Disney as a Utopian Dreamer
Oksana Bulgakowa
Eisenstein’s essay on Walt Disney forms part of his unfinished book
‘Method, which examines the connection between the practice of art
and archaic forms of thought.’ With his interest in archaic struc- 1 _ Eisenstein’ essay on
tures, Eisenstein followed the same path as T.S. Eliot, D.H. Lawrence, Seen. ail or
Ezra Pound, Aby Warburg. He began the book in Mexico in 1932 San see Problemysintezov
and worked on it until his death. The formalized structures of archa- _\uteshestenothure, es
ic thinking were regarded as a reservoir for the artistic devices: pars _ Renschesbash (ockos Nevke,
pro toto—and the close-up; sympathetic magic—the function of the 1985, 208-2e4;in English, see
landscape; participation—actors’ experience; the reading of tracks by eeminen Dry ey
a hunter—constructing the plot of a detective story. Shakespeare, Bach, (Calcutta: Seagul 1986). Anew
Dostoevsky, Joyce and Disney were analyzed according to his mod- German varsiaion oncon
el. Nobody before had placed the creator of Mickey Mouse in such text published in 2008 by Po-
“heavy” context. tepalerene ed d Chsane
Eisenstein’s starting point is neither Disney’s synaesthesia nor his Thigis assed on manuscripts
perfect rhythm. Rather, Eisenstein begins with eloquent descriptions _(September71,1840-June 16,
of the unstable stability achieved by Disney in his creation of plastic Mercier iicetne and An
form. This property of unstable stability, which Eisenstein admired for Moscow [RGAU} fond 1923, opis
its irresistible attractiveness, is paradoxical because of the way Dis- 754029 chranenieh 31.372,
ney’s forms seem to exist in a continuous state of self-dissolution. In
an analysis of Disney’s animated drawings, Eisenstein shows how this
plasmatic property (one shared by the elements of origins—water, fire,
air and sand) functions within a form strictly delineated by a line’s con-
tour. The line is the form’s limit, but in Disney's work this line is con-
stantly in motion: stretching, extending itself, dancing. This continu-
ous movement animates the line-drawing, lending it a certain plasticity.
As a result, Disney’s work does not take metamorphoses as a topic or
even as an object of representation, rather, metamorphosis is a proper-
ty of his form, which embodies the essence of art, here understood as a
deeply mythological activity. The “animated cartoon” is traced back to
anima and animation, the life and the movement of things, i.e. bringing
things to life by making them move, In this respect, constructivists are
no less archaic than symbolists.
Disney’s ducks and mice create a modern animal epic, leading
Eisenstein towards animistic beliefs, totems and myths of origin. This
strengthened his conviction that relations between humans and nature
still followed an archaic model, one deeply rooted in ritual. Thus, when
fighting or hunting, man devours the animal or is devoured by him, he
copulates with the animal or he disguises himself as an animal. In all of
these forms, there is a palpable sense of an original unity of opposites,
a unity which creates the ecstatic moments experienced in the passage
from one state to another. This passage can instill horror or can bring,
about laughter. Disney’s comic bestiary confronts the uncanny ani-
Animism ne
eemals of Edgar Allen Poe, Comte de Lautréamont and D.H. Lawrence,
but also Eisenstein’s own ecstatic cows and oxen, which copulate like
mythical beings. The bulls of the corrida, which both die and kill, take
the place of Jesus in Eisenstein’s Mexican drawings, his film-bull res-
urrected as the God of the seasons’ return, Thanks to Disney, Eisen-
stein became aware of his own bestiary, which he now saw as reveal-
ing modernity’s mythological monstrosity. His battleship now seemed
like a mechanical man-fish, the fleet a mythological whale threatening
to swallow the Potemkin, the bull appearing in the form of a tractor.
Eisenstein believed that he could draw borders between horror, ecstasy
and laughter, separating the mythological from the rational—in life as
well as in art.
Where the pre-logical meets the rational, past and present collide
and the archetypes of an archaic, classless society meet modernity’s
fantastic visions. It is precisely at this point that utopias appear. Eisen-
stein regarded nineteenth-century utopias as an archive of collective
dreams, in which technical progress and social development coincide.
