Dive 88 Bic =“ Li tae AGMA 207.06 NOV., 1974 AGMA STANDARD System Tooth Proportions for Fine-Pitch lnvolute Spur and Helical Gears Published bys AMERICAN GEAR MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION 1901 North Fort Myer Drive @ Arlington, Virginia 22209FOREWORD [As originally developed by the American Gear Manufacturers Association, this standard was in two parts; the first part, “Clearance for 20-Degree Pressure angle Fine-Pitch Gears” (AGMA 470.01), and the second, “20-Degree Involute Fine-Pitch System for Spur Gears” (AGMA 207.02). ‘The standard for clearances of fine-pitch gears was first presented as a paper at the 1941 Semi-Annual Meeting of the American Gear Manufacturers Association. It was released as a tentative AGMA Standard in 1941. In September, 1947, it was designated AGMA Standard 470.01. Originally, fine pitch gears were considered to lie within the range of 30 to 200 diametral pitch. In 1945, the system was extended to gears of 20 diametral pitch to avoid an intermediate (medium) pitch range In May, 1949, the two standards were combined and completely re-edited. Nomenclature and symbols were brought up to date and made to conform with ASA standards. In developing this standaed, a pressure angle of 20-deg was chosen after prolonged and careful corssideration of tooling problems and other pertinent factors. ‘The next revision of this standard was begun in 1955. The revisions consisted of the removal of minor restrictiozs, the corrections of typographical errors and the addition of a format for the specification of spur and helical gears. ‘As a result of the increasingly widespread use of gears by sintering and injection moulding process, and for those cases Where greatest tooth strength is required, tooth forms for 25-degree pressure angle ate included. The high angular precision requirements and low backlash required of control gearing containing large numbers of teeth is recognized by the addition of data on the 14% deg pressure angle system in the Information Sheets. Helical gear tables for the 14% des pressure angle have been purposely omitted because they are seldom used in control gearing. Data on drawing formats and other general design information have been removed from the body of this standard. Data fon drawing formats can be obtained from AGMA 114.02, “Information Sheet—Formats for FinePitch Gear Specification Data.” Data on fine-pitch gear design will appear in a Design Manual for Fine-Pitch Gearing, Data on pinions with very low numbers of teeth have been removed from the body of this standard due to the controversial nature of their design. AGMA. 207.05, was approved by Sectional Committee BG and by the sponsors, and designated USA Standard. B6,7-1967 as of September 18, 1967. Due to difficulties encountered in fabricating gears with involute profiles to the base circle, the Fine-Pitch Committee developed a new set of tooth proportions for enlarged pinion that would not require active tooth profiles below the five degrees of roll. ‘These revisions are in keeping with requirements of current practices in the fine-pitch gear field and are presented in the form of tables and graphs on 20 degree normal pressure angle enlarged pinions. AGMA 207.06 was approved by the Fine Pitch Gearing Committee in June, 1971. The standard in its present form was approved by the membership as of May, 1974. copyRIGHT, 1974, 8Y AMERICAN GEAR MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION A? ayAGMA Standards and related publications represent minimum or average data, conditions or application. They are subject to constant improvement, revision or withdrawal as dictated by experience. Any person who refers to AGMA technical publications should satisfy himself that he has the latest information available from the Association on the subject matter, Personnel of Fine-Pitch Gearing Committee ‘Technical Division