puss ea na PRUPiNAS KAGAWARAN NG EDUKASYON. Penoxl SANGAY NG LUNGSOD NG DABAW Usasoa a patan ‘TIN: 000-863-958 Te Ns 2265274224010" RM/DIATG 22.0058/22-1672/ D285 /DAO8SY/ 253600 DIVISION MEMORANDUM No. To: From: Subject Date: 18.2016 Public Schools District Supervisors Cluster Heads School Heads (Elementary and Secondary) Schools Division Superintendent ‘SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SIP) AND W.A.T.C.H. PROGRAM EVALUATION 20 DEC 2016 Herewith is Dep&d Regional Memorandum No, 332, s, 2016 received by this Office on December 8, 2016 re: Schoo! Improvement Plan (SIP) and WA.T.C.H. Program Evaluation, contents of which are self-explanatory. In this connection, you are hereby advised to prepare in the said regional evaluation scheduled on January 17-20, 207ikfor the Division of Davao City ‘Attached are the schedule and assignment of evaluators, and the evaluation tools to be used for SIPIAIP and W.A.T.C.H. Program, Expenses incurred by the DivFTACT are chargeable against local funds while the Regional Evaluator Team expenses incurred shall be charged against Regional funds subject to the usual accounting and auditing rules and regulations, For immediate dissemination and compliance. KW MARIA INES C. ASUNCION, CESO VI ‘Schools Division Superintendent h° fn: sgoditanine! schoo! improvement pin fp} and wa.tc_ program evatuationRepublika ng Pilipinas KAGAWARAN NG EDUKASYON ‘TANGGAPANG PANREHIYON XI Lungsod ng Dabaw Telefox Numbers: (002) 227-1102; 227.9342 Ctrumkline) 225.8495 zanna REGIONAL MEMORANDUM No. 382, s. 2016 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SIP) AND W.A.T.C.H. PROGRAM EVALUATION To: Schools Division Superintendents 1. __ The Department of Education ROXI through the Field Technical Assistance Division (TAD) will conduct a last quarter evaluation on Schoo! Improvement P! (SIP), Annual Implementation Plan (AIP) and W.A.T.C.H. implementation December 12-14, 2016 to January 31, 2017 2. The objectives of this activity are to monitor and provide technical assistance on the: a) completeness of the enhanced School Improvement Plan (SIP|/ Annu Implementation Plan (AIP) as a document as per DepED Order 44, s 2015; b) inclusion of Programs/Activities/Projects to improve school Key Performance Indicators (KPI); and ¢} implementation of the Project W.A.T.C.H. in schools (integration in the curriculum, school, and community activities) 3. __ The Division SGOD Chiefs, SBM and W.A.T.C.H, Coordinators are reque to accompany and provide assistance to the Régional Evaluators in visiting schoals. 4. Attached are the schedule and assignment of Evaluators, and the evaluatior tools to be used for SIP/AIP and W.A.T.C.H. Program. 4. __ Expenses incurred by the DivFTACT are chargeable against local funds whil: the Regional Evaluator Team expenses incurred shall be charged against Regional funds subject to the usual accounting and auditing rules and regulations. 5. Immediate di semination of this Memorandum is desired. Ge ATTY. ALBERTO T. ESCOBARTE, CESO IL Regional Director MONITORING PROGRAMS ‘SCHOOLSAttachment A to Regional Memo No. 332, s, 2016: SIP and Project WATCH Evaluation Schedule and assignment of Evaluation January 4-6 | January 9-10, 2017 | Panabo City & Digos _ [January 11-13, 2017 ~~~‘ Davao Oriental _ __ January 17-20, 2017 | Davao City __ |Sanuary 23-25, 2017 Compostella Valley — Tagum City & 1GaGoS Dr. Mary Jeanne B. Aldeguer Dr. Basilio P. Mana-ay, Jr., Cl Dr. Brenda B. JacoboAttachment B fo Regional Mer Evaluation —_ _ = | On Language Assessment for Primary | Grades (LAPG) I APG) rventions | according to skills of the Is there an action plan for the implementatio intervention? Are there tracking forme in the formance on the development icarners’ skills in the | 4. Are there available reading sii} builder materials used in the ventions to address the least learned competencies in LAPD? Are interventions of d in the SIP; [ On National Acitievement Test (NAT) I e there interventions oT ding to skills of the | in English, Math, | nce, Araling | Panlipunan