowski RJ, et al. Extracellular matrix
outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2361–2368. alterations in human corneas with bullous keratopathy. Invest Ophthal-
8. Suh LH, Yoo SH, Deobhakta A, et al. Complications of Descemet’s mol Vis Sci. 1996;37:997–1007.
stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: survey of 118 eyes 18. Eagle RC Jr, Laibson PR, Arentsen JJ. Epithelial abnormalities in chronic
at One Institute. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1517–1524. corneal edema: a histopathological study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc.
9. Shih CY, Ritterband DC, Rubino S, et al. Visually significant and non- 1989;87:107–119; discussion 119–124.
significant complications arising from Descemet stripping automated 19. Morishige N, Chikama T, Yamada N, et al. Effect of preoperative dura-
endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:837–843. tion of stromal edema in bullous keratopathy on early visual acuity after
10. Morishige N, Wahlert AJ, Kenney MC, et al. Second-harmonic imaging endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:303–308.
microscopy of normal human and keratoconus cornea. Invest Ophthalmol 20. Gupta A, Monroy D, Ji Z, et al. Transforming growth factor beta-1 and
Vis Sci. 2007;48:1087–1094. beta-2 in human tear fluid. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15:605–614.

 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins www.corneajrnl.com | S83

You might also like