Janiary, 1974 E, Adams, Chairman, International Business Machines Corp., Endicott, New York E, Berlinger, Jr., Quaker City Gear Works, Inc., Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania L. Borden, The Falk Corp., Milwaukee, Wisconsin E. Buckley, Ex-Cell-O Corp., Detroit, Michigan M. Dean, Jr., Mechanical Technology Inc, Latham, New York P. Dombrowski, International Business Machines Corp., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina D. R W. L. c. ©. B. D. L P. cn >. Ervay, Gleason Works, Rochester, New York Estabrook, Jr., Precision Molded Gearing Corp., Norwood, Massachusetts Harriman, Fellows Corp., Springfield, Vermont Jannick, Minois Tool Works Inc., Chicago, Iinois Leming, Arrow Gear Co., Downers Grove, Ilinois K. W. MacCormae, Gear Technologies Inc., Broomfield, Connecticut L. D. Martin, Rochester Gear, Inc., Rochester, New York JR. Mihelick, Reliance Electric Co., Columbus, Indiana J.M. Oichawa, Litton Precision Gear, Chicago, Hinois H. L, Olmstead, Franklin Electric Co., Inc., Bluffton, Indiana W. F. Porgande, Illinois Tool Works Inc., Chicago, Illinois Andre Quehen, SECIM, Courbevote, France Gord Reinig, Gould & Eberhardt Gear Machinery Corp., Webster, Massachusetts, F. E, Seymour, Winsmith Div. of UMC Industries, Inc., Springville, New York E. E. Shipley, Mechanical Technology Inc., Latham, New York W.L. Shoulders, Reliance Electric Co., Columbus, Indiana J.L, Smallwood, Smallwood & Son Machine Co., Dallas, Texas L. J. Smith, Invincible Gear Co., Detroit, Michigan HE, Speary, Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, New York Yoshikazu Sueyoshi, Tsubakimoto Chain Co., Osake, Japan Gary Yesey, Illinois Tool Works Inc., Chicago, Ilinois E F. B. W. I es rat General Consultant G.L. Breur, Curtiss Wright Corp., Caldwell, New Jersey Tables or other selfsupporting sections may be quoted or extracted in their entirety. Credit lines should read: “Extracted from AGMA Standard System — Tooth Proportions for Fine-Pitch Involute Spur and Helical Gears (AGMA 207.05), with the permission of the publisher, the American Gear Manufacturers Association, 1901 North Fort Myer Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22209.”AGMA STANDARD TOOTH PROPORTIONS FOR FINE-PITCH INVOLUTE SPUR AND HELICAL GEARS 1, Introduction 1.1 The spur gear portions of this standard closely follow ANSI B6,1-1968, “Tooth Proportions for Coarse-Pitch In- volute Spur Gears,” (AGMA 201.02). 1.2 The main difference between the proportions of fine-pitch gears and those of the coarse-pitch is in the clearance. In fine-pitch gearing, wear on the points of the cutting tools is proportionally greater than in coarse-pitch tools. The fillet radius produced by such tooling will therefore be proportionally greater. The increased clearance in gearing of 20 diametral pitch and finer provides both for the relatively larger fillet and also for foreign material that tends to accumulate at the bottoms of the teeth. 2. Scope 2.1 This standard applies to spur and helical gearing of 20, through 120 diametral pitch. Similar data for spur gears of 19.99 diamettal pitch and coarser is found in ANSI B6.1-1968, “Tooth Proportions for Coarse-Pitch Involute Spur Gears.” (AGMA 201.02). 2.1.1 The tooth proportions shown herein will be suitable for many gear designs of finer than 120 diametral pitch, hrowever, such designs should be checked for suitability, particularly in the areas of contact ratio, undercutting and clearance, 2.2 Information on tooth proportions for spur and helical gearing of 20 degree pressure angle and having 7 or more teeth is given in the main body of this standard. 2.2.1 Gear Designs with low numbers of teeth should be checked for suitability, particularly in the areas of contact ratio, undercutting and clearance. 