Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Through extensive research about the extensive medical benefits of embryonic stem cell
research, I came to understand that the popular controversy surrounding their use is not morally
and ethically warranted. I came to the conclusion that from sociopolitical, scientific, and
theological perspectives, embryonic stem cell research is not only morally permissible but is
morally commendable. Although opponents of stem cell research do have noble concerns about
the sanctity of life, to argue that it is immoral to use unwanted or unneeded embryo or blastocyst
tissue (otherwise destined for destruction) as a means to conduct life-saving scientific research is
to turn morality on its head. Although alternatives to embryonic stem cell research have been
proposed, none provide the same practical and medical benefits of embryonic stem cells.
Abortion Viewed in Moral Terms: Fewer See Stem Cell Research and IVF as Moral Issues.
(2013, August 15). Pew Research Centers Religion Public Life Project RSS. Retrieved
from http://www.pewforum.org/2013/08/15/abortion-viewed-in-moral-terms/
A recent pew survey asked Americans whether abortion, embryonic stem cell
research, and in vitro fertilization are morally acceptable, morally wrong, or not a moral
issue. Whereas 38% of adults either do not consider abortion to be a moral issue or
consider it to be morally acceptable, over 68% do not consider embryonic stem cell
I will use these statistics from the Pew Research Center to argue that from a
public policy and sociological perspective, it is faulty to view stem cell research as
inherently tied to the abortion issue. Because Pew is a highly respected polling research
agency and this study was published recently, it should have a lot of authority.
Stem-Cell Research. (n.d.). In Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints, and Voices.
Whereas scientific utilization of adult stem cells is for the most part not a major
source of public controversy in that the cells come from consenting adult donors or from
umbilical cord blood, ES stem cells are believed to possess greater therapeutic potential
because they are relatively rare in the body and are not easily cultured in the laboratory.
To those who believe that life and personhood begins at conception, the destruction of an
embryo is as repugnant as the murder of an adult human being. However, it is argued that
opponents of stem-cell research seem not to be bothered by the fact that thousands of
embryos are destroyed annually by IVF clinics, merely as a consequence of the fact that
they “are no longer wanted or needed. Allowing religious beliefs to restrict scientific
few individuals who may themselves eventually benefit from its results.
This is a very helpful article concerning stem cell research that gives a brief
overview of both sides of this position. I will bring up a few points that the authors of this
source raised that I had hitherto not given much attention, notably the relationship
between the restriction of funds for stem cell research and the separation of church and
Bioethics: A Christian Exploration of Technologies and Trends. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B.
Eerdmans.
The argument of this source is essentially that the use of human embryonic stem
virtue ethics. ESC research is argued to be “the equivalent of murder” and a a violation of
the sixth commandment (88). According to this source, even embryos that have been
cryopreserved in the process of IVF treatments for infertility should not be used for stem
cells, even if there is no longer any hope that the embryos would ever be implanted and
allowed to mature. The moral argument that we should produce the greatest good for the
greatest number by using these embryos that are destined for destruction to treat various
saying, ‘these Jews are going to be gassed anyway, so let’s do horrible experiments on
regarding stem cell research. Furthermore, I will argue that it is morally repugnant to
compare stem cell research to genocide and Nazi experimentation upon the Jews.
