Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bhs - Inggirs 3
Bhs - Inggirs 3
We present two cases of peritonitis shortly after endoscopic examination of the large
bowel with polypectomy in patients on continuous ambulant peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) despite
the standard preventive measure to drain the dialysate from the abdomen prior to the procedure.
We have reviewed the current literature on this topic. These cases demonstrate that the
13
Introduction
Peritonitis is an inflammation of the peritoneum, the thin membrane that lines the
abdominal wall and covers the organs within. The inflammation is caused by a bacterial or
fungal infection of this membrane. There are three major types of peritonitis. Primary peritonitis
is caused by the spread of an infection from the blood and lymph nodes to the peritoneum. This
type of peritonitis is rare -- less than 1% of all cases of peritonitis are primary. The more
common type of peritonitis, called secondary peritonitis, is caused when the infection comes into
the peritoneum from the gastrointestinal or biliary tract. And the last is tertiary a persistent or
recurrent infection after adequate initial therapy. These cases of peritonitis are very serious and
Peritonitis is most often caused by introduction of an infection into the otherwise sterile
peritoneal environment through organ perforation, but it may also result from other irritants, such
as foreign bodies, bile from a perforated gall bladder or a lacerated liver, or gastric acid from a
perforated ulcer. Women also experience localized peritonitis from an infected fallopian tube or a
ruptured ovarian cyst. Patients may present with an acute or insidious onset of symptoms, limited
and mild disease, or systemic and severe disease with septic shock.
pathologic stimuli with a fairly uniform inflammatory response. Depending on the underlying
pathology, the resultant peritonitis may be infectious or sterile (ie, chemical or mechanical).
Infections in the peritoneum are further divided into generalized (peritonitis) and
localized (intra-abdominal abscess). This article focuses on the diagnosis and management of
infectious peritonitis and abdominal abscesses because of the tertiary part, where the treatment is
in-adequate.
13
Case Report
study from Hong Kong revealed an average risk of peritonitis after colonoscopy of 6.3% in 77
CAPD patients after 97 endoscopic procedures. Colonic biopsy or other interventions such as
mesenteric lymph nodes, then to portal circulation resulting eventually in systemic bacteraemia
with peritoneal seeding. In CAPD patients the glucose-containing fluid in the peritoneal cavity
impairs the local immune response by diluting cytokines and reducing the macrophage level. The
function of mesothelial surface and cells, another local host defence system, may be altered due
to presence of dialysis solution. Further, activated cytokines and macrophages are constantly
removed by daily changes of the dialysate. All these factors may facilitate bacterial growth in the
Swelling and tenderness in the abdomen with pain ranging from dull aches to severe,
sharp pain
Loss of appetite
Thirst
13
Nausea and vomiting
Causes:
Primary peritonitis is usually caused by liver disease. Fluid builds up in the abdomen,
Secondary peritonitis is caused by other conditions that allow bacteria, enzymes, or bile
into the peritoneum from a hole or tear in the gastrointestinal or biliary tracts. Such tears can be
Peritoneal dialysis, which uses the blood vessels in the peritoneum to filter waste from your
blood when your kidneys are not able to do so, also may cause peritonitis.
13
Risk Factors:
The following factors may increase the risk for primary peritonitis:
Stomach ulcers
13
Torn or twisted intestine
Pancreatitis
Peritoneal dialysis
Trauma
Diagnosis:
Peritonitis can be life threatening, so the doctor will first conduct a physical examination to
determine whether you need surgery to correct the underlying problem. The doctor will feel and
press the abdomen to detect any swelling and tenderness as well as signs that fluid has collected
in the area. The doctor may also listen to bowel sounds and check for difficulty breathing, low
blood pressure, and signs of dehydration. The following procedures also may be performed:
Samples of fluid from the abdomen -- identify the bacteria causing the infection
X-rays -- detect air in the abdomen, which indicates that an organ may be torn or
perforated.
13
Etiology
Primary Peritonitis
observed almost exclusively in patients with ascites from chronic liver disease. Contamination of
the peritoneal cavity is thought to result from translocation of bacteria across the gut wall or
mesenteric lymphatics and, less frequently, via hematogenous seeding in the presence of
bacteremia.
Approximately 10-30% of patients with cirrhosis and ascites develop SBP.1 The incidence
rises with ascitic fluid protein contents of less than 1 g/dL (which occurs 15% of patients) to
more than 40%, presumably because of decreased ascitic fluid opsonic activity.
13
More than 90% of cases of SBP are caused by a monomicrobial infection. The most
common pathogens include gram-negative organisms (eg, Escherichia coli [40%], Klebsiella
pneumoniae [7%], Pseudomonas species, Proteus species, other gram-negative species [20%])
and gram-positive organisms (eg, Streptococcus pneumoniae [15%], other Streptococcus species
[15%], Staphylococcus species [3%]) (see Table 2). Anaerobic microorganisms are found in less
than 5% of cases, and multiple isolates are found in less than 10%.
Secondary peritonitis
caused by perforation or necrosis (transmural infection) of a hollow visceral organ with bacterial
The pathogens involved in SP differ in the proximal and distal GI tract. Gram-positive organisms
predominate in the upper GI tract, with a shift toward gram-negative organisms in the upper GI
tract in patients on long-term gastric acid suppressive therapy. Contamination from a distal small
bowel or colon source initially may result in the release of several hundred bacterial species (and
fungi); host defenses quickly eliminate most of these organisms. The resulting peritonitis is
almost always polymicrobial, containing a mixture of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria with a
As many as 15% of patients who have cirrhosis with ascites who were initially presumed
to have SBP have SP. In many of these patients, clinical signs and symptoms alone are not
sensitive or specific enough to reliably differentiate between the 2 entities. A thorough history,
13
evaluation of the peritoneal fluid, and additional diagnostic tests are needed to do so; a high
Peritoneal abscess
fibrinous exudate, omentum, and/or adjacent visceral organs. The overwhelming majority of
abscesses occurs subsequent to SP. Approximately half of patients develop a simple abscess
without loculation, whereas the other half of patients develop complex abscesses secondary to
fibrinous septation and organization of the abscess material. Abscess formation occurs most
frequently in the subhepatic area, the pelvis, and the paracolic gutters, but it may also occur in
the perisplenic area, the lesser sac, and between small bowel loops and their mesentery.