3. Basic Rack 3.1 The basic rack shown in Figure 1 is used to illustrate the tooth proportions covered by this standard. When small ‘numbers of teeth, or special center distance situations are encountered, it is intended that long and short addendum proportions be used. This standard permits freedom of choice in making minor changes in the tooth proportions to meet special design conditions as long as the resulting gears are fully conjugate to the basic rack. Such changes may be indicated when a special contact ratio or modification for tooth strength is desired. 3.2 Spur Gears. The basic rack shown in Figure 1 and the tooth proportions shown in Tables 2 and 3 provide the basic design data for spur gear teeth. 3.3 Helical Gears. Tho helical teeth covered by this standard are conjugated in the normal plane to the besic rack shown in Figure 1, and Tables 2 and 3. 4, General Features 4.1 Pressure Angle, The standard pressure angle is 20 degrees, and is recommended for most applications. In the information sheets attached, data may be found on 14% and 25-degree pressure angle sysiems. Pressure angle of helical teeth is taken in the normal plane. a 4.1.1 In certain cases, notably sintered or moulded gears, of in gearing where greatest strength and wear resistance are desired, a 25-degree pressure angle may be required. Pressure angles greater than 20 degree tend to require the use of generating tools having very narrow point widths. In addition, the larger pressure angles require closer control on. center’ distance tolerance for those gear trains in which backlash is critical. C 4.1.2 In cases where considerations of angular position or backlash are critical and where both pinions and gears contain relatively large numbers of teeth, a 144 degree preseure angle may be desirable. In general, pressure angles of less than 20° degree require a greater amount of modification to avoid undercut problems and ate limited to Jarger total numbers of teeth in gear and pinion when ‘operating on a standard center distance, 4.2 Working Depth. C 4.2.1 The basic working depth is 4.2.2 Teeth with this depth are commonly referred to as full-depth teeth, 43 Addendum. 43.1 Equaladdendum teeth are used for general purpose applications where the number of teeth are equal to or ‘exceed the minimum number shown in Table 1 43.2 Long and short addendum proportions are used to avoid objectionable undercut or for considerations of tooth Cc strength, contact ratio or center distance. Sections 7 and 8AGMA STANDARD TOOTH PROPORTIONS FOR FINE-PITCH C INVOLUTE SPUR AND HELICAL GEARS ‘Table 1 Minimum Number of Pinion Teeth vs. Pressure Angle and Helix Angle Having No Objectionable Undercut* Minimum Number of Teeth to Avoid Undercut Helix Angle, Normal Pressure Ane, 6, degrees Degrees 144 20 25 ° 32. 4 1s 5 2 cay 15 10 3h 23 4 15 2» 2 4 20 21 20 3 2 6 19 2 25 25 18 u 30 2 16 10 35 19 B 9 40 1s u 7 45 2 9 6 *This table is compatible with the values for enlargement of helical pinions given in Figure 4, page 13. give recommended tooth proportions to avoid undercut problems in meshes of small numbers of teeth. As the total number of teeth in gear and pinion gets smaller, the contact ratio diminishes. Special attention must be given to avoid contact ratios below 1.2. 44 Clearance. 4.4.1 Minimum stendard clearance is 92° + 0,002 4.4.2 Greater clearance than giveri in Tables 2 & 3 is required if tecth are to be finished by a. secondary operation. While the required clearance may vary with 0.350 specific gear applications, a value of + 0.002 pro- vides the necessary amounts in most cases. See also, ANSI B94.7-1966 “Hobs”, ANSI B94.21-1968, “Shaper Cutters,” and AGMA 370.01, “Design Manual for FinePitch Gearing.” 4.5 Tooth Thickness. 4.5.1 The basic tooth thickness shown in the tables does not include an allowance for backlash when the gears are meshed at standard center distances. 