Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The CSC-Central Office denied CHREA’s request in a (It should be emphasized that the review by the DBM of
Resolution and reversedthe recommendation of the any PPC resolution affecting the compensation structure
CSC-Regional Office that the upgrading scheme be of its personnel should not be interpreted to mean that
censured. CHREA filed a motion for reconsideration, but the DBM can dictate upon the PPC Board of Directors
the CSC-Central Office denied the same. and deprive the latter of its discretion on the matter.
Rather, the DBM’s function is merely to ensure that the
action taken by the Board of Directors complies with the
CHREA elevated the matter to the CA, requirements of the law, specifically, that PPC’s
which affirmed the pronouncement of the CSC-Central compensation system “conforms as closely as possible
Office and upheld the validity of the upgrading, retitling, with that provided for under R.A. No. 6758.” )
and reclassification scheme in the CHR on the
justification that such action is within the ambit of CHR’s
fiscal autonomy. 3. As measured by the foregoing legal and jurisprudential
yardsticks, the imprimatur of the DBM must first be
sought prior to implementation of any reclassification or
ISSUE: Can the CHR validly implement an upgrading, upgrading of positions in government. This is consonant
reclassification, creation, and collapsing of plantilla to the mandate of the DBM under the RAC of 1987,
positions in the Commission without the prior approval Section 3, Chapter 1, Title XVII, to wit:
of the Department of Budget and Management?