Moreover, the author clearly doesn’t hide his or her personal bias on this issue. I will
point out that it is anachronistic to use the sixth commandment to critique stem cell
research is anachronistic because when that text was written, the murder being spoken of
was that of another human being and to apply that command to stem cell research is
Should Support Stem Cell Research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
The primary argument is that stem cell research can be both morally and
theologically justified. They articulate three ethical frameworks (the embryo protection
framework, the human protection framework, and the future wholeness framework) and
The abortion debate can be contrasted with the stem cell research debate by
noting that whereas with abortion the moral argument centers around the ethics of
removing a living fetus from its mother’s womb, with the stem cell debate the debate
over stem cell research “the moral argument is over the blastocyst in a laboratory Petri
dish” (47). I will emphasize this point repeatedly in my paper. I will argue that the moral
status of a fetus is thus superior to that of a blastocyst because the fetus represents a
potential human person, whereas 60% of zygotes and blastocysts in a mother’s body are
I will use the research contained in this book to examine the moral logic behind
the the Vatican’s opposition to stem cell research on the basis of the doctrine that the
(as articulated in the papal encyclical Donum Vitae) and note that monozygotic twins
challenge the idea that genetic uniqueness is related to ensoulment because that would
stem cell research based on the idea that it involves “playing God” and would lead to a
alongside God and state that stem cell research is one further application of God’s
I will essentially argue that stem cell research is morally justified but will use
information gleaned from this source to warn of a few moral abuses that could result
from it, such as the possibility that wealthy families could afford to enhance the genomes
of their future children and warn that “today’s economic inequality could become
With regard to this source’s timeliness of information, it must be noted that it was
published in 2008. However, because the book spends a significant amount of time
dealing with abstract and unchanging ethical arguments, much of the information it
presents is thus still current. With regard to relevance, the intended audience of this book
interest in the issue of stem cell research; hence, the information contained in this book
relates strongly to my topic. The authors include Ted Peters (a theologian), Karen
anthropologist, biologist, and theologian). Hence, the authors are highly qualified to
present information on this topic from multiple perspectives. With regards to accuracy, I
have checked some of the information contained within this book against other sources
and have found it to be correct. The authors clearly state that their purpose is to persuade
Christians to support stem cell research in their subtitle, which is “Why Christians Should
Support Stem Cell Research.” Hence, the authors admit their bias concerning this issue.
Wright, Richard T. (2003). Biology through the Eyes of Faith. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
In therapeutic cloning (or nuclear transfer), embryos are taken as far as far as the
blastocyst stage (that is, up to 200 cells), and the embryos with cloned nuclei are
disrupted to result in the production of individual cells that retain pluripotency. Because
the embryonic stem cells retain their pluripotency, they can differentiate into almost all
human cells and tissues (80). Although stem cells can similarly stem from from embryos
frozen for IVF (in vitro fertilization) purposes and from fetal tissues acquired via
terminated pregnancies, stem cells resulting from therapeutic cloning possess a distinct
advantage: “they are antigenically identical to the animal that “donated” the nucleus to
the enucleated egg,” (184). Hence, they are from which cell lines capable of producing
replacement tissues and organs fully compatible with the donor (184). This is distinct
without fertilization or the intent for it to ever become a person. It is highly controversial
in part because opponents argue that permitting therapeutic cloning would only serve to
Another advantage of embryonic stem cells is that they could be induced to turn
into the insulin- producing cells that the pancreas normally produces and subsequently
introduced into diabetic patients, or they could be stimulated to morph into dopamine-
producing neurons and and then subsequently be “implanted into patients with
Parkinson’s disease” (185). Although most stem cells come from human embryos or
from aborted fetuses; some, however, are “derived from human umbilical-cord tissue,”
organizations. Therefore, he is. However, this book was published in 1989 and updated
last in 1989; therefore, some of his information may be out of date. However, I have
verified the accuracy of all of the information that I am planning on using in my paper.
The author is very unbiased and displays a very apparent “just the facts” attitude in his
chapter on stem cell research and concludes that he is unable to find only one position on
the issue that can be labeled “the Christian position.” I will use this resource to talk
therapeutic cloning.