4.5.2 In general, the teeth of both members are reduced in thickness an equal amount to provide backlash in equal addendum gearing. In the cases of pinions having small ‘numbers of teeth, consideration should be given to applying all of the tooth thickness reduction to the gear member to provide the required backlash. AGMA 207.06 ~ Novernber, 1974AGMA STANDARD TOOTH PROPORTIONS FOR FINE-PITCH INVOLUTE SPUR AND HELICAL GEARS 4.6 Backlash. See AGMA 390.03, “AGMA Gear Hand- book,” for suggested backlash, 47 Whole Depth. 4.7.1 The whole depth values shown in the tables will increase in proportion to the amount of tooth thinning in cutting the teeth, unless the outside diameter is also modified. 4.7.2 The whole depth of long and short addendum gearing generated with pinion type cutters may be slightly greater than that shown in the tables 5. Involute Profile 5.1 Teeth designed in accordance with this standard will have a true involute profile between the form diameter and that point where the tip relief or edge round produced by ‘the manufacturing process begins. 5.2 Any special tip relief or modification of involute Profile to suit design or operational requirements shall be considered beyond the scope of this standard. 6. Center Distance 6.1 Standard Center Distance. Standard center distance is given by the equation shown in Table 2. 6.2 Center Distance Systems. There are two center distance systems in use. These are the Standard CenterDistance System and the Enlarged Center-Distance System. The choice of which is used will depend on the number of teeth in the meshing gears and on other design requirements. ‘When an enlarged pinion is to be meshed with a gear at the WORKING / Derr | Ba ‘aNeLe coRcuLaR, PireH center distance that is standard for the numbers of teeth, the gear diameter and tooth thickness must be decreased by the amount of the pinion enlargement. When two enlarged pinions. or an enlarged pinion and a standard gear are meshed together, the center distance must be greater than standard. 6.2.1 Standard Center-Distance System. (Long and short addendums.) In this system the center distance is made standard for the umber of teeth, and the operating Pressure angle remains constant. The outside diameter and root diameter of the gear are decreased the same amount ‘that the pinion diameters are increased. If, however, the number of teeth in the gear is too small, undercut will result, 2 6.2.1.1 Table 4 lists the decrease in gear outside diamete: basic circular thickness and the minimum number of teeth to avoid undercut in the gear. 6.2.1.2 The advantages of this system are: No change in center distance is required; operating pressure angle re- mains standard; slightly greater contact ratio is obtained than when the center distance is increased. 62.13 The diadrntigs ae The gs a wl a the pinions must be changed from standard dimensions; pinions hhaving fewer than 24 teeth (i., those requiring enlarge- ment to avoid undercut) cannot be satisfactorily meshed together. In most cases where gear trans include idler gears, the standard center-distance system cannot be used 6.2.2 Enlarged Center Distance System. When two enlarged Pinions, or an enlarged pinion and standard gear, are meshed together, the center distance must be increased. If _ the center distance is increased by the amount of the radial ‘enlargement of the pinion, an excessive amount of backlash may be encountered. Figure 3 and the accompanying s00eHOUM DeDENoum Figure 1 BASIC RACK~(Normal Plane)AGMA STANDARD TOOTH PROPORTIONS FOR FINE-PITCH C INVOLUTE SPUR AND HELICAL GEARS Table 2 Tooth Proportions and Formulas for Diameters and Standard Center Distance (All values in inches) —_ ‘Tooth Proportions ITEM SPUR HELICAL af 1.000 1.000 ‘Addendum (a) e Dedendum (5) 4.299 50,002 (min) 122, 0.002 (min) — 2.000 2.000 Working Depth (iy) ; 3 3 Whole Depth (i) 2200 + 0.002 (min) 2.200 4 0.002 (min.) Clearance fe) 9.290 + 0,002 (min) 9.200 + 0,002 (min.) (Standard) a (Shared or Ground Teth) 1350.90 (nin) 2350 6.002 (nin