The incidence of abscess formation after abdominal surgery is less than 1-2%, even when
the operation is performed for an acute inflammatory process. The risk of abscess increases to
10-30% in cases of preoperative perforation of the hollow viscus, significant fecal contamination
of the peritoneal cavity, bowel ischemia, delayed diagnosis and therapy of the initial peritonitis,
and the need for reoperation, as well as in the setting of immunosuppression. Abscess formation
Tertiary peritonitis
following apparently adequate therapy for SBP or SP, often without the original visceral organ
13
pathology. Patients with tertiary peritonitis usually present with an abscess, or phlegmon, with or
patients and in persons with significant preexisting comorbid conditions. Although rarely
requiring ICU admission for severe abdominal infections may be as high as 50-74%.
Patients who develop tertiary peritonitis demonstrate significantly longer lengths of stay
in the ICU and hospital, higher organ dysfunction scores, and higher mortality rates (50-70%).
Pseudomonas species) are found in a significant proportion of cases of tertiary peritonitis. Most
patients with tertiary peritonitis develop complex abscesses or poorly localized peritoneal
infections that are not amenable to percutaneous drainage. Antibiotic therapy appears to be less
effective in tertiary peritonitis than in all other forms of peritonitis, and up to 90% of patients
Tuberculous peritonitis (TP) is rare in the United States (<2% of all causes of peritonitis), but it
continues to be a significant problem in developing countries and among patients with human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The presenting symptoms are often nonspecific and insidious in
onset (eg, low-grade fever, anorexia, weight loss). Many patients with TP have underlying
cirrhosis and more than 95% of patients with TP have evidence of ascites on imaging studies,
and more than half of these patients have clinically apparent ascites.
In most cases, chest radiographic findings in patients with TP peritonitis are abnormal;
active pulmonary disease is uncommon (<30%). Results on Gram stain of ascitic fluid are rarely
13
positive, and culture results may be falsely negative in up to 80% of patients. A peritoneal fluid
protein level greater than 2.5 g/dL, a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level greater than 90 U/mL,
or a predominantly mononuclear cell count of greater than 500 cells/µL should raise suspicion
but have limited specificity for the diagnosis. Laparoscopy and visualization of granulomas on
peritoneal biopsy specimens, as well as cultures (requires 4-6 wk), may be needed for the
Chemical peritonitis
Chemical (sterile) peritonitis may be caused by irritants such as bile, blood, barium, or
other substances or by transmural inflammation of visceral organs (eg, Crohn disease) without
bacterial inoculation of the peritoneal cavity. Clinical signs and symptoms are indistinguishable
from those of SP or peritoneal abscess, and the diagnostic and therapeutic approach should be the
same.
Discussion
In the 2005 guidelines for CAPD peritonitis of the International Society for Peritoneal
Dialysis (ISPD) drainage of the peritoneal cavity and antibiotic prophylaxis with ampicilline, an
recommended. However, due to the lack of prospective trials there is scarce evidence to support
this recommendation. Therefore, this guideline is not widely accepted and implemented. In the
13
current guidelines of the Dutch Federation of Nephrology (NfN) the use of prophylactic
However it is mentioned that this is currently not daily practice in the Netherlands. Furthermore,
these nephrology guidelines are widely unknown among gastroenterologists who are responsible
for the planning and performance of endoscopic procedures. In the current guidelines of the
Gastroenterology (BSG)6 and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE),7 the
In 2009, two colonoscopies in 32 CAPD patients were performed in our hospital with one
episode of peritonitis. Although peritonitis after colonoscopy in CAPD patients might be a rare
event, it may lead to serious complications in the short and long term and even to death.
distinction, the prophylactic use of a single-dose antibiotic prior to colonoscopy has almost
no risks.
The implementation of the ISPD guidelines should be considered in every endoscopy unit
prophylaxis next to drainage of the peritoneal cavity prior to colonoscopy in CAPD patients as
advised in the ISPD guidelines. A clear, interdisciplinary communication over these patients
13
Conclus ion
CAPD peritonitis after colonoscopy is not a rare event. It may lead to serious morbidity.
With our cases we have demonstrated that drainage of the peritoneal cavity prior to endoscopy is
current ISPD guidelines to use additional antibiotics. The gastroenterologist should be familiar
13
References
1. Piraino B, et al. Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendation: 2005 update. Perit Dial
Int. 2005;25(2):107-31.
2. Yip T, Tse KC, Lam MF, Cheng SW, Lui SL, Tang S, et al. Risks and outcomes of peritonitis
3. Brulez HF, Verbrugh HA. First-line defense mechanisms in the peritoneal cavity during
13
4. Richtlijnen Peritoneale Dialyse gerelateerde infectie. Nederlandse Federatie voor Nefrologie
gerelateerde-infecties.2007.pdf
8.
6. Allison MC, Sandoe JAT, Tighe R, Simpson IA, Hall RJ, Elliot TSJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis in
assets/downloads/pdfs/guidelines/antibiotic_prolax.pdf.
2002;25(4):249-60.
13