Biology / Sciences
pluripotential stem cells are a foundation of an creature’s “complete array of cell types at
derived from stem cell research, such as analyzing the diverse causes of cell degeneration
and cell death, is assured to assist us in the creation of new drugs. Progress in research
has made it possible, at least in principle, to utilize stem cells for cell therapy. That is, it
is now theoretically possible to identify new molecular targets for disease treatment to
contain oncogenesis [or] to reconstruct or replace diseased tissues.” (xx). Stem cell
research has also played an enabling role in gene therapy. The stem cell revolution was
initially delayed by funding restrictions, arising from those with ethical concerns about
using human embryos for research. However, it is likely that future acceptance of stem
cell research will skyrocket “because of iPS [induced pluripotential stem] cell
This source was published recently and is a goldmine of information about stem
cell research. will use the information found in the preface and introductory chapters of
this book in order to outline the medical benefits of stem cell research in depth as a part
Mackey, T. K., & Liang, B. A. (2013). Dangerous science: Online promotion of unproven stem
cell therapies and global health risks. Journal Of Commercial Biotechnology, 19(4), 19-
28. doi:10.5912/jcb.624
The abstract notes that stem cell-based therapies represent a potential pathway for
a new era of regenerative medicine; it is, moreover, enormously useful for understanding
the process of human embryonic development, for pharmaceutical research, and for
developing tissues and cells that can be used to repair damaged tissues and organs. After
scientific evidence for safe, effective use of stem cells clinically, an explosion of
questionable and often illegal stem cell providers around the world are now offering
of currency and authority. The paper is related to stem cell research and clinics,
advertising. Hence, it is highly related to my topic and will prove very useful when
discussing these issues in my paper. The paper describes the proliferation of questionable
and often illegal stem cell providers around the world. Thus, this article is relevant to my
research question only insofar as it details the ethical abuses that may arise from stem cell
research but are not inherent in it. I will use the information presented in this paper by
stating a series of lessons that should inform future global regulation and policymaking in
this arena. Because this source is published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Commercial
Neural Stem Cells. (2003). In Encyclopedia of the Human Genome. Retrieved from
http://www.acu.edu:2048/login?url=http://www.credoreference.com/entry/wileyhg/neural
stem_cells
A primitive pluripotent embryonic stem cell can be cut off from the developing
blastocysts and propagated in a tissue culture dish while holding onto the possibility of
generating into a multifarious variety of tissues, such as brain, blood, and muscle;
however, there is the “chance of tumor formation following transplantation” which can
be avoided via the use of multi-potent neural stem cells derived from the developing
central nervous system. This will likely play a huge role in the field of cell therapy, which
I previously had no idea that the implantation of some stem cells carried a slight
counterarguments. This source seems reliable, and I have double-checked the facts it cites
Power, C., & Rasko, J. J. (2011). Will Cell Reprogramming Resolve the Embryonic Stem Cell
“enter an embryonic stem cell–like state.” Induced pluripotent stem cells possess are not
only more medically promising than embryonic stem cells but have likewise escaped the
moral controversy wherein the latter is fixed. Although cell reprogramming can arguably
be expected to alter regenerative and reproductive medicine despite the sociopolitical and
moral obstacles that it faces, it will not untangle the stem cell controversy but will only
serve to further complicate it. Moreover, an assortment of legal and ethical problems
I plan on using the information discussed in this article to discuss and explain why
induced pluripotent stem cells will not serve as a reliable substitute for embryonic stem
cells and why results to substitute induced pluripotent cells for embryo derived stem cells
Silva, J., Chambers, I., Pollard, S., & Smith, A. (2006). Nanog promotes transfer of pluripotency
culture in the form of embryonic stem cells (723). One potential way to create a
pluripotent cell outside of an embryo would be to reprogram somatic cells. One possible
containing protein” necessary for pluripotency and essential at the earliest most primitive
stages of embryonic development. Moreover, in human cells it has been demonstrated
that Nanog possesses the capability of enabling molecular reprogramming. It has likewise
been demonstrated that Nanog promotes the “transfer of pluripotency” after embryonic
stem cell fusion (724). This indicates that it may be possible to use Nanog to reprogram
As this source was published in one of the most prestigious scientific journals
worldwide, it is a highly credible and academic source for my research paper over stem
cells and the ethical, moral, and societal controversies emanating therefrom. Because this
provides a possible future alternative to embryonic stem cell research, I will mention it in
my paper, although I will note that that the technology currently depends upon te
embryonic stem cell to reprogram the adult cell and that it is difficult to ascertain as to
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/565211/stem-cell
There are many other types of adult stem cells, such as mouse embryonic stem
cells, epithelial stem cells, and neural stem cells. Since the early 2000s when the stem
cell debate achieved widespread American media coverage, the controversy primarily
important to point out that not all research uses these cells but instead uses adult stem
cells, amniotic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. Prior to 2001, it was
supposed that only stem cells from embryos possessed the capability of developing into
different tissue types. Furthermore, there are an assortment of legal and ethical problems
related to egg donation to embryonic stem cell research. Moreover, there are many
unknown risks related to transplanting SCNT-derived stem cells (that is, stem cells
To be honest, at first I thought that I did not need this source and was only going
to use it because I needed fifteen sources. However, I now think it will be very helpful in
writing my paper because it gives some facts about SCNT-derived cells of which I have
source; hence, I can be assured that the information is trustworthy and up to date.