Tooth Thickness) At Pitch Diameter Circular Pitch (p) Pn Bo Pitch Diameter 2 ¢ Pinion (d) P N & Gear (D) , 3 Outside Diameter n+2 Pinion (dy) P N+2 Gear (Dg) + Nen Nen Center Distance (C) oe Wee ¢ Where: P = Transverse Diametral Pitch Helix Angle Normal Diametral Pitch Number of pinion teeth Normal Tooth Thickness at Pitch Diameter Number of gear teeth = Normal Circular Pitch ae AGMA 207.06 — November, 1974AGMA STANDARD TOOTH PROPORTIONS FOR FINE-PITCH INVOLUTE SPUR AND HELICAL GEARS formulas show how the center distance should be adjusted to obtain proper meshing conditions without incurring an increase in backlash, 6.2.2.1 With an increase of center distance, there is a slight increase in the operating pressure angle. 6.2.2.2 The advantages of this system are: Only the pinions need be changed from standard dimensions; pinions having fewer than 24 teeth may engage other pinions in this rangé. 6223 The disedvantages are: Centerdistances must be enlarged over standard; the operating pressure angle in- creases slightly with different combinations of gears and pinions; the contact ratio is slightly smaller than that obtained with the standard centerdistance system. This consideration is of minor importance as in the worst case, the loss is approximately 6 per cent. Table 3 Tooth Dimensions for 20.Depree Pressure Angle Fine-Pitch Gears* 4 6 7 7. Recommended Dimensions 7.1 Standard generating tools (hobs or shaper cutters), are used for either spur or helical gears. See ANSI B94.7-1966, “Hobs,” and ANSI B94.21-1968, “Shaper Cutters.” TAA Table 2 gives the formulas for standard tooth proportions. In order to minimize the vast number of tools (Cutters and master gears) required for all possible diametzal pitches the following diametral pitches, based on a logarith- mic sequence are recommended: 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 64,72, 80, 96 and 120. Table 3 shows the tooth dimensions for each diametral pitch. The gear ratios and non-standard center distances which are sometimes fixed bY component design requirements can usually be obtained using standa pitch cutters and enlarging one or both of the mating gears. 1 2 Sul 5 Z 8 9 Standard ; Diametral | Circular | Circular | Working | Whole Standard | Standard Pitch Pitch | Thickness | Depth | Depth | Clearance | Addendum | Dedendum | © 20 0.15708 | 0.07854 | 0.1000 | 0.120} 0.0120 0.0500 0.0820 | .0000 24 0.13090 | 0.06545 | 0.0833 | 0.0937 | 0.0104 0.0417 0.0520 0004 32 0.09818 | 0.04909 | 0.0625 | 0.0708 | 0.0083 0.0313 0.0395 |) .0007 40 0.07854 | 0.03972 | 0.0500 | 0.0570 | 0.0070 0.0250 0.0320} 0010 43 0.06545 | 0.03272 | 0.0417 | 0.0378 | 0.0062 0.0208 0.0270} 0012 64 0.04909 | 0.02454 | 0.0312 | 0.0364 | 0.0051 o.o1s6 0.0208} 01s 72 0.04363 | 0.02182 | 0.0278 | 0.0326 | 0.0048, 0.0139 0.0187 | 0015 80 0.03927 | 0.01964 | 0.0250 | 0.0295 | 0.0045 0.0125 0.0170 | 001s 96 0.03272 | 0.01636 | 0.0208 | 0.0249} 0.0041 0.0104 | o.014s | 0016 120 0.02618 | 0.01309 | 0.0167 | 0.0203 | 0.0037 0.0083, 0.0120} .0017 All dimensions are given in inches. ‘4= increase in dedendum over the values determined by dividing the dedendums shown in tables 4, 5 and 2B & 3B by the diametral pitch. ‘The corrected dedendums would be conjugate with the basic rack dedendums of *See page 4, section 3, Basic Rack and page 1B, paragraph 2. + 002AGMA STANDARD TOOTH PROPORTIONS FOR FINE-PITCH INVOLUTE SPUR AND HELICAL GEARS 8, Spur Pinion Enlargement 8.1 Enlargement of Spur Pinions of 20-Degree Pressure ‘Angle and Diametral Pitches from 20 through 120. Spur pinions having fewer than the minimum numbers of teeth shown in Table 1 should be enlarged to avoid objectionable undercut. Pinions of finer than 120 diametral pitch require special consideration since the proportionally larger. clearance requires hobs which tend to produce greater undercut. In general, pinions cut by the shaping process will not have as much undercut as those cut by hobbing. 