Socialism draws on these dreams, which Eisenstein wanted to analyze
using the examples of Campanella, More, Cabet, Jules Verne, Fourier,
Sue and Disney. One of the reasons for the resonance of Disney’s work
Eisenstein saw in the promise of freedom within the relationship of
people to natures this provides Eisenstein with the transition to Fouri-
et. Fourier conceived labor according to the model of children’s games
that was not oriented on value production, but rather on “improved
nature.” His utopian vision—with humanity and nature in alliance,
with humans neither themselves exploited nor exploiting the environ-
ment—is a countermovement to industrialization, which subordinated
nature to humans and humans to machines.
Eisenstein placed his text on Disney in the anthropological section
of his extensive book. Here the body is presented as a direct source for
art but also as its material, with the skin seen as a surface for paint-
ing, tattoos as the first self-portraits, and the abdomen presented as the
original form for architecture and ceramics. Bodily fluids and excre-
tions (blood, urine, excrement) are the basis of the color scale. As a
model for structure, Eisenstein suggests this fluid body rather than the
skeleton; form is analyzed for its plasmatic, polymorphous qualities.
Disney emerges as the central object of analysis because his work unites
animism and totemism with plasmatic qualities of form, synaesthetic
perceptions of sound and color, and perfect visual rhythm. Eisenstein
ultimately explains the impact of Disney’s work by its utopian promise
of liberation from ossified form, the way it offered the possibility of a
state of eternal becoming. Here Eisenstein discovered a deep longing
for freedom, which would allow a fresh reimagining of relations be-
tween human and nature, and even perhaps their reformation.
‘Oksana Bulgakowa WwDisney
Sergei Eisenstein’ 1. From: Sergei Eisenstein,
Disney, ed. Oksana Bulgakowa,
trans Dustin Condren (Berlin:
PotemkinPress, 2010)
I
‘The animals in “Merbabies” substitute for other animals: fish become
mammals.
In Disney's opus in general, animals substitute for humans.
The tendency is the same: displacement, combination, an idio-
syncratic protest against metaphysical inertness established once and
for all.
It interesting that such a “flight” into animal skins and the anthro-
pomorphic qualities of animals seem to be characteristic of many differ-
ent epochs. This is most sharply visible in the very inhumanness of the
systems of social government or philosophy, be it during the epoch of
American-style mechanization of daily life and behavior or during the
epoch... of mathematical abstraction and metaphysics in philosophy.
It’ interesting that one of the brightest examples of such a rebirth
of the animal epic is, as a matter of fact, the century in which meta-
physics was first systematized...the nineteenth century. Or more accu-
rately, the eighteenth century which moved under the banner of over-
coming the seventeenth.
‘That which Rousseau had fought for, with open polemic and slo-
gans, had been spoken of before him by the artistic images and
form of La Fontaine’s works.
“He defended his animals from Descartes, who had made
them into machines. He does not allow himself to philosophize
like the educated doctors, but humbly asks permission and in the
manner of a meek recommendation he tries to devise a soul to be
used by (a Pusage) rats and hares...”
And that’s not all:
“Like Virgil he feels for the trees and does not exclude them 2 _Hippolye Adolphe Taine,
from the general picture of life. ‘Plants breathe,” he said, At the [2fertneetses fables as8)
very time when artificial civilization sheared the trees of Versailles _tyo-eo,tisenstein vanslated
into cones and geometric bodies, he wanted to preserve freedom ‘hs text ini Russian
for their greenery and their sprouts...”*
Soulless geometrism and metaphysics engender here, as an antithesis, a
sudden rebirth of universal animism.
Animism, wherein thoughts and feelings for the interconnectedness
of all elements and kingdoms of nature wandered blindly, long before
science solved the puzzle of this configuration with its sequences and
stages. Objective examination of the surrounding world took hold.
Animism m8
i i3 Pera Atasheva (1800-1985),
Soviet journalist, Elsenstein's
lavdul wife he married her in
1934, but they never lived to-
gether, was editing a volume
fon American animated cartoon
for the series ofthe publishing
house “iskusstvo" on American
film directors. The volumes on
(DW. Griffith 1944) and Chaplin
(i946}—withEisenstein’scon-
‘ributions-—were published but
this one never appeared,
4 Marked nearby and deleted
Endymion the embodiment of
sunset and sleep. In Greek my-
thology Hyperion—a ttan, the
son of Gala and Uranus, a"shin-
ing’ god, often identified with
Helios although he does not
‘throw himself nto the fie tis
possible that Eisenstein is con-
Flating the heroes of two difer-
ent works by Hélderlin, Hyperion
and Empedokles. The hero of
the tragedy The Death of Emo