0% found this document useful (0 votes)
589 views6 pages

Urodynamics Normal Values Guide

This document provides normal reference values for various urodynamic measurements based on studies by different authors. It includes normal values for peak and average flow rates during uroflowmetry, first sensation and maximum bladder capacity during cystometry, detrusor pressure at peak flow, and maximum urethral closure and functional urethra length during urethral pressure profilometry, broken down by age and gender groups. The values given can be used as guidelines to determine if urodynamic test results fall within the normal range or indicate abnormalities.

Uploaded by

Service CX
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
589 views6 pages

Urodynamics Normal Values Guide

This document provides normal reference values for various urodynamic measurements based on studies by different authors. It includes normal values for peak and average flow rates during uroflowmetry, first sensation and maximum bladder capacity during cystometry, detrusor pressure at peak flow, and maximum urethral closure and functional urethra length during urethral pressure profilometry, broken down by age and gender groups. The values given can be used as guidelines to determine if urodynamic test results fall within the normal range or indicate abnormalities.

Uploaded by

Service CX
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

NORMAL VALUES URODYNAMICS

UROFLOW
PEAK FLOW RATE (Qmax)
Group Normal (ml/s) Author

All persons > 20 Kiesswetter (1981)

Persons with catheter > 15 Jonas et al. (1980)

Male 24 (±8) Palmtag (1977)

age < 40 years > 22 Abrams et al. (1990)

age 40..60 years > 16 Abrams et al. (1990)

age > 60 years > 13 Abrams et al. (1990)

age > 60 years 15.6 (± 6.5) Neubauer et al. (1992)

Female > 26 (± 8) Palmtag (1977)

age < 50 years > 25 Abrams et al. (1990)

age > 50 years > 18 Abrams et al. (1990)

Children * 23 (±10) Palmtag (1977)

age < 10 years > 15 Siroky et al. (1990)

age 10..20 years > 20 Siroky et al. (1990)

* girls 34.3 (±7.2) Toguri et al. (1982)

* boys 25.9 (±7.3) Toguri et al. (1982)

* (miction volume > 175 ml,


body size > 1.1 m2)

AVERAGE FLOW RATE (Qavg)


Group Normal (ml/s) Author

All persons 10..15 Kiesswetter (1981)

Persons with catheter > 7.5 Jonas et al. (1980)

Male age > 60 years 7.8 (± 3.2) Neubauer and Melchior (1992)

Children * girls 14.1 (±3.3) Toguri et al. (1982)

boys 19.5 (± 3.6) Toguri et al. (1982)

* (miction volume > 175 ml,


body size > 1.1 m2)
TIME TO PEAKFLOW
Group Normal (ml/s) Author

All persons < 33% of voiding time T. Poll and G. Fröhlich

VOIDING TIME
Group Normal (s) Author

Male 24 (± 8) Palmtag (1977)

age > 60 years 26.2 (±13.9) Neubauer and Melchior (1992)

Female 23 (±8) Palmtag (1977)

Children 16 (±10) Palmtag (1977)

RESIDUAL URINE
Author

Normal < 15 % of maximal bladder capacity Jones et al. (1980)

Normal 10..30 ml

Abnormal > 100 ml

INCONTINENCE GRADE
Grade 1 < 2 gram urine loss

Grade 2 2 .. 10 gram urine loss

Grade 3 10 .. 50 gram urine loss

Grade 4 > 50 gram urine loss


CYSTOMETRY AND PRESSURE FLOW STUDY

FIRST SENSATION
Group Normal (ml) Author

All patients > 60 % of bladder capacity Jonas et al. (1980)

150 .. 250 Tanagho and McAninch (1992)

150 .. 200 Kiesswetter (1981)

100 .. 300 Siroky and Krane (1980)

200 .. 400 Faber (1984)

Male 250 (± 50) Palmtag (1977)

Female 225 (± 75) Palmtag (1977)

Children 180 (± 100) Palmtag (1977)

COMPLIANCE
Group Normal (ml/cm H2O) Author

All patients 25 Jonas et al. (1980), Faber (1984),


Stöhrer (1989)

40 .. 50 Palmtag (1977)

20 .. 50 Kiesswetter (1981)

> 10 Madersbacher (1992)


MAXIMUM BLADDER CAPACITY

Group Normal (ml) Author

All patients 300 .. 600 Jonas et al. (1980)

Male 600 (± 150) Palmtag (1977)

Female 500 (± 100) Palmtag (1977)

MAXIMUM BLADDER (CYSTOMETRIC) CAPACITY IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN

Age Infant Infant Age Children


boys girls
(ml) (ml) (ml)

1 month 34 39 1 year 60

2 months 36 41 2 years 90

3 months 38 43 3 years 120

4 months 40 45 4 years 150

5 months 42 47 5 years 180

6 months 44 49 6 years 210

7 months 46 51 7 years 240

8 months 48 53 8 years 270

9 months 50 54 9 years 300

10 months 52 56 10 years 330

11 months 54 58 11 years 360

1 year 56 60 12 years 390

13 years 420

14 years 450

15 years 480

Boys: MCC = 24.8 * age + 31.6


Girls: MCC = 22.6 * age + 37.4
Children: MCC = 30.0 * age + 30.0

ICS, Standardization and definitions in lower urinary tract dysfunction in children, Nørgaard, van Gool,
Hjälmås, Djurhuus, Helström, Second course on pediatric urodynamics, sep 1997, page 25
MAXIMUM BLADDER (CYSTOMETRIC) CAPACITY IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN

Group Normal (ml) Author

Infant 0..1 year approx 30 Goellner (1981)

Infant 1..2 year approx 60 Goellner (1981)

Children 300 (±150) Palmtag (1977)

400 .. 500 Tanagho and McAninch (1992)

400 .. 700 Faber (1984)

PDET AT PEAKFLOW

Group Normal (cm H2O) Author

All patients < 30 Tanagho and McAninch (1992)

40 Palmtag (1977)

50 .. 100 Kiesswetter (1981)

60 .. 120 Siroky and Krane (1990)

< 75 Jonas et al. (1980)

Male 43 (± 10) Palmtag (1977)

Female 33 (± 15) Palmtag (1977)

Children 35 (± 12) Palmtag (1977)


URETHRA PRESSURE PROFILE
MAXIMUM PURA DURING UPP
Group Normal (cm H2O) Author

All patients normal = 92 - AGE (of patient) Edwards (1974)

Male 65 .. 105 Siroky (1990)

Female age < 50 60 .. 90 Siroky (1990)

60 .. 85 Abrams (1979)

age > 50 50 .. 80 Siroky (1990)

50 .. 60 Abrams (1979)

MAXIMUM PCLOSURE DURING UPP


Group Normal (cm H2O) Author

All patients 50 Jonas et al. (1980)

Female before menopause 50 (± 25) Webster (1994)

50 .. 75 Abrams (1979)

after menopause 35 (± 25) Webster (1994)

40 .. 50 Abrams (1979)

50 .. 75 Faber (1984)

FUNCTIONAL URETHRA LENGTH


Group Normal (mm) Author

Female 25 .. 30 Jonas et al. (1980)

20 .. 35 Siroky and Krane (1990)

25 .. 27 Abrams (1979)

Male 40 .. 50 Jonas et al. (1980)

age < 50 35 .. 45 Siroky and Krane (1990)

age > 50 40 .. 55 Siroky and Krane (1990)

Source: Urodynamik Leitfaden, [Link], [Link]öhlich, Springer verlag Berlin

You might also like