Stem cell. (2013). In The Hutchinson Unabridged Encyclopedia with Atlas and Weather Guide.
entry/heliconhe/stem_cell
Prior to 2001, it was supposed that only stem cells from embryos possessed the
capability of developing into different tissue types, but this supposition was rendered
invalid in experiments concerning the extraction of stem cells from the brains of adult
mice; this led to the realization that adult stem cells can likewise develop into different
tissue types, which could lead to self-repair of damaged brains or spinal cords while the
need to use stem cells taken from human embryos unnecessary. In the past decade, a
group of scientists at the University of Minnesota heralded the discovery of a stem cell
known as a “multipotent adult progenitor cell” or MPAC, located in the bone marrow of
adults, that might possess the potential to develop into almost any tissue of the human
This was a very helpful article outlining one of the few legitimate
counterarguments that can be argued against my position in favor of embryonic stem cell
research, namely, that it may be possible to bypass the need for embryonic stem cells
altogether in the future; however, this does not seem to be a possibility at present. I will
use this article towards my conclusion while talking about recent developments in this
field of research.
Solomon, E. P., Berg, L. R., & Martin, D. W. (2011). Developmental Genetics. In Biology (pp.
The section of the chapter Stem cells begins by defining stem cells as
nevertheless preserve and maintain the ability to divide to maintain the stem cell popular.
As each stem cell divides, moreover, its daughter cells can differentiate into specialized
cells such as muscle cells, neurons, or blood cells (373). Embryonic stem cells, unlike
adult stem cells, are pluripotent and hence more useful. The ultimate hope of researchers
would be to “establish lines of human pluripotent stem cells that can grow indefinitely in
a culture, be induced to differentiate under controlled conditions and stably maintain their
differentiated state, and be manipulated genetically” (374). This would allow the curing
This is a highly reliable source because it is the textbook that I use in class. It is
highly useful in that it provides a huge section on stem cell research in the chapter on
developmental genetics. It was only recently revised and as such is highly up-to-date. I
plan on using this in the introduction of my paper when defining my terms and providing
an introduction to stem cell research. This source gives definitions of cell development
and differentiation, totipotency, differential gene expression, transcription factors, human
therapeutic and reproductive cloning, in vitro fertilization, embryonic stem (ES) cells,
transgenic organisms, and so forth. I am familiar with its contents already, having studied
it for class.
Vitale, A. M., Matigian, N. A., Ravishankar, S., Bellette, B., Wood, S. A., Wolvetang, E. J., &
Importance for Disease Modeling. Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 1(9), 641-650.
stem/stromal cells (MSCs). Usually only around one out of a third of umbilical cord
blood specimens can yield MSCs. To access earlier “fetal, placental, and amniotic
sources” requires access to abortive tissues. MSCs are needed for cardiac, renal, neural,
joint, and bone repair. This source provides a plausible experimental alternative method
research was recently released. It provides information that will prove helpful in writing
the conclusion to my paper as I address the future of stem cell research. However, the
advanced level of scientific jargon found in this paper prevents me from obtaining more
information from this article than can be found in a cursory reading; thus, I plan on only