82 Dimensions 8.2.1 Tooth thickness and pinion outside diameter are ‘obtained by dividing the appropriate values shown in col. 2 & 3 of table 4 by the diametral pitch. 8.2.2 The dedendum for the pinion may be determined by dividing the dedendum shown in col. 5 of table 4 by the diametral pitch and adding the increment “0” shown in col 9 of table 3 823 The enlarged center distance should be obtained by means of the Formula under figure 3 using the center distance factor K from col. 9 of table 4 8.2.4 Short addendum gears should be designed in accor- dance with table 5. The dedendum should be determined by dividing the dedendim shown in col. 4 of table 5 by the diametral pitch and adding the increment “A” shown in col. 9 of table 3. ‘TOP LAND IS THE SURFACE OF THE TOP OF A TOOTH TOP LAND FILLET LAND BOTTOM LAND IS THE SURFACE AT THE BOTTOM OF A TOOTH SPACE ADJOINING THE FILLET. Figure 2. GEAR TOOTH NOMENCLATURE AGMA 207.06 — November, 1974ac Terp ydesBeEd 20544 wa 120} poxaup 09 Pinoys Any, “Boxe papeys ue ou 4g % 4 & fog . i gge9'er oove't O80Ls"T 00°97 % i ¥S6Te ouet | uzres't 19s0'sz @ i { zesvoz susrt | 19¢¢9T ospr'se w | | 6808'6T osert | s6sso't over'ee ie | 1s98'°8T getoT | 6e88o't seeTe ow $06 zeol | $900L"T onIr Te 61 16.6 1636" 8625L°T 900s'oz ar 8se0 es06° cesse't 68s'61 ut | $260 6006" gouis't ze19'sT or | zevr 9998" Toose'l LL9e'Lt st | 0900 ozs seces'T o9se'9r ct 1 | Lest 9u9u" ooreT Brr6'ST e e } vere ceee! e0b6'T 9620'S a rot TOLEOT 18 LE6LET poeorT ir | overs Teg" sse10%, © 6L20e1 or i pars seis” ossore soeo7zt “6 | BE9S'L osis s360°% oszorrr 8 L089°9 sash PutbT@, zo10'or L suowig fe | wnaoe @ yenbg omy | nF 25) sears, wo ee sjourq | poog, omy |e ued seas eet tome |e 9 oeIt09 a mapuopaq, ; soquinyy or 6 9 s + £ z ei Hap pIopubig ‘ym Bey wor suosuaung worung \ worse "a9 posses ypeay Jo sraquiNN TEMS Jo SHON ay8uy amssorg 07 SusPsepug 105 popuouwosoy suortodoug WOOL, p A98Las opt AGMA STANDARD TOOTH PROPORTIONS FOR FINE-PITCH INVOLUTE SPUR AND HELICAL GEARS FACTOR 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 NUMBER OF TEETH, MATING GEAR = Ng Center Distance 1 AptNe ara +K-F) Note: The Center distance as calculated above is based on the general formulas: Np+Ng cos $y Cp, os b2 Where: (Bet To ~P Pa iw 62 = 6, * Fig. 3 Center Distance Factor “F” For 20° Enlarged Pinions Sie AGMA 207.06 — November, 1974i & { ep ydessesnd 295, tu N oq % on u i % osous't o000"t % i se ze0ss'T 6tL6 ea x S6LIST sie w w ¥9980'T rss" iz man we ocese'T 98es" oz Of 6 s60zr'T esl" or ES oe Tosse'T Lov” at BO Ie Lcose'l £S0L ur B we e6eze't 6099" oT a2 fe aster | $909 st Bas ve e6st't ozs" +1 B65 se ossce't outs" et Bae oe osver" zee" er \ 4 Be Le ees user Ir 2 564 8 ours" v8 Tee" or 1 ans oe 906° s9s80"l seee’ 6 Say or os96't SOE+OT osiz’ 8 Zor Bom ew seco st0001T sore’ L 2692 T aS wpeay UO SSOUONEL poet | Ba Pp a oo, | wnpuappy i i Se woney | “ON win ue ose t Sz yoeqwoy | _papuourmoooy | mpuered - aa 2 s ¥-suorsuouna 3295 r (umnpueppy toys put uo) i see eee | td poBeugy a[Suy omssatd OZ $ O19%L> AGMA STANDARD TOOTH PROPORTIONS FOR FINE-PITCH ¢ INVOLUTE SPUR AND HELICAL GEARS 53 Enlargement of Helical Pinions of 20-Degree Normal reduced in diameter or the center distance must be Pressuse Angle. The enlargement of helical pinions to avoid increased to correspond with the enlargement, as in spur undercut cannot be tabulated as simply as for spur pinions gears, because of the wide range of helix angles used. It is recommended that helical pinions be enlarged in accor- Seas dance with the following graph and formulss. When using ange 2th an enlarged helical pinion, either the mating gear must be l= d+ > ol Y ‘ eNLARCEWONT yt — HELICAL Pons NOTE: This data is based on the use of hobs having sharp comers 2t their top lands. Pinions cut by shaper cutters may not require as much modification. Figure 4. Recommended Enlargement for Helical Pinions { ¢ Example Given: 12 teeth, 32 normal diametral pitch, 20-degree a= ikea 03043 normal pressure angle and 1&-degree helix angle. Kj, = 851 (Grom graph) P=Pyx cosy 2+ 851 P=32 x 0.95106 = 30.4339 to = 03943 + <= = 4834 Graph Derivation 120 $y tnd, . 