to improve NAT | esults? Are interventions to improve NAT results inctuded in the | | Are the interventions prepared |_| cording to skills of the learning areas? _ nee ing forms in the | performance on the development | of learners” skills intervention? Are there available 3 based materials used in the | classroom designed to address the least learned competencie: in NAT as part of the interventions? | ot On Teachers/Staif Develo; 11. Is there a SLAC session conducted for the im of the LAPG/NAT and ; | integration on the implementation of project _W.A.T. mo No. 332, s, 2016: SIP and Project WATProgram recipient, is i mplemented and functional as intervention for LAPG? | TS. Was there a staif/teachere | development on materials |. production ta be teed for | classroom instruction in developing LAPG/NAT skills? Is SLAC included in the SIP/AP for Teach Developr | Ifthe school is an ELLN 4 le ementation ofD.0. on LAC (D.0.#35Attachment C to Re; Evaluation On Improving NAT/LAPG | Yes ba Project WATCH. is integrated in the SIP/AIP for the S.Y,2016- | L201 | Action Plan for the current school year ‘Advocacy posters ia conspicuous places especially __in the cl |__ community Orientation and other stakeholders’ involvement in the project advocacy _ W.A.T.C.H, Program Evaluation Tool No | gional Memo No, 332, s. 2016: SIP and Project WATCH Teachers’ development/SLAC on the integration of honesty and punctuality in the ning process Functional School W.A.T.C.H activiti Integration on values of honesty and punctuality in the lessons of teachers across learning ar Award/ incentive system for | | honest pupils/ employees and | | L__parents _ | Conformed: Evaluators: DR. MARY JEANNE B. ALDEGUER Chief, FrAD DR. BRENDA B. JACOBO EPS, FTAD DivIACT ~ ‘School Head Teacher Representative DR. BASILIO P. MANA-AY, JR. EPS, FTAD DivTACTAttachment D to Regional Memorandum No 332 s.2016: ‘SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SIP) AND W.A.T.C.H. PROGRAM EVALUATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Schoo! Improvement Plan (SIP) Output Checklist School 10 School Name: Division: Name of person who submitted the sip Date of StP Submission: Name of SIP output reviewer: (Miser: air Preparatory Activities 1 FSehoo!- Community Data Template and/or other data sources 11 |Community Profile/Data 1.22 |social, Demographic and Cultural Profile 1.16] Political/Peace and Secu Peace and Order Lic) Physical Environment/ Ecological Profile 1] Economic Profle 1.1¢] Technological 12 [school Profile/bata 1.2a]Location, Relative Distance, and Type of School 1.2b [Learning Environment 1.2¢ [Teachers 2.2d [status of Priority improvement Projects or Cl Projects 1.2e|Fund Sources 1.34 [situation of Children/Leamers: Acces - In and Out of School 1.3.1]child-en not in school 1.3.2| children enrolled in school 1.38 [Retention 13.3]attendance 1.3.4]Dropout 1.3¢ [Situation of childven/Learners: Quality Promotion/Graduation Rates Mean Percerntage Scores Literacy Level 1.3.8] Awards/Recognitions 2 _ [child Mapping Tool 3 _[chite-Frienally School survey 4__|chita Protection Policy implementation ChecklistSchool Report Card [School Watching Checklist and Hazard Wap) List of SPT members Documentation of vision sharing ist of SPT with roles and responsibilities Plan (Gap Analysis Template Priority improvement Area (Pia) Template Planning Worksheet Intermediate Outcomes Priority Improvement Areas ‘General Objectives Root Cause Timeframe [Project Team members with roles and responsibilities Docuinentation of listening to the voice of the learners Flowchart of school processes relevant to each PIA Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix [Annual implementation Plan [SRCSummary of information [Basic School Report Card instructions: The Output Checkist Tool isa tool that you may use to determine the level of completeness of yaur School impravement Plan (IP) based on required template. Decide if the questions/ criteria have been met with a "Yes" or "No". Write your answers in the yellow colls/ boxes, No. ‘Not applicable