You are on page 1of 14

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

perawatandiri * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%


Umur * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%
pendidikan * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%
status * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%
pendapatan * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%
tipekusta * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%
lamapengobatan * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%

perawatandiri * kecacatan

Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

perawatandiri kurang baik Count 1 17 18

% within perawatandiri 5.6% 94.4% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 70.8% 51.4%

% of Total 2.9% 48.6% 51.4%

baik Count 10 7 17

% within perawatandiri 58.8% 41.2% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 90.9% 29.2% 48.6%

% of Total 28.6% 20.0% 48.6%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within perawatandiri 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 11.511 1 .001
b
Continuity Correction 9.172 1 .002
Likelihood Ratio 12.815 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 11.182 1 .001
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for perawatandiri


.041 .004 .385
(kurang baik / baik)
For cohort kecacatan = cacat .094 .013 .661
For cohort kecacatan = tidak 2.294 1.285 4.093
N of Valid Cases 35

Umur * kecacatan
Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

Umur 13 Count 1 0 1

% within Umur 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

15 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

16 Count 0 2 2

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%


% within kecacatan 0.0% 8.3% 5.7%

% of Total 0.0% 5.7% 5.7%

17 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

18 Count 1 0 1

% within Umur 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

20 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

21 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

23 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

26 Count 1 1 2

% within Umur 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

31 Count 1 2 3

% within Umur 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 8.3% 8.6%

% of Total 2.9% 5.7% 8.6%

33 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

34 Count 0 2 2

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%


% within kecacatan 0.0% 8.3% 5.7%

% of Total 0.0% 5.7% 5.7%

35 Count 1 1 2

% within Umur 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

38 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

39 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

41 Count 1 0 1

% within Umur 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

43 Count 1 0 1

% within Umur 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

44 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

45 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

47 Count 1 1 2

% within Umur 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

50 Count 2 1 3
% within Umur 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 18.2% 4.2% 8.6%

% of Total 5.7% 2.9% 8.6%

60 Count 1 0 1

% within Umur 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

63 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

65 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

66 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

73 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within Umur 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 21.853 25 .644
Likelihood Ratio 27.618 25 .326
Linear-by-Linear Association .023 1 .880
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 52 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .31.

Risk Estimate

Value
a
Odds Ratio for Umur (13 / 15)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be


computed. They are only computed for a
2*2 table without empty cells.

pendidikan * kecacatan

Crosstab
kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

pendidikan tidak sekolah Count 0 1 1

% within pendidikan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

tidak tamat SD Count 4 1 5

% within pendidikan 80.0% 20.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 36.4% 4.2% 14.3%

% of Total 11.4% 2.9% 14.3%

SD Count 7 5 12
% within pendidikan 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 63.6% 20.8% 34.3%

% of Total 20.0% 14.3% 34.3%

SMP Count 0 10 10

% within pendidikan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 41.7% 28.6%

% of Total 0.0% 28.6% 28.6%

SMA Count 0 6 6

% within pendidikan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 25.0% 17.1%

% of Total 0.0% 17.1% 17.1%

PT Count 0 1 1

% within pendidikan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within pendidikan 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 17.754a 5 .003


Likelihood Ratio 22.269 5 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 9.835 1 .002
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .31.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for pendidikan
a
(tidak sekolah / tidak tamat
SD)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be


computed. They are only computed for a
2*2 table without empty cells.

status * kecacatan

Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

status belum menikah Count 4 7 11

% within status 36.4% 63.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 36.4% 29.2% 31.4%

% of Total 11.4% 20.0% 31.4%

menikah Count 6 16 22

% within status 27.3% 72.7% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 54.5% 66.7% 62.9%

% of Total 17.1% 45.7% 62.9%

janda/duda Count 1 1 2

% within status 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within status 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .621 2 .733
Likelihood Ratio .599 2 .741
Linear-by-Linear Association .012 1 .911
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .63.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for status (belum a

menikah / menikah)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be


computed. They are only computed for a
2*2 table without empty cells.

pendapatan * kecacatan

Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

pendapatan < UMR Count 11 16 27

% within pendapatan 40.7% 59.3% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 66.7% 77.1%

% of Total 31.4% 45.7% 77.1%

> UMR Count 0 8 8

% within pendapatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 33.3% 22.9%

% of Total 0.0% 22.9% 22.9%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within pendapatan 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4.753 1 .029
b
Continuity Correction 3.051 1 .081
Likelihood Ratio 7.075 1 .008
Fisher's Exact Test .037 .031
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.617 1 .032
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.51.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

For cohort kecacatan = tidak .593 .433 .810


N of Valid Cases 35

tipekusta * kecacatan

Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

tipekusta tipe PB Count 0 3 3


% within tipekusta 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 12.5% 8.6%

% of Total 0.0% 8.6% 8.6%

tipe MB Count 11 21 32

% within tipekusta 34.4% 65.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 87.5% 91.4%

% of Total 31.4% 60.0% 91.4%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within tipekusta 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.504a 1 .220


b
Continuity Correction .332 1 .565
Likelihood Ratio 2.391 1 .122
Fisher's Exact Test .536 .309
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.461 1 .227
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .94.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

For cohort kecacatan = tidak 1.524 1.186 1.958


N of Valid Cases 35

lamapengobatan * kecacatan
Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

lamapengobatan 1 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

2 Count 1 3 4

% within lamapengobatan 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 12.5% 11.4%

% of Total 2.9% 8.6% 11.4%

3 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

4 Count 1 3 4

% within lamapengobatan 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 12.5% 11.4%

% of Total 2.9% 8.6% 11.4%

5 Count 1 1 2

% within lamapengobatan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

6 Count 2 2 4

% within lamapengobatan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 18.2% 8.3% 11.4%

% of Total 5.7% 5.7% 11.4%

7 Count 1 1 2

% within lamapengobatan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

8 Count 2 1 3

% within lamapengobatan 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%


% within kecacatan 18.2% 4.2% 8.6%

% of Total 5.7% 2.9% 8.6%

9 Count 1 1 2

% within lamapengobatan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

10 Count 1 1 2

% within lamapengobatan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

11 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

12 Count 0 5 5

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 20.8% 14.3%

% of Total 0.0% 14.3% 14.3%

13 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

15 Count 1 0 1

% within lamapengobatan 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

17 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

18 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%


Total Count 11 24 35
% within lamapengobatan 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 11.026 15 .751
Likelihood Ratio 14.122 15 .516
Linear-by-Linear Association .202 1 .653
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 32 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .31.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for a

lamapengobatan (1 / 2)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be


computed. They are only computed for a
2*2 table without empty cells.

You might also like