2AC = Ky = enlargement = 2.1 ~ E> [sin dy ~ 00s tan $°] sing y= normal pressure angle op = transverse pressure angle -B- AGMA 207.06 — November, 1974INFORMATION SHEET A BASIS FOR ENLARGED PINION PROPORTIONS 1. Pinions with 12 through 23 teeth are enlarged enough so ‘that a standard tooth thickness rack with addendum 1.05/Pitch will start contact 5° of Roll above the base radius. The use of 1.05/Pitch for addendum allows for center distance variation and eccentricity of mating gear OD. The 5° Roll Angle avoids the fabrication of the involute in the troublesome area near the base circle. 2. Pinions with less than 12 teeth are enlarged to the extent that the highest point of undercut coincides with the start of contact with the standard rack described above. ‘The height of undercut considered was that produced by a sharp comered 120 pitch hob. Reference 3. Pinions with less than 12 teeth are truncated to provide a top land of .275/Pitch. 4. The form diameters and the roll angles to form diameter show the values which should be met with a standard hob when generating the tooth thicknesses shown inthe tables. These form diameters provide more than enough length of involute profile for any mating gear smaller than a rack, However, since these form diameters are based on the generation with standard hobs, they should impose little or xo hardship on manufacture except in the cases of the most critical quality levels. in these cases, form diameter specific cation and master gear design should be based on actual rating conditions. G. L. Breur, “Proposed Revision of Tooth Proportions for Enlarged Pinions,” paper AGMA 209.10, Nov., 1971. Poa syoN INFORMATION SHEET B Tooth Proportions for 14¥%-Degree Full-Depth and 25-Degree Full-Depth Fine-Pitch Spur Gearing 1. Scope 1.1 This information sheet contains reference data on tooth proportions for the following spur gear tooth forms, Lid 14%4Degree Full-Depth Involute Teeth, 1.1.2 25-Degree Full-Depth Involute Teeth, 1.2 The data in this information sheet covers only features of tooth proportions that differ from those tabulated or discussed in the main text. 1.3 Table 1B is based on the equations and data given in the main text, Table IB lists tooth proportions for small ‘numbers of teeth in the 144degree pressure angle system, 1.4 Table 2B is based on the equations and data given in the main text. Table 2B lists tooth proportions for small numbers of teeth in the 25-degree pressure angle system. ie 2. Tooth Proportions 21 The tooth proportions for both the 14¥é-degree pres- sure angle system and the 25-degree pressure angle system are the same as those used by the 20-degree pressure angle system shown in Table 2 of the main text. 3. Enlarged Pinions 3.1 Since the design policy uséd for enlarging the 20-degree pressure angle pinions, if applied to 14¥4-degree pressure angle pinions would require modification for all pinions with less than 56 teeth, and since new applications for 14¥degree gears are quite limited, the Fine Pitch Gear Committee agreed not to revise the tables for 14¥-degree enlarged pinions at this time. 3.2 The enlargement of pinions with 25-degree prossure angle was treated in the same manner as the enlargement of, 20-dearee pinions. Twenty-five degree pinions with 15 or more teeth do not require enlargement. AGMA 207.06 ~ November, 1974wy ‘ we Te 'p udesBered 9054 . 2 3020979 oN OF mp Arca MH FONTEA CUTUON,. “umous se poresou 9 nl soup oyun ap ‘suTpOdord prepueys yi ape xe 839 TE ‘wowasiejo werd ao youu oy 9 pasa:op oq nu Suu 888 Sue a NONE pou Sus roy sSOUEsp35}8 propurs UBM OLS “youd enouweyp amp Aq sonqea sojnqey ops “soyortd Jayyo Zou. -yoxedrevoure T 10 soqoun axe sonqea seINgeL, Saou yea a sooty BY a opso'ee ie * of se 6 9 upvc oe 8 ut su0e'ee “ se roe'se % 6 sceruz st ; ow 9s6v'9t we a ir rass'st e 5 a 300992 z | Hs seao'ee 12 i g eS wwe | oe 5 HG 6a08'1z st z ob susgor ar : g 4 sheet ut BI E ey oL66'8t 91 a 4 & L6s081 st 1 & os e221 + § : & a Bg ze Luvest & es sorest oo +s leceer sours un ay = 9: soma | ST | comm | comes | AIRE | ame : rebg om | JNO) sun preptis 8 Prono | propuns ie fe one ae Sono, Prepueiset | “sow, a aug | Oa | weto9 | popuoucony | Sehr onamog | SUPML soquiny ® soroum 1099 ® ‘ oyunu 89, , : . ' Suneyy prepueig (unptappy uous pue 8407) suorsuoung worg uuoisag cours wo9edg sounysicereiue9 prepueng ap pou ita ands sso7] 10 O91, TE PayTPON 0) WSs AUT 9fSUY aanssang IOsTOESAbT A 91g,AGMA 207.06 — November, 1974 a 5 5 Tep udesiered a2g, 2 ooo | eur | as oooour [st So reo" Oost oS 9890°9L or E sor | veor | Ss sess |e s FOL SLbe oS: e1SeL'T 88SerT a ' a ozse" Lo8c" iG 615081 6E0S"EL H 8 oO Sle oS SPELST or 1 & slit oS Tver 6 a , siz | ve's TOL10% 8 sos |. suc’ | Soro scoot L usy | saz | gre zest 9 ep “ug : suoquig ne wei o@ ® WOOL ST) rents omy, puey | °F | sorournig 0 SSePOREL yyaoy oy et wwooy, | upusppy Be | one do | gly | tio a men ° pouty, | 171009 ba uumpuopoq sequin TT 6 gs L 9 s e € z T vopsuowig wopmg 24, J stoquiay eu jo athey among oz Sump 305 popuourosny suoqodorg yoo zee, e) » ) co ¢ a) we.007 .006 005 ‘Fi 004 .003 FACTOR -002 :001 lo 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 NUMBER OF TEETH MATING GEAR = Ng Center Distance +K-F) Note: The Center distance as calculated above is based ‘on the general formulas: NptNg Py cosy cae 088 ¢ Where: (Tp*Te~P Pa inv by inv, + Fig, 1B Center Distance Factor “F” For 25° Enlarged Pinions ~4B- ArAGMA 207.06-Novernber, 1974 a 5 Tey UdesBered v9g5 | et 5 Bse'l st osous'T 0000" st 4 wel si SU8651 1596" v1 \ 5 LET or CIILP'T Te68" €L EB Lee uu S¥E0H'T soze’ a 4 é wet ; sb" 1 a z wet 61 sis" o1 x pec oz 6209" 6 wrt zw guzs: 8 * 8Or'l et wey" L ogo % Le 9 (Cu) wo (2) | oy | a (wy 99, wna 07 ae 0 — | Sune) aa ve moog, ‘wmpuoppy mpe0y, oney Con WUE posed ‘oyseg jo 281409 popusouruioany swnpuspaq [atm 9 s + € t T I suoqsusug 2209 (wapuappy 01s pw R07) urajs4g a0u7,4C J9}U99 prEpUEYS suormg poSrepusofiuy srnesong Sz AE a0" { - \? }‘The user of this Standard Practice (AGMA 207.06) may find these other AGMA Standards of value as reference data: saber Title 1 AGMA 110.03 Gear-Tooth Wear and Failure (ANSI B6.12-1964) AGMA 112.04 Terms, Definitions, Symbols, and Abbreviations AGMA 114,02 Informtion Sheet-Formais for Fine-Pitch Gear Specification Data. AGMA 201-02 Tooth Proportions fo Coarse Pitch Invelute Spur Gears (ANSI B6. ACMA 202.03. System for Zerol Bevel Gears. ‘AGMA 203.03 Fine itch On-Center Face Gears for 20-Degree Involute Spur Pinions AGMA 208.02. System for Straight Bevel Gears (ANSI BS.13-1965) .......----2--+ AGMA 269.03. System for Spiral Bevel Gears . . AGMA 210.02 Surface Durability Pitting) of Spur Gear Teeth ‘AGMA 212.02. Surface Durability (Pitting) Formulas for Straight Bevel and Zetol Bevel Gear Teeth AGMA 211.02. Surface Durability Piting) of Helical and Jingbone Gear Tet + AGMA Rating the Strength of Spur Gear Teeth a AGMA Rating the Strength of Helical and Herringbone Gear Teeth... . AGMA Rating the Strength of Straight Bevel and Zerol Bevel Gear Teeth AGMA 223.01 Rating the Strength of Spiral Bevel Gear Teeth : AGMA 374.04 Design for Fine-Pitch Wosmgearing AGMA 350.03 AGMA Gear Handbook-Volume I-Gear Classification, ‘Materials and Measuring Methods for Unassembled Gears. - ‘A more complete list of AGMA Standards published by the American Gear Manufacturers Association is available upon request. AMERICAN GEAR MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION 1901 NORTH FORT MYER DRIVE, ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209